The Christmas before I left for college, I made three wise men out of pipe cleaners and felt. I fashioned a camel for one the size of a mouse. I hung a paper star from the ceiling to guide them to our living room.
There a plastic creche perched under the tree. We weren't religious, but the symbols mattered to me; they were part of the set. Mary, Joseph, Jesus, barn animals—back then, I didn't see how unconventional this family was.
In my teens, I'd taken over the Christmas decorations. I was bossy; I was determined. My mother the artist didn't like "crafts"; she hated diagrams for making angels. "You kids are amazing," she'd say, with a whiff of judgment I ignored. I kept painting partridges on blown eggs for ornaments.
Even then, I was willing my childish version of a happy family into being—caring mother, stout-hearted father, loyal younger brother—or thought I was.
What makes a family real? It can be defined so many ways that I believe all families are willed into being. Or imagined. They're like ropes of clay made by children, jammed into jars or boxes. They're good fits; they're bad.
In an adoptive family like mine now is, the term "real" is as loaded as "happy." My son's real parents could be the ones who gave him life or the ones who are raising him. Even I have slipped when talking about his unknown birth mother with friends, calling her his "real mom."
My son is only beginning to do some self-willing of his own. Sometimes he's furious with me; sometimes he's scared and dives at my waist for a hug. At eight, the bright rope of himself is firmly braided through mine and my husband's. We are real—of course. We don't feel provisional.
Yet my boy has asked, "Why do people always stare at me?"
"What people?"
"You know, people. Strangers on the street."
So many reasons, some of which have nothing to do with adoption. But I've felt compelled to explain that some people aren't used to seeing an Asian kid with a white mom. To them, we don't fit together.
"Why?" he shoots back. "Lots of people are mixed."
Yes. But mixed families require an extra mental step.
People who grow up in biological families have the luxury of assuming they fit together. They rarely start out questioning the reality or strength of their bonds. Blood is thicker, blood is natural and the norm, and these natural families are the real ones by convention.
But I think biological families constantly mold and reconfigure themselves, too. Is it better to understand this from the get-go, to realize how much of an imaginative leap forming any family entails? I won't say adoptive families have an edge; that isn't true. But we know how much work it takes to create the family you want—or think you want—and the one you get regardless.
My first Christmas home after college, I set up the pipe-cleaner wise men—as usual. I planned for when we would get our Christmas tree—as usual. I made eggnog with rum. I wore a soft red sweater I'd found on sale in Pittsburgh, where I then lived, even though it was too hot for California. I remember sweating, red streaks mixed with antiperspirant on my skin.
My mother finally snapped. "You always make me feel like I have to do a big Christmas!" she cried. "It means more to you than anyone else."
I won't say the illusion broke at that instant. For years, my relationship with her had been rocky. But the shame I felt then, the disappointment, all the rage that went underground, have led me to a different understanding now.
At least a decade later, before my husband and I were married, we crafted new wise men. It was the first Christmas we were living together. We both loved dinosaurs—we were geeks and punks, postmodern goofs, soul-mates—and so we created an entire dinosaur creche, complete with gold glitter on its roof.
It had a plastic T-Rex in a tiny kafiyeh as Joseph; an allosaurus decked in blue felt and a gold-wire halo was Mary. "Baby Jesusaurus" lay in a small fake nest, a flashing light rigged up behind him.
It was tacky. It was wonderful, a treasure we brought out Christmas after Christmas. We would arrange our stegosaurus sheep with glued cotton balls and camptosaurus shepherds and the gilt-painted pterodactyl flying under a pipe-cleaner star. We had built it together, without conscious thought, this mock family of biological and adoptive and extended relations.
Joseph was an adoptive dad, of course, Mary a birth mom, and God—his spark was everywhere and nowhere. But the others had gathered for one moment in time, in a barn, the wise men and shepherds and dino sheep. Perhaps all we ever have are such moments of family being, when who we love extends to everyone under a burning star.
The creche stayed packed away on our son's first Christmas with us. We thought about bringing it out but didn't. As a crawling baby, our little boy would put Jesusaurus in his mouth. When he was a toddler, we told each other, he'd unravel Jospeh's kafiyeh and robe. A kindergartner, he'd play with the plastic dinos as if they were action figures.
But I think we knew all along that the creche wasn't part of what our family had become. I did bring it out for a Christmas party last year, and my son watched me put it together. He liked it; he was mildly amused; he didn't understand. Now it's the newer ornaments—a fabric turtle from Vietnam, his strings of origami cranes—that represent who we are together.
I'm not the first to quibble with Tolstoy's distinction between happy and unhappy families in Anna Karenina. But every day, I now embrace new versions of my family, and I offer this rewrite:
"Unreal families are all alike; every real family is real in its own way."


Salon.com
Comments
"Unreal families are all alike; every real family is real in its own way."
You said it._r
and
Jesusaurus loves you. Sorry . . . I just had to say it.
I would suspect that unless you live in a very different America than the one I have lived in for most of my life, people are looking, and perhaps not really staring, for the "other" reasons you suggest: your kid is cute, he looks happy, you are lively, whatever. The assumption that, "to them" you don't "fit together" is, of course, your assumption.
"Mixed" families are just not that unusual and, if I was walking down the street with my family member who was born in Asia, but is not, of course, Asian, I'd not assume anyone looking was thinking we didn't fit as a family or even, really, that they cared.
I also sure wish people could get, no matter how nicely intended, beyond thinking of people as "Asia" or whatever. He really is just your kid. If you are American, he is too.
However, there's background to that piece of the story which didn't make it into the post. We've had several recent encounters in which an adult has done a double-take looking at us, in a way that differed from the usual indulgent smile my son often gets. We also had two children ask my son point-blank where his mother was (I was standing right there), not with ill intention, but really very curious. My son handled this well. I also think such curiosity about mixed families is normal and isn't necessarily a curse. It's just part of the way we put our family together.
I'd not take the kids too much to heart.
I still find it odd, although what you see is what you see, that this is any sort of "issue", that is your son being a different so-called "race", but it is what it is to you, of course.
Hope that the few adults you've encountered get beyond this. And, as already said, it would be nice to just have our "ASIAN" relatives be our son, daughter, niece, etc. and nothing more. The day will come. For many of us, it is already here.
The nicely meant, but in my view, ill-advised focus on race, is disturbing, but you mean all the best.
Good luck to you.