McGarrett50

McGarrett50
Birthday
July 05
Bio
I'm nobody important and there's nothing uniquely interesting about me. My blog is intended as planting a free market, conservative flag on Salon Island. I want to be a bit provocative and will attempt to present a counter-counter-culture view. The blog name is based on the idea that the 1960's should not be viewed as only a time when the young pushed change against conservative norms. The 60's were as much represented by law and order shows such as Hawaii Five O. Conservative waves continued through the 80's and into this day. Salon tends to represent the desire to overcome the conservative waves. I will playfully join the debate here to see whether I hit the beach or hit the rocks.

JULY 5, 2009 12:28PM

I'm Dead: Give My Children a Celebrity Guardian

Rate: 5 Flag

With the public release of Michael Jackson's Will (Link to PDF), we learn that even in death he has shown a genius that must be respected.

Unbeknownst to Diana Ross, he named her as the guardian of his children if the primary guardian, Jackson's mother, was deceased.  This got me to thinking that maybe all parents should name celebrities as guardians for their children... especially since the potential guardian does not have to be told.  In death, we can make our children's dreams come true.

Now, the first objection is that these celebrities can just simply decline to be guardians.   I think there are multiple strategies here:

  • The children would need to be taught to go on TV and describe how they need to be taken care of.  It would be hard for rich celebrities to publicly refuse to help.  But, some will decline anyway.
  • So, each Will could have a list of potential guardians.  It might be necessary to have the list decline in celebrity power so that the lower-end celebrities might see the guardianship as a way to gain publicity and rebuild their careers.

With the above strategy in mind, here is a potential list of celebrities in order of choice:

Jen 

1. Jennifer Aniston - Her ability to decline guardianship should be low given her desire for children and that her arch-enemy, Angelina Jolie, has both adopted and had her own children.  I think she would actually do a good job raising children.

 

Angelina  

2. Angelina Jolie - If Aniston did decline, it would be really hard for Angelina to decline.  She does seem to care about her children.

 

Oprah  

3. Oprah Winfrey -  Oprah might be a popular choice for many and that poses a risk.  She might accept lots of kids and then give them away to audience members on her TV show. 

 

Katie  

4. Katie Holmes - Tom Cruise would likely pressure her to accept the guardianship so that Scientology would have more young recruits to brainwash. 

 

 

Janet

 

 5. Janet Jackson - Given that her own brother invented the concept of celebrity guardianship, it might be hard for her to decline.  She seems kind of normal (at least for a Jackson) so this could turn out OK.  Don't accept substitutes.  No LaToya.

 

 

But, as we get further into the list, it could get quite dicey.

MaryLouise  

6. Mary Louise Parker - She might accept to prove that she is not like Nancy Botwin, the terrible mother she plays on the TV show Weeds.  Or, maybe she really isn't that good of an actress and actually is like Nancy Botwin.  You're taking a chance.

 

Paula  

7. Paula Abdul - One thing is for sure.  Your children would get a lot of praise and encouragement.  They would also probably learn some dance steps.  Rational thought and coherent speaking?  Not so much.

 

Courtney

 

8. Courtney Love - She has a daughter who has not had any public problems to speak of.  However, Courtney lost custody for a while due to heroin addiction.  Do you judge her on results or methods?

 

Britney  

9. Britney Spears - She can't have parental rights to her own children so she might as well have yours.

 

 

Dennis  

10. Dennis Rodman - Couldn't you just picture him saying goo-goo-ga-ga to your orphaned baby?  No?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beyond the Entertainment World

There are choices besides entertainment celebrities.  Political celebrities could fit the bill.  However, few politicians are truly celebrities.  So, the quality drops off quicker.

1. Michelle Obama - Your kids would be raised well.  You just need to keep a stipulation in your will about second hand smoke.

Michelle Barack

 

Sarah  

2. Sarah Palin - You can probably rest assured that your genes will get passed on through your children... maybe even quicker than you think.  With her recent resignation, she probably will have more time for kids.

 

Carla 

3. Carla Bruni - See how quickly this drops off.  I don't even have a good joke for this.  On second thought, she's got really beautiful eyes.  Maybe she should be number 1.  This picking guardian stuff is hard.

 

Hugo  

4. Hugo Chavez - It's not exactly the same as being raised French but your kids probably would get to wear berets.  In spite of his attempt in this picture, his eyes are nowhere near as beautiful as Carla's.

 

 

 Ahmadinejad

5. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - It was a tough call picking Ahmadinejad over Kim Jong-Il.  But, don't you just love the twinkle in his eyes in this picture.  Your babies could sleep under mobiles with nuclear missiles hanging from them.

 

 

In Conclusion

Most celebrities are probably not the best parents.  So, before you should select one as a potential guardian, you should ask yourself, "How bad of a parent am I?"  If you can honestly say that the celebrity can't do much worse than you already are, then go for it.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This is kind of an homage to Con Chapman who regularly posts humor pieces.
You made your point so well! I'm updating my will today. And my son goes to....Kathy Griffin! [Poor son, she hates kids].
I'll take Mary Louise Parker, please. Good looking--and she keeps pot in the house.
Deb, Kathy Griffin is probably a good sixth or seventh choice. She is definitely better than the "ney" twins Court and Brit.

Con, yes, like I said, Mary-Louise could be a big winner for your kids... or maybe not. You takes your chances.
And speaking of poor Diana Ross, just picture this, if you will . . .

You just turned 65 in March, which makes you not necessarily old, but certainly somewhat "oldish" (I can say that since I just turned 62 and am verging on oldishness myself). You've worked your butt off since you were a teenager to make your name and your fortune. You've already raised five daughters and are finally feeling like your work, parenting-wise, is done and you can now sit back and bask in the glow of your efforts. You're done, done, done with that role in your life, although it might be nice to play doting grandma to your daughters' offspring, eventually.

Out of the blue, you find out that you have been designated as the parent-to-be of three very young kids who are of dubious/unknown parentage and who have been raised in one of the most dysfunctional families of all time, and who now may be deposited on YOUR doorstep, emotional/legal baggage and all!

Don't you think that she just might be thinking "oh, shit!" or something along those lines?
Yes, Diana Ross probably was not looking to enlist as Queen Bee of the Prince Michael triplets. But, worse that Ross being 65, Katherine Jackson is 80. I think she needs to get her will updated pronto so she can designate who should be guardian in case her health doesn't hold up.
Hahahaha - very enteratining. :)
I think you are on to something here. I see a franchise opportunity for this also. This can spin off into an enterprise.
What a great idea! I am reworking my will as we speak to give my kids to Madonna. This way Madonna will be ahead of Angelina AND they will be tucked in by Dennis Rodman.
Of course, since they are 27-31 I guess they may have some say in all this.
Tim, your adult children may in fact be intrigued by the idea of having Madonna "baby them." :-)
Hilarious. Highly rated.