Sexism Damages Children, Men, and Women

Mary Wollstonecraft

Mary Wollstonecraft
Bio
Private message me at Redstocking Grandma rather than Mary Wollstonecraft. i will not be checking the MW inbox as regularly. You can also email redstockinggrandma45@gmail.com I encourage you to post on sexism at MW and link to the post on your own blog. Most people prefer to identify themselves, but you can be an anonymous MW.

NOVEMBER 17, 2009 6:31PM

Are Children, Elders, and the Poor Better Off?

Rate: 6 Flag
When I was an active young feminist in the late 60s and early 70s, the upper middle class nature of New  York feminism was profoundly disturbing. Only a tiny minority of women could afford to become doctors, lawyers, college professors, corporate executives. The needs of  women of color  were ignored.
African American women had always worked and taken care of their children. They were more dubious about abortion, since the babies of teen mothers were often cared for by relatives.
 
Unlike many women with my intellect and education, I stayed home with my four children full-time for 15 years and part-time until the youngest was in high school. I also care for my mother in my home 24/7  during the last four years of my life.  Both my husbands made career and financial sacrifices to make that possible.
 
I involved myself in nonsexist childrearing, childbirth education, breastfeeding counseling, parent education, toddler playgroups, babysitting cooperatives, cooperative nursery schools, school libraries, a campaign to save the local public library, the nuclear freeze movement, mental illness support and advocacy, parent advocacy for playground upkeep and a preschool playroom, the War Resisters League, Pax Christi (Catholic anti-war group)--the list is endless. When I made the mistake of attending library school and social work school, I naively assumed my qualifications would be obvious and no one would dare to treat me like a beginner. Instead, I was given the  the salary, benefits, authority, and respect of a beginner and the responsibilities of a long-term employee. Several bosses seemed threatened I was their jobs. .

I recall one infuriating incident during my first social work placement; my childless supervisor earnestly instructed me how to interview a client with her two year old present. I had frequently run La Leche Meetings with 20 moms and 30 babies and toddlers. Women social workers who had taken very short maternity leaves and worked full-time during their children's childhood too often acted like all my knowledge and wisdom had been attained by cheating. I got more respect from male professors.
 
The situation has worsened; women are terrified of taking only a few years off from work. And yet the men who fought World War II left their jobs for several years and did not suffer economic consequences. The government even paid for their college and grad school education.

When my mom went back to college in 1963 and work in 1968, after having raised 6 children, she was accorded more respect and her experience was more honored than mine was 20 years later Full-time childrearing is frequently belittled as beneath the time and attention of intelligent, well-educated parents, who presumably should have exploited immigrant women of color to love and understand their children while they pursued their more important jobs.

In the 70s parents were going to have flexible work schedules so both could raise their children. Instead , in New York City both  child care and elder care are lovingly performed by women of color, mostly immigrants, some with irregular  immigation status..  When I take care of my grandson in the  same New York City playgrounds where his mother frolicked,. my companions are mostly nannies from all over the world. An older white woman with a toddler is assumed to be his grandma, not his nanny. I am often appalled how little highly successful two-career couples pay their nannies; many fail to provide the caregivers with any benefits, Social Security, least of all health care. They think nothing of calling the nanny on Sunday and telling her they don't need her that week or forever..  As one dedicated women from the Dominican Republic told me, "the more I love the children, the more it hurts my heart." Imagine loving a child as your own for three or four years and then never seeing them again when they go to school full-time or the family finds a cheaper nanny.
 
The aides who helped us take care of my mother during the last years of her life had tragic stories. We paid the agencies about $18 an hour (2001-04); the aides got less than half of that. Most did not  have cars and might have to take two buses and a subway to reach their client's homes.  Many had left their children in the Caribbean with their families.

I agree that most women with college degrees, graduate, or professional degrees have made enormous strides in most major professions and in the workplace generally. It is only when women have children or have to care for aging parents that they fully realize that women have mostly gained the right to follow the traditional male life style, emphasizing work over relationships, caregiving, community activism.. As women chose to have children at an older  age, the realization is late in coming. At that point their lives tend too become too frenzied and exhausting to leave any time for political activism.  Nothing has changed to make full-time or even part-time child care by fathers more financially possible.
 
My four well-educated, successful daughters are only having their consciousness raised as they begin to have children. Before they became mothers, they believed feminism had won its battles. You might make over $100,000 a year, but you might still have to pump breastmilk for your infant in the toilet  One daughter was told she could not store her pumped milk in a company refrigerator  for a day because it was a biohazard. If you work at Walmart's or a department store,  you won't be able to nurse at all, no matter how vehemently your doctor argues that breastfeeding is best for your babies.
 
Look at my blog title. A nonviolent revolution as sweeping as the civil rights movement is required to make the US a child-friendly, family-friendly, elder-friendly, human being-friendly society. Join me. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
why do you blame feminism for this?

i think you have described the reality that still exists well, but i don't think things were better before feminism. i don't think it would be better for me to have not had the opportunity to go to college and work. since i wound up putting my husband through school, i don't think it would have been better for him either.

i am 32. i spend a lot of time with the raging grannies, a group of activists in their 60s and beyond. and i am struck by the way they eschew typical "women's activism". i can't get them to go to a food bank with me because they want to lead chants about gay rights and get arrested. in a way, that's awesome. in another way, it kind of means that they have chosen not to apply themselves to charities that used to benefit from their volunteerism and in turn benefited the elderly and the poor.

i feel very lucky that at least i notice this choice. i know a lot of women my age who consider it a failing to stay home with the kids, and that is still not fair to individual women who want that role and value it. feminism is not yet done so long as we second-guess our choices (and those of other women) simply because we are women. i don't think men do this. i worry about poverty and women, but i won't sacrifice other women's futures in service to those causes.

and i fear that's exactly what this kind of thinking implies.

also, there are more stay at home dads nationwide than there were. it still isn't that many, but i think your perception might not be accurate. i'm not trying to bust you, i just hope this makes you a little more hopeful.
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/006794.html
I think that the way we have applied feminism, by choosing to ignore the need for caregivers in society, can be seen as having hurt many people. I don't wish for the days when I wouldn't have had a choice in the role I played in my marriage, but I also never expected to be the sole breadwinner, unable to find the time to consider parenting. Sometimes I think we have taken ourselves out of one box, only to end up in another. How do we open the box, and allow ourselves to be exactly what we want to be?
From a male prospective I think the biggest problem was not the movement but the way men tried to irrationally discredit it. They knew that women had them by the balls and went to great lengths to discourage any thoughts in the children, their wives and elders. In other words that male ego shit was being threatened. Some women do take extreme measures that not only hurts the cause but also has a confusing effect especially on children. My wife's first husband was an alcoholic, he fathered her two boys, she worked two part-time jobs and took seven years to finish her nursing degree on her own and house, feed, educate, her children. Both young men are college graduates and have done well, and will be the first to tell you and be proud of it, there mom made them who they are today. Feminism helped many, and with anything that isn't status quo can hurt too. Is my wife a feminist? Probably, but she is my wife and I love her, nothing is going to change that. ( she's also a 6ft. Redhead) always......older/exasperated
bstrangely,

Your comment made me rethink my post. I did not mean to blame feminism.That so many feminist leaders were well educated, professional women warped the movement. I belonged to Redstockings, a radical feminist group in Manhattan. Many of the leaders were militant lesbians who made happily married women feel defensive. I often was accused of false consciousness. None of the leaders I knew had children. Sometimes a woman would discuss her two year old son as if he were the enemy.