Arran's Alley

Mick Arran

Mick Arran
Location
Savannah, Georgia, USA
Bio
I've done everything from recycling to teaching in a pre-school. Most recently I was for 10 years an acting and theater teacher as well as a pallet builder. I read a lot and I'm an old man who remembers the distant past with somewhat more clarity than this morning's breakfast. I've been blogging for a decade and I don't do "light". If you're looking for recipes, self-promoting displays of items made for sale, titillating stories about how I was a pimp for an afternoon, or the beauties of toasters, you've come to the wrong place. Check the Front Page.

JUNE 29, 2009 8:32PM

Corporate Greed and Denial of Reality Threaten Us All

Rate: 7 Flag

If nothing else, it is becoming painfully obvious that the major players responsible for the economic debacle, the health insurance scam, the looming environmental disaster, and all the rest of the corporate agenda of the last 8 years have no intention of doing a damn thing different than they have been, and no apparent belief that anyone can make them.

The Mortgage Players

After years of successfully gaming the system to make themselves rich and impoverish the planet to do it if necessary, the corporations holding the paper on millions of failed mortgages are deliberately making it as hard as they can for those mortgages to be recast in a sensible, payable way.

Somewhere on earth, there must be a more difficult task than this: persuading American mortgage companies to lower payments for homeowners who can no longer afford their loans. But as Karina Montenegro struggles to accomplish this feat for a troubled borrower, she strains to imagine a more futile pursuit.

Ms. Montenegro, an intern at a local company that seeks loan modifications, dials Washington Mutual to check on the status of an application for a homeowner whose income has plummeted. She endures a Muzak-scored purgatory while on hold. Syrupy-voiced customer service representatives chide her for landing in the wrong department. She learns that the documents her company sent in have simply vanished — for the third time since November.

“I don’t know what happened,” says a customer service officer who identifies himself as Chris. “I don’t know if there was a glitch in the system, whether it was transferred from one call center to the other.”

(emphasis added)

Of course he doesn't. He doesn't know a damn thing, He just works there.

The reasons are simple. Obama's plan "offers mortgage companies $1,000 for each loan they agree to modify, then another $1,000 a year for up to three years." It's chickenfeed to what they think they can get if they hold out. And if the mortgages nevertheless go sour, they've got control of all that property for when the market recovers and prices again go up.

Wall Street's confidence has been immeasurably enhanced by Obama's bail-outs. They no longer believe there's anything to worry about. They have chosen to believe that despite nearly 10% unemployment and a cadre of Damoclean swords hanging over every industry from the auto makers to the banksters themselves, everything's going to be just fine and the party will be on again any day now. Besides, they're getting paid from both ends just for running the process. Viz:

Two days in Los Angeles — where a loan modification company allowed a reporter to listen as its agents contacted mortgage servicers provided the firm not be named — starkly illustrated the problems.

The company charges homeowners $3,000, typically upfront, as it seeks to persuade lenders to rewrite loan documents so as to lower monthly payments.

So they charge a broke homeowner trying to keep their house $3 grand upfront and collect another grand a year from the govt and they still don't have to moderate their terms. It is, iow, business as usual: take everybody for a ride for as long as you can and rake as much as you can off the top while you're doing it.

They ain't going to change until we make them change.

The Health Insurance Corpo Fraud

The NYT ed board is on the Congress' back today to put some teeth into the regulations governing insurance companies since they are patently not going to do it themselves.

A House oversight subcommittee took a close look at a particularly shameful practice known as “rescission,” in which insurance companies cancel coverage for some sick policyholders rather than pay an expensive claim. The companies contend that rescissions are rare. But Congressional investigators found that three big insurers canceled about 20,000 individual policies over a five-year period — allowing them to avoid paying more than $300 million in medical claims.

The companies typically argue that the policyholders withheld information about pre-existing conditions that would have disqualified them from coverage. But the subcommittee unearthed cases where the pre-existing conditions were trivial, or unrelated to the claim, or not known to the patient. When executives for the three companies were asked if they would be willing to limit rescissions to cases where the policyholder deliberately lied on an application form, all said they would not. This tactic will not be ended voluntarily.

No and neither will any of the other frauds they practice regularly. They sat in front of Ciongress, got grilled by the House and toasted to a golden brown by the press and still had the balls to insist they were going to go right on perpetrating fraud, practically daring the Congress to do anything about it but sputter and shake.

Now that's an industry that is confident it owns the playing field. And the players. They're so sure we can't stop them breaking any fucking law they want that they're telling us to our faces to get bent.

They ain't going to change until we make them change.

Environmental Disaster Deniers

Paul Krugman writes a sizzling column today, pulling very few punches about the holocaust global-warming deniers who got up in Congress last week and told everyone that science is shit because they don't like what it's telling them.

[A]s I watched the deniers make their arguments, I couldn’t help thinking that I was watching a form of treason — treason against the planet.

To fully appreciate the irresponsibility and immorality of climate-change denial, you need to know about the grim turn taken by the latest climate research.

The fact is that the planet is changing faster than even pessimists expected: ice caps are shrinking, arid zones spreading, at a terrifying rate. And according to a number of recent studies, catastrophe — a rise in temperature so large as to be almost unthinkable — can no longer be considered a mere possibility. It is, instead, the most likely outcome if we continue along our present course.

***

[I]f you watched the debate on Friday, you didn’t see people who’ve thought hard about a crucial issue, and are trying to do the right thing. What you saw, instead, were people who show no sign of being interested in the truth. They don’t like the political and policy implications of climate change, so they’ve decided not to believe in it — and they’ll grab any argument, no matter how disreputable, that feeds their denial.

Indeed, if there was a defining moment in Friday’s debate, it was the declaration by Representative Paul Broun of Georgia that climate change is nothing but a “hoax” that has been “perpetrated out of the scientific community.” I’d call this a crazy conspiracy theory, but doing so would actually be unfair to crazy conspiracy theorists.

The corporate apologists, puppets, tail-waggers and ass-kissers in Congress are prepared to risk the life of the planet if it means more $$$ in the pockets of the Masters of the Universe. The combination of unchecked greed bolstered by a denial of uncomfortable realities so complete that they can ignore the fact that half the polar ice cap is gone is so dangerous to our welfare as a species that it is almost incomprehensible. 

Yet there they stood, arrogant, blind, and stoopid, loudly decrying the evidence of their lying eyes.

They ain't going to change until we make them change.

Will we?

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
We don't need a March on Washington, we need a March on Wall Street.
Hi Mick,

I liked this as I like a lot of your work. So I did the reddit and digg thing.
I'm glad to have discovered another curmudgeon like myself. i am now about to go through your back catalogue.
We don't need a March at all.

I've been preaching to everyone within earshot for years now that we need to hit the insurance companies where it hurts: the wallet. Stop paying. Just stop. Stop, stop, stop.

As of August 1st, not one health insurance company gets one red cent from me, because I won't bow to extortion and that's precisely what it is. I am completely flabbergasted as to why they haven't been charged under racketeering laws at the VERY least. They ought to be hauled up on treason and first-degree murder charges.

Could you imagine what the effect would be if everyone just closed their wallets and said "No more"? Everybody? What the hell could they do about it? Critical mass. How long would it take to wipe them out financially the way they've wiped out so many of our fellow human beings lives?

There's a key there, if we could just get enough people to realize they don't have coverage anyway. I'm so sick of dreaming about it.
Monkey fingered. Politics subreddit.
Mick is, as usual, entirely correct that the corporate elite and their puppets in government won't change until we make them change. The question is, how do we do that? Marches and boycotts are all very well, but only as a supplementary tactic.

The only method for effectuating change that REALLY works, per the lessons of history, is concerted labor actions - strikes, picket lines, workplace occupations, etc. That's how we got the 8-hour day, the 40-hour week, and all the other benefits won by workers during the first half of the 20th century. That is the only way we can hope to get anything now.

Rent strikes work too. I'd suggest a mortgage strike for those who can't get their lender to negotiate in good faith, but it has to be backed up with the power to resist evictions. That, also, can only come from organizing large groups of workers who can be mobilized to defend homeowners when the sheriff arrives.
I think we need renewed unions. Only voice for the average person.
Another incisive post. Of course, they are willing to parlay the future of the planet for their short term gain. That's all they know or desire.

It became evident many years ago what we were doing to the ecosphere and what course we would take. It's not fortune-telling, there's no tarot cards or crystal ball. Just look at our past.

I look at my nephews and nieces, the children of those I know and I wonder about the travails those youngsters will see before it's all said and done.

Stanley Kubrick supplied us with an perfect image of humanity, an icon to fit our reign and departure. Oh, that I could say it's the star child of 2001 floating through the heavens but I'm afraid it's not. It is Slim Whitman riding that atomic bomb to earth in Dr. Strangelove, whooping and waving his cowboy hat, rodeo-style. Climate change might not be nuclear war, but its rooted in the same reckless fascination with toys and heat that did the damage.
So they charge a broke homeowner trying to keep their house $3 grand upfront and collect another grand a year from the govt and they still don't have to moderate their terms. It is, iow, business as usual: take everybody for a ride for as long as you can and rake as much as you can off the top while you're doing it.

Mick, I don't really disagree with your overall point. However, in the above quote, it is the mortgage company or bank that gets the 1k/yr from the Obama plan for each loan modification, not the 3rd party company you reference above that is trying to negotiate the loan modification with the mortgage company or bank. The 3rd party corporation is charging the 3k, one time fee, to the client facing foreclosure and in that particular article if you read farther down, they return the 3k up front fee to the client if they cannot negotiate a loan modification.
Slim Pickens not Slim Whitman!
Tarheel: Thanks for the correction. I read it wrong, I guess, but as you say, it doesn't really change the substance much. As for their claim that they'll pay the money back. I believe that trying to make that actually happen once they've got their hands on the money will run into the same stone wall of delaying tactics and lost paperwork. They take money quick but they make you work like three stevedores when it's their turn to pay up.

Padraig: Great old Irish name. I'm from Boston and even there you don't hear it much any more. And it certainly is Pickens, not Whitman. Big difference.

O: Sometimes I think we need to create a Citizen's or Voter's Union so somebody is represaenting our interests. Pols no longer do it. That's what advocacy groups like PIRG and Fair Share used to be about but 30 years ago people decided the times had changed and we really didn't need them any more. Things started to go downhill right about then. Co-incidence? I don't think so.