He’s so lucky to have a parent like you.
She’s lucky to be here.
Every adoptive parent hears the “lucky” comment at some point, especially if a child was born in a developing country like Vietnam, as my son was. Most of us have ready-made responses: No, I’m the lucky one or We all feel lucky to be a family.
If you haven’t adopted internationally or spent time with adult adoptees, it’s probably hard to imagine the mix of guilt, irritation, and confusion the “lucky” comment sparks. I’ve heard it from extended family members, strangers on the street, friends, even from a security worker at the Phu Quoc airport last December.
I’m never sure if people say it because they think it will make me feel good, because they think it’s what I want to hear, or because they simply don't know what else to say. In the case of the Vietnamese airport worker, I think she really believed it.
Talking about my lucky son doesn’t make me feel better, however. More than anything, the notion of luck emphasizes the randomness of life and the fact that a child I dearly love might not ever have crossed my path. How could that be? The thought scares me; I’m also deeply grateful. I’m all too aware of the cognitive dissonance I experience as an adoptive parent: I'm thrilled we are a family; at the same time, I know my gain is another woman's loss—and possibly a loss for my son as well.
When Mei-Ling Hopgood titled her terrific memoir Lucky Girl, I’m sure she was invoking cognitive dissonance, too, as an adult adoptee. A child’s understanding of luck changes over time. It’s not a simple notion, particularly if you’re grappling with what luck means in two different cultures and the way that has shaped who you’ve become.
Talking about adoptees as "lucky" makes them sound like charity cases. This construction of international adoption was foisted on an earlier generation from Korea and Vietnam, including those adopted through the infamous or humanitarian (depending on your point of view) Operation Babylift in the mid-1970s.
There’s been plenty of criticism of this humanitarian approach, much of it justified. Yet now the pendulum has swung the other way, with many current adoptive parents claiming they were motivated by a desire for a family rather than by charitable impulses. Critics snap back that we’re buying babies. Celebrity international adoptions and ethical violations put us on the defensive even more.
In discussions on blogs like Racialicious and Harlow’s Monkey, there are bracing comments about the “selfishness” of international adoption and the havoc it wreaks for children of color. These are well worth a read; they make clear that mainstream media representations of adoption and the debate about it are misleading at best. (There's a recent piece by Hopgood in the New Daily News with "dangerous" in the title, which says oceans about how the media frames adoption issues.)
But if you extend this reasoning—as some more hyperbolic commenters do, especially when railing again Madonna—no international adoptees are lucky. They’ve been torn from their birth families and cultures; they are saddled with unresolvable grief and identity confusion.
So, when a well-meaning person beams at my charming seven-year-old and says, “He’s so lucky,” I’m extremely uncomfortable. Knowing the sharp criticism of some adult adoptees, how can I not squirm?
Nevertheless, there really are millions of children who need homes now. Not in some distant future when all sending countries have completely overhauled their systems and the U.N. is satisfied—now.
In this way, I think my son is lucky. I don’t believe he would have been better off in an orphanage. He’s lucky to have escaped an institutionalized existence or life on the streets.
Like so many adoptive parents, I’ve been tempted by the idea that fate brought this child to my husband and me. Our being together just feels right. But if I’m honest, luck makes more sense than fate. I can’t pass off a decision I made—and the resources I have to carry it out—on God or the Universe. I’m responsible for it, for good or ill. And I'm an American, after all, who believes we make our own luck.
At the moment, my son is going on eight years old and confused about what his luck means. He still clings to me whenever he gets worried that we aren’t a “real” family. Yet close to a year after we took a return trip together to Vietnam, my son’s understanding of his own situation also seems to be deepening.
He tells me lately that he feels sad, as if he left a part of himself in Vietnam.
“You did,” I say, because it's the truth.
This post originally appeared in WOMEN = BOOKS, the blog for the Women's Review of Books.


Salon.com
Comments
Maybe what people should say when they see you together is, "You seem to have such a nice mother-son relationship." How our children come to us should not be a topic of casual conversation. But I guess with adoption, as with so many things in life, people are bound to say unenlightened phrases.
Because the simple answer to comments which transmit a sense of discomfort to an adopted parent, is; "love is love."
If parents feel the need to say anything beyond that, then perhaps they should check their motives.
R
My foster family demonstrated a deep commitment to contributing to children in need and to me in particular, but that didn't change the struggle I had personally with the facts of my circumstances as a person whose family could not properly care for or love me the way that I needed. To tell me that I was lucky to deal with those circumstances was naive at best and unintentionally cruel.
I don't think that it is wise to make assumptions when encountering an adoptive family. Perhaps folks could demonstrate being more personally interested in the person standing in front of them, rather forming opinions and conclusions about their circumstances. That would go a long way towards demonstrating actual compassion rather than simply slapping on some label which may be sadly inaccurate.
Living in Vietnam doesn't guarantee a person will be poor or miserable, and America does not guarantee happiness or prosperity, not even the undiluted opportunity for such. We want it to guarantee those things, and we're trying. But we are not there yet, and when we assume that we are, then we reside in a strange Happy Bubble that separates us from the rest of the world.
So we are grappling with too much pride. It's all right to be proud of the things we have accomplished, but we have a long way to go. When we realize this and put ourselves in context in the world, we may more accurately say that it's wonderful when people find one another in a very complex world where anything can happen.
I wish your family the best!
Its the same thing with race, when people make sweeping statements like "I'm color-blind" or "All people are the same". Love is certainly transcendent, and the author's piece fairly glows with her love for her son, but to be blind to the questions surrounding an incredible cultural phenomenon as international adoption would be foolish.
So I think your son is lucky, too.
I have a close friend who has an awesome mom - my family, completely dysfunctional. I frequently compliment my friend on her choice of mothers. Really good parents, pretty rare. So yes, I do think luck (or whatever you call it) is involved.
I truly believe that Something brings people together. You and your son were meant to find each other. That is a good thing.
Hugs to you.
@madcelt: I'm so glad you feel lucky. I think many adoptees do. The thing is, when my young son is told that he's lucky--or hears someone say that to me--it comes with a whole lot of baggage. It's not an opinion that he himself owns (yet).
@ Suzanne F: You state very vividly and clearly why the "lucky" word can feel like so hurtful to adoptees or those in foster care. I've never wanted my son to feel that he needed to be grateful to me for adopting him. I believe all children deserve love without strings, and when they don't get it in the early years, in is a huge loss indeed.
@MissMisk: I do agree that westerners can be very biased about what country is "best." One of the reasons we did a return trip to VN with my son last year--and will likely go again in the near future--is that we wanted him to see his birth country as a real, thriving place, not a bunch of huts in a bomb-pocked rice paddy. You are very right that VN or any other developing country can't be reduced to a stereotype and may offer far more than the U.S.
@charliemk: Your sense of luck with your great daughters is akin to what I feel sometimes. How did this happen? Why did I luck out with the roll of the dice? You are absolutely right that feeling lucky in the ones you love happens in all kinds of families. It is a blessing, but it doesn't necessarily make the universe feel like less of a random place.
I think this is a very broad issue, and being puzzled about it is necessary. There is much to learn and write about it.
My story is, although not adopted, my family is a dysfunctional one broken into two different continents. Many people including my own mother continuously tells me that I am lucky to be in the States, but I always try to re-evaluate that luckiness, and never have come up with a definite answer to satisfy myself. I do consider myself lucky in one hand because the place where I come from lacks the basic foundation of life as we know it in America, and in the other hand, I get worried that people here will never consider me a complete American no matter how many years I live here. That is my story, but the subject is very broad, and I think its good to talk about the issue with your son.
@Sudesh and K -- I know, any kind of family dysfunctionality has to make you wonder about your luck--or lack thereof. Sudesh, I really hear that caught-between feeling in your words, and how hard it can be to fit in. Often that comes through love, of a partner and with children. Suddenly you've made a home together. If only the outside world (sometimes) would go away.
@Gwendolyn--a hug back to you!
Which may illustrate what I dislike and disagree with about your statement about making your own luck. Your son didn't choose to be adopted by a great mother but he'll benefit from it all his life.
It could be purely random that the two of you came together or there could be forces at work that brought you together. I haven't made a decision about supernatural forces at work on humans.
I don't know about the mechanics of your adoption but what was to prevent you from getting a child with some undiscovered, dread disease that would have killed him young or a budding mental illness that would have made your life hell no matter how well you mothered him? What was there to prevent him from being paired with parents that, with the best of intentions, had no clue about differentiating between a child's needs and their own?
I knew a woman, a Korean adoptee whose adoptive mother died shortly after adopting her. Her older brothers subjected her to constant racial teasing and insults. She was one of two non-white kids in a very big high school. In that environment, she would have been subject to constant racism, even if not maliciously intended. In the long run she's done all right, you could say she made her own luck in that respect, or that her life in Korea would have been much worse but she didn't choose the luck she got.
As is usually the case with your posts, there's just too much meat here for me to comment more extensively. In light of the depth, honesty and clarity of your discussion, - all I can say is - and knowing it's absolutely NOT my place to say it - with at least a little irony - your son is definitely one lucky kid!
"He's lucky to have found you."
The two statements are intended to mean the same thing: that it's good that you have this kid. Good for everyone.
Don't infer malice where it is not intended. Life's hard enough, already.
And I think it is random luck. He could have been taken by a farmer who needed cheap labor. He could have languished in the orphanage unloved by anyone.
He could have been taken by a loving and well-off family. The question you seem to be asking is, did you take him away from a possible happy childhood in Vietnam, where he "belonged?"
That makes an interesting assumption about where he belongs. Many people with closer ties to their country of birth don't feel like they belong there. Many people emigrate as adults, more so those from places like Vietnam than from the US.
He'll make his own place in life.
The night that I heard her fuss and went into her room and picked her up out of her crib and she made some small animal noises of comfort against my shoulder, was the moment that I knew that I loved her as much as I could ever love anyone or anything.
I was worried that I couldn't love her as much as she deserved, as much as my son, and in that moment, when she grunted and relaxed in peace in my arms, I knew that she was my baby, really my baby, in every sense that made sense.
Seriously. We got lucky, beyond belief.
@Sara -- Yes, I think friends are responding to a very specific you (that is, me) when they say my son is lucky. But that's not the case when strangers say it. They may be responding to the evident love between us, but more often I think it's a snap judgment about the goodness of the white middle-class home my baby has found.
@Jeff -- I don't infer malice on the part of those who say we're lucky. I really don't. My main point is that such a statement is often based on unexamined assumptions about adoption and race. Frankly, I think this is a discussion we need to be having, and not just in the adoption community.
@ Ginny -- I know and share your feelings of disbelief--and the great good power of love.
"She is so lucky .... "
and the biggie
"Who were her real parents?"