Italians say, “Only good people die.” They are not referring to the American myth that “bad things happen to good people,” but rather to the universal practice by which eulogies declare every corpse a saint.
Joe Paterno is now dead and already the sanctifiers are blaming authorities at Penn State and the state of Pennsylvania for killing the coach. These sports fanatics cannot accept that, for years, Paterno oversaw a team where students, alleged victims and assistant coaches claim that young boys were sexually assaulted and molested by Paterno’s underling Jerry Sandusky.
The illegal and unconscionable silence of Joe Paterno about the possibility of rampant pedophilia on his watch does not resonate with jock-happy mourners. They are simply interested in the game—intoxicated on the tailgate brews and adrenaline highs of Paterno’s record number of victories. If young boys were raped in the shower in the meantime, it is to them a small price to pay.
They say the scandal killed Paterno: they wonder why an ailing coach with Joe’s history should have been fired for closing his eyes to the pain of young boys claiming to have had their youth and their future serenity decimated by the alleged perversion of a man pretending to be their mentor.
Those for whom the Penn State scorecard is more important than the truth need to grow up. Those who would rather revere the sports hero than stand by children sacrificed at the altar of pedophilia while football heroes turned the other way ought to reassess their priorities. And those who say the Sandusky scandal killed Joe Paterno ought to read the death certificate.
Joe Paterno was already dying from lung cancer before he was fired from Penn State. He continued to die slowly of that cancer after he was publicly accused of refusing to blow the whistle on Sandusky.
Lung cancer killed Joe Paterno. If, in his final months, the coaching legend also suffered remorse for his actions and inactions of the past (or for finally having been caught neglecting his legal and moral duty) so be it. Joe created that guilt: no one else should be held responsible. It is, as school authorities like to remind students, “…a part of his permanent record.”
Joe Paterno is dead. Now he will either rot in peace or answer to a higher authority, in the ground, in paradise or in some circle of hell, depending on your view. It is doubtful, however, that whatever God one may believe in, Paterno’s winning football record will count more than his adherence to the golden rule-- to love one’s neighbor as oneself-- which is known as the greatest commandment.
_______________
(image courtesy wikicommons public domain)
TIP:
Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
escrito por nada
Wren Dancer
FusunA
Leepin Larry
Out on a limb
Miguela Holt y Roybal
Salon.com
Comments
Great Post, Mary Ann
rated!
leT"s sEt uP aN aNaLOGouS siTUatIOn
pReTEnD I cLaIm tO B dUEinG soMEthING iLLeGaL oR hARmFuL
U wOuLD oR sHoULd rePOrT mE to tHe pROpEr auThOrITieS aT OS maNAgEmEnt
iF tHeY dON"t dUE anYtHiNG sHoULd eVeRYwOn bLAmE u
U R wRoNg
The problem with the Internet is that it gives every nut job with an axe to grind a chance to state their opinion in public and have it taken seriously. Don't confuse the rantings of a few crazies with a modem for the opinion of the mainstream sports world.
As to Paterno, most people who liked Joe Paterno liked him for the fact that his program had good academics, and not necessarily just the wins, as in reality, on a percentage basis, there were people who were better at winning than him, but not nearly so much the graduation rates, or essential lack of NCAA violations. That's why he was a big deal at least as much as a lot of wins, if granted, if he had been a .500 coach, he wouldn't have lasted very long either. He did give back rather a lot of the money he ever earned there to the schools' academic programs. It is not remotely alleged that Paterno himself did anything wrong other than possibly, if not yet proven in a court of law, place trust in one person he shouldn't have, possibly, and then possibly not do enough about that when the assistant made a claim that cannot seemingly ever be verified in a court of law, since that person was never identified in the indictment, and therefore presumably will not be, especially since the assistant has made statements that it seems like could be impeached on cross-examination rather easily, as they are not from what one reads consistent statements. That's why juries o our peers decide such things, or if Sandusky so chooses, a judge. Time will tell.
R♥
R♥
Whatever their lost one may have been, it was not their fault.
Fear not, when the pain eases, they'll not hold you to those silly praises. They likely know of his faults better than anyone. But they will appreciate that you offered that comfort in their time of need.
.