Nonviolent Revolution for a Family Friendly US

Redstocking Grandma

Redstocking Grandma
Location
Baldwin, New York,
Birthday
July 17
Bio
My name is Mary Joan Koch. The Redstockings were a NYC radical feminist group in the late 60s and early 70s. I have five grandchildren, 5, 3 1/2, 3 1/2, 2, and 1. Becoming a grandma has rekindled my radical feminism. I speak for the children.

MY RECENT POSTS

Redstocking Grandma's Links

Contact me
APRIL 1, 2010 10:57AM

2010 Workplace Is Perfectly Designed for 1960 Workforce

Rate: 13 Flag

 I have made this an Open Call on Family/Work Conflict. If you have managed a more flexible schedule, please blog how you did it. Babyboomers are discovering that elder parent/work conflicts are even more challenging and last longer than children/work conflicts. They often arrive with no warning. You get a call from the hospital, and your life changes dramatically.

I changed my avatar and blog title because I want to concentrate far more on the necessary revolution to transform the US into a family-friendly society than  on personal family stories.

If you read nothing else today, please read The Three Faces of Work-Family Conflict--The Poor, the Professionals, and the Missing Middle by Joan C. Williams and Heather Boushey, posted to the excellent  Center for American Progress Website.  I highly recommend Williams's Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It.

 I don't usually quote this extensively from another site, but this is too important to attempt to paraphrase.  Download the full report.

An American Workplace Perfectly Designed for the Workforce of the 1960s

 In 1960, only 20 percent of mothers worked, and only 18.5 percent were unmarried. Because the most common family was comprised of a male breadwinner and stay-at-home mother, employers were able to shape jobs around that ideal, with the expectation that the breadwinner was available for work anytime, anywhere, for as long as his employer needed him. Even then, this model did not serve the small but significant share of families who did not fit this mold, yet the model stuck.

 This model makes absolutely no sense today. Now, 70 percent of American children live in households where all adults are employed. Nearly one in four Americans—more every year—are caring for elders. Hospitals let patients out “quicker and sicker.” Yet employers still enshrine as ideal the breadwinner who is always available because his wife takes care of the children, the sick, the elderly—as well as dinner, pets, and the dry cleaning. For most Americans, this is not real life. ...

 Work-family conflict is much higher in the United States than elsewhere in the developed world. One reason is that Americans work longer hours than workers in most other developed countries, including Japan, where there is a word, karoshi, for “death by overwork.” The typical American middle-income family put in an average of 11 more hours a week in 2006 than it did in 1979...

 So it should come as no surprise that Americans report sharply higher levels of work-family conflict than do citizens of other industrialized countries. Fully 90 percent of American mothers and 95 percent of American fathers report work-family conflict. And yet our public policymakers in Congress continue to sit on their hands when it comes to enacting laws to help Americans reconcile their family responsibilities with those at work...

The United States today has the most family-hostile public policy in the developed world due to a long-standing political impasse. The only major piece of federal legislation designed to help Americans manage work and family life, the Family and Medical Leave Act, was passed in 1993, nearly two decades ago. In the interim—when Europeans implemented a comprehensive agenda of “work-family reconciliation”—not a single major federal initiative in the United States has won congressional approval. 

Shockingly, neither Obama or Clinton made this a major focus in the campaign. Yes, Michelle Obama talks about it, but we need legislation, not talk. This is a bipartisan issue. Republicans have children and families too.


Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This is not an April Fool's joke.
Good thing I'm on vacation. I've got lots of reading to do.
Thank you for bringing our attention to this critical issue.
ladyslipper, what makes me so militant and so discouraged is that this issue was much more in the forefront in the late 60s and 70s than it is now. This generation of parents has no faith whatsoever that the government would ever do anything to help them.

Babyboomers are discovering that elder parent/work conflicts are even worse and last longer than children/work conflicts.
Those who must leave the workforce to give birth to and raise children are not credited for social security benefits while they are not working, either.
Will, thank you for such a thoughtful comment. I have just started reading a truly superb book, Huck's Raft: A History of American Childhood. Two weeks ago I heard the author, Steven Mintz, speak at a Conference on Children and Play. School played a much more minor role in the average child's life in the 19th century than we realize.

As a young feminist in early 70s, we certainly believed in economic reform that would make it possible for the father and mother to take turns caring for young children. I knew more stay-at-home fathers than I do now. At least in NYC almost all children are cared for by women, usually women they are not related to, usually women who are underpaid and deprived of benefits. This is not the new world we envisioned.

When I take care of my grandchildren in NYC playgrounds, everyone assumes I am grandma, because even older white women don't take care of children. Women of color from all over the world do.

Feminism often seems like an unwitting handmaiden of corporate capitalism. Just as women won the right to combine career and children, they lost the right to stay home because wages stagnated and one income could no longer support a family.

sophieh, you make an excellent point. Too many of the nannies and home health aides I have met over the last ten years caring for my mom and grandkids get paid off the books; they don't accumulate Social Security benefits either.

I have always found taking care of young children the most fascinating, challenging, demanding job I have ever held. It is a tragedy that few of today's parents have the opportunities I have.

Even those parents who could afford it have accepted the lie that staying at home with your babies for even a year or so will jeopardize your career forever. That is absurd. Men who left their jobs for four or five years to fight World War II were rewarded by the GI Bill of Rights that enabled them to go to college, buy homes, and greatly improve their economic status.
You are so right about that elder care and issues are harder and last longer. My husband and I moved in with my mother in 2002, when she was released from the nursing home after her first stroke. My sister, who had lived with her for years, free childcare, no bills chose that moment to move in officially with her boyfriend, now husband. Mom had 7 children and Rick and I were the only ones standing to let her live her remaining days in the home she loved. She was pretty physically dependent, and trusted him to do her daily care needs, so I worked, and he became the house husband until her death in September, 2006.

Because of the layers of animosity created in our childhood, there is little regard among my siblings for the sacrifices we made for her. On the day I was to take a check to a bankruptcy lawyer which would have saved our own house, my sister lets me know mom is ready to come home and she is moving out. I left my home to come to one already deeply declining, foundation issues, bb-gun pellets in the ceilings, (by my sister's two teenagers), all walls punched in, also by those two, plumbing issues, overgrown yard trees, beer cans everywhere. Oh, it's just too tiresome to think about, and I didn't mean to write a missive.

What I really wanted to say is thank you. Although I love your stories, I think adding your voice to illuminate the problems families are facing now is a wonderful activity to be doing. I hope it makes a difference, we need an uptick of support since our society has consistently picked away at the security families need to produce the inheritors of the society.
irish colleen, you raise so many important points. I am shocked by the number of otherwise well-informed people who think Medicare pays for long-term care and are totally ignorant of the challenges they will face. Long-term care issues were almost entirely ignored in the debate on health care.

After 79 incredibly active, healthy years, my mother's health suddenly fell apart in January 2000. Insidiously, she developed a terrible neurological disease, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, much worse than the Parkinson's Disease it was mistaken for until the last 6 months of her life. Her balance was destroyed, and she never could accept her limitations. In 2000 she fractured her pelvis, her sternum, her arm, her ribs. In 2001 she fell down the stairs at my brother's house, landing on her head. After that devastating head injury, she never recovered cognitively.

She moved in with us for the last four years of her life, and needed 24/7 supervision so she would not constantly fall. We had to install a motion detector in her bedroom which sounded a loud alarm if she tried to get out of bed. She always had to be visible when she was awake.

I was far more fortunate than you in my siblings. My family decided what would make sense would be for them to match my (rather low) salary so I could take care of her. Like your Rick, my new English husband Andy made it possible. He took such tender care of her that people always assumed he was her son. Fortunately we could use my mom's money.

Tragically, siblings seem inevitably to revert to childhood conflicts when faced with the challenges of elder care. My grandma used to comment on the mystery of how one mother could take care of 7 children, but 7 children couldn't take care of one elderly mother.

People taking care of aging or sick parents can feel desperately alone, as many heartbreaking posts on OS evidence.
We're lucky in that my wife's company encourages people to work from home. This gives us a lot of flexibility with our schedule, because it's easy for her to make up time in the evening, if necessary. It's also a moneysaver for the business - less employees on site means smaller, less expensive offices.
Cranky Cuss, very few people I know have such flexibility, even though there is no reason why they shouldn't since the Internet came into being. Though you can still be expected to work too many hours if you worked at home.
Before I retired from a major telecommunications corporation in 2000, many of my most stressful days were the result of a conflict between my work commitments and the needs of my elderly relatives. When my stepfather was beginning his demise from lung cancer, I left Atlanta to spend several weeks helping at my mother's home in Illinois. Thanks to the Internet, the telephone and cooperative bosses, I was able to continue working. The flexibility offered by technology, however, is only as good as the flexibility of the decision-makers in the company.
Lezlie
Excellent Post, Grandma! Informative, Provocative, Compelling! We are going to get the books that you indicated. I am about to do some heavy research on this topic. My lady will be returning to med school, after our son turns 1 years old. This gave us much to think about & discuss. Thank you for taking the time to gather the info & post it. Well Done!!!



Rated!
Thanks. My sister is taking care of my mother and father--who need someone to run errands for them and figure out various choices in care. She wanted to cut back on work hours and was able to find an affordable house near them. My sister-in-law spent years taking care of her mother and father while the rest of the family slunk away. At least with raising a family, you make some kind of choice in the matter--which doesn't happen with "Parent Boom."
Granny~
I took a full 12 weeks of Family Emergency Leave w/o pay in 1991 when my wife gave birth to our daughter. I gradually eased back part-time in my job as an electronics field engineer for the banking OEM industry but found I had been subsequently displaced from the advancement line and wound up finally being laid off. I believe the concrete, unwaivering commitment that I made to family values in taking that pro-active "daddy" path contributed to it. I may develop this tale a bit more on Larinovem.
Great post. I absolutely Agree!!! Glad to make your acquaintance.
The problem is also that, even though Americans work longer hours, they are not necessarily more productive. They are just forced to "look" productive in many cases in order to justify their jobs.

I went through a live change that involved never being able to work at a traditional job again. It would be good if others could make decent incomes from home so that they can have more time with the kids or in caring for elderly relations.

It's usually one person who does all of the eldercare, too, while the others stay out of it. There is not a lot of group effort going on these days.
Much of the apathy regarding this issue, I think, stems from the fact that many Gen Xers, like myself, are hard pressed, financially, to even think about having kids. I very much want kids, but even with a law degree, salaries are so low, student loans are so high, hours are so long, vacations so sparse, and the need to work both Sat and Sun so constant, that we may not have kids until our late 30s, which we do not like.

Capitalism is the number one cause of this. It is a cannibalistic economic system, that consumes and annihilates all those who live within its embrace. Why is it that Western Europe, the US, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Australia have such low birth rates? It is because of the modern state of the Capitalist system. Even the mixed economies of Western Europe, however much I like them, are not immune. Wages have not kept pace with inflation over the past 40 years and nobody is having kids like they used to. To compensate for disastrous fertility rates, we bring in immigrants, which is fine. However, once they reach middle-class status, the same inflationary restraints will hinder them and their quest for satisfying family life. We need a new economic system that puts people, rather than profits, first.
I score Acheivement Test essays on the internet , and have been swamped with work on a project that began April 1, at Pearson, flexible scoring.

Anyone interested who has at least a BA degree should check them out at

http://www.flexiblescoring-reg.pearson.com/

Working from home is an excellent way to have more time for beautiful grandchildren- or other family responsibility.