Athena's Head

On Writing, Parenting, and Pop-Mom Culture

Martha Nichols

Martha Nichols
Location
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Title
Contributing Editor
Company
Women's Review of Books
Bio
I am a freelance journalist and editor in the Boston area. I write about women's issues, business, nonprofit management, youth services, and adoption. As the mother of a son born in Vietnam, I look for fresh perspectives on the many seemingly random pieces of our lives.

Martha Nichols's Links

New list
No links in this category.
Martha's Blogs
Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 16, 2009 11:24AM

Is My Son Lucky?

Rate: 14 Flag

He’s so lucky to have a parent like you.

She’s lucky to be here.

Every adoptive parent hears the “lucky” comment at some point, especially if a child was born in a developing country like Vietnam, as my son was. Most of us have ready-made responses: No, I’m the lucky one or We all feel lucky to be a family.

If you haven’t adopted internationally or spent time with adult adoptees, it’s probably hard to imagine the mix of guilt, irritation, and confusion the “lucky” comment sparks. I’ve heard it from extended family members, strangers on the street, friends, even from a security worker at the Phu Quoc airport last December.

I’m never sure if people say it because they think it will make me feel good, because they think it’s what I want to hear, or because they simply don't know what else to say. In the case of the Vietnamese airport worker, I think she really believed it.

Talking about my lucky son doesn’t make me feel better, however. More than anything, the notion of luck emphasizes the randomness of life and the fact that a child I dearly love might not ever have crossed my path. How could that be? The thought scares me; I’m also deeply grateful. I’m all too aware of the cognitive dissonance I experience as an adoptive parent: I'm thrilled we are a family; at the same time, I know my gain is another woman's loss—and possibly a loss for my son as well.

When Mei-Ling Hopgood titled her terrific memoir Lucky Girl, I’m sure she was invoking cognitive dissonance, too, as an adult adoptee. A child’s understanding of luck changes over time. It’s not a simple notion, particularly if you’re grappling with what luck means in two different cultures and the way that has shaped who you’ve become.

Talking about adoptees as "lucky" makes them sound like charity cases. This construction of international adoption was foisted on an earlier generation from Korea and Vietnam, including those adopted through the infamous or humanitarian (depending on your point of view) Operation Babylift in the mid-1970s.

There’s been plenty of criticism of this humanitarian approach, much of it justified. Yet now the pendulum has swung the other way, with many current adoptive parents claiming they were motivated by a desire for a family rather than by charitable impulses. Critics snap back that we’re buying babies. Celebrity international adoptions and ethical violations put us on the defensive even more.

In discussions on blogs like Racialicious and Harlow’s Monkey, there are bracing comments about the “selfishness” of international adoption and the havoc it wreaks for children of color. These are well worth a read; they make clear that mainstream media representations of adoption and the debate about it are misleading at best. (There's a recent piece by Hopgood in the New Daily News with "dangerous" in the title, which says oceans about how the media frames adoption issues.)

But if you extend this reasoning—as some more hyperbolic commenters do, especially when railing again Madonna—no international adoptees are lucky. They’ve been torn from their birth families and cultures; they are saddled with unresolvable grief and identity confusion.

So, when a well-meaning person beams at my charming seven-year-old and says, “He’s so lucky,” I’m extremely uncomfortable. Knowing the sharp criticism of some adult adoptees, how can I not squirm?

Nevertheless, there really are millions of children who need homes now. Not in some distant future when all sending countries have completely overhauled their systems and the U.N. is satisfied—now.

In this way, I think my son is lucky. I don’t believe he would have been better off in an orphanage. He’s lucky to have escaped an institutionalized existence or life on the streets.

Like so many adoptive parents, I’ve been tempted by the idea that fate brought this child to my husband and me. Our being together just feels right. But if I’m honest, luck makes more sense than fate. I can’t pass off a decision I made—and the resources I have to carry it out—on God or the Universe. I’m responsible for it, for good or ill. And I'm an American, after all, who believes we make our own luck.

At the moment, my son is going on eight years old and confused about what his luck means. He still clings to me whenever he gets worried that we aren’t a “real” family. Yet close to a year after we took a return trip together to Vietnam, my son’s understanding of his own situation also seems to be deepening.

He tells me lately that he feels sad, as if he left a part of himself in Vietnam.

“You did,” I say, because it's the truth.

 
This post originally appeared in WOMEN = BOOKS, the blog for the Women's Review of Books.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
There are so many deep-seated issues with adoption but the bottom line is that you are a family, no matter how you came to be one. Telling a mother of an adopted child that her son is "lucky" seems like an ill-thought out comment, no matter how well-meaning.

Maybe what people should say when they see you together is, "You seem to have such a nice mother-son relationship." How our children come to us should not be a topic of casual conversation. But I guess with adoption, as with so many things in life, people are bound to say unenlightened phrases.
The sheer length of this column suggests the author is a tad conflicted.

Because the simple answer to comments which transmit a sense of discomfort to an adopted parent, is; "love is love."

If parents feel the need to say anything beyond that, then perhaps they should check their motives.
Interesting analysis, Martha. This is an issue I never even knew existed until reading this fine piece.
R
But life is always random, adoption or no. Necessity is an illusion.
I've used the lucky word. I thought I was complimenting the courageous and kind people who take in children.
I am an adoptee, and although I understand your blog and think it well thought out and written, I do feel lucky. I may have ended up in a trailer park with a black velvet Elvis on the wall. My parents, my true parents were loving and never made me feel 'adopted'. In fact I think I recieved more love and care as a result. I do feel lucky - god knows where I could have ended up.
People said that to me when I was a teenaged foster child. I believe these folks have termites invading the confines of their wooden block-headedness. Those comments have everything to do with making assumptions about anothers origins and circumstances and the concerns and commitments of the adoptive family.

My foster family demonstrated a deep commitment to contributing to children in need and to me in particular, but that didn't change the struggle I had personally with the facts of my circumstances as a person whose family could not properly care for or love me the way that I needed. To tell me that I was lucky to deal with those circumstances was naive at best and unintentionally cruel.

I don't think that it is wise to make assumptions when encountering an adoptive family. Perhaps folks could demonstrate being more personally interested in the person standing in front of them, rather forming opinions and conclusions about their circumstances. That would go a long way towards demonstrating actual compassion rather than simply slapping on some label which may be sadly inaccurate.
My adopted daughter is 20; her birthmom friended her on Facebook recently, so she now knows quite a bit about her birth family. She told me just a few days ago just how lucky she feels to be my child and not her birthmom's. And I told her I felt exactly the same way. All best, HB
Your concerns reveal a sensitivity and openness that may be lacking from the point of view of many Westerners. We have so many ingrained prejudices--some of them not based in racial hatred but in our habit of thinking of America as "the best" or "the most advanced." In fact, we're struggling, as a nation. We may or may not exist in a hundred more years. But many of the cultures we consider less advanced or "still developing" are actually hundreds or even thousands of years older than our own. Vietnam, for example.

Living in Vietnam doesn't guarantee a person will be poor or miserable, and America does not guarantee happiness or prosperity, not even the undiluted opportunity for such. We want it to guarantee those things, and we're trying. But we are not there yet, and when we assume that we are, then we reside in a strange Happy Bubble that separates us from the rest of the world.

So we are grappling with too much pride. It's all right to be proud of the things we have accomplished, but we have a long way to go. When we realize this and put ourselves in context in the world, we may more accurately say that it's wonderful when people find one another in a very complex world where anything can happen.

I wish your family the best!
I dunno Bonnie, I think the author is thinking quite deeply about the consequences of her actions on her child, her family and her society at large. A thoughtful look at what people are thinking and saying around us may not be motivated by feeling "conflicted" ourselves, but by understanding that not everyone feels the same way.

Its the same thing with race, when people make sweeping statements like "I'm color-blind" or "All people are the same". Love is certainly transcendent, and the author's piece fairly glows with her love for her son, but to be blind to the questions surrounding an incredible cultural phenomenon as international adoption would be foolish.
madcelt...good on you...and God bless your parents!
I adopted a 12 year old who is distant relative and have had to deal with the same comments -- how LUCKY she was to have me when she needed help. I answer as honestly as I can, by saying "She's done a lot more for me than I ever did for her".
Excellent post Martha. My understanding of when people use the word lucky is as you say, lucky to be living in a loving home and not an orphanage. The other, the tragedy of having to be adopted I guess goes without saying in most people's minds. I appreciate the thoughtfulness of this post and all the references you include. I love how you simply affirm his sadness, rather than try to make it otherwise. Very loving indeed.
My wife and I have two adult daughters, and sometimes I feel just plain lucky to have them. I know we conceived them and raised them, but so many things can go wrong, or right, that I feel I have no control over. I feel a similar conflict about the phrase, "I'm so proud of you." I'm usually delighted with who they are and what they do, but that phrase seems to say that I had more to do with all that than is reasonable, so I just compliment what they've done or mention how capable they are. Did I mention that they're great daughters? But I could have been the same father, and things might have turned out differently. I just have to smile and accept them gratefully.
If someone has good parents, they are lucky, no matter how those parents were acquired.

So I think your son is lucky, too.

I have a close friend who has an awesome mom - my family, completely dysfunctional. I frequently compliment my friend on her choice of mothers. Really good parents, pretty rare. So yes, I do think luck (or whatever you call it) is involved.
Thank you, Martha. I really appreciate your honesty and compassion. I've always wanted to adopt a girl from China because there are so many girls that need a home and a family. It's not easy being adopted or taken from your culture and birthplace. But I don't think it's better to be raised in an orphanage with no family.

I truly believe that Something brings people together. You and your son were meant to find each other. That is a good thing.

Hugs to you.
One thing about adoption, you come smack up against your personal beliefs about who's in charge and why things happen the way they do. Lots of great, thought-provoking comments here. In many ways, love is everything, or at least it's the starting place. But in a world in which racial differences still matter, and in which children and adults of color can be judged harshly, I think there's no way to avoid the assumptions people bring to transracial and international adoption, and I feel we need to deal with that openly in our family.

@madcelt: I'm so glad you feel lucky. I think many adoptees do. The thing is, when my young son is told that he's lucky--or hears someone say that to me--it comes with a whole lot of baggage. It's not an opinion that he himself owns (yet).

@ Suzanne F: You state very vividly and clearly why the "lucky" word can feel like so hurtful to adoptees or those in foster care. I've never wanted my son to feel that he needed to be grateful to me for adopting him. I believe all children deserve love without strings, and when they don't get it in the early years, in is a huge loss indeed.

@MissMisk: I do agree that westerners can be very biased about what country is "best." One of the reasons we did a return trip to VN with my son last year--and will likely go again in the near future--is that we wanted him to see his birth country as a real, thriving place, not a bunch of huts in a bomb-pocked rice paddy. You are very right that VN or any other developing country can't be reduced to a stereotype and may offer far more than the U.S.

@charliemk: Your sense of luck with your great daughters is akin to what I feel sometimes. How did this happen? Why did I luck out with the roll of the dice? You are absolutely right that feeling lucky in the ones you love happens in all kinds of families. It is a blessing, but it doesn't necessarily make the universe feel like less of a random place.
I hadn't thought about it but of course the accusation that somehow people who adopt to build a family rather than for humanitarian motives is upside-down. What better motive, or motives for that matter? And if it makes you feel less alone, we all fear randomness, but it appears that those who adopt at least in one respect have a way of working this through. In that sense, you're the lucky one.
Great read.

I think this is a very broad issue, and being puzzled about it is necessary. There is much to learn and write about it.

My story is, although not adopted, my family is a dysfunctional one broken into two different continents. Many people including my own mother continuously tells me that I am lucky to be in the States, but I always try to re-evaluate that luckiness, and never have come up with a definite answer to satisfy myself. I do consider myself lucky in one hand because the place where I come from lacks the basic foundation of life as we know it in America, and in the other hand, I get worried that people here will never consider me a complete American no matter how many years I live here. That is my story, but the subject is very broad, and I think its good to talk about the issue with your son.
I know exactly what you mean. I count myself extremely blessed by my children, but surely the best luck for them would have been to be born into a functional family who wanted to, and could, raise them with love.
@BOKO -- You're right, sometimes these kinds of challenges make parents lucky, and in confronting randomness head-on, I feel that I'm lucky that way.

@Sudesh and K -- I know, any kind of family dysfunctionality has to make you wonder about your luck--or lack thereof. Sudesh, I really hear that caught-between feeling in your words, and how hard it can be to fit in. Often that comes through love, of a partner and with children. Suddenly you've made a home together. If only the outside world (sometimes) would go away.

@Gwendolyn--a hug back to you!
The most generous interpretation I can think of is like the thing people say to their engaged friends. You're lucky to have him/her. It may reflect more on you as the parent than on the child and his origin. People may say that he's lucky to have you, but mean it more in the sense that he's lucky to have YOU, not that he's lucky to have any family at all.
Even if you'd given birth to him I'd say your son's one lucky kid to have a damn good mother.

Which may illustrate what I dislike and disagree with about your statement about making your own luck. Your son didn't choose to be adopted by a great mother but he'll benefit from it all his life.

It could be purely random that the two of you came together or there could be forces at work that brought you together. I haven't made a decision about supernatural forces at work on humans.

I don't know about the mechanics of your adoption but what was to prevent you from getting a child with some undiscovered, dread disease that would have killed him young or a budding mental illness that would have made your life hell no matter how well you mothered him? What was there to prevent him from being paired with parents that, with the best of intentions, had no clue about differentiating between a child's needs and their own?

I knew a woman, a Korean adoptee whose adoptive mother died shortly after adopting her. Her older brothers subjected her to constant racial teasing and insults. She was one of two non-white kids in a very big high school. In that environment, she would have been subject to constant racism, even if not maliciously intended. In the long run she's done all right, you could say she made her own luck in that respect, or that her life in Korea would have been much worse but she didn't choose the luck she got.

As is usually the case with your posts, there's just too much meat here for me to comment more extensively. In light of the depth, honesty and clarity of your discussion, - all I can say is - and knowing it's absolutely NOT my place to say it - with at least a little irony - your son is definitely one lucky kid!
"it's good fortune that you found each other."

"He's lucky to have found you."

The two statements are intended to mean the same thing: that it's good that you have this kid. Good for everyone.

Don't infer malice where it is not intended. Life's hard enough, already.
Having observed orphanages in poorer countries, I'd say any kid in an orphanage is lucky to escape, as long as his new caretakers aren't abusive.

And I think it is random luck. He could have been taken by a farmer who needed cheap labor. He could have languished in the orphanage unloved by anyone.

He could have been taken by a loving and well-off family. The question you seem to be asking is, did you take him away from a possible happy childhood in Vietnam, where he "belonged?"

That makes an interesting assumption about where he belongs. Many people with closer ties to their country of birth don't feel like they belong there. Many people emigrate as adults, more so those from places like Vietnam than from the US.

He'll make his own place in life.
I was terrified that I would not love my adopted baby daughter as much as I loved my natural son. I spent two days and nights trying to bond with her, and when she finally rested her baby head on my shoulder, I cried.

The night that I heard her fuss and went into her room and picked her up out of her crib and she made some small animal noises of comfort against my shoulder, was the moment that I knew that I loved her as much as I could ever love anyone or anything.

I was worried that I couldn't love her as much as she deserved, as much as my son, and in that moment, when she grunted and relaxed in peace in my arms, I knew that she was my baby, really my baby, in every sense that made sense.
One other thought. I heard from so many collegues and friends that she was so "lucky" to be adopted by us, and I was always confused hearing this. To Gary and I, we were the lucky ones.

Seriously. We got lucky, beyond belief.
@ Nerd C -- You are right, my guy didn't get a chance to make his own luck; I'm the lucky American making my own luck. But I meant this ironically, because you can try to control everything in your life, but it still doesn't work out the way you planned. Thanks for your support, as always.

@Sara -- Yes, I think friends are responding to a very specific you (that is, me) when they say my son is lucky. But that's not the case when strangers say it. They may be responding to the evident love between us, but more often I think it's a snap judgment about the goodness of the white middle-class home my baby has found.

@Jeff -- I don't infer malice on the part of those who say we're lucky. I really don't. My main point is that such a statement is often based on unexamined assumptions about adoption and race. Frankly, I think this is a discussion we need to be having, and not just in the adoption community.

@ Ginny -- I know and share your feelings of disbelief--and the great good power of love.
One of the first two things our adoption agency taught us to deal with was the following to comments:
"She is so lucky .... "
and the biggie
"Who were her real parents?"
My late husband, who was a rabbi, when asked about God, used to say "God is luck." The thing is *any* family member who is loved lucks out.