When Bill Beck was accused of deletions, everybody joined in, in a virtual gang lynching fest.
When gordo does far worse, nobody seems to notice or mind, thesagejournal who must be sage in the sense of shrub's ranch (cause she sure ain't wise, nor a spice; and is in fact dumb as a doornail, as most racists are.) in crawford everybody just stands by and pretends not to notice.
She promises she's gonna get out of political discourse and stick to black bras and little brown bunnies (aw, how cute), yet she goes and is the only one to rate (one day before he deletes the racist parts, which he did today) gordo's racist blog post!!!
Is there a double standard here? You betcha there is.
White is right - black is wack!!!


Salon.com
Comments
Where's the outrage that Bill took on??????????????
He was assaulted on all fronts and Gordon O trolls around this site unscathed because people "don't want to fool with giving him attention". That's bull shit! He NEEDS to be "fooled" with because he is a hypocritical fool.
He ALWAYS deletes my comments. EVERY time I comment he deletes it because I post the harsh truth and Gordon O, just like the Right Wing of Politics is never about the truth.
WHERE'S THE FUCKING OUTRAGE and WHERE IS BILL'S APOLOGY?
Bullshit is bullshit, no matter WHO says it!
Fucking rated! :)
What is popular is not always right, what is right is not always popular.
I'm not saying he's right, because I have no idea what y'all are talking about, but deleting specific comments is lame.
They called him a lying rat basta*d c*nt at the time. Are you any different ms. "sage." You need to take a good look in the mirror lady and if you don't recoil in horror, don't worry G-d IS gonna get ya' in the long run.
I don't know about your G-d, but my G-d does Not approve of racism and/or lying, let alone censorship
Quoted verbatim
"I would be in favor of a total discontinuance of interest in the extent to which sand monkeys or rice oriented savages develop nuclear weapons. Let them have a go."
As for all Y'all, please forgive me, but I am so furious and it is 4:39 am here, so I think I should refrain from further comment - I might just punch out a mirror or make punch out a hole in my apartment wall, because the more and more I think about it, the angrier I get at the repugance of it all.
Thanks for stopping by - I REALLY do appreciate it. later.
"I would be in favor of a total discontinuance of interest in the extent to which sand monkeys or rice oriented savages develop nuclear weapons. Let them have a go."
I felt he was talking sarcastically not literally, and it did cross my mind that it would offend some people. I do agree we should stay out of the business of undermining the sovreignity of other countries and just take care that we have good defenses and a good military..."just in case". Obviously others took it another way. I haven't read lots of Gordon O's stuff. He is not a favorite on my list. But I just read through it and commented on what I felt was the gist of the post. If I was wrong...well then I apologize if it sounded like I would agree with the way he said it, because I don't.
I've been called plenty during my time here, and I know I am way way out on the far left, BUT I've never deleted a comment.
Sentence 1:
Whatever entitles the United States, or any other nation for that matter, to tell another nation that they can't develop any weapon they've a mind to develop?
Later Sentence:
Then America can say, confidently, "Go ahead, develop all the nuclear weapons you want. In the meantime, we'll cut off your balls economically at every juncture.
I always tell my students never do anything if you're not willing to sign your name to it. It sounds like my high school students have more principles than Gordon O. To be fare, I've never read his posts, but a comment like the one he left has no defense or validity.
But, as I say, I avoid these situations, so I may not have a valid perspective.
RATED
The real difference is, I dont dress my positions in fancy paper, or deny that I hold them. I stick to the truth as I know it, and understand it, and I acknowledge when someone presents it to me. I dont make ad hominems, and I am willing to put my real chin behind everything that I say. I recognize that it takes conceptual thinking to be moved off of comfortable prejudices, and many of the loud ones here prefer their comfortable prejudices. So no, I did not withdraw anything. But I did learn not to indulge an argument with a cowardly, masked insulter. It's a complete waste of time.
I think that you are a bit harsh on Sage. She is politically naive and is way to the right of most of us here. But it does nobody any good to jump on her integrity as you and Blue have done. I don't think she can compete on the merits with the sharper wits here but she has the right to try. She has never attacked anyone on OS about anything; yet because she is conservative and has some views that we all think are from the stone age many here have treated her pretty shabbily.
You, Mark, and Blue are both friends of mine and we share 99.9% common beliefs on things political. I want to keep those friendships and ask you both to think about what you are really mad at and the issues that you care about, not about whether someone is bright enough, or sharp enough, or whatever, to make it across some arbitrary line to be treated with respect. She has never done a single thing to hurt either of you, and she has apologized more than once where if it had been me I would have suggested it be the other way around.
Monte
I’m sorry if you construed my comment as some kind of an insult. It was not intended as such. It was based on my vague and incomplete recollection of the events being addressed in this post; I recall that you did disappear for while after the big ‘dust-up’ about you, but perhaps I just did not see your presence at that time.
Regardless, I think my point may still be valid; I don’t have the impression that you seek out the same kind of interaction on which GordonO seems to thrive. But, again, I may be wrong.
But ol' Gordo once took a slap at my smarts, which I took as a joke, of course, but also as an invitation to do the same. Arthur James did a GordonO post, so I was compelled to poetry, and wrote this comment--
GordonO
Inverse in hemisphere and cranium
Thoughts strain to dranium
Pontifies on the trivial
With commentary drivial
Politics MySpace teenage complaint
Will correct usage without restraint
Hot dog served with too much relish
Simple thought puffed with embellish
If words were birds his words
Are jewel laden feathered turds
Like radio station contest on dock
Flying machines decorated, then fall
Like rock
The rollout being the moment of glory
Before abrupt splash end of story
Setup builds stroke after stroke
Yields no payoff -Dennis Miller joke
Tread Water Tread Water
GordonO
He's been known to sometimes slither his way here to disrupt the OS community with neanderthalian comments and despicable lies.