:

  

Monte Canfield

Monte Canfield
Location
Newcomerstown, Ohio, USA
Birthday
December 28
Title
Rev. Dr. Monte Canfield
Bio
Retired Protestant Pastor and Theologian, jointly credentialed in the United Church of Christ and the Moravian Church. Education: BA, MA, M.Div, Thd. Public Service: NY State Office of Executive Development; Federal Exec. Branch: Executive Office of the President, BOB; Interior, BLM; Non Profit: Ford Foundation, Energy Policy Project; Congressional: General Accounting Office; Private industry: Grow Group, Inc.; US Paint; Owner, the Energy Center, St. Louis. Christian service: Pastor, First Congregational UCC, Ottawa, Illinois; Pastor, St. Paul's UCC, Port Washington, Ohio; Pastor, Moravian Church, Gnadenhutten, Ohio.

APRIL 30, 2009 6:08PM

Appearances of the Resurrected Christ, Part One

Rate: 27 Flag
 
Photobucket


This series of Reflections focuses on one of the key elements of Christianity: the Resurrection of the Christ. It is what Easter is really about. Over the next weeks, until Pentecost, we will explore this subject together. 

I know that these Reflections are not short. Understanding faith in depth cannot be a series of sound bites.  I try to write them in such a way that all readers can understand them as a form of their own spiritual reflection, allowing for both thinking about the subject but also allowing time to feel the meanings of faith. 

I hope that those of other faiths, or those who are searching on their spiritual journey, can get value out of learning about one of the central tenets of Christianity.

In this Reflection I would like to accomplish three things.  First, I want to summarize my thoughts on the importance to a Christian of belief that the resurrection is true. 

Second, I would like to share with you some conclusions which I have come to after years of study of the resurrection.  

And, third, I would like to lay the groundwork for understanding the importance of the appearances of the Risen Lord after his resurrection.

First: A Review of the Importance of the Resurrection to the Christian faith.

I would like us to review briefly my Easter Reflection on the resurrection of Jesus, called "Resurrection Faith" because no other part of Christianity is more crucial to the faith.

If, at some point in a Christian's life he or she cannot believe that the resurrection of Jesus is true, then that person's faith is incomplete.  What distinguishes Christianity from all other religions is the truth of this event: the raising by God of Jesus of Nazareth from the grave. [Thanks to Mike Rodgers for giving me reason to clarify this point.]

I know something about trying to skirt around, to rationalize, this issue.  I did it for years; telling myself I really was a good Christian, going through all of the right motions, and all that.  But I really doubted that a resurrection happened. I desperately wanted to believe it, but I couldn't truthfully say that I did. 

And, as I told you, I desperately tried to study my way to that belief; but I couldn't get there that way.  Finally, after much anguish and prayer, literally for years, God gave me the faith to believe.

Having finally, after years of struggle, come to believe in the truth of the resurrection I was able then, after God gave me the faith, to study and to better understand some of the basis of that faith.  It is that understanding that I would like to share with you in this series.

I do this with two goals in mind.  First and foremost, I wish to share it with those Christians who may still be struggling with the truth of the resurrection.  I know the struggle you are going through, because I have been there.  Yet, it seems to me wholly possible that the Holy Spirit can convict you of the truth of this most important event in history, even as I was eventually convinced. 

Secondly, I would like to share with those who believe the truth of the resurrection some of the conclusions I have come to that shore up my own faith.  I do this in the hope that your faith might also be further strengthened.

Second: A summary of my conclusions about the resurrection.

In order for us to intelligently review the appearances of the Risen Lord after the resurrection, I need to lay out some of my basic conclusions upon which the Reflections I am sharing with you about the resurrection appearances are based.  I have come to these conclusions after years of intensive study of this issue.  These are my conclusions which you may or may not decide to make your own.

Each one could be the basis of a seperate Reflection in itself and I believe each to be true; and each conclusion is backed by the Biblical witness. But, for now, in this series, I can only give you the conclusions.

I know that offering these conclusions so starkly opens myself up to considerable argument on any or all of them. I would only ask that you wait, if you can, and see how they play out in the series.

I believe I will answer most of your questions as we go along.  But if you cannot wait just ask away and I will try to elaborate a bit in my replies to your comments. 

First, a conclusion that you already know: that belief in the resurrection of Jesus is a primary necessity of Christianity.  If Christ be not raised, then we are fools.

Second: that the Risen Lord attested to in the Bible is the same Jesus of Nazareth who was crucified, dead and buried.  In other words, that the Risen Lord is not some abstraction, some hope, some ghost, some result of group hysteria, or a vision or a dream; but is, in fact, the person, Jesus of Nazareth.

Third, that there can be no resurrection without death.  That is, that Jesus of Nazareth really died, that nothing was faked, that this was not some resuscitation of a person who was in a coma or deep sleep, or other such nonsense.

Fourth, that death is the total, complete and irreversible sundering of human and divine relationships; not only with the living but also with God.  That is, that Jesus' death was not different than our own, and that it was a complete, absolute, final ending to Jesus' earthly life.
 
Fifth, that resurrection is a pure gift from God, a pure grace, which overcomes even the finality of death.  And nothing, absolutely nothing, that anyone does, beyond having faith,  modifies that grace in any way.  No amount of good living or good works affect any individual's resurrection.

Sixth, that death has absolutely nothing to do with the freeing of an immortal soul from a finite and evil body; the concept that the soul is immortal is a Greek idea and is foreign to the Biblical idea of resurrection.

Seventh, that resurrection has to do with the raising of the entire being who has died.  That is, body and spirit, or "soul," are integrally united in what we call today, the "self" or the "person."  In other words, that an individual, identifiable, discreet, conscious person is raised, not an abstract, ethereal wisp, a mere shade or shadow of the whole person.

Eighth, that the resurrection of Jesus cannot be understood apart from the cross.  That is, that the resurrection apart from the death of Jesus and his atonement is at best a meaningless anomaly, a one-time-only curiosity which holds no useful insight for us.

Ninth, the resurrected body is not "human" as we know it, but rather is, as St. Paul attests, in a way we cannot perceive, "glorified," all the while maintaining the same personal identity it had before death.

Tenth, resurrection in the abstract is meaningless to us.  It is meaningful only as it relates to the specific purposes of God.  Just so, Christ's resurrection would be meaningless to us without the purposes of witnessing to the glory of God and instructing the faithful, through the statements of the resurrected Lord, on the intentions of God for the lives of the faithful.

Eleventh, the primary effect of resurrection is to reestablish relationships: between God and humankind and between humans whose relationships were severed by death.  If God had no interest in reestablishing relationships with us there would have been no need for any resurrection appearances at all.

Twelfth, that relationship with God is meaningful for Christians primarily in the context of the faith community which the Risen Lord established, the Church, and within the context of His instruction to that community to take the Word of God to the entire world. 

And finally, - and this is the most important of all, and also the most difficult to understand, so read this carefully: that the resurrection occurred at the intersection of time, or history, as we know it and eternity. 

As such it is what the Church calls an "eschatological event;" meaning that it is an event signaling the "last days."
 
We are living in a period between the beginning of the last days, signified by the coming of God in Christ, and the culmination of the last days at the second coming of Christ.

We live in what is known in the Church as the "in-between" time; the time of "already" - meaning the breaking in of the Kingdom of God with the coming of Jesus - and "not yet" - meaning the final triumph of the Kingdom of God when Christ comes again.
 
Just as Jesus left eternity and entered the time and space of creation at His conception, so too, after his resurrection and the appearances he left time and space as we know it and returned to eternity. 

That is the main reason we can't "prove" the resurrection.  It was an event that moved beyond history as we know it.  Certain aspects surrounding the resurrection have been made available to our consciousness by God, in particular the appearances of the Risen Lord. 

But, by definition, the very act of resurrection itself lies beyond human understanding. It simply does not fit what we know about how things work.

Third: An introduction to the Resurrection Appearances

I would like to conclude this Reflection by giving a brief introduction to Christian understanding of the appearances of the Risen Lord after his resurrection.  We will discuss the appearances in detail in the following Reflections.   

In my Easter Reflection I told you that there were three basic reasons why people for the first 1800 years or so of Christianity believed the truth of the resurrection. 

First, they believed it because the Bible said it was true. But, since the Enlightenment and the scientific revolution that position has been challenged constantly by those who think that we either have to prove the Bible scientifically or explain a lot of it away. 

You already know that I believe that we cannot prove almost any important aspects of the Bible scientifically and that there is no reason to try to rationalize away key aspects of the faith.

Second, they believed it because witnesses that they trusted said that they saw the Risen Lord, after His crucifixion and burial.  That is, they testified that the Risen Lord, the same Jesus of Nazareth who was crucified, appeared to them after he had died.  

And, third, those same disciples and many others, even to this day, testified, and still testify, that the Risen Lord is alive and active in their own lives, even as I testify to the activity of Christ in my own life. 

 The Christians who make up the Church are living witnesses to the truth of the resurrection.  As the body of Christ, Christians within the Church witness today to the truth of the living Christ working in our daily lives.  In fact, it is our witness that keeps Christianity alive, and provides the hope for generations yet unborn.  Without the witness of his body, the Church, resurrection faith would die within a few generations.
 
I would like to focus in this series particularly on the appearances after Jesus death by the Risen Christ to the disciples and others.  The four gospels, plus Acts and First Corinthians, all attest to these appearances, and they form the basic fabric from which the belief that the resurrection is true is constructed. 

It is these eye witness accounts recorded in the Bible  that most clearly explain the basis of the faith of the original Christian communities.

It is the trust that the communities of faith placed in these witnesses that allows us to believe the stories of the eye witnesses.  In other words, when the Gospel writers write what they do about the appearances, I trust that they, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, are writing truth, not lies or fabrications. 

And, likewise, when  Paul tells me that the Risen Lord appeared to Him on the road to Damascus, and when Luke, in Acts, confirms that event, I trust both Paul and Luke to tell me the truth, and not to lie about it.

And that trust is bolstered by another trust: that the Bible is the inspired witness to the Word of God, Jesus Christ.  In other words, Christians believe that the Bible is the primary revelation of God in Jesus Christ.

The revelation of God in Christ in the Bible is the normative revelation of God to us. Upon its words Christians make decisions about the nature of God and of God's relationship to us. 

When Christians believe that the Bible offers such a revelation of God to us, then Christians not only trust what the witnesses to the Risen Christ say, but also to trust that what they said is truthfully recorded by the biblical writers.

In a few days we will walk together through an overview of the appearances of the Risen Lord, and see if we can discern some fundamental aspects of these appearances.

May God bless you all.

 Monte

 979 page views on 11 03 2009

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Monte, I hope you've thought about publishing your collected essays in book form. Your writing is pristine and organized. You could do for our generation what C.S. Lewis did for his.
I tend to believe that Jesus did live, and was crucified. Death is a condition that even today can be misdiagnosed and this is what I suspect happened here. He was a kind, philosophical man with much to offer. He gave solace to lowest of society and upset the status quo.

The sever dehydration he suffered during the crucifixion undoubtedly caused his blood pressure to drop and his heart rate to become nearly imperceptible, his breathing undetected; add that to the shock he was experiencing and the low tech ways of the times to determine death and you have a case of premature death diagnosis.

A few hundred years ago they were still making mistakes and burying people when they were still technically alive.

I love that he loved the whores and the poor. For that alone he should be honored at Christmas. But, do I think he rose from the truly dead?

No, I don't.
Thanks, Steve. I have been asked to do that by a Christian publishing house but I told them I would see what I could garner together after I worked some of my research into this format. I really don't care if I publish beyond here, but maybe I will try after I get some more of these under my belt. Thanks for thinking that I could.

Monte
Blonde, it is kind of you to come here and comment, regardless of where your spiritual journey has led you. I appreciate you and your honesty. Good friends do not have to agree about everything.

Peace,

Monte
Monte, this is so well written. I agree it should be published elsewhere, as you write with clarity.

It takes great faith to believe in all things the Bible says, and to trust in the written words of others.

I believe there is a God. I believe that in each of us resides a need to believe in something universal, something which unites us as a people. I am not clear on everything, so I look forward to your postings.

Thank you.
I'm with Steve on this, Monte.

You know, no matter what one's belief, one can derive an awful lot of good from reading your work.

Rated
You have beautifully shared the deep meaning the resurrection has for you. Dugg and rated, my friend.
Thanks, Buffy, for reading and commenting. We are all at different places in our spiritual journeys. Some good friends of mine here on OS have decided that they do not need any of the belief systems that I and others believe. That is their decision and I respect it.

I can assure everyone that I am in a far different spiritual place that I was at 10 or 30 or 50. To the extent that my writings can help define what one option is compared to another, then they have served their purpose.

================

Thanks, b1, I appreciate your commenting.

==============

And, Brinna, from someone who writes as well as you do, that is a very kind comment. Much appreciated.

===============

Thanks all,

Monte
What Steve said, plus:

I've been struggling with this for years, and several things fell in to place with this reflection: Christ's resurrection as the intersection of time and eternity, the centrality of belief in the resurrection, and the emptiness of the resurrection without the cross. I look forward to the upcoming reflections.
This is a lot to take in! I am hoping to have some time, over the next few days to contemplate your message. Either way, thank you, Monte, for sharing your faith!
Thanks, Mama Lou, for reading and commenting. I hope the entire series can speak to you.
================
OSW: Take your time reading and contemplating. The post will be here when you have the time. I know how you like to not be pushed by time when you read. Glad you are reading these reflections.

Monte
Can I just say, without sounding too melodramatic, if I were dying I would most like you Monte, to be holding my hand.
As someone who has gravitated from orthodox jewry into a combination of Hindu/Buddhist beliefs, I can only echo what others have said before me, and that is that Your thoughts and humanitarian manner deserve wider exposure than just here.

As a medical/technical/financial/editor, I think Your works need no editing but only submission.
Monte these are things as we get older and bogged down in life that we (I include myself in this group, not inferring anyone else) tend to forget. Your reflections always make me think deeply and give me food for thought during my daily meditation. Thank you for all of your hard work, as always.
Rated
This is a lot to think about -- as always, beautifully and effectively written. There is definitely a book here.

For me, the Resurrection works as a source of hope and an image of what God is. It does not have to be factual to work for me that way, but maybe it is facutal anyhow.

I have trouble with the implication that God saved some kind of special truth just for Christians. I believe that God has many conversations with his/her children.
Let's pray that nothing like that happens to you, blonde, until long after I am gone; but it would be a privilege for me.
========================
Thanks, Mark. Your words are very kind, and much appreciated. I am glad that you are sticking with these reflections and getting something out of them. I am getting a little more exposure to these through Digg and some of the aggregation web sites, but the mostly liberal sites only have a few folks who read religious writings. I guess that being a liberal Christian is a novelty to some, who are so sure that all Christians are fundamentalists.

But OS is kind of my little flock for now, made up of Christians and all kinds of other believers, and non-believers; which is a wonderful experience for me. I figure that exposure to my work will either come or not. That is really mostly out of my control. And I am grateful for those who do read my work.
===============================
Thanks, Blue for your comments. I am glad that these reflections are stirring the memory and offering again to you some of the truth of that "old, old story" that you and I grew up with, but can slip away from us a bit in the busyness of life.
=================

God bless all,

Monte
I am looking very forward to your next posts. Much to take in on this one, and I will be doing so as I walk and pray this afternoon.

Ablonde - your last comment was simply and beautifully expressed.
Thank you, Annette. Much appreciated and am very glad that this post resonated with you. I hope you will like the ones that follow as much.

Blessings,

Monte
Hey, Faith, somehow I missed you in that last go around of replies. Very sorry about that. You write: "I have trouble with the implication that God saved some kind of special truth just for Christians. I believe that God has many conversations with his/her children."

If I understand you right as to your meaning of "special" then I would have trouble with that too, for I believe that God can and does have "conversations" with all of God's children.

Perhaps we could think of that this way: That God had/has "particular" conversations with the Jews, and with Christians and with all of God's children of whatever faith.

Those "particular" conversations are about what it is to be faithful for those of that religious orientation. IE: to be a faithful Christian this is what you believe and what you do. To be a faithful Muslim this is what you believe and what you do, etc.

To the Jews, for example, he gave them the position of being "chosen" not in an "exclusive" sense, not in the sense that they were "special" any more than Christians are "special" and therefore somehow "above" all others, but in being "chosen" for a very particular purpose for those people: to be a blessing for others.

Gen. 12:2 "I will make you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great SO THAT YOU WILL BE A BLESSING." Later, God says of the children of Abram "...in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed."

So their "chosenness" was not for them, per se, but rather they were chosen for a particular task given to them by God. Like Christians, Jews have sometimes lived up to their given task and sometimes not so much. Christians certainly have much to account for over the centuries by abusing what God would have us do.

Christians are "chosen" by God to follow the teachings of Christ, to spread the Good News of the Gospel, and to reach out to others in love. Christians are called to be Christ like in our behavior and to follow the teachings of Jesus. The primary teaching of Jesus is, of course, to love God, ourselves and others, including our enemies.

God bless,

Monte
Thanks, so much, phm. I appreciate that you like my selection in art for these Reflections. Much modern religious art is banal and unimaginative, and I tend to go back toward the old masters, but that is just a conservative streak that rears its head in me now and then. I do love good religious art, and my definition of good is not always what someone else's is.

Monte
Monte, I'm printing this right now and reading it in the morning . . . .my hormones (however you spell that?) are crazy right now and I've been crying at the drop of a hat, most of the day.

Anyhoo, I look forward to reading this tomorrow when I'm not so emotional, I hope.

Pawed, because I KNOW its going to be good.
Thanks, Miko. Take your time and read it when you feel up to it. I know all about those blue days. Let's pray that tomorrow will be better.

Monte
Monte, I appreciate your writing. I trust you so I'm listening.

But, my 88 year old mother is going to be furious that she has to keep the same damned body even in heaven. That poor woman has had so many surgeries and two radical mastectomies and suffers daily from physical issues large and small. She would really like to believe that she can escape it.

So I'm not going to tell her any of this!

xoxo

denese
And the conversation between you Monte and Ablonde made me cry. You're both a gift.

Please tell me about the painting.

denese
Hi, Denese. Thanks for reading and commenting.

I think that somehow I did not get part of my message across to you. I apologize for that. And will try to correct that now.

Please stay with the series because your mother (and you) will be pleased when you get to see this point I made expanded and clarified: "Ninth, the resurrected body is not "human" as we know it, but rather is, as St. Paul attests ...."glorified," all the while maintaining the same personal identity it had before death."

Believe me, I surely don't want the 70 year old body that I now have and I have every reason to believe that I will not. Certainly those who have been torn apart in wars, etc. do not want to get that human body somehow glued together. That is not what the resurrection of the body means. And that will become very clear in later posts in this series.

So, until we get to it, try to think about the "persona," the identifiable whole person, or "self," as what we will be after resurrection. And that "person" will be "glorified," a term mostly used in the Bible to describe the beauty and wonder of God, as in talking about God's "glory."

A glorified person is not going to be 88 and have massive health issues. There will be no health issues. That is certainly one of the benefits of being a glorified person. Pass that on to your Mom. And tell her she can safely read this because nowhere in this post does it say that we keep the worn out bodies that we have when we die.

Monte
Hey again, Denese: I do not know who did the painting. I got it from wordpress on a Christian blog that did not identify the painter.
I think it is a beautiful painting though.

The picture represents a scene in John 20 where the Risen Christ appears to Mary Magdalene and calls her name and she finally recognizes him and calls him "Rabbouni" meaning "teacher." And then he tells her to not "hold on" to him as he has "not yet ascended to the Father." That is one of the puzzling things he says and there is all kind of speculation what exactly that means.

I am not sure that the painting is all that old, but it is certainly in the mode of the masters, isn't it?

Monte
Thanks for being here, Monte. Much love & peace :)
I agree with Steve Blevins as to your work here should be published in some way. One thing that does bother me a bit is this statement:


As I told you then, perhaps too bluntly: if, at some point in a Christian's life he or she cannot believe that the resurrection of Jesus is true, then that person's faith is dead. I would like to find a more kindly way to say that, but so far I haven't found any way to sugar-coat that Gospel truth.

Even Mother Teresa had doubts at times and admitted so publicly. Seems a little harsh to me to say that that persons faith is dead. Dead sounds so permanent. I would rather like to think that faith can also be resurrected.
I'm continuing to read and to learn. I just don't understand one thing, or let's say, here's one thing I don't understand.

Does the return of Christ herald the "End of Days"? If so, should we look forward to them and not fear them as I am always led to believe we should (be endless New Yorker cartoons at the very least!)? I honestly am confused about this conundrum.
Thanks for commenting, SMama and Mike. Much appreciated.
=====================

Mike, it is harsh. You have opened my eyes on this one. I may have better said that a Christian's faith is "incomplete." And, thanks to you, that I will change that statement. But let me give it context.

This idea comes from 1Corinthians15:12 ff. There Paul uses the term "in vain" rather than "dead." He is talking about people who already DO believe the resurrection is true. Paul assumes that a Christian DOES believe that the resurrection is true. (1Cor15:4) Christians are supposed to believe the resurrection is true.

So if they do not believe that then it would be fair to say that their faith is "incomplete." But since the resurrection is one of the key, essential elements of Christianity (See 1Cor15:1-9 and the Apostles Creed, the Nicene Creed, etc.) unless a Christian does believe that essential before he or she dies then that Christian does not have complete faith. "Dead" is a poor choice of words on my part to describe this.

Could a Christian like me, who has doubts now and then, or Mother Teresa, doubt it and then decide again that they do not doubt that particular part of the faith? Yes. That is what I understand that you are saying, and you are correct.

So, thank you for that observation and I will change that statement in the post. You make an important point and many people would hesitate to question me on this and I am glad that you did. I will clarify the statement thanks to you.

I think that your comment provides an important lesson to all of us, and that is that a lay reader can pick up things in a religious document that simply do not sound right and can make comments to so called "experts" like me that are valid.

Thanks very much, Mike.

Monte
DCV: good question, and lots and lots of arguments on the answer.

You ask; "Does the return of Christ herald the "End of Days"? If so, should we look forward to them and not fear them as I am always led to believe we should (be endless New Yorker cartoons at the very least!)? I honestly am confused about this conundrum."

There are infinite squabbles about this issue. Some argue that there will be a period of fighting and suffering before the coming of Christ. Others argue that Christ will come and lead this long period of fighting against the antiChrist and the Devil, etc. And there are fancy theological terms for both ideas and a hundred nuances on each one. Some argue that a chosen very few with be taken up into heaven at a "rapture" when Christ appears and all the rest, including me and thee, are doomed.

The truth is that we do not know exactly what will happen when Christ comes again. I believe that we should have absolutely no reason to fear anything when he comes. We should look forward to it and rejoice in it. It should be something that every Christian looks forward to. That will not sell a whole lot of books or end times movies, but I think it is stupid for Christian alleged "leaders" to teach any kind of fear of the coming of Christ again to the world.

More importantly, the likelihood of us dying before the coming of Christ is infinitely more possible than that we will be alive when that happens. Yet we have been told over and over that the coming of Christ is going to be on this date or that date or that this war or that war signals the coming, or that this person or that person is the antiChrist which means that the end of days is coming in our generation. There are several here on OS who now believe that Obama is the antiChrist. Seriously. But all that we worry about never happens, does it?

So, he will come some day. Yet even Jesus said that he knew not what the hour of the end of days would be, that only God knew the time.

Believe me, it is the last thing on earth that I am worried about.

I hope this helps. There has been a ton of rubbish published on this. Some of it has been published in a shameless ploy to scare people into becoming Christians. Mostly it is to sell books and movies by playing on ignorant fears because most people do not think it through or read their Bibles carefully.

Rest easy, dvc. If it happens, rejoice.

Monte
Monte, thanks, as always, for your thoughtful response. I appreciate the fact that when you respond to comments and questions, you really listen. I appreciate your clarification.
Thanks Monte for your excellent post about this vital tenant of the faith.
Thank you, Faith. I am glad that I was able to explain the idea of the particularity of the various faiths.

=========================

Thanks, Dave, for reading and commenting. I continue to enjoy your daily reflections, short homilies, on the Bible.

=================

Monte
Monte, thank you so much for these reflections. They mean a lot to me, personally. I have found that I am "reflecting" on my own faith with each of these essays. And that's a good thing. On the faith of resurrection... I believe this with all my heart and soul. Unwavering. I have a few doubts concerning other areas of Christianity, but not in the resurrection. And I believe my faith insures my place in heaven. As I read comments, my question becomes, am i'm a tad off my rocker? If I'm NOT questioning this particular aspect of our faith, am I blind? Naive?

I saved this post to read today, when I could absorb your beautiful words. I agree with others here that these essays should be published. But today, I also feel very thankful we, here on OS, have you. Rev Monte, to share these special reflections. Looking forward to future essays.
Thank you, Fab. You are not blind and you are not naive. There is absolutely nothing wrong with your faith. It is strong and you have every reason to believe that your faith assures you a place in the Kingdom. I feel the same way.

God bless you.

Monte
I really appreciate the time and effort that you put into all of your post. Not only that, but you generously spend your time reading and commenting on others' as well. Glad to have found you. Thanks for this summary and making it 'reader friendly' by bolding the sections.
Hi, YH. Thanks for the good comments. They are appreciated. I am glad that you are now one of my favorites as well. I like the work you are doing on your blog. I hope the further posts in this series will resonate with you as well.

Monte
Thank you for sharing this Rev. Canfield. You do indeed write in a manner which allows for accessibility & reflection.

After a recent memorial service some friends were asking about our continuing belief as they have moved away from their own belief. In their questions I think they were trying to get back in touch with the spiritual belief even as they rejected our institutional religion. I think I will refer them to your writings as a great starting point for whatever spiritual journey they seek. Thank you.
Thank you, JT. I hope that they take you up on that offer. Too many people come to church when, unlike you, they are just going through the motions and they never ask for help but just leave. It is certainly true that they need first to make that spiritual reconnection and then they will have the basis for considering an organizational reconnection.

Thanks for reading and commenting.

Monte
I've never doubted that Jesus rose from the dead because I believe that our spirits live on after our deaths; they simply become a new form. Since St. Paul described the resurrected Jesus as being "glorified," I wonder if he had witnessed this change in Jesus' energy (and form) that occurs when the physical body dies. Whatever explanation is used, I don't believe that everything in this world can be known with 100% certainty. I look forward to the other parts of this series.

By the way, I heartily agree with the other commenters. This is professional-quality writing which needs to be published.
Thanks, Lisa, for reading and commenting. Paul was blinded temporarily by his encounter with the Risen Christ so while he heard Christ he did not see him. Both Paul and Luke record the same think happening on the road to Damascus. Most of what happens in the afterlife are a mystery and much of our thinking about that is speculation based on inference. Some makes logical sense, other is pretty much off the wall. Allowing for mystery which you do in your faith is what I do in mind. I am content to know that there will be many things that I cannot know in this lifetime.

Monte
Note: I have removed a comment. It was off topic and insulting, belittling of Christianity, and disrespectful of theology. We have been down this road before and we will not go there again.

Comments that ask questions about the subject at hand and are respectful of faith and believers are always welcome.

Monte
Monte this is a very powerful and nicely worded reflection. I am speechless! (yeah me speechless lol). Incredible post! Thank you for sharing it with us and I can't wait to read more.
That was well done, and actually helpful. We all have days like that I suppose.
Thanks, fireeyes and Don. Much appreciate you reading and commenting. Hope you like the rest of the Reflections on this subject.

Monte
Monte - like many others here, I hope your essays will be published some day. I am tired now, but this post has provoked a lot of thought. I am intrigued by the idea that the division between body and an immortal soul is a Greek concept. Am printing this so I can mull it over some more. I see your next reflection is up and am looking forward to reading it in the morning when I am fresher.
Hey, Dusty, glad to have you reading into the series.

I should be clear about the non-Biblical idea of an immortal soul, and the "sinful" body that we slough off when we die, because many Christian have taken that incorrect idea and run with it. The Church itself for centuries was so ingrained with Greek philosophy that it actually taught about an immortal soul. However, that idea is a Greek philosophical concept that worked its way into the teachings of the Church.

The Biblical, Hebrew, idea of the soul, also called spirit, is that an entire "person" is created by God at conception, body and soul. That person is wholly unique and individual and exists from the time of conception, but does not pre-exist somewhere out in ether prior to the creation of the person.

This is important because the entire person, both body and soul, are seen by God, from the beginning of the creation of man and woman to be "good."

Thus the normal and ordinary things of the body, sex, procreation, hunger, etc. are not evil; they are natural and good. That is why the body is seen as a "temple" of God to be taken care of and sanctified. Even St. Paul says that the new and glorified body will be given to us when we "put on" immortality. Until then we are conceived as mortal beings, live and die as mortal beings, but then we are raised "glorified" and "immortal." And all of our personal attributes will be raised. Then body and soul will be united forever.

I have researched this extensively and will someday publish here Reflections on what happens between death and resurrection. It is a fascinating area of study, but it is very difficult to examine and then explain.

Monte