
I hate to say it, but President Obama rode my people to victory and then tossed us aside once he got into office. I remember the Democratic Primary when Obama's campaign website touted equal rights for LGBTQI people as one of its top priorities. He spoke avidly against the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and against Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) as unamerican and even promised he would repeal DOMA.
Well the first suit to be filed in Federal courts by a married gay couple from California asking for its marriage to be recognized by other states who have constitutional amendments prohibiting or outlawing same-sex marriage - a direct challenge against DOMA - has been dismissed by the Obama administration. So much for standing behind your campaign promises.
Then again, perhaps this is another crafty political move by Obama. He is known for making deals that appear to screw over his supporters and then turn around and get us exactly what we want in the end. Perhaps the lawsuit was just not properly phrased or challenged the wrong laws and wouldn't stand up in court - or might even set judicial precedent that would end up harming us in the long run? Or, perhaps he's promising to avoid repealing DOMA in exchange for Republican support to pass his Health Care plan? Who knows? But in the mean time, score one for bashing the gays yet another time.
Then there's Don't Ask, Don't Tell - the ridiculous military policy that was Bill Clinton's darkest moment in the white house (if you ask me). You can be gay in the military, just don't tell anyone you're gay and while we're not SUPPOSED to ask you if you're gay, if we happen to find out we'll kick your ass out anyway. How does that make any sense? Well it's the law in the military, and thanks to it, we've lost dozens of Arabic translators who would have been critical in dealing with terrorism.

Then there's Lt. Dan Choi - a gay arabic translator who was recently dismissed under DADT. Pleads and demonstrations across our country to prevent his dismissal fell on our President's deaf ears. Score one for securing the homeland right? Because apparently gays are a greater threat to national security than arabic-speaking terrorists.
Then again if you ask Republican State Representative Sally Kern, she would say:
"Studies show that no society that has totally embraced homosexuality has lasted more than, you know, a few decades. So it’s the death knell of this country. I honestly think it’s the biggest threat our nation has, even more so than terrorism or Islam, which I think is a big threat… If you got cancer or something in your little toe, do you say, well, you know, I’m just going to forget about it because the rest of me is fine? It spreads. OK? And this stuff is deadly, and it’s spreading, and it will destroy our young people, it will destroy this nation.”
If you ask me, ridiculous public policy and laws crafted on old Jewish faery tales are the biggest threat to our country. They spread hate, discrimination, and fear. They craft apartheid political structures and repress good, tax-paying citizens because they don't love according to the rules of the majority.
Obama, shame on you, and shame on your caving to the whims of the majority. Stop trying to be a "make everyone happy" centrist because in the process you're just pissing everyone off.
Oh, and if he manages to botch the National Health Care plan, I'll be writing a nice long article on that one too.


Salon.com
Comments
Who will you vote for in 2012?
As for who I'll vote for in 2012, we'll have to see who is in the field of competitors. I most certainly will not vote for a Republican, that's for sure.
The other thing is that just because the DOJ asked for the case to be dismissed doesn't mean it will. The federal court could decide to hear the case and then rule against DOMA, in which case appeals will take it up to the Supreme Court, eventually.
Regardless of whether he is obligated to defend the law in court or not, it is certainly a kick in the stomach to have him tell us his is going to overturn it, only to balk at the first opportunity. Not the change we all expected, that is for sure!
" As it generally does with existing statutes, the Justice Department is defending the law on the books in court. The president has said he wants to see a legislative repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act because it prevents LGBT couples from being granted equal rights and benefits. However, until Congress passes legislation repealing the law, the administration will continue to defend the statute when it is challenged in the justice system.
Yeah, you see, that's an outright lie. Fortunately for you, and unfortunately for Justice, Joe and I are both lawyers. We suspected this betrayal was coming, so we read up on the law. In fact, George W. Bush (ACLU et al., v. Norman Y. Mineta - "The U.S. Department of Justice has notified Congress that it will not defend a law prohibiting the display of marijuana policy reform ads in public transit systems."), Bill Clinton (Dickerson v. United States - "Because the Miranda decision is of constitutional dimension, Congress may not legislate a contrary rule unless this Court were to overrule Miranda.... Section 3501 cannot constitutionally authorize the admission of a statement that would be excluded under this Court's Miranda cases."), George HW Bush (Metro Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission), and Ronald Reagan (INS v./ Chadha - "Chadha then filed a petition for review of the deportation order in the Court of Appeals, and the INS joined him in arguing that § 244(c)(2) is unconstitutional.") all joined in lawsuits opposing federal laws that they didn't like, laws that they felt were unconstitutional. It is an outright lie to suggest that the DOJ had no choice."
I am still waiting for Obama to pull out that super secret weapon he was going to use after he voted for FISA. The idea that he has some contrary trick up his sleeve is getting old.
This is an excellent post. Rated.