mary gravitt

mary gravitt
Location
Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Title
Ms.

Mary gravitt's Links

New list
NOVEMBER 15, 2011 6:26PM

OPPOSING THE SYSTEM & THE SUPER CRAP

Rate: 1 Flag

http://www.npr.org/2011/11/09/142164530/gop-wants-pentagon-protected-from-automatic-cuts 

 

DANIEL’S MIND

Mind may run / on a narrow gauge track / never slowing down to ponder / never looking back / makes rules with no exceptions / that might prove them to be valid / keeps blinders finely set / non-reconsideration solid /

Changing such a mind / is a subtle sort of job / to be done on a side track / with a weave and a bob / by innocent questions / delivered on a lob / so the mind must rise - / mayhap. . .reprise. /

Never thought of it like that. . . .AHA, a hit. /

                             Nancy Adams-Cogan 11/8, 10/11

 

 

Occupy Iowa City, [is] based on the material and social conditions of the world today, and aware of the particular responsibility we bear as people who reside in the United States, articulate the following principles:

  1. We stand in solidarity with the brave people participating in Occupy Wall Street and other Occupy movements throughout the world.
  2. We affirm inherent human rights and recognize the utility of the United Nation’s “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” as a model for the articulation of these rights, but additionally affirm the need for protection of diverse and indigenous cultures.
  3. We affirm the need for safe and affordable housing for all human beings.
  4. We affirm the right of human beings to choose where they live and work, and to engage in these activities free from intimidation or harassment from the state, employers, employees, financiers, or the community.
  5. We affirm the need to protect the environment and believe that a just world requires all people and organizations to take full responsibility for the ecological implications of their actions.
  6. We affirm the right of all people to have access to appropriate health care as well as clean and nourishing food and water.
  7. We affirm our commitment to peace and the belief that entities, including nations, states, and private capital, should never pursue war or brutality of any kind.
  8. We affirm transnational interdependence, which rejects colonization, military occupation, and economic and cultural imperialism.
  9. We believe in the equitable and just distribution of all resources, opportunity, and wealth.
  10. We affirm the necessity of affordable public education for all people, so that they may be fully informed, creative and curious participants in a just society.
  11. We affirm our commitment to the process of democratic decision-making, and believe all people deserve an equal voice and vote.
  12. We affirm the interconnectedness of these principles and seek new paradigms to bring about systematic change.

This is a living document and is not all-inclusive.

              OCCUPY IOWA CITY, Monday, October 24, 2011 @ 8:12

 

p004t1s0_178_100 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00lf05t 

  • Hardtalk
  • Jeanette Winterson - Author
  • Jeanette Winterson - Author

    Media :

    Listen now (25 minutes)

    Availability: 7 days left to listen

    Last broadcast today, 20:05 on BBC World Service (see all broadcasts).

    Next on: Tomorrow, 02:05 on BBC World Service

    Synopsis

    Jeanette Winterson was a twenty-something literary sensation back in the 1980s.

    Her first book, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, a raw, taboo-busting semi-autobiographical novel about being adopted, being abused, and being a lesbian.

    In the years afterwards, the author railed against those who would ask her - how much of it is true, how much of it really happened?

    But now Jeanette Winterson appears to have answered her own question. She's just published her memoir and the truth, she writes, is even more painful.

     

    UNCIVILIZED DISCOURSE

    On Thursday, November 9, 2011, I had a long and sometimes arduous political day, trying to remain civil in an uncivil circumstances (digesting expert political knowledge from carpetbaggers).  It began at 11 a.m. with the UI Symposium: Conflict and Civility in Political Discourse: Where is the Line?  I left dissatisfied because the both the media and the featured symposium speakers, Jean Elshtain and Jim Leach, who does not believe in class warfare, seemed to interpret civility with cowardice and citizens should support the System’s dictum for its pluralistic citizenry to keep its collective mouth shut, while the Religionists run rule the nation.

    Thus, what Charles A. Reich calls protecting the “private government’s” interests.  Then I moved on to Prairie Lights Bookstore at 6:30 p.m. to see and hear Jeff Sharlet read from latest book, Sweet Heaven When I Die: Faith, Faithlessness, and the Country in Between (2011).  I have loved Sharlet’s work ever since I read The Family (2008).

    'Family': Fundamentalism, Friends In High Places

     

    July 1, 2009

    In the book The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power, author Jeff Sharlet examines the power wielded by a secretive Christian group known as the Family, or the Fellowship.

    Founded in 1935 in opposition to FDR's New Deal, the evangelical group's views on religion and politics are so singular that some other Christian-right organizations consider them heretical.

     

    Previously in 2004, authors Peter Manseau and Jeff Sharlet read excerpts from their book Killing the Buddha: A Heretics Bible; an eccentric and original collection of stories considering the facets of true belief. Works Read: "Psalm of Heartland, Kansas" and "Psalm of Geneva, Illinois" from Killing the Buddha: a heretic's Bible by Peter Manseau and Jeff Sharlet read Live From Prairie Lights Bookstore.  http://digital.lib.uiowa.edu/u?/vwu,118 

     

    Sharlet was delightfully political and quoted James Buchanan, Jr. (April 23, 1791 – June 1, 1868) was the 15th President of the United States (1857–1861). He is the only president from Pennsylvania, the only president who remained a lifelong bachelor and the last to be born in the 18th century.  When he left office, popular opinion had turned against him, and the Democratic Party had split in two. Buchanan had once aspired to a presidency that would rank in history with that of George Washington.[3] However, his inability to impose peace on sharply divided partisans on the brink of the Civil War has led to his consistent ranking by historians as one of the worst Presidents.

     

    Sharlet said that Buchanan’s saving grave was that he stated that “Democracy is a cacophony . . . noisy never silent.”  This cheered me after enduring the attempted silencing of America which the Keynote speakers at the UI Symposium seemed to be promoting. 

     

    THE MAJORITY MINORITY PARTIES

      After being reinvigorated by Jeff Sharlet, I moved on
    to the Occupy Iowa City Talk-in at ICPL where I
    became uncivil by speaking out loud to make my point
    about registering citizens to vote, instead of writing it
    as a question on the index cards being passed around
    by the “ushers.”  Having had Sharlet to renew my
    faith in political cacophony, I set off to encourage the
    Occupy Iowa City Talk-in to do so.  I am a vicious
    person when it comes to politics only, and I also
    believe “what comes out of the mouth comes out of
    the heart.”  So that when I arrived at ICPL and saw
    that questions could only be asked silently via index
    cards, my enthusiasm began to flag.
     
    I wrote a couple of cards, and on one, I asked my
    main question, “Are you registering people (citizens)
    to vote?”  But I couldtell by the way the cards were
    being shuffled that my question would never get
    asked.  The Talk-in for me had deteriorated into a one
    way process, a dictatorship of liberalism.
     

    Then miracle of miracles, the conversation switched to the electoral process.  Now it was going in the direction I intended.  Then I got uncivil in my political discourse and made a verbal statement based on what I had gleaned from Earl and Merle Black’s Divided America: The Ferocious Power Struggle in American Politics (2007), “There is no American majority political party.”  And I had to iterate that Goodman, Cheney and Swarner were murdered because of the vote.  It is the very threat of the vote that terrorizes the System like an atomic bomb.

    earlmerle

    Earl and Merle Black

    untitled

    Earl and Merle Black write in Divided America: The Ferocious Power Struggle In American Politics (2007) write that the biggest story of modern American politics—a story with no end in sight—is the ferocious power struggle between conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats over each elected institution of the national government.  Because the two major parties are now evenly balanced in the national electorate, control of the presidency, the Senate, and the House of Representatives can shift with each round of elections.

     

    And because Republicans and Democrats disagree so fundamentally over the direction of countless public policies, changes in partisan control can seriously affect millions of people in the United States and even larger numbers elsewhere in the world.  (1)

    Will Health Law Cost Democrats Seats In Congress?

     

    April 4, 2010

    Two weeks after Congress passed the landmark health care bill, polls show that people who dislike the new law slightly outnumber those who approve of it. Can the Democrats reverse those figures in time for midterm elections, particularly in the South? Host Linda Wertheimer speaks to political science professor Earl Black of Rice University in Houston and his brother, professor Merle Black of Emory University in Atlanta.

     

    POLITICAL LEVERAGE

    While liberals and conservatives are sizable majorities within their parties, their influence on American politics represents a tremendous leveraging of their actual size among all voters.  In the 2004 presidential election, 15 percent of the voters were liberal Democrats, and 24 percent were conservative Republicans.  Members of the two polar groups comprise about two-fifths of the entire electorate.  Finding sufficient allies outside their respective bases to forge majorities is the perennial task of conservative Republican and liberal Democratic politicians.  (4)

    America’s Competitive Minority Parties ~ No Majority Party

    Earl and Merle Black posit that America’s power struggle is waged in a political system that does not have a majority party.  Close national elections rest upon the nearly equal size of the two minority parties.  However, Regan’s presidency reshaped the national party battle.  Beginning with his reelection in 1984, the wide gap between Democrats and Republicans narrowed to a smaller Democratic lead and, by 2004, to a partisan tie.  During the presidential elections from 1984 through 2004, on average, Democrats fell to 39 percent, and Republicans rose to 36 percent of American voters.  In the exit poll, 39 percent of voters were Republicans, and 38 percent were Democrats.  A huge Democratic advantage in the electorate has thus narrowed to a partisan dead heat in the opening decade of the twenty-first century.  (7-8)

    The Blacks conclude that at opening of a new century, America’s two parties have less in common in their composition, values, and objectives than was the case after World War II.  Because they are minority parties in the electorate, neither Democrats nor Republicans can secure national majorities simply by appealing to their most committed supporters.  [This is why it makes sense to make the registration of citizens as part of the Occupy Movements nationwide.]

    Hence it is essential to recognize—indeed, it is necessary to emphasize—the importance to each party of winning as many votes as possible from groups they ordinarily lose.  Republicans manifestly need more support from minorities and non-Christian white, and Democrats need to improve their performance among white Christians, [and after Obama, both parties need the youth].

    Importance of Independents in Elections

    America’s power struggle is rooted in the very different values and priorities advocated by the leading groups in each party’s distinctive regional strongholds.  The national and international problems facing American leaders transcend partisan imperatives, but the new regionalism encourages continuous battles between ideologically driven partisans—conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats—who represent minorities of the entire electorate.  Under such conditions, governing the United States will remain an extraordinarily difficult challenge. (260) http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08292008/watch3.html

    BBC WORLD SERVICE 

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/search/?q=occupy%20wall%20street%20protests

    News

    The Occupy Wall Street protest camp in New York has been cleared after a late-night raid by police

    News114 results>

     

    whys 

    BBC World Have Your Say

    WHYS60: Is Occupy Wall Street an American Spring?

     

    WHYS60: Is Occupy Wall Street an American Spring?

     

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00khv3q

    Media : Listen now (55 minutes)

    Availability: Available to listen.

    Last broadcast on Fri, 7 Oct 2011, 18:05 on BBC World Service.

    Synopsis

    We come to you from Florida and we ask whether the Occupy Wall Street protests in the US are part of an 'American Spring'?

     

    whys 

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/whys 

    WHYS 60: What next for the Occupy movement ?

  • Tue, 15 Nov 11

    Duration: 50 mins

    Available:
    7 days remaining

    What should be the next move of the Occupy movement ? Are the protesters being treated fairly ?

    Download 23MB (right click & "save target as / link as")

  •  

  • WHYS 30: New York police clear Occupy camp

    Tue, 15 Nov 11

    Duration:
    24 mins

    Available:
    7 days remaining

    We hear from people in New York who witnessed the clearance of the Occupy Wall Street camp.

    Download 11MB (right click & "save target as / link as")

  •  

    OPPOSING THE SYSTEM BY MINDING YOUR VOTES

     

    CHARLES ASYSTEM

      Charles A. Reich

     

    In his “Managerial Review,” in Opposing the System (1995), Charles A. Reich writes: Policies and choices made by voters as part of the electoral process shall be subject to review by a Board of Managers representing the governmental and corporate sectors.  The Board may, in its absolute discretion, confirm or reverse decisions by the electorate or substitute other policies for those chosen by the electorate.

     

     

    It is often said that “big government” has too much power that “big government” is too intrusive, and that “big government” interferes with the everyday lives and opportunities of individuals.  But the power of combined economic government and public government is vastly greater than this, and those who participate in its exercise are not necessarily conscious of the impact of their decisions on ordinary people’s lives.

    On Capitol Hill, Rand's 'Atlas' Can't Be Shrugged Off

    November 14, 2011

    These days it can feel like the country is unsteady — politically, economically. In a search for the way forward, scholars and politicians often turn to their fundamental beliefs. NPR is taking a look at some of the most influential philosophers whose ideas molded the present and could shape the future. You might not know all their names, but you're certainly familiar with their ideas. They are woven into the fabric of our society.

     

    Ayn Rand is best known for her novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. The ideas behind them — her philosophy — have sunk so deeply into our political thought, most people don't even recognize them as her ideas anymore.

    But Rand does have important admirers, like House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. Recently, House Speaker John Boehner channeled Rand when he said, "Job creators in America basically are on strike."

     

    EFFECT & EFFECTS OF MANAGERIAL DECISIONS

    Reich posits that the decision that most directly affects the lives of ordinary Americans concerns the structure of work and the workforce.  The workforce has been reshaped into an ever steeper pyramid, with fewer and fewer people enjoying a greater and greater share of wealth and privilege at the top; more and more workers thrown into a “lower tier” of reduced pay, benefits, and security; and a permanent surplus of unemployed at the bottom ready to take any job that becomes available and thus making the working population easily replaceable and therefore unable to demand higher wages and better terms and conditions. 

    It is this decision that is destroying the middle class, driving more and more people into desperation and poverty, separating the population into antagonistic classes of extreme wealth and powerless subservience, and crating the dissatisfaction that drives the demand for change.

    Now workers who “play by the rules” are steadily losing ground, and frustration, fear, and anger has stolen their dreams.  Opportunity is greatly diminished by this decision, security is lost, antagonism is engendered, [and] community is destroyed.  And yet Americans have passively, [until the Occupy Movement], accepted this prime example of unwanted social change, believing it to be not a decision at all, but the result of impersonal economic forces that no one can or should control.

    Reich cautions that the way voter choice can be reversed by the managerial elite is illustrated by the raising of interest rates in 1994 despite the negative effects of this action on employment.  The minimum wage increase was not enacted [as promised]; the budget failed to include significant funds for training and job stimulus, and by 1994 the Clinton administration had quietly accepted the Federal Reserve board’s program of raising interest rates at the expense of employment.  What the people voted for at the polls was reversed by the invisible managerial structure.

    friedman

    Thomas L. Friedman

    Reporter Thomas L. Friedman of the New York Times wrote:

    But what is implicit in such moves (raising interest rates) is the following assumption: that America has decided that in the tradeoff between job growth and inflation growth, between putting people back to work and putting up prices a little, jobs are less important.  Higher mortgage rates and more unemployment be damned.  But this has left a lot of people asking: “Who decided that?”  “Was there a vote I missed?”  “Why should I be held hostage by the bond market?”

    EPA Regulations Give Kilns Permission To Pollute

     

    November 10, 2011

    Part three of a four-part series, Poisoned Places: Toxic Air, Neglected Communities.

    The smokestack stands more than nine stories above the southeastern Kansas prairie and the small city of Chanute, and it's bright, white flashing lights are like a beacon in the night sky.

    "In the wintertime when the leaves are off the trees you can see that," says Ken Lott, 71, a pecan farmer and Lutheran minister with a farm two miles northeast of the stack. "I tell people that that's my Christmas tree over there because it really looks good."

    But for Lott and for people in communities across the country, smokestacks like the one in Chanute provide mixed messages. They signal some of the best-paying jobs around (137 people in Chanute), funding for community projects and revenue streams for local governments.

     

    Fla. Utility Customers Pay Now For Future Power

    by Greg Allen

     

    November 9, 2011

    Regulators in Florida recently gave two utilities permission to begin charging customers for nuclear plants that won't be completed for at least a decade. To encourage development of nuclear power, Florida allows utilities to charge customers upfront for the costs. Now there's a movement to rethink that policy.

    http://www.npr.org/2011/11/09/142166324/fla-utility-customers-pay-now-for-future-power

     

    ON POINT RADIO TO MY POINT

    ON POINT RADIO

    MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2011

     

    Wednesday, October 12, 2011 at 10:00 AM EST

    Occupy Wall Street Examined

    Occupy Wall Street has spread to cities and towns across the country. We’ll talk with some of the occupiers: what do they want? Where’s the movement headed?

    The Occupy Wall Street movement first raised its flag – or flags – on September 17th in New York. Within two weeks it was world news. In three, it had the President and top politicians in both parties speaking to it. Not always respectfully.

    A protester affiliated with the

    A protester affiliated with the "Occupy Wall Street" demonstration listens to a drum circle in Zuccotti Park in New York, on Monday, Oct. 10, 2011. (AP)

    Today, it’s reported active in 150 cities around the country and many more towns. It is sprawling. Proudly unregimented. But the top of its list of gripes is pretty clear. Gross inequality. Rampant joblessness and insecurity. The charge of a corrupted system. What now? We’ll ask.

    This hour On Point: Occupy Wall Street is with us, in the studio.

    -Tom Ashbrook

    Guests


    Bre Lembitz, an activist with Occupy Wall Street in New York.

    Jon Phoenix, a student at Northeastern University, he has been active in the Occupy Boston protests.

    Peter Kuhns, a community organizer for the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, he has been active in the Occupy Los Angeles protests.

    Todd Gitlin, a professor at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.

    Highlights

    The Occupy Wall Street protests are sweeping the nation and stretching into their fourth week. It is getting national attention and raising questions about what exactly the demonstrators want and where their movement is headed.

     

    Occupy Boston activist Jon Phoenix at WBUR. (Alex Kingsbury/WBUR)

    Occupy Boston activist Jon Phoenix at WBUR. (Alex Kingsbury/WBUR)

    I felt like I was one in a million before joining this protest,” said Bre Lembitz, an activist with Occupy Wall Street in New York who has spent the past three weeks demonstrating in Lower Manhattan, and spending her nights in a sleeping bag. “The movement is giving voice to lots of other people who hold the same opinion as I do.”

    Jon Phoenix, a student at Northeastern University and party of the Occupy Boston protests, said today that the motivation for the demonstrations are clear. “Society is too damned unfair,” he said “These tent cities you see out there are Obamavilles, they are the modern day equivalent of the Hoovervilles of the 1930s.”

    Phoenix said that in the long run a third party could form as a result of the Occupy protests. “These protests at some point, they have to be translated into some type of tangible organization that can end up building something for the long term.”

    And in Los Angeles, Peter Kuhns, a veteran community organizer active in the Occupy Los Angeles protests, said he sees people fighting for tangible results, like lower tuition and fewer foreclosures.

    “What we’re seeing now is capitalism out of control – clearly,” Kuhns said. He said that there are numerous problems, including the high cost of college education, high numbers of foreclosures, and fair taxation. “One big question will be how our political leaders will respond to the demonstrations.”

    Todd Gitlin, a professor at the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and a veteran of the radical student movement of the 1960s, had some advice for the demonstrators.

    The most useful thing they could do, Gitlin said, was to act as a point of leverage on the Democratic Party. “By exercising a gravitational force there, it will remind intelligent Democrats that they [the protesters] can point the direction to victory,” Gitlin said.

    More

    You can find a collection of “We are the 99 percent” statements here.

    From Tom’s Reading List

    The Nation “Six weeks later, on September 17, the occupation in downtown New York began, with scant attention, minimal and often derisive media coverage, and little expectation that it would light a spark where others had not. Now, in its fourth week, Occupy Wall Street has the quality of an exploding star: It is gathering energy in enormous and potent quantities, and propelling it outward to all corners of the country.”

    The New York Times “If some aspects of the Occupy Wall Street protest feel predictable — the drum circles, the signs, including “Tax Wall Street Transactions” and “End the FED” — so does the right-wing response. Is it any surprise that Fox News and its allied bloggers consider the protesters “deluded” and “dirty smelly hippies”? ”

    The Wall Street Journal “The Occupy Wall Street movement calls itself “leaderless,” but a small cadre of dedicated activists has stepped up to manage the increasingly complex demonstrations as they move into their fourth week.”

    CNN “To be fair, the reason why some mainstream news journalists and many of the audiences they serve see the Occupy Wall Street protests as incoherent is because the press and the public are themselves. It is difficult to comprehend a 21st century movement from the perspective of the 20th century politics, media, and economics in which we are still steeped.”

     

    Occupy Los Angeles

     

     

    Occupy DC Storms Senate Office Building

     

     

    Brooklyn Bridge Arrests

    Your tags:

    TIP:

    Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
    Recipient's email address:
    Personal message (optional):

    Your email address:

    Comments

    Type your comment below:
    Hi,

    Remember Democracy is a Cacaphony!
    Democracy is a cacophony indeed.
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!"
    --upton sinclair

    "One withstands the invasion of armies; one does not withstand the invasion of ideas."
    --victor hugo


    occupy party reaches critical mass/seismic effect--now what?