Return with me to a simpler time: July, 1999.
Clinton was president. Times Square still had cars in it. Downtown still had a World Trade Center.
In New York City, it was a month a record number of triple digit degree days. And I was pregnant with my first child.
I was at the time Salon's fourth string movie critic, which meant I got to see a lot of dreadful teen comedies and schocky horror flicks.
But months earlier, I'd heard of a truly original and deeply unsettling little low budget fright film that had come out of Sundance. But more telling was something else.
I'm an online community person. Have been for most of my career. I host Table Talk here and had my hand in a variety of other social networks. And the buzz coming the net was unbelievable.
Filmmakers Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez had done something unprecedented: they'd created a website for their spooky mockumentary of three young people who'd gone missing in the Maryland woods. They fleshed out the myth of a witch, a curse, and a history of grim crimes.
I was fascinated, and I called dibs.
Though I did eventually see the movie one unbearably hot night in a midtown screening room, I'll confess now that I had already had an earlier glimpse. A few weeks earlier, a well connected friend in the horror world had sent me a video copy. I watched it alone in my apartment one suffocating evening and it scared the beejeebers out of me.
That was, of course, before the interminable lines started snaking out the door of the Angelika, before the movie had become one of the most profitable films in history, before the inevitable "What's the big deal?" backlash. Before the parodies. Before the hype that I, in my own small way, helped fuel.
Though none of the actors or filmmakers went on to major stardom, the film itself, and its influence, continue to resonante. It changed the way films are marketed. It make studios realize the power of the net community. (Hey, think maybe someday newspapers and book publishers will catch on too?)
I still think it's a nifty little thriller. I'm hard pressed to think of too many horror movies of the ensuing decade that have gotten under my skin so effectively. ("Let the Right One In," definitely, but for a thousand different reasons.) And nothing, NOTHING, I have ever written has continued to generate email like my original review of "Blair Witch." I still get letters asking if it's real.
What did you think of BWP in '99, and how well do you think it's aged?

Salon.com
Comments
Too bad the movie didn't live up to the hype. I was much more angry than frightened.
Back then, I’d heard about the movie from friends w/Live Entertainment (in the act of becoming Artisan) just after the company picked it up post-Sundance. I saw it shortly after Artisan dumped some more money into it w/reshoots and a little sound mixing. So for me, before the cool internet hype – which BTW was the result of industry marketing individuals – it seemed like a smartly done, nifty twist on a back-to-basics horror/thriller pic.
But though the internet gamut created the ‘did it happen’ buzz and brought in the huge crowds, after a while it seemed over-hyped, and I think it set the expectations a little too high for lots of moviegoers…
But I know how you feel about your first big scoop. I was the first journalist to interview Rufus Wainwright, right after he got signed to this label no one had really heard of yet, called Dreamworks. (He was the second person they signed after George Michaels). I still have the demo tape he sent them. And everytime someone talks about him, I feel like I made that guy.
(For written horror fans, there are recognizable connections between Blair Witch and Karl Edward Wagner's short story "Sticks", which is really good Lovecraft pastiche.)
(Oh, and I mentioned on Thomas's blog that one of the makers of Blair Witch, Eduardo Sanchez, later did a gory low-budget horror movie, Altered, that's worth seeing.)
Meh.
M. Chariot is correct about Don't Look Now. That is a very scary movie and very well done. Venice has never been so menacing.
Another crazy scary movie in my favorites list is Wait Until Dark with Audrey Hepburn and Alan Arkin. Almost the entire movie takes place in a small NYC apartment, oh it's soooo scary.
Still, I like the fact that it did so well on such a shoestring budget. That is always cool and sort of puts me on the side of the minority of those who saw the film.
I also remember having a discussion with my parents who saw it much later after the hype and were only annoyed and nauseated by the film. I can see both opinions.
I still think it's a really original horror movie, though. The parodies prove that- you can't parody something so well unless it's unique.
You want to see something really scary? Pay attention to the world around you.
The Shining, however, makes me want to hide under the bed.
Great remembrance of indeed, a happier and simpler time.
Rated
One lasting influence from that movie: I still call it the "Blair Witch cam" whenever I notice bouncy motion sickness inducing handheld camera work.