

E. J. Dionne
TRYING TIME
USA ife less fair, listen / now, gather, nest, settle into / a CITIZENS ALERT! / In our parks and fields / tent domes and ridge poles cluster, / shifting encampments, / For all harm’s collateral, / justice is failing the people. / Stay together. Stand. / Be counted this day. / Read our message, read our lips: / We Shall Overcome. / Our country t’ is for thee, / our sweet land of liberty, / we sing out “Justice!” / We sing out “Freedom,” / we sing out “Love” between / our brothers and our sisters / All over this world. / Listen & Speak up. / Stand & Sing. / Support. / Persist.
Nancy Adams-Cogan 10/18/11
Literary Necromancy
Literature both nonfiction and fiction effects and affects the political culture of the body politic. As did the previous Occupy Movements in Paris 1968:
And the Civil Rights Movements of the 1960s:
Each movement was concerned with the symbol of corporate and Congressional corruption that the literature and philosophy within the literature of mid-to-late 1990s expresses, and why it has so much relevance in the 21st century. E. J. Dionne’s book is one such text.
SHOWDOWN~THE REPUBLICAN CHALLENGE AND THE PROGRESS PROMISE
Dionne writes in They Only Look Dead Why Progressives Will Dominate The Next Political Era (1996) that the new radicalism in American politics means that the debate in 1996 and beyond is not simply a contest between political parties. It is a confrontation between fundamentally different approaches to economic turbulence, moral uncertainty and international disorder. American politics has been unsettled in recent years because most Americans sense that the country has not adapted well to these changes, and because they are ambivalent about them. (265)
Predicting the 21st Century
Newt Gingrich exposed the technological change that was to spur the 21st century. His strategy was to make technological change itself the priority and push government aside. “We do have an economic game plan,” said the House Republicans in their post contract [with America] manifesto, Restoring the Dream, “and its central theme is to get bureaucratic government off America’s back and out of the way.” Third Wave [from futurists Alvin and Heidi Toffler’s text] conservatism posits that virtually all the constructive changes in the next era will take place in the private sector. Thus, as Restoring the Dream puts it, the way to create a “first rate, globally competitive” economy is to free it from the iron shackles” of “taxation, regulation and litigation.” (265-6)
BBC WORLD SERVICE
http://www.bbc.co.uk/search/newt_gingrich
A look at some of the potential Republican party candidates who could take on Barack Obama for the US Presidency in the 2012 election
NEOCONSERVATIVE DRAMA
Gingrich Has Record Of Clashing With The Right
by Evie Stone
November 29, 2011
Listen to theStory
http://www.npr.org/2011/11/29/142868567/gingrich-has-record-of-clashing-with-the-right
Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich speaks to the crowd at the Naples Hilton on Friday in Naples, Fla.
November 29, 2011
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich surprised viewers of last week's Republican presidential debate with his take on illegal immigrants.
"If you've been here 25 years and you've got three kids and two grandkids, you've been paying taxes and obeying the law, you belong to a local church, I don't think we're going to separate you from your family, uproot you forcefully and kick you out," he said.
His GOP opponents accused Gingrich of endorsing amnesty, a policy many conservatives deem unacceptable.
But the immigration issue is only Gingrich's latest clash with the right.
Past Disagreements
The trouble started early in Gingrich's presidential campaign. He announced he was running on May 11. Four days later, on NBC's Meet the Press, he had this to say about fellow Republican Paul Ryan's budget proposal: "I don't think right-wing social engineering is any more desirable than left-wing social engineering." http://www.npr.org/2011/11/29/142868567/gingrich-has-record-of-clashing-with-the-right
Mitt Romney's Evolution On Abortion
by Julie Rovner
November 29, 2011
Listen to the Story
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/11/29/142827112/mitt-romneys-evolution-on-abortion

Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has asserted his opposition to abortion rights in recent years, which has lead some to wonder about his earlier views.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has been labeled a flip-flopper. And when it comes to abortion, the former governor of Massachusetts appears to have changed his position from being in favor of abortion rights to being opposed.
But now some people are asking if Romney ever supported abortion rights at all? Backers of abortion rights don't think so.
"In Massachusetts, when he was running for governor...a very liberal state, a state that was pro-choice, he was playing to the audience," says Nancy Keenan, President of NARAL Pro-Choice America. "And he made promises to the pro-choice community at that time that he did not keep," she said, including vetoing a bill that would have provided emergency contraceptives to victims of rape. "So the fact of the matter is he was not authentic in his position at that time."
During that 2002 run, Romney insisted in a debate, "I will preserve and protect a woman's right to choose, and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard." Putting a point on it, he said, "I will not change any provisions of Massachusetts' pro-choice laws." http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/11/29/142827112/mitt-romneys-evolution-on-abortion
Bachmann's 'Conviction' To Fixing Government
November 25, 2011
Listen to the Story
http://www.npr.org/2011/11/25/142730724/bachmanns-conviction-to-fixing-government
It wasn't long ago that Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann's rise to the top of the Republican field of presidential candidates was called "meteoric." In August, she won the Iowa Straw Poll. Now, she's polling in the single digits.
But Bachmann is plowing ahead with her campaign, and this week she came out with a memoir, Core of Conviction. In it, she writes about "our 29 children" — by which she means five biological children and a miscarriage, plus 23 foster kids. She spent much of the 1990s as a stay-at-home mom.
In her career, Bachmann worked as an IRS lawyer, opened a charter school and ran a counseling business with her husband. All these experiences, including her time as a foster parent, involved close relations with the government and — in some cases — receiving government money. http://www.npr.org/2011/11/25/142730724/bachmanns-conviction-to-fixing-government
ECONOMIC ROAD TO SERFDOM OR ROAD TO SALVATION
Those who believe in government’s possibilities cannot pretend that they share the [Republican] conservatism’s view of the state. At the heart of [their] conservatism is the belief that government action is not only essentially inefficient but also inherently oppressive. Democratic government, in this telling, has interests all its own that have nothing to do with what the voters want. What’s especially important about this idea is that it ultimately sees no fundamental distinction between free government and dictatorship. The differences are only a matter of degree, not of kind: The more limited democratic government is, the better; the more active democratic government is, the more it begins to approach the evils of Nazism or Communism.
“Behind our New Deals and New Frontiers and Great Societies,” writes Dick Armey, “you will find, with a difference only in power and nerve, the same sort of person who gave the world its Five Year Plans and Great Leaps Forward—the Soviet and Chinese counterparts.” This is an extraordinary and radical claim, effectively equating Roosevelt, Kennedy and Johnson with Stalin and Mao. If the problem is stated like this, then there is only one choice: Preserving freedom means having government do as little as possible. A government that might levy taxes to provide health care coverage for all or pensions for the old is seen as marching the people down “the road to serfdom,” in the evocative phrase of the libertarian economist Friedrich A. Hayek.
BBC World Service
Outside The Eurozone, But Britain Is Still Struggling
November 28, 2011
Britain opted out of the euro, but it's by no means protected from the eurozone troubles. Declining demand on the continent means fewer British exports. The picture is particularly bleak in places like Hull — a port city with one of the highest rates of youth unemployment in Britain.
http://www.npr.org/2011/11/28/142839192/desperate-young-briton-looks-for-work-in-hull
Hayekian Point of View ~ the Hacking of US Democracy
It is better in [Hayek’s libertarian economics], to have no health care and no pensions than to have the government embark on this terrible path. Environmental regulations are seen not as preserving streams and forests for future generations; they are viewed as ways of interfering with the free use of private property. Work regulations are no longer ways of providing employees with some protections against hazardous machines or conditions; they are seen as “interference in the right of contract.” (286-7)
Should CEOs No Longer Be Granted Stock Options?
November 28, 2011
Author Jim Collins talks to Steve Inskeep as part of the Morning Edition occasional series Fixes. Collins says that by making CEOs buy company stock with their own money, they will have more incentive to manage for the long term and make the types of decisions that lead to job growth.
This [libertarian] sort of thinking is now so common that it has been forgotten how radically different it is from the tradition on which the United States was founded—a tradition to which contemporary liberals, moderates, conservatives and libertarians all trace their roots. (287)
T-Party Republicans Have Come to Washington to Bury Government Not to Compromise
A dark cloud passes over the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. Many lawmakers fear that Congress' already low approval rating will sink even further after the failure of the supercommittee. http://www.npr.org/2011/11/25/142705292/even-lawmakers-ask-does-anyone-like-congress
[4 min 23 sec]
One evening a couple of weeks ago, Colorado Democrat Michael Bennet rose to speak in a nearly empty Senate chamber. Clearly exasperated, he warned his absent colleagues that their 9 percent approval rating was fast approaching the margin of error for 0 percent approval. http://www.npr.org/2011/11/25/142705292/even-lawmakers-ask-does-anyone-like-congress
Dionne writes that in the current cacophony of anti-government sloganeering, it is forgotten that the ever-popular slogan “equality of opportunity” was made real only by extensive government efforts to offer individuals opportunities to develop their own capacities, i.e. public financed education and the GI Bill, to name only two.
Government also fosters liberty by doing something so obvious that it is little noticed: It insists that certain things cannot be bought and sold. We do not, for example believe that justice in the courts should be bought and sold. We presume that votes and public offices cannot be bought (even if expensive political campaigns raise questions about the depth of our commitment to this proposition). We now accept, though we once did not, that it is wrong for a wealthy person to buy his way out of the draft during a time of war. And, of course, we do not believe that human beings can be bought and sold. (288)
The current vogue for the superiority of markets over government carries the risk of obscuring the basic issue of what should be for sale in the first place. In a society characterized by growing economic inequality, the dangers of making the marketplace the sole arbiter of the basic elements of a decent life are especially large. Doing so could put many of the basics out of the reach of many people who “work hard and play by the rules.” (289)
Discussing Market-oriented Solutions
Supporting market-oriented solutions to problems is not the same as suggesting that the market itself, left to its own devices, will solve all problems. If the government had not given the education vouchers to the GIs, many of them would never have gone to college. The market can break down, recessions can throw people out of work, families can lose their health insurance, and poor people can lack the money to buy food and shelter for their children. The answer to the most rabid free-market advocates is that the free market is a wonderful instrument that also creates problems and leaves others unsolved. To assert as the flat rule, as Representative Armey does, that “the market is rational and government is dumb” is to assume that it is rational to accept problems created by unemployment, low wages, business cycles, pollution and simple human failings; and dumb to use government to try to lessen the human costs associated with them. Mr. Armey might believe that: most Americans do not. (290-1)
Noting Difference
The difference between this era’s conservatives and the American Progressive tradition lies in the distinction between two phrases, “freedom from” and “freedom to.” Free market conservatives are very much alive to the importance of what the philosopher Isaiah Berlin called “negative liberty,” defined as freedom from coercion by the state. American progressives and liberals share this concern for negative liberty, which is why they accept with the conservatives the need for limited government.
THE EXACHANGE@IPR
http://iowapublicradio.org/news/the-exchange/
Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry recently led a day of prayer and fasting at a rally in Texas. A similar event is planned next month at a Cedar Rapids church. Is this an appropriate mix of politics and religion? How should faith inform our politics? Host Ben Kieffer talks with the Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance in Washington, D.C. He’s in Iowa this week to talk about the relationship between religion and politics.
Historically, however, Progressives have been more alive to the promise of “positive liberty” and to free government’s capacity for promoting it. To be the master of one’s own fate—a fair definition of liberty—means not simply being free from overt coercion (though that is a precondition); it also involves being given the means to overcome various external forces that impinge on freedom of choice and self-sufficiency. It means being free to set one’s course. (291)
DEMOCRACY~ MORE THAN ELECTIONS
Dionne writes that democracy is, in the end, more than just periodic elections and the formation of shifting majorities. The United States has always embodied a stronger view that saw democracy, as John Dewey did, as “a way of life.” It was a way of life in which citizens constantly learned from one another—in their own arguments and discussions in the taverns and the churches, and not just from someone else’s talk on television or radio, [as well as the Occupation Movement.]
Alaskan Winter Doesn't Freeze Protesters' Resolve
by Dan Bross
November 27, 2011
Listen to the Story
http://www.npr.org/2011/11/27/142815003/alaskan-winter-doesnt-freeze-protesters-resolve
"A tent sitting there with a woodstove in it, to me, certainly looks like camping," says Fairbanks Mayor Luke Hopkins.
November 27, 2011 from KUAC
The frigid air needles exposed flesh and sinks through clothing, but that hasn't kept at least one protester from occupying a park in Fairbanks, Alaska, for more than a month. The temperature has been 30 to 40 degrees below zero in recent weeks.
This time of year, the days are short. It's dim, bleak and other-worldly in the nation's northernmost Occupy protest. While local officials want the protesters' tents taken down, occupiers say the shelter is necessary in such cold weather. http://www.npr.org/2011/11/27/142815003/alaskan-winter-doesnt-freeze-protesters-resolve
Democracy requires citizens who respect one another as equal under the law and as civic equals in a deeper moral sense. Democracy entails the belief that citizens, through common action, can improve their own lot and their society, and create new means of practical cooperation. In a functioning democracy, problems are not simply argued about, but solved.
At the national level, it’s easy enough to list some minimal steps that need to be taken to rebuild popular confidence in government. These include serious reforms in the way campaigns are financed, to decrease money’s role in the political process, as well as stricter limits on what lobbyists can give to legislators and greater openness about how the lobbying works. Many in the Anxious Middle rightly complain about the influence of special interests on Washington.
The battles over health care, environmental regulation, taxation and legal reform all show that the interests who finance political campaigns can win large and unfair advantages in shaping legislation, and also in blocking it. Ultimately, political reform—particularly in the financing of campaigns—is the precondition of all other serious reform. But private institutions and individual politicians also need to act. We’ve already seen how the modern media shape the public debate. Television, radio, newspapers [now the internet] must find better ways of drawing citizens into the political argument. Ultimately, democracy will always come “from below,” from communities themselves taking responsibility for themselves. If America is to experience a rebirth of its civic culture and democratic values, it will occur because citizens decide to create their own civic space and force onto the political system seriousness and civility it now lacks. (310-11)
This does, indeed, include talk radio, which is creating opportunities for citizens to make their voices heard. But it must also include an effort by mainstream journalism to highlight the importance of the democratic debate and to draw more citizens into it. Above all, those media that have traditionally been serious about reporting and commenting on politics and government cannot use the public’s current dismay with politics as an excuse to abandon their responsibilities to give serious coverage to the democratic enterprise.
THE FUTILITY OF POLITICS
Dionne writes that this century, far from proving the futility of politics, is a history of the triumph of democratic politics. At the end of the [20th] century, the central problem confronting the democracies is not excessive government or a lack of economic and technical inventiveness, but a decay in the sort of social and political inventiveness and organization that gave power to ordinary citizens, shaped the economy into an engine of mass prosperity and strengthened democracy.
The overriding need in the United States and throughout the democratic world is for a new engagement with democratic reform, the political engine that made the industrial era as successful as it was. The technologies of the information age will not on their own construct a successful society, any more than industrialism left to itself would have made the world better. The industrial age needed to be recued from those who thought that technology on its own could save the human race.
Now the information age must also be saved from the cyberutopians. Even the most extraordinary break-throughs in technology and the most ingenious applications of the Internet will not save us from social breakdown, crime or injustice. Only politics, which is the art of how we organize ourselves, can even begin to take on such tasks.
Dionne’s final words are, politics and government cannot raise children, write love songs, create computer languages, invent the technology after the microchip or discover a cure for cancer. But politics and government do shape the conditions under which such acts of creativity are made easier or harder, more likely or less likely. Politics has everything to do with building a more just, more civil, more open society. Those who rallied to Progressivism, the cause of those who believe that democratic government has the capacity to improve society, always understood this. Their time has come again.
The State of the American Dream
rights reserved. " width="485" height="265"> Flickr user edueca. Some < ahref="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23596424@N00/with/3655826734/" mce_href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/23596424@N00/with/3655826734/">rights reserved.
Political gridlock and economic anxiety have taken their toll on American optimism. Different perspectives on what the American Dream means today.
Political gridlock and economic anxiety have taken their toll on American optimism. Different perspectives on what the American Dream means today.
Guests
senior fellow, The Brookings Institution, columnist, Washington Post and author of "Souled Out: Reclaiming Faith and Politics After the Religious Right" and of "Stand Up Fight Back."
Director of the Jefferson Institute's Patchwork Nation project and online correspondent for the PBS NewsHour; author of "Our Patchwork Nation."
founder, and president of the Bernard Center for Women, Politics & Public Policy and an MSNBC political analyst.




Download 
Salon.com
Comments