Michael Fox

Michael Fox
Location
Orange County, California, USA
Company
Fox Barker Communications
Bio
Michael Fox has a J.D. from the University of Wisconsin Law School and an M.F.A. and Ph.D. from the University of California, Irvine. He is a partner in Fox Barker Communications, which provides expert public relations, media and communications support to progressive candidates and causes. His legal career has included clerking for the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, working for the National Labor Relations Board and the United Steelworkers Union, and arguing numerous cases before federal and state appellate courts. He has also published works on Shakespeare, Samuel Beckett, and French avant garde drama, taught acting, drama and literature, and directed more than 50 plays. He is Artistic Director of Moving Target Theatre and has received an AFL-CIO Award for Meritorious Service for Commitment to Human Rights. He is also a member of the Executive Board of the Democratic Party of California. Michael is married and has one son, one dog, two cats, and five guitars. He is currently directing the play "In Darfur" by Winter Miller.

Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 29, 2008 12:26AM

Sarah Palin's Jewish Problem

Rate: 9 Flag
David Brickner, the leader of Jews for Jesus, was invited to speak last month to the faithful at the Wasilla Bible Church, Sarah Palin's fundamentalist congregation.

In his talk at Wasilla on August 17, 2008, with Palin in the audience, Brickner described terrorist attacks on Israelis as God's "judgment of unbelief" on Jews who have not converted to Christianity.

"Judgment is very real and we see it played out on the pages of the newspapers and on the television," Brickner said. "It's very real. When [my son] was in Jerusalem he was there to witness some of that judgment, some of that conflict, when a Palestinian from East Jerusalem took a bulldozer and went plowing through a score of cars, killing numbers of people. Judgment — you can't miss it."

In his Hebrew-laced sermon, Brickner also told the congregation that "Israel is an example of what all humanity has been saying to God since the beginning of time, shaking its fists at the heavens and saying 'You'll not rule over us'."

At the conclusion of Brickner's sermon, the congregation contributed money for Jews for Jesus' mission of converting the Jews and and prayed that Jews would come to accept Jesus.

Brickner, who was not born Jewish, has lead Jews for Jesus since 1996.

Here is a link to the text of Brickner's sermon from the church's website, where you can also hear the audio of his talk.

UPDATE #1:

John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin as his vice presidential candidate has already cost him the vote of at least one prominent Jewish politician -- former New York City Mayor Ed Koch.

Koch, who endorsed George W. Bush in 2004, said that McCain's choice of Palin has led him to endorse Barack Obama.

"She's scary," Koch said.

UPDATE #2:

See Palin's New Jewish Problem: Paster Says Take Banks from Jews

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I'm overloading on all the Palin scandal, but this one is more serious than most (with the exception of SecessionistGate). Very interesting.

Guess she's the opposite of Joe Lieberman.
Did Sally Swift see this? She was in Israel when the bulldozer attack too place. Somehow I think she is not of like mind as Mr. Brickner.

Appalling.
I completely agree that this man's presentation was offensive, and it would have said something positive to me if Sarah Palin and her family had walked out. However, I'm not sure that this meets the level of "scandal," because he's not the regular pastor and she hasn't made any statements saying she supports him (and he hasn't, to my knowledge, endorsed her). I think a simple "yes, we were there, but no, we don't agree" from Palin would wrap this up.
I doubt that Palin would want to distance herself publically from David Brickner and Jews for Jesus. It appears that the McCain campaign has made a tactical decision that pandering to the fundamentalist "base" of the Republican Party is more important than appealing to Republican moderates or Obama-wary Jews in Florida and elsewhere.
Let's add another car to the train wreck that is the Palin nomination....good catch.

- es
I am--momentarily--speechless. Almost. Not any more. Jews for Jesus??? Bulldozers for Judgement???

Here's how serious this is: I totally agree with Madame Bitch.
Michael, you're right, I was thinking too much as a Democrat.
gosh, what a weird waste of cyberspace. it reminds me of tim leary mentioning how amazed ginsberg and alpert were about finding a happy gentile.
Somebody must have forgot to inform Mr. Brickner that Jesus is Love.
As a former fundamentalist (from very many years ago) I can testify that the sheer volume of wacky and controversial statements spoken in these churches is amazing. A reporter could camp out for a week in Sarah Palin's church and come away with a book's worth of material. These places make Reverend Wright seem quite reserved.

Certainly one cannot assume that Sarah Palin agrees with everything said in the church. But the problem is that we don't know what she agrees with and what she doesn't. The only way to find out is to ask. But this leads to endless questions and speculations and explanations. Frankly, if these church issues gain traction, I don't see how she's going to have time to campaign, because most of her time will be spent dealing with this stuff.

Fundamentalist churches are divided over the issue of the Jews. In fact, this is an issue that goes back to the very origins of Christianity. Today there are two extreme-- but common -- positions. The first is that God specifically punishes Jews for their rejection of Jesus through the Holocaust, terrorist attacks, etc. The second is that Jews are God's chosen people, living on land that God reserved for them, and that therefore Christians have an obligation to support them. And speaking of foreign policy, the second position in particular has many foreign policy implications. McCain rejected Rev. Hagee's endorsement, but he may have a running mate who agrees with some of Hagee's theology. Time for the press to ask more questions.
Time for Palin to do what Obama did and separate herself from the church. I don't think she will however. She appears too unwavering in her convictions which honestly scares me.
Thanks for the comment, Mishima. I think that the more common position among evangelicals -- including Jews for Jesus -- is both that the Jews are punished by God for their rejection of Jesus and also that they are the Chosen People of Israel with a special role in the world's salvation. That's why preachers like Brickner and Hagee can say, and believe, that they love the Jews while also saying that God has, and will continue to, punish them for their obstinate refusal to accept Christ as their savior.
This makes one realize how normal Reverend Jeremiah Wright is. Not mainstream because mainstream Christianity is captive to the culture of consumerism.
Most Fundies believe in the End Times, the Rapture when they will be raised to Heaven to watch the great final battle where the Jews will convert or be slaughtered. Before any of this happens certain things have to pass. One of these involves Israel's occupation of the rest of its "biblical lands" (most of the Middle East), and the rebuilding of the Third Temple on the site now occupied by the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosques.

By the way the "rapture index stands at 161 down somewhat from its all time high.

There's a bumper sticker I see now an then that says;
"Caution, driver may disappear at any moment."
While I'm no fan of what was said - and no fan of Jews for Jesus, I gotta say, this doesn't really merit too much looking into. It's basically almost the exact same thing that happened to Obama with Jeremiah Wright, which was also, in my opinion, a complete non-issue. These are words that were spoken by someone else, not her - just like those were words spoken by Jeremiah Wright, not Obama. They may have been there when they were said, but that doesn't mean they agree with them.

Plus, this is pretty standard fundie speak. You can find stuff like this all over the right. After all, who can forget this one - http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/22/mccain-rejects-hagee-backing-as-nazi-remarks-surface/?hp
Jews for Jesus are a fraud. It is intellectually dishonest to portray Jesus as anything what so ever to do with Judaism. 'Jesus' is an invention of the 3rd century. Invented to give Europe a monotheistic rather than pagan religion, though its pagan origins are clearly evident...virgin birth and resurrection etc.
"It is intellectually dishonest to portray Jesus as anything what so ever to do with Judaism."

Taking things a little far, aren't we? :)
My nom de plume requires I support fivish. Events that took place over two thousand years ago when human existence was fundamentally different from today implies that the 'Truth' regarding the origins of Christianity will always be open to debate - and reinterpretation. My reasonable side, however, finds that bringing these sorts of things up at cocktail parties tends to put a damper on the evening.

I cannot agree more with Mishma666, regarding the sort of crazy that probably gets said in that church of hers on a weekly basis.

The fact that the leader of Jews 4 JC was not born into the Jewish fate is awful.
Statements like "Jesus is an invention" might explain why southern democrats like myself, are an endangered species. I see intolerance is not just a virtue of right wing christian fanatics.
Important questions are
1) how long will we wait for Palin to publicly and explicitly distance herself from these clearly anti-semitic remarks?
2) aside from being anti-semitic doesn't it also happen to be insane to believe that the 9-11 attacks were God's retribution for anything, especially against one demographic group?
3) sarah palin has herself explained away the US invasiion of Iraq and the necessity to extend oil drilling/pipelines as expressions of the "will of God". Do we really need a possible President of the USA who basically underwrites each position coming out of the ruling GOP-hardline as "the will of God" or "God whispering in his ear" (GW Bush on Iraq invasion)? Isn't that just admitting it's beyond reason and the politician doesn't need to explain it further?
Palin disavowed Brickner not long after he was at her church.

http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?p=35251261&posted=1#post35251261
I’m a Jewish believer in Jesus. Most blogs and news services have posted the same one paragraph of the six-page transcript of David Brickner’s message, giving the false impression that he is saying that a bulldozer attack by a deranged Palestinian is God’s judgment on the Jewish people. I'm glad you posted the link to Brickner's sermon, so that readers can see Brickner’s remarks in context. Please also take a look at Mr. Brickner’s comments concerning his message at Wasilla Bible Church at the Jews for Jesus website, http://www.jewsforjesus.org.
I thought god attacked people because of gay Teletubbies. Now it's for not converting to Christianity as well? Will he never let up?
Have you seen this blog and the letter? Very scary. New on this group usually hang out at Racialicious.com, but your info is very comprehensive and up to date!
http://electronicvillage.blogspot.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-and-african-americans-in.html
Mr. Fox:

Sarah Palin may or may not have a Jewish problem, but there is NOTHING in your column that justifies Jewish people not voting for Palin.

What you are doing here is the unfortunate guilt-by-association game. This is the same rationale that leads many people to oppose Barack Obama -- his pastor has said nutty things so Obama must believe those nutty things.

Actually, what you're doing is much worse since the Jews for Jesus guy is a visitor to the church.

Frankly, I would love to see you do some research on Sarah Palin and write a column on HER beliefs. As a Jew, I would love to see if, in fact, she is anti-Semitic. At some point in his political career, George Bush Jr. made what I construe as anti-Semitic comments although he stopped doing it after a minor backlash during his 1994 run for governor of Texas. I have cousins who go ballistic at the mention of Bush's name because of what he said in 1994.

For now, though, I give Palin the benefit of the doubt. And, for the record, I don't accept the premise that she believes what people in her church believe. To me, the evidence against her has to be words out of HER MOUTH.

Sorry for giving you an assignment. I'm an editor. It's a sickness.

Shalom,
ZWrite
fivish: "Jews for Jesus are a fraud. It is intellectually dishonest to portray Jesus as anything what so ever to do with Judaism..."

I beg your pardon, but with what we know, or think we know, about the historical Jesus EVERYTHING in his life was about Judaism. Jesus was a Jew who preached only (or almost exclusively with a couple of noted exceptions) to Jews. He was born a Jew and died a Jew, This entire other religion was concocted in his name, after he was dead or otherwise departed the scene. As Erich Gruen, Professor of History & Classics, at U.C. Berkeley said: “Christianity may have been possible without Jesus; it certainly would not have been possible without Paul.” Those are the historic facts as clearly as we can know them.

There are very many reasons that Sarah Palin is unqualified for national office; the unpleasantness of her toxic religious fanaticism is just another fragment in that ugly mosaic.

Sarah Palin's judgement is obviously defective. Lack of sensitivity of the magnitude that allowed these repulsive opinions to be preached in her presence, reflects on John McCain's judgment. If he didn't know about her unfitness, he's incompetent; if he did consider Palin's defects, John McCain placed a big bet on the ignorance, bigotry and gullibility of the American voter to fall for her charisma. McCain went all-in on Sarah Palin, we'll soon know how his wager pays off.
As far as the "Rapture" goes I find it horrifying that people who truly believe this will occur are allowed to opeerate motor vehicles, fly Planes, drive school busses, etc. Do these folks who claim to believe in the sanctity of all human life find the position of dissappearing while in control of these vehicles a responsible method for being a good steward of life?