Just hours from now, Americans will know who is going to be running the country for the next two years. Whatever the outcomes of the elections coast-to-coast, nothing much is likely to change in Washington.
Why should it? The White House is still the home of Barack Obama and his hand-picked inner circle. The House and Senate will, for the most part, be run by the same gang (with different hats) and a minority of new faces who will-- in short order-- be brought into line. Part of the orientation of new lawmakers must include a secret class where they are told-- in language they can understand-- that in the great halls of the Capitol, you either learn how deals or made or perish.
Name me a real independent thinker who made it all the way to Washington and I'll name you a person who either is headed for or already has made it to political obscurity. Eugene McCarthy was the great hope of my Vietnam generation. After him George McGovern offered possible new ways of looking at things: Richard Nixon decimated McGovern at the polls, eventually, and we all know what a great president Nixon was. Then there's Ralph Nader: need I say more?
The problem with America is that its memory is too short, its inertia too widespread and its desire to "forgive and forget" too deep. On November 2, the electorate that claimed to hate George W Bush for the damage he had done to the country is likely to go to the polls and return to power any number of W clones. I should clarify that those going to the polls will be a lot less than the number who voted in 2008 when Obama was a savior. This November, probably less than half of those eligible to vote will actually get their butts to a poll while our troops still risk injury and death every day to bring the allegedly "precious right to vote" to Afghanis and Iraqis. Go figure.
In the interim, "savior" Barack Obama is derided from one end of the country to the other, by Republicans and Independents and even by his own party regulars who like power and the monies graft and corruption can generate more than they like the concepts of party unity or salvaging the nation from economic, social, and practical ruin.
So those of you who like to wrap yourselves in the flag, be my guest. Hang those stars and stripes from the highest poles and drape them over your balconies and out your second story windows. Raise your voices in praise of the, "...spacious skies" and, " amber waves of grain..." And let your hearts continue to hope that whatever god you believe in will actually, "bless America" and "shed his grace on [it]."
But it's a real long shot.
Even a divine intervener would have his hands full getting the gang in DC to see what is "right and just" as being more important than power and money, both of which figure prominently on the only altar at which politicians worship.
So let's make a date for Thursday, November 4, when, after 24 hours of post-election celebration, America can inaugurate the next cycle of disappointment, disillusionment, and despair.
It's our system that's busted, and continuing to elect cowards with no interest in fixing that system-- whatever their political stripe-- accomplishes nothing.


Salon.com
Comments
Rated with hugs
And, yes, Sarah, Feingold's imminent massacre is typical of the irrational disgust of voters ready to make "changes" at any cost.
I couldn't agree with this assessment more.
However, as much as I loathe the so-called "Tea Party Movement" (keep the word "movement" in here otherwise these folks will get the idea that it's a "true" political party) I also have to grudgingly admit that they represent a form of rebellion from the far right.
The "left" is almost always too disjointed to coalesce into any sort of viable political movement (see your reference to Eugene McCarthy).
I was scared by the end of Bush 43s first term and even more scared through his 2nd term. We survived it. I'm more scared than ever by the vitriolic fervor of those who espouse and embrace the
Becks and Palins of this world.
And unfortunately, I have come to the conclusion that perhaps Barak Obama is not up to the task. If we had not had a meltdown of our economy (that left us literally at the brink of national financial ruin) perhaps he could have succeeded in creating the type of change we seemed poise to embrace and implement. Obama's "audacity of hope" has lost both its audacity and hope leaving us with just more of the same old same old.
Too bad. And on Wednesday, the world will still be here. But, I'm more afraid than ever of the kind of world that it may become.
I couldn't agree with this assessment more.
However, as much as I loathe the so-called "Tea Party Movement" (keep the word "movement" in here otherwise these folks will get the idea that it's a "true" political party) I also have to grudgingly admit that they represent a form of rebellion from the far right.
The "left" is almost always too disjointed to coalesce into any sort of viable political movement (see your reference to Eugene McCarthy).
I was scared by the end of Bush 43s first term and even more scared through his 2nd term. We survived it. I'm more scared than ever by the vitriolic fervor of those who espouse and embrace the
Becks and Palins of this world.
And unfortunately, I have come to the conclusion that perhaps Barak Obama is not up to the task. If we had not had a meltdown of our economy (that left us literally at the brink of national financial ruin) perhaps he could have succeeded in creating the type of change we seemed poise to embrace and implement. Obama's "audacity of hope" has lost both its audacity and hope leaving us with just more of the same old same old.
Too bad. And on Wednesday, the world will still be here. But, I'm more afraid than ever of the kind of world that it may become.
I've voted this time hoping votes and not big money will rule the day. I'm speaking specifically to the Citizen's United decision. Until the system changes, it will not matter who is in office. They are all a bunch of whores...Republicans, Democrats and TeaBaggers too. If only Democrats had the same attitude of unity as the Republicans.
The R are in a long-term battle to minimize government. "The people" don't want that on a micro level but always seem to fall for it on a macro level. "Keep your dirty government hands off my medicare," sums it up perfectly.
The D won't fight back and if they try to are met with a deafening response decrying "our" lack of civility and charging them with "playing the blame game."
Corruption? People everywhere seek power and wealth and put themselves first, it's not just a political thing - though I do think politics attracts the narcissistic more than other professions.
Meanwhile, I consider myself fortunate to have Klobuchar, Franken and Ellison representing me. Probably not perfect and certainly subject to the temptations of the environment but they are about as good as it gets.
The loss of Feingold is frightening but I hear you have to expect that sort of stupidity from WI. I can't say, personally.
Appropo of nothing: last round of elections someone told me she was a well-informed voter because she watched the TV ads from both sides. She had always seemed like an otherwise fairly intelligent woman, too. I just needed to tell someone that.