I have made this an Open Call on Family/Work Conflict. If you have managed a more flexible schedule, please blog how you did it. Babyboomers are discovering that elder parent/work conflicts are even more challenging and last longer than children/work conflicts. They often arrive with no warning. You get a call from the hospital, and your life changes dramatically.
I changed my avatar and blog title because I want to concentrate far more on the necessary revolution to transform the US into a family-friendly society than on personal family stories.
If you read nothing else today, please read The Three Faces of Work-Family Conflict--The Poor, the Professionals, and the Missing Middle by Joan C. Williams and Heather Boushey, posted to the excellent Center for American Progress Website. I highly recommend Williams's Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It.
I don't usually quote this extensively from another site, but this is too important to attempt to paraphrase. Download the full report.
An American Workplace Perfectly Designed for the Workforce of the 1960s
In 1960, only 20 percent of mothers worked, and only 18.5 percent were unmarried. Because the most common family was comprised of a male breadwinner and stay-at-home mother, employers were able to shape jobs around that ideal, with the expectation that the breadwinner was available for work anytime, anywhere, for as long as his employer needed him. Even then, this model did not serve the small but significant share of families who did not fit this mold, yet the model stuck.
This model makes absolutely no sense today. Now, 70 percent of American children live in households where all adults are employed. Nearly one in four Americans—more every year—are caring for elders. Hospitals let patients out “quicker and sicker.” Yet employers still enshrine as ideal the breadwinner who is always available because his wife takes care of the children, the sick, the elderly—as well as dinner, pets, and the dry cleaning. For most Americans, this is not real life. ...
Work-family conflict is much higher in the United States than elsewhere in the developed world. One reason is that Americans work longer hours than workers in most other developed countries, including Japan, where there is a word, karoshi, for “death by overwork.” The typical American middle-income family put in an average of 11 more hours a week in 2006 than it did in 1979...
So it should come as no surprise that Americans report sharply higher levels of work-family conflict than do citizens of other industrialized countries. Fully 90 percent of American mothers and 95 percent of American fathers report work-family conflict. And yet our public policymakers in Congress continue to sit on their hands when it comes to enacting laws to help Americans reconcile their family responsibilities with those at work...
The United States today has the most family-hostile public policy in the developed world due to a long-standing political impasse. The only major piece of federal legislation designed to help Americans manage work and family life, the Family and Medical Leave Act, was passed in 1993, nearly two decades ago. In the interim—when Europeans implemented a comprehensive agenda of “work-family reconciliation”—not a single major federal initiative in the United States has won congressional approval.
Shockingly, neither Obama or Clinton made this a major focus in the campaign. Yes, Michelle Obama talks about it, but we need legislation, not talk. This is a bipartisan issue. Republicans have children and families too.


Salon.com
Comments
Thank you for bringing our attention to this critical issue.
Babyboomers are discovering that elder parent/work conflicts are even worse and last longer than children/work conflicts.
As a young feminist in early 70s, we certainly believed in economic reform that would make it possible for the father and mother to take turns caring for young children. I knew more stay-at-home fathers than I do now. At least in NYC almost all children are cared for by women, usually women they are not related to, usually women who are underpaid and deprived of benefits. This is not the new world we envisioned.
When I take care of my grandchildren in NYC playgrounds, everyone assumes I am grandma, because even older white women don't take care of children. Women of color from all over the world do.
Feminism often seems like an unwitting handmaiden of corporate capitalism. Just as women won the right to combine career and children, they lost the right to stay home because wages stagnated and one income could no longer support a family.
sophieh, you make an excellent point. Too many of the nannies and home health aides I have met over the last ten years caring for my mom and grandkids get paid off the books; they don't accumulate Social Security benefits either.
I have always found taking care of young children the most fascinating, challenging, demanding job I have ever held. It is a tragedy that few of today's parents have the opportunities I have.
Even those parents who could afford it have accepted the lie that staying at home with your babies for even a year or so will jeopardize your career forever. That is absurd. Men who left their jobs for four or five years to fight World War II were rewarded by the GI Bill of Rights that enabled them to go to college, buy homes, and greatly improve their economic status.
Because of the layers of animosity created in our childhood, there is little regard among my siblings for the sacrifices we made for her. On the day I was to take a check to a bankruptcy lawyer which would have saved our own house, my sister lets me know mom is ready to come home and she is moving out. I left my home to come to one already deeply declining, foundation issues, bb-gun pellets in the ceilings, (by my sister's two teenagers), all walls punched in, also by those two, plumbing issues, overgrown yard trees, beer cans everywhere. Oh, it's just too tiresome to think about, and I didn't mean to write a missive.
What I really wanted to say is thank you. Although I love your stories, I think adding your voice to illuminate the problems families are facing now is a wonderful activity to be doing. I hope it makes a difference, we need an uptick of support since our society has consistently picked away at the security families need to produce the inheritors of the society.
After 79 incredibly active, healthy years, my mother's health suddenly fell apart in January 2000. Insidiously, she developed a terrible neurological disease, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, much worse than the Parkinson's Disease it was mistaken for until the last 6 months of her life. Her balance was destroyed, and she never could accept her limitations. In 2000 she fractured her pelvis, her sternum, her arm, her ribs. In 2001 she fell down the stairs at my brother's house, landing on her head. After that devastating head injury, she never recovered cognitively.
She moved in with us for the last four years of her life, and needed 24/7 supervision so she would not constantly fall. We had to install a motion detector in her bedroom which sounded a loud alarm if she tried to get out of bed. She always had to be visible when she was awake.
I was far more fortunate than you in my siblings. My family decided what would make sense would be for them to match my (rather low) salary so I could take care of her. Like your Rick, my new English husband Andy made it possible. He took such tender care of her that people always assumed he was her son. Fortunately we could use my mom's money.
Tragically, siblings seem inevitably to revert to childhood conflicts when faced with the challenges of elder care. My grandma used to comment on the mystery of how one mother could take care of 7 children, but 7 children couldn't take care of one elderly mother.
People taking care of aging or sick parents can feel desperately alone, as many heartbreaking posts on OS evidence.
Lezlie
Rated!
I took a full 12 weeks of Family Emergency Leave w/o pay in 1991 when my wife gave birth to our daughter. I gradually eased back part-time in my job as an electronics field engineer for the banking OEM industry but found I had been subsequently displaced from the advancement line and wound up finally being laid off. I believe the concrete, unwaivering commitment that I made to family values in taking that pro-active "daddy" path contributed to it. I may develop this tale a bit more on Larinovem.
I went through a live change that involved never being able to work at a traditional job again. It would be good if others could make decent incomes from home so that they can have more time with the kids or in caring for elderly relations.
It's usually one person who does all of the eldercare, too, while the others stay out of it. There is not a lot of group effort going on these days.
Capitalism is the number one cause of this. It is a cannibalistic economic system, that consumes and annihilates all those who live within its embrace. Why is it that Western Europe, the US, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Australia have such low birth rates? It is because of the modern state of the Capitalist system. Even the mixed economies of Western Europe, however much I like them, are not immune. Wages have not kept pace with inflation over the past 40 years and nobody is having kids like they used to. To compensate for disastrous fertility rates, we bring in immigrants, which is fine. However, once they reach middle-class status, the same inflationary restraints will hinder them and their quest for satisfying family life. We need a new economic system that puts people, rather than profits, first.
Anyone interested who has at least a BA degree should check them out at
http://www.flexiblescoring-reg.pearson.com/
Working from home is an excellent way to have more time for beautiful grandchildren- or other family responsibility.