:

  

Monte Canfield

Monte Canfield
Location
Newcomerstown, Ohio, USA
Birthday
December 28
Title
Rev. Dr. Monte Canfield
Bio
Retired Protestant Pastor and Theologian, jointly credentialed in the United Church of Christ and the Moravian Church. Education: BA, MA, M.Div, Thd. Public Service: NY State Office of Executive Development; Federal Exec. Branch: Executive Office of the President, BOB; Interior, BLM; Non Profit: Ford Foundation, Energy Policy Project; Congressional: General Accounting Office; Private industry: Grow Group, Inc.; US Paint; Owner, the Energy Center, St. Louis. Christian service: Pastor, First Congregational UCC, Ottawa, Illinois; Pastor, St. Paul's UCC, Port Washington, Ohio; Pastor, Moravian Church, Gnadenhutten, Ohio.

AUGUST 7, 2009 9:25AM

Claiming the Stories of Faith

Rate: 14 Flag
Woodcut: Abraham and Sarah

Woodcut of Abraham and Sarah


Note: this post is directed primarily to Christians and Jews and to those interested in the theology of those faiths.  However there are hopefully lessons to be learned that are applicable to those of other faiths and those who are interested in the foundations of Jewish and Christian faith.

Christians and Jews should look to the Bible for the great stories upon which our faith is built.  In spite of what our clergy and doctrinal theologians too often teach, our understanding of God is not found only in a few key verses, lines, lists or parables.  The stories of the faith are most often where the theology had its genesis, not in lists of rules.  

Faith is far more than rules, "dos and don'ts," doctrines and dogma. And faith is demonstrated in stories; those of our ancestors in faith and our personal stories.  Stories are at the heart of God's message to us.  To the extent that we embrace our faith, ancestral stories within the Bible are our family stories, told to enlighten, inform and form us in our daily living.

To give you an idea of the truth of this, let's look at the story of Abraham and Sarah, the story out of which came the greatest proclamation of the Protestant Reformation.  Martin Luther concluded that our salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone. This is the idea we today call “justification by faith.”  

Other conclusions have been derived throughout the centuries from the stories of the faith and are recorded in the Talmud, in the teachings of the early church, both Eastern and Western, and in many of the teachings within Christianity and Judaism today.  Much of that theology is derived from the stories of faith found in the Bible.


The story of Abraham and Sarah in the Hebrew Bible runs from the end of Chapter 11 of Genesis into the beginning of Chapter 25.  I am going to summarize some of the highlights of that story now.  You should, of course, read the story for yourself and see if you get some of the same ideas and come to similar conclusions.  Each story informs us differently as individuals.

In Chapter 12 Abram and Sarai, trusting God's promise to them totally, pull up stakes and leave their homeland of Ur, and the life that they knew, not knowing even where they are going, only that God told them to go, promising them a great future. 

They end up in Canaan.  But Abram is put to the test soon thereafter.  There is a famine in Canaan, and Abram loses faith and they abandon the promise and flee to Egypt.  

There, fearful for his own skin, Abram has Sarai claim that she is his sister. (She is his half-sister; but she is also his wife.) He does this because she is beautiful and he is afraid the Egyptians will kill him and take Sarai if he admits she is his wife.  So she lies to please Abram, who is not killed, but Sarai is taken and becomes one of Pharaoh’s concubines, and a favorite at that.  That is pretty impressive since Sarai is pushing 70 years old at the time!

Because Pharaoh is charmed by Sarai, he pours riches on her “brother” Abram. Pharaoh ferrets out Abram's deception, and, acting more honorably that Abram, he has them both kicked out of Egypt!  Surprisingly,  Pharaoh doesn’t have him killed; and he doesn’t strip him of his possessions.  So they are out of Egypt, but they are very rich.  

The first thing you notice is that this is a very strange, highly condensed story, full of hyperbole and shrouded in bits of myth.  Yet it is very much designed to show clearly the motives and ambitions of Abram and Sarai.

Nothing about Abram's character is glossed over or made to seem better than it is.  Abram shows almost no redeeming qualities at all, does not trust God, and uses half-lies to secure his own future.  Yet God does not abandon him and continues to protect him.


In Chapter 13 we find Abram back in Canaan, cattle farming with his nephew, Lot.  But they have so many cattle that they can’t both graze the same land, and quarrels break out between their herdsmen.  So, in stark contrast to the person we came to know, and dislike,  in Chapter 12, Abram becomes very generous and lets Lot choose the best land.  Abram takes the scrub desert.  

In other words, Abram, once again trusts the promise, trusts God to provide.  And God does.  More importantly, God again appears to Abram and repeats the promise: land, descendants, prosperity, and that a great nation will arise from him, a nation by which all other nations and peoples shall be blessed.  Abram again believes God, and both he and Lot prosper.


Chapter 14 is an odd little interlude in which Lot finds himself embroiled in a local war, gets captured, and is rescued by Abram.  After that, King Melchizedek, called a “priest of the most high God,” blesses Abram. In the New Testament book of Hebrews, much is made of Melchizedek, but he does not play a large role in the story of Abraham and Sarah.


Chapter 15 is a pivotal chapter.   It is the sixth verse of Chapter 15 that St. Paul relies upon to show how we are justified by grace, through faith.  This idea was effectively buried until Martin Luther resurrected it over 1400 years later and put his own spin on it.  A key verse reads, “And he (Abram) believed God, and the Lord reckoned it to him as ighteousness.” 

Right before this verse,  Abram’s faith had wavered yet again.  And we can easily see why.  In spite of the promises of God, Sarai is still childless, and Abram can’t see how she can ever have a child.  So he doubts.  

And God promises yet again!  And yet again, Abram believes, and this time, because of his faith, God treats him AS IF he were righteous.  God, “reckons it to him as righteousness.”  Now, clearly, he isn’t very righteous.  He is not “right with God” which is what being righteous means. 

He is righteous neither according to his actions in Egypt, nor according to his constant vacillation in his trust of God.  But, just this small amount of faith is enough for God to treat him as if he were righteous.  

And that is true with us.  Our faith is seldom, if ever, pure.  We vacillate, we wander, we have our doubts; we come back to God, only to back away again and try to control our present and invent our own future.  But God accepts our small, faltering, halting attempts at faith and justifies us, though we are not actually righteous. Christians, of course, believe that this justification comes to us because of our faith in Christ.

But in this story, there is a price to be paid by Abram for his wavering faith.  God tells him that the some of the promise will be delayed, and not just for a couple of weeks.  God says that the total fulfillment of the promise will be delayed for 400 years!

Abram will reap some of the rewards of the promise in his lifetime, but it will be future generations who will reap the reward of a land that they can call their own!  Abram himself will not see this, but his descendants will.  Because Abram vacillates, over and over, between faith and doubt the full reward of the promise is delayed, but the promise remains!


And so we come to Chapter 16.  And Sarai is still barren.  Plus she is getting really old.  So she and Abram decide, again, to abandon the promise; to try to take life, literally, into their own hands, to circumvent the waiting.  Sarai tells Abram to lay with her Egyptian slave girl, Hagar, and attempt to conceive offspring through her.  

He does; and Hagar becomes pregnant; and then makes the mistake of flaunting that fact in Sarai’s face.  Sarai becomes furious and mistreats Hagar, who runs away.  But this amazing God  cares not only for the chosen, but for others as well, and He sends and angel after Hagar, who tells her to return.  

The angel guarantees to Hagar that her son, who will be born Ishmael, will be cared for by God, and will become a great person and nation in his own right.  But there is no guarantee that Ishmael will inherit the promised land.  Rather, Ishmael will forever remain outside of God’s divine plan for this elected family.  

But, and this is vitally important, Ishmael will be greatly blessed.  God blesses and cares for so called "outsiders" as well as for we who think of ourselves as "insiders."


By Chapter 17 yet more time has passed.  Abram is now 99 and Sarai is 90!  And, in spite of their doubting the promise and their aborted intentions to take their future into their own hands, God appears yet again; and again God promises.  But with the passing years the promise looks even more impossible and ridiculous to the couple, and also to us.   

Yet, God is insistent, and in a symbolic act of great importance, which is often ignored or misunderstood when we read this story, God changes their names.  He gives them new identities which signify new life and new possibility.

Abram is named Abraham; Sarai, Sarah.  To underscore the truth of the promise, Abram, which means in Hebrew “Exalted Ancestor,” becomes Abraham, which means, “Ancestor of a multitude!”  And still Abraham doubts, name change or not.  Abraham doubts.  We would likely doubt too.  

And so God “cuts a covenant” with Abraham, makes him a promise that will be sealed in blood.  And the sign of that covenant is circumcision.  Circumcision becomes the physical sign of the special and chosen nature of Abraham in God’s eyes.  And Abraham trusts God again — a lot, I’d say — because Abraham then circumcises himself! And he circumcises his 13 year old son Ishmael. That is likely more detail than we needed to know.  But just imagine the pain!


This little wince filled scene brings us to the climactic Chapter of the promise:  Chapter 18.  This is not the end of the story by any means, which runs on through Chapter 25, but it is the high point of the story of the promise made and to be kept.  

Three men visit Abraham and Sarai.  And Abraham extends to them hospitality.  In reality, they are God and two angels in disguise! (As a little aside, this is where the saying in Hebrews 13 comes from “Be kind to strangers, for you may be entertaining angels unawares!”)   

In the course of the visit the strangers ask after Sarah, who is in the tent preparing food.  One, who is God in disguise, says to Abraham that he will return to them and Sarah shall have a son.  Sarah, eavesdropping, overhears this, and laughs to herself at the audacity of such a statement.  

But God hears her unvoiced laugh and tells Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, and say, ‘Shall I indeed bear a child, now that I am old?’  Is anything too wonderful for the Lord?  At the set time I will return to you, in due season, and Sarah shall have a son.”  But Sarah denied, saying, “I did not laugh!”  The Lord said, “Oh yes, you did laugh, Sarah!”

Here then, we are at the heart of the matter: how very hard having faith is.  Listen to Walter Bruggemann on this key point in Chapter 18:

      “Once again, this story shows what a scandal and difficulty faith is.       Faith is NOT a reasonable act which fits into the normal scheme of life and perception....

     Abraham and Sarah have by now become accustomed to their barrenness.  They are resigned to their closed future.  They have accepted that helplessness as normal.  The gospel promise does not meet them in receptive hopefulness, but in resistant hopeLESSness....

     The total Abraham /Sarah story is about a call embraced.  But in this central narrative the call is NOT embraced.  It is rejected as nonsensical.  And indeed, if no new thing can intrude, if newness must be conjured from present resources, the promise announced here IS truly nonsensical.  But we must focus on the question of the Lord in verse 4, “Is anything impossible for the Lord?”

Bruggemann is right.  We are at the heart of the matter of this story.  This is the conundrum that we always face in our relationship with God.  If we say, “No, nothing is impossible for the Lord,” then we embrace the promise, however unsteadily.
 
If we say, “Yes, some things are impossible, even for God,” then we are not yet ready. We are not yet willing to let the initiative flow from us to God.  We aren’t ready to relinquish control.  So God can say to Sarah, and to us, “Oh, yes, you DID laugh!”

And that could be the end of the story.  God could add, “If you are going to laugh at my promise, you are on your own.  I’ll go help someone else!”  But, of course, no thanks to Abraham and Sarah, it isn’t the end.  

You see God’s plans do not depend on our opinions about how preposterous we think God’s promises are!  Even here, toward the very end of the story of the promise, Abraham and Sarah still have serious doubts.  But, God will be God and will do what God wants to do.  

God will keep Abraham’s and Sarah’s future open, in spite of their doubt.  Just so God keeps our future open, in spite of our doubts.   We may think that we are in control, but it is not up to us to decide what God will do.  God intends to "make all things new", in spite of all resistance from us to the contrary.  

The question for us today is the same as it was for Abraham and Sarah then: Will we trust God?  Will we embrace the promise, the future, and live the sense of joy and freedom that embrace can bring?  Or will we laugh and say, “There are some things that really are impossible, you know.”

This story says that the future is in the hands of God.  It always has been.  On our own, all we can claim of the future with certainty is the knowledge that we all shall die.  That is our future without the promise.  With the promise we are told that we shall live, now and forever.

In this story Abraham and Sarah, ultimately, trust the promise, and God has the last laugh.  Sarah has her baby boy, and God names him “Laughter!”  Isaac means laughter.  Later God will name another baby boy.  He will call this one, Emmanuel, “God with us!”  

It all comes down to this. Will we believe the promise of faith?  That is always the question.  God promises us new life.  And the story of Abraham and Sarah urges that we see that God will provide it.  That is their story.  It is also our story, a story told about our ancestors in faith.  Are we ready to claim it?  Are we willing to receive from God, grace, through faith?  The offer still stands.  The promise still awaits.



1504 page views on 11 15 2009

 


 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Very, very informative Monte (as always) and I always look forward to your stories on faith. Thanks for sharing your immense knowledge and in lay terms.

RATED
Thanks, Greg. They are a labor of love, not all that popular compared to the other posts but there is a growing following of them. Your support has always been important to me.
I needed this today - faith - thanks, Monte.
You are most welcome, Owl. Actually, when I woke up this morning and looked at what I prepared last night for posting today it dawned on me that I too, needed to read this again. Funny how that works out at times. Thanks much.
I am just finishing a very similar sermon series on David. Too often I think we emphasize exegesis at the expense of good storytelling, and so we don't pass along the stories that are, collectively, *ours*.
Where does the faith in the self figure in this Monte?
Hi, HL, I would love to read that series on David. Exegesis is fine and I use it all the time. The problem is that the exegetical pericope is often way too short and you lose context, meaning and setting, to say nothing of focusing on a minute issue in the midst of a great story. Personally I think that exegesis should come after understanding the story, as part of the conclusions that one draws from the story, life lessons, as it were. If the story is going to lead our behavior at all we have to come to see how we think that is, and that, for me, comes in the conclusions that the story yields to us. Then I think it is helpful to test those conclusions by doing exegesis on the passages that we draw those conclusions from. Sometimes there are NO specific passages, in which case exegesis is not helpful, but the lesson is still there without exegesis.

Monte
Traveller, that is an excellent question.

For some faith in the self seems to be enough.

For Christians, though, we believe that faith, or better "belief" in ones self comes through the strengthening power of the Holy Spirit in our lives. That is, left to our own devices, too often the faith in our selves is misplaced, and that we believe that we have total control of our present and our futures. Abraham and Sarah often thought that, ultimately deciding that they could not really control the things that counted. There is an uncomfortable aspect of "surrender" to a Higher Power, if you will, in most religions, and many people can't and won't ever do that.

Let me use AA for an example. In my case, alcoholism had me by the throat for 30 plus years and it was not until I surrendered to that Higher Power in AA that I was able to have enough faith in myself to kick the habit, one day at a time. That was 19 years ago. I hope that it will continue both today and tomorrow, but I rely on God to make that possible.

I know that offends many people and many can not make that commitment to admitting that they are "powerless over alcohol" for example. I have watched those people recycle themselves in and out of AA, in and out of rehab, sometimes for decades. They have never "hit bottom" in AA terms. And until many people do hit bottom and realize that faith in self is not enough they do not escape.

Bottom line, it is all an individual choice. I know some very good people who rely solely on faith in self. It seems to work for them. For me it simply was not enough.

Great question. From my point of view there is no one answer, only an answer that works for me, and for countless others who chose to believe the promise. But it is not for everybody. Each decides for his/her self.

Monte
Read my blog today and tell me whether you think that I have that faith you speak so eloquently of. You might be able to have an insight which I should pay attention to....

http://open.salon.com/blog/traveller1/2009/08/07/top_10_reasons_for_not_giving_up_after_losing_my_job
Hi, Traveller, got the PM, read the post you wrote and have further replied by PM. Where ever it comes from you have belief that you can and will be better tomorrow than today. And that, as you say, "we grow and mature and learn and adapt and change and become who we were meant to be." If you have an idea that we are "meant to be" something then that sounds like faith to me.
By "meant to be" I meant the interplay of genetics and environment.

You did answer the question I asked. I answered you by PM too. I accept graciously your prayers and dont doubt your faith at all. We who come from the East have been exposed to faith from birth...from the animals, trees, stones and waters, from Brahma, Vishnu and Maheswara and bhakti and nature around.

Maybe I would discuss it with you if you were sitting in front of me and could see my facial expression and know that whatever I said was not to demean and tear apart but to solidify and build. But since that cannot be I will think that it is best to let everyone believe in what they think is right for them.

These discussion ultimately MUST end in faith and belief and since I am not willing to say yours or anyone's is either misplaced or wrong I will desist. And will always read your posts with respectful curiosity, absorbing, learning, assimilating, juxtaposing, correcting myself , and moving on.......
Well and sincerely stated, Traveller. I have utmost respect for you and thank you for this dialogue. I have known you long enough here on OS that I know that you would never intend to demean or hurt anyone. That is not part of your nature. Nor is that ever my intention. Sorry I misinterpreted your phrase "meant to be." I my interpretation was based on causality and not on what you meant. You and your comments are always welcome here.

Blessings and Peace,

Monte
Monte, I'm a bit overwhelmed today and have bookmarked this post, rather than rush through it. Your posts are too important for rushed reading, so thanks, and please keep writing!
I am at your church, hearing your sermon. And I grew up in the church, so I don't listen to preachers. I feel comfortable in my lack of faith reading your words. Thank you!
Zuma: I know you will read when you have the time to do it without rushing, so we will see you then.

Aim: a lack of faith happens to most of us from time to time, and sometimes for long periods in our lives. But God is patient and will hold out the promise of a bold new future to us in spite of that. At some point we will decide either to embrace that promise or not. My life is far better that I have. But each makes that decision individually.

Thanks, both of you.
Well there is another bible story finally explained so that I can understand it. Maybe one day you will dissect it further for us. I know that there must be quite a bit more to the story with that many chapters involved.
I never knew that is the origins of circumcision and am not sure yet that I wanted to know. Hehehe. Yet there it is! Thanks, Monte.
Thanks, Mike. Like all stories there is far much more to tell about Abraham and Sarah. I have taught adult Sunday School classes on just this story and taken almost a year to get through it. Not all of that is in just dissecting the story but in getting the class members to tell how the story intersects with their own stories and how they can thus claim that story as part of their own story. But blogging simply is not conducive to in depth study. My own notes on this chapter run in hand scribbles well over a hundred pages of notes, exegeses and commentary. Can't squeeze that into a blog, but it would make a commentary book if I had the energy. But I am just glad that this helps a bit. As for the "ouch" factor, yes, I think any information on that is a bit too much for us males.
Ahh -- to be a hot concubine at 70! Although giving birth past 90 -- ouch!

Faith is always the toughest for me. Belief I can manage, but our feelings of faith have so much to do with our self-worth, with believing or not believing ourselves worthy of what we ask. I like this: God will be God and will do what God wants to do.

As always, Monte, thanks for sharing this.
Hey, Suzie: good to see you here. Yes, we do tend to worry about our "worth" in our eyes and in the eyes of others. But God's idea of love is not much concerned with what we think we are worth. To God we are priceless children. It is the old conflict between our belief that "good works" are what counts vs. faith. In orthodox Christianity good works are very important but are seen to stem from us as gratitude for God's grace, not as the cause of it. Of course, "faith vs. works" was what Luther in trouble with the Church. Still, it is good from my point of view that people struggle with it at all. It tells me that they think it is worth thinking about.

I can only imagine what the Pharaoh saw in Sarah. To be a "hot" anything at 70 is pretty much something.
This may be a little off point (what I am about to ask you), but this got me to thinking about something. In a few weeks my beautiful niece, raised Roman Catholic and later Non-denominational Christian, will wed a Persian Jew in a Jewish wedding ceremony.

My niece is being shunned by her soon to be husband's mother, one sister and a group of friends, because she is not Jewish. I fear that even if she was Jewish but not Persian/Iranian, that would be a problem, too.

However, the father is coming, other brothers, aunts and uncles and friends that do, accept her and welcome her to the family. I can understand cultural differences, religious practices of differing measure and so on, but this family is now American and has been for over 30 years and are American educated.

Perhaps there is no question at all here. Just an inner sadness for my niece that puts her in a negative light by anyone at all, starting out her new life with a mother's utter disapproval. She deserves better than this, in my eyes, however, her intended loves her dearly, respects their differences and hopes that future and children will bring the family closer again. That may well be, but till then, she is compromised in some ways and stands outside the family circle. They are all very close, tight, you might say and there will be challenges. I hope and pray that their bond will survive the cultural attacks to come and those which have begun.
Cathy, I am sorry that your niece will have to endure this, but that is what it will amount to: endurance.

One could hope that the mother, who is no doubt the center of the rejection, will come around, but it is not likely; at least not any time soon. So the couple has to learn to lean on each other, not expect more than they get from his family and build a new family upon the two of them. Otherwise there will be resentment and bitterness within the new family that is going to form between them.

The issue that could cause the most trouble is how the children will be raised. I am sure that has been discussed but if not it surely should be, and soon. A good pre-marriage counselor would seem to me to be a must.

In any case I think that it will be as hard as you think it will be and your niece certainly needs all the love and support from her side of the family as she can get; not to take sides, but to be there for her when there are problems so that she can maintain her self esteem.

I wish I had a rosier future I could forecast but the truth is that I had had a lot of experience with inter-faith couples and those who do well usually do not have a parent who is unaccepting. I shall pray for them, and, should the maternal rejection continue on the husband's side, their children.

Monte
Thanks so much, Monte! Wise words as usual and so very appreciated, along with those vital prayers! Yes, they have discussed the children's religious upbringing and they will raise them in the Jewish faith along with the basics of Christianity and a Christmas tree will be allowed. I know that may sound wierd, to say "allowed," but that is pretty much how it is, right?! They think as you do, in that they will build their own family and so many of his family is supportive, so the belief is that once they have a child, the mother, sisters and others will come around...the test of time...faith...hope...and "endurance."
I so want to believe; I made a conscious decision to believe when I got baptized at 33. I am struggling right now with the gray land between the faith of my heart and my church life in a community that doesn't share many of my basic values. This was helpful to me right now. Thank you.
Hello again, Blue in TX: God tells us that we will know God because God will write his love of us on our hearts. Communities of faith are many and varied, and come in many shades of doctrine, liturgy and theology. There is one that will share the values of your heart. I pray you find it. Meanwhile, I hope that you will follow your heart. When faith in God is there you will not go wrong. PM me if you wish to discuss this further.

Blessings,

Monte
Monte - "Will we trust God? Will we embrace the promise, the future, and live the sense of joy and freedom that embrace can bring? Or will we laugh and say, “There are some things that really are impossible, you know.” Can I do both???
Hi, dcv: yes, you can do both, vacillating between the two.

That is what happened to Abraham and Sarah for much of their lives. Most people of faith, like me for example, finally decide to get in the back seat and let God drive. But then things get tough, or we get impatient because we do not see the promise as we define it happening quickly enough, and we try to scramble over the seat and take control again.

What I have found is that unless I "Let go and let God" that I do not find that "sense of joy and freedom that embrace can bring." So I think that ultimate sense of peace, of turning our lives over to God and accepting the future God holds out to us, cannot long be achieved if we swing back and forth between the two.

We can have a relative sense of calm and accomplishment but something is always missing. I guess that I, echoing St. Augustine, believe that there is real truth in his statement, "O Lord, our hearts are restless until they rest in Thee."

Shalom,

Monte
You are right that we vacillate so much in having faith. This story, even with its hyperbole, is relevant for me.
Thanks, Delia, that is all that I could ask for. Glad you found it relevant.

Monte
I didn't know "Isaac" meant laughter. Interesting (and as usual, enlightening and uplifting). Thanks, Monte.
Thanks, Steve. Glad you enjoyed this post.

Monte
Monte, I just came back from the steps of heaven. Ive been fighting cancer for almost a year.Im pat Anne`s soul mate.I just recieved a clear as a bell on my pet scan.Until I gave it all to god I was spinning my wheels. healing is faith exercized.Without pure faith, complete ,no doubt. you are only kidding yourself in gods name. You must present pure faith in order to reap the rewards. Thanks for your wise notes. Pat
Hi, Pat. What great news! I have been praying for you and have not gotten out to Anne's blog yet to get the details, but I am so very happy for you. God bless you, my friend. Your faith, strength and never give up attitude are a blessing to all who have heard about your struggle. Prayers will continue, of course. But it is nice just to hear some really good news!

All praise to Him who calls us his precious children.

Monte