:

  

Rev. Dr. Monte Canfield

Rev. Dr. Monte Canfield
Location
Newcomerstown, Ohio, USA
Birthday
December 28
Title
Rev. Dr. Monte Canfield
Company
Retired
Bio
Retired Protestant Pastor and Theologian, jointly credentialed in the United Church of Christ and the Moravian Church. Education: BA, MA, M.Div, Thd. Public Service: NY State Office of Executive Development, Management Intern; Federal Exec. Branch: Executive Office of the President, Budget Examiner, Bureau of the Budget; Interior, Director of Energy and Minerals, Bureau of Land Management; Non Profit: Ford Foundation, Deputy Director, Energy Policy Project; Congressional: Director, Office of Special Projects; Director, Division of Energy and Materials, General Accounting Office; Private industry: Vice President, Grow Group, Inc.; Chief Executive Officer, US Paint; Owner, the Energy Center, St. Louis. Christian service: Pastor, First Congregational UCC, Ottawa, Illinois; Pastor, St. Paul's UCC, Port Washington, Ohio; Pastor, Moravian Church, Gnadenhutten, Ohio.

Rev. Dr. Monte Canfield's Links

Memoirs and Biographical (also see Motorcycling Memories)
Musical Tribute Essays, Playlists, Videos
Motorcycling Memories
The Christian Calendar Series
Essays on the Exodus and the Ten Commandments
Reflections on Faith
NOVEMBER 11, 2009 12:02AM

The Decalogue: The Ten Commandments

Rate: 19 Flag
Photobucket


This is the 8th of a series of essays that cover the origin of the Israelite nation and conclude with a discussion of the Ten Commandments. This and all remaining essays will deal with what we call The Decalogue or Ten Commandments. Links to the prior essays can be found in the left hand column of this post under My Links: "Essays on the Exodus and the Ten Commandments."



To make it easier to understand this essay and to reference the relevant Biblical passages I am including here at the beginning those passages that most closely relate to this essay.

From Exodus 20

1  Then God spoke all these words:
2  I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery;
3  you shall have no other gods before me.
4  You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5  You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the LORD your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me,
6  but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.
7  You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not acquit anyone who misuses his name.



One of the first things you notice is that modern Bibles break the Decalogue, the Ten Commandments, into 17 verses. The breakout is not entirely arbitrary, but it is not well thought out either. And it came about centuries ago, when it was decided that the Bible would be easier to read if it were broken into books, chapters and verses.  Sometimes it is easier.  But other times it is just more confusing. And here, at the Decalogue, it is confusing.

Since we often see the Ten Commandments on statements, brochures, signs and elsewhere there is an assumption that we know what each commandment is, what its number is, and which verse contains it in the Bible. But that is not quite so.

 The vast majority of the signs we see of the Decalogue are shorthand phrases of longer phrases in the Bible. It can get pretty confusing trying to walk through that maze. So I am going to walk us through a bit of that fog today. So just hang on, and we will make it to the other side unscathed.

Here is the first important thing to know in order to help you understand how the Decalogue is arranged. The first FOUR commandments are about our relationship with God, with the 4th commandment acting as a bridge to the remainder of the commandments. The SIX remaining commandments deal with how we relate to one another. Thus, ALL of the commandments deal with relationships: God with us and we with one another.

Now for a bit of maze walking. What is the first commandment?

It clearly is not verse 1: "Then God spoke all these words:"

But is it verse 2?  "I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery;"

Or is it verse 3? "You shall have no other gods before me."

Well, Jewish tradition says verse 2 is the first commandment. But Christians say verse 3 is the first commandment, with verse two being just a preamble.

However, verse two is far more than a preamble. It is the basis of the "Shema," the holiest of Jewish prayers.  Many of you know it, if not by that name. The Shema says, "Hear, O Israel: the Lord is our God, the Lord alone. You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might."

Christians may remember that Jesus assumed that everyone knew the first sentence of the Shema and recited only the second, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might." And then he said that the "second" commandment was "like it," saying, "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." He then said that on these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.  In other words everything else in the Bible rests on keeping these two "commandments."

Now, clearly, neither of these two great religious statements, which Jesus called "commandments" is one of what we think of as the Ten Commandments. But both the Shema and the first and greatest commandment which Jesus recites derive from the proclamation of Yahweh the he and he alone is "the Lord your God." So Jewish tradition should make sense to both Jews and Christians. I will come back to that in a bit.

But, first, I want to show a bit more of the complication here before we move on. If you are a Roman Catholic or a Lutheran chances are that you have been taught that the first commandment is ALL of verses 3 through 6, which have to do with "having no other gods." In other words, verse four which says not to make idols, and verse 5, which says not to worship such idols, are seen as elaborations, details explaining verse 3.

So, in order to come up with TEN commandments you have to split verse 17, which deals with not coveting, into commandments which deal with different aspects of "coveting."

Most Protestant Christians say that verse 3 is the First Commandment, that verses 4 through 6 is the 2nd Commandment, and verse 7 is the 3rd Commandment. That way you can come up with a total of ten commandments without splitting verse 17.

I have actually seen it proposed that one could logically keep verse 2 as the first commandment as Jewish tradition does, split verse 5 into 2 parts, split verse 17 into 7 parts and so forth  and come up with from 11 to 19 Commandments, depending on how you separate phrases.

 And, that would be just as logical as saying there are ten commandments.  In fact, ten is not a particularly "holy" number and numerologists would no doubt rather have the Twelve Commandments, given the twelve tribes of Israel and the holiness thought by some to be attached to that number.

My guess is that about now God is shaking his head and laughing at the absurdity of worrying about this, let alone fighting to have the Ten Commandments put up in public places, where they have no business being, but that discussion comes later in the series so I will not belabor it here.

My own feeling is that God is a whole lot less concerned with how we count than God is with what we do about obeying or living by the spirit of those commandments. If we must have 10 rather than 19 that is fine with me. But we are clearly not going to agree on how to split up the text to arrive at ten.

Keep in mind that this is no more problematic than trying to figure out the exact names of the original disciples of Jesus or trying to figure out who exactly were the twelve disciples, and coming to the conclusion that there were no more than twelve tribes of Israel. We can not be certain about those figures either.

Because I am a liberal Protestant theologian and am comfortable with what I was taught early on, I will go by the majority of  Protestant positions on the Decalogue.  This is not because it is better or "more right" than the other ways the Decalogue can be split up, but it is the way I can talk about it comfortably.

Accordingly, and no drum roll please, the FIRST commandment is Verse 3: "You shall have no other gods before me."

The SECOND commandment is Verses 4 through 6 with Verses 5 and 6 elaborations on verse 4. "You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the LORD your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me, but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments."  The shorthand version of commandment #2 is simply, "You shall not make for yourself an idol."

The THIRD commandment in this counting scheme is Verse 7. "You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not acquit anyone who misuses his name." Again, the shorthand version of the third commandment is the first phrase of the commandment, "You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the LORD your God."

Now, having settled that to no ones satisfaction except a few uptight Protestants who really care about these things for reasons that elude me, I want to come back, as I said I would, to Verse 2 and explain why the Jews are in the most fundamental theological sense right.

Their tradition says that the 1st commandment should be the statement of who Yahweh is, "I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery." This bothers those who are literalistic in their understanding of English since it is a statement of "fact," and not strictly a command to do something when viewed literally in English.

But, if it is a "fact" it is a fact that almost no one else knew at the time the Decalogue was spoken, and one that you know, simply from reading this series, the Israelites themselves challenged more than once.

But here, in stark clarity, Yahweh tells the people the He and He alone is the only God that they need, and they must remember that he is bound to this people by holy covenant. Keep in mind that in those days most people believed in many gods. Many of the Israelites believed that there were more than one god and to be safe several should be prayed to and appeased. Here Yahweh does not try to disabuse them of that belief. Remember that Yahweh has just proven that he could defeat the "gods of the Egyptians." Rather, here Yahweh makes the simple point that this Yahweh is the God who saves THEM.

It will only be much later in the development of the theology of Israel when Israel will come to believe that there are no other gods, period. That is, they will come to believe that no other gods even EXIST.

For now it is only necessary that the Israelites believe that Yahweh is the one with the proven track record: This Yahweh is the God who saves, delivers and redeems them from the dreaded 400 year captivity within Egypt.  It is this special and specific God who has chosen this special and specific people to be the ones he loves, holds close and protects. And it is this God that the people must learn to worship and obey in gratitude for that love and protection.

If what comes next sounds familiar it is because I have walked you by this point before.  But it cannot be overstated if you are to understand the place of the Decalogue within the context of salvation history. The conditions of the covenant, the details of the Torah, and all the minor and detailed laws that spring from interpretations of it, are the result first of God's deliverance of the people, saving them from bondage in Egypt.

He can make the demands he makes of the people in following the commandments of the Decalogue precisely because of the GRACE that he has ALREADY given to them. This Torah, this instruction for living, is not to be seen as another form of bondage, but as the GIFT of a redeeming God, the GIFT of the instruction as to how to live a full and holy life under this one God, Yahweh.

If we cannot see the so-called "Law" of the Ten Commandments in this light then we miss the entire ebb and flow of our relationship with God. For God always provides the pure grace of deliverance, redemption and salvation before any guidelines for living are promulgated. And by so doing we can respond to the Instruction for Living, the Torah, in gratitude. If we miss this point we might conceive of Torah as another form of servitude, something not even remotely true theologically.

Think of it this way.  The "Law" is not given to them so that, IF they obey it they will be God's people. The Israelites are already God's people. Thus the Law or Torah can never been seen as a means of salvation. God saves, delivers, heals and redeems because he loves us, not because we follow some set of instructions, as important as those instructions may be.

Thoughtful Jews never consider Torah as a unique vessel for salvation. They know that they were saved from bondage in Egypt before the Torah came alone. Rather they see the Torah, what Christians too often call narrowly as "Law," as teaching or instruction regarding how to live a redeemed life day to day under the guidance of the LORD.

Here in the beginning of the Decalogue God is affirming WHO HE IS and he does that on moral grounds.  This God of Israel, our God, is defined not in vague philosophical or theological propositions, but is defined by the very nature of the moral imperatives He will place upon the people.  He is a HOLY GOD and he will insist that HIS PEOPLE BE HOLY.

It is no accident that Jewish tradition sees verse two as the First Commandment. Verse 2 defines "who they are" by telling them WHO THEIR GOD IS.  Logically, it would be of little help to tell them that they should "have no other gods before me," if the people had little or no idea who the God that they were to honor in that way was and is. They could have no respect for such a God because that God would have shown no love, care and protection to them. Yahweh did and still does show that today.



Speaking of now, how much respect do we have for God? Do we really know who God is? Does each of us, individually, have a concrete idea, a firm belief, that in some way relevant to our individual lives the God we worship is the one who redeems, delivers, heals and saves us?

Perhaps that sounds too easy.  But it is not.  It is precisely at times when we forget that the grace of God precedes anything we must do in thanksgiving for that grace that we chafe at God's rules, and often break them.

But, my friends, a strong argument can be made that if we really believed that God is God and that God has our well being first in his heart, we would not chafe at the rules for living and would instead obey and trust God in thanksgiving for his grace.

The Torah, both written and spoken, is at the heart of Jewish morality. And I know some Christians who would like to see it as not applying to us. But that is totally anathema to orthodox Christian teaching.

Besides that, if we Christians truly believe that God is God and we are grateful for our personal salvation as Christians the promulgation of rules for living is standard Christian instruction. You can pick up just about any book in the New Testament, say, the letters of Peter, Paul or John and you will be told over and over and over that believing Christians ARE saved, ARE holy, and ARE sanctified. In fact that we ARE God's own saints.

And yet, even while knowing that, every one of the great apostles shook his head not only at our inability to avoid sinning, but at their own. Even the greatest of the apostles could not meet the tests that they clearly say that we have ALREADY MET because of faith in Christ.

So, for Christians, the big question is how can we possibly be holy, sanctified, and saved if we sin all the time?  And it is a good question.


The truth  is that we cannot save ourselves. Writers like Peter, Paul, John and the writer of Hebrews stress heavily that we cannot save ourselves, that only Jesus can do that. Paul says it best. I will paraphrase. We are saved not by our merits, not by our good works, not even by our holiness, but because we believe in Jesus, the Christ. Once we believe in God's Son, God considers us ("reckons us") to be righteous for the sake of his Son, through the sacrifice he made for us on the Cross.

So, just as the Israelites were already saved from bondage in Egypt by the grace of Yahweh BEFORE they received the Torah, and were already God's chosen people bound by covenant to Yahweh even before he spoke the Ten Commandments, so too, Christians like me believe that they are saved by the grace of God through faith in Christ.

I believe that it is important to try to live up to the Torah and the instructions for living that apply to Christians and Jews. But if we cannot we have a remedy at hand within both faiths which is to admit our sin and be cleansed once more to be vicars of God.  That is good news for Jews and Christians alike.  In fact it is Amazing Grace!

God bless,

Monte 

Next: Snares and pitfalls in applying the Decalogue.  And just who do these commandments apply to anyway?

 

632 page views 2010 01 10

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This is an excellent series, Monte. Thanks! Bookmarked and Zumapick for all of your hard work.
If this is true, "We are saved not by our merits, not by our good works, not even by our holiness, but because . . . we believe in Jesus. . ." Then presumably, a Christian can be less than diligent in his moral life, as long as he duly repents and goes to church.

I don't mean deliberately wrong others, but most of us have been tempted. Surely it's easier to give in to temptation if you know that forgiveness is going to come. And how can your victim deny you the forgiveness that God has given?
First, I loved this line: "My guess is that about now God is shaking his head and laughing at the absurdity of worrying about this." Ain't it the truth?

Second, thank you once again for compelling and thought-provoking exegesis. More spiritual teaching here than in many a sermon I've heard.
Just imagine, Monte. if Moses had to carry down the Mountain the entire 613 Commandment's, he would have made Schwarzenegger look like a Kindergartener.

Great series of History and God.
PS Malusinka and I agree, I never accepted that, "We are saved not by our merits, not by our good works, not even by our holiness, but because . . . we believe in Jesus." If so most of Jesus' preaching about doing good, doing the right things were just lip flapping.

The ancients were no better at translating what they thought they heard from God than are many in error today. Scribes in many cases were illiterate and were used to simply copy the ancient writings by visual appearance and many errors from copy to copy have been uncovered.

Jesus entire existence was to reveal that there is indeed an afterlife and goodness and works are of great import in developing a conscience especially in those who are conscience deprived.

Prophets, I do believe however, know what the rest do not, since, "God chooses not as men choose..."-Samuel, that prophets like all men have faults, and the things for which Conservatives condemn men like high libido's, are irrelevant to God.
Monte - This is a very helpful discussion of what grace is, exactly. I studied under a Rabbi for a time in college and considered conversion; going to the source of our relationship to the one God from a Baptist background was attractive b/c I sensed that thread of grace, which was absent from my upbringing. I will be bookmarking and coming back to read this again. Thanks as always.
Your comment: "My own feeling is that God is a whole lot less concerned with how we count than God is with what we do about obeying or living by the spirit of those commandments." stands out to me. Seems to me that was what Jesus was saying when he preached about the two great commandments. I never thought about the different possible configurations of the ten commandments - never even considered why there would be ten and not seven or twelve. I always learn much from your posts, and they continue to make me think. Thank you!
This is one of my most favorite posts of yours, Monte. I love the history and meanings behind the 10 commandments! Lessons for all time. I could eleborate on my feelings about each one as they are all so packed with meanings and lessons, from the simple to the complex. You are a master scholar in matters of biblical history and the meanings found therein. What can one add to this, but mere admiration and awe at your wisdom. Thank you for another incredible, inspiring post!
Malusinka and Professor, thank you both for your comments and questions. However, this is not the place to argue the Protestant principle of sola fide, sola gratia, sola scriptura. What both of your concerns address is a deeply difficult area within theology regarding how Christians are "saved."

That you do not agree with my statement is wholly understandable, and I did not wish my statement of my personal beliefs to detract from the main thrust of the essay, but obviously it has.

I do not think that if a person is saved by grace it indicates at all that that person can be less "diligent in his moral life." To the contrary, if a Christian is less diligent it is likely that such a person was never saved in the first place. There are many allegedly "saved" Christians who are simply going through the motions.

A saved Protestant Christian will hew closely to the path taught by Christ, try not to sin, and do good works in gratitude for his salvation, not as an effort to earn his salvation. So whether you are saved by faith or by works or by both, good works will be done.

That, in a nutshell, is the Protestant principle. No one need believe it and I do not want to belabor it further here. But I assure you, Professor, that one who believes as I do certainly does not believe that Jesus' preaching about good works was just "lip flapping."

That is a rather simplistic and baited conclusion about a serious question that has for far too long separated the western church into denominations, and will continue to do so as long as such lines are drawn in the sand rather than discussed humbly with an intention of finding common ground.

But wrestling with this issue is not the purpose of this essay and I hope we can move on. If we can't I will remove my comments from the post and these conversation about them so other readers can focus on the Ten Commandments and not on how modern Christians are saved.
Thank you, Zuma for continuing to follow this series and get something useful from the essays.

Hi, Pilgrim, I do think God has to have a sense of humor when God sees all the twisting and turning, and the minutia we are willing to indulge in which is irrelevant to the broader issues.
-------------------------
Hey, Blue, you must have had quite an experience having a Baptist background and then studying under a Rabbi. That had to be something that really opened your eyes to the wide difference we can have within the faith communities. I did something similar in my own studies, but within Christianity. I did my M.Div at one of the most liberal seminaries and my ThD at one of the most conservative. I wanted to have the full spectrum of teaching before I decided where I would end up. That turned out to be on the liberal end of the spectrum of Protestantism. But it has always been helpful to me to know what very conservative Christians think and teach.
---------------------------------
Thank you, Dusty. Sometimes it is easy to get tangled all up in the brush and the trees and miss the broader picture. Truth can sometimes be in the details but seldom is. Truth, when it comes to faith, has to be found in the heart as well as in the head.
----------------------------
Hey, Karin, good to have you back here. Sometimes we can remember only the bits and pieces of what we were taught about religion as children. But what we almost never remember is the context of what we learned. I doubt that is because we forget, but rather because we were never taught the context in the first place. Hopefully this series will do that for the 10 Commandments.
--------------------------------
Thank you, Cathy. What I worried most about when writing this essay is whether it would be too busy in the details and not light enough to keep interest given the many options of how to split up the Commandments. I am glad that you were able to weave through the maze with me and come up with an enjoyable read.

God bless,

Monte
Your words are a blessing, as always, Monte.
Monte,
I am flabbergasted by the invaluable information contained herein, due to your serious study.

Number two is today the one we ignore at our peril: idols come in
many forms... the largest one i see is the nation-state. Veteran's Day proves this. They died, heroically, for an idol.
ps this in no way takes away their mighty dignity...
their sacrifice...
god warns us against idols because
they will consume us.
yet behind the idol...the nation state..lies loyalty
and the giving of one's life
for another...

are these not God's injunctions?
Thanks John and Jim, I much appreciate you continuing to read this series.

Jim, it is possible to confuse worship of a nation with worship of God. This often happens under theocracies. In the US it is more likely that people will EQUATE one with the other and end up thinking that patriotism is essential to being godly. That happens too much in right wing settings in this country. In many places in rural America it is assumed that if you love God you will love your nation as a "shining light on a hill" or as an embodiment of values that are holy. This is a dangerous belief.

God and country are simply not the same and too many people cannot tell the difference, to the point where they insist that the nation must be "godly" as they define godly.

Monte
Thank you, Harvey. Amazing grace indeed.

Monte
Once again your rigorus insight impresses me. As I've stated before I'm not even remotely a christian, but I am very pleased to see the work you are doing here. It is always enlightening and pleasant to travel down this road with you, even if we are wearing different boots.
I always followed Heinlien's 11th commandment "Thou Shalt not get caught"
and been an adherant of my own "Thou Shalt not take this shit so seriously." But that's just me.
Again, excellent writing, good work and food for the soul of the believer. Thank you.

Rated.
Monte,
Here I am, late as usual. Thanks for explaining the Ten Commandments. Now I'm more confused than ever! I kid, of course. I never realized there was that much to it. As a personal view, the Ten Commandments are about the very easiest thing to remember and assimilate in the whole Bible. They are very literal and cut and dry compared to a lot of the teachings (as far as I know). There is little doubt about their meaning, which is a very good thing for laymen like me.
I would also like to say that if we were to only follow those Commandments that deal in human relationships, the world would be a much better place for all of us.
I'm often surprised by those who find it difficult to treat others with any kind of decency and yet still call themselves good Christians. Sadly I've witnessed many with no particular Christian view of themselves treat each other better at times. I suppose that's just human nature. For all our accomplishments, we are truly flawed as a species. It's good to know that there are denominations that are tolerant of each other. It's what attracts me to your posts.

Totally unrelated is something that Blue in Texas brought up that makes me curious. What I understand from your writings and what I've learned in my far past is that (please correct me if I'm wrong), Christians have to accept Christ to enter the gates of Heaven while Jews only have to follow the word of God per the Old Testament, at least that is my understanding.
My confusion is about converting to Judaism. I'm sure it's a complicated process, but it seems impossible to become a Jew if not born a Jew. I often hear Jew as a reverence to race and I get confused, knowing little about Judaism. I've always considered Judaism a religion and Israeli as a nationality. (I told you I was dumb about it). So my question is,if being Jewish is a race, how can one become a Jew? As in, if someone is caucasian, how could they become black or Asian or Hispanic, etc.?

BTW, great series, Monte. Inspirational and informative.
Monty,
Jesus did not say that only those who are considered the "religious" -- those ordained, are to be holy. We are all called to be apostles if we are Christian, true disciples, who, though imperfect, truly expected to live the Commandments, and to be prayerful every day, not as followers of ritual, but as true believers witnessing to the grace in our lives and the fruits of the Holy Spirit.

Monty, I am pleased and proud to see you practicing your calling here on Open Salon. Keep up the wonderful work, which is God moving in and through you. ~millie
Thanks Monte---as always, wanted to give this the full attention it deserved, so I'm walking in even after Michael!

First, it is always a blessing to be reminded of God's sense of humor. That ALWYS helps. Everything.

Second, I love the fact that you use ALL of the Bible in your preaching. The mainline Protestant or megachurch inclination to pick and and as if in approaching God's meal we'd just prefer to have desert today approach is just not fulfilling to me.

Third, in reading your explanation of the slicing and dicing of the Word, it struck me that perhaps GETTING to the word of God is supposed to be hard.

Finally---I love the message that the 10 commandments are not rules, like rules for the road in a drivers ed book. The Bible is not a training manual. (Training manuals being things no one writes anymore ---trust me on that---if they did, I'd have a job because that's what I do!0 The 10 commandments are---as you say---a gift.

A gift.

Thanks Monte!

Roger
Hi, Andy. Thanks once again for reading and commenting on this series. It means a lot to me that it is interesting enough to you for you to stick with it. You will always be welcome to travel with me, whatever boots you wear. As for taking this "s**t too seriously, I got a good chuckle out of that. That is quite a Catch 22 for far too much of Christianity. Most Christians are functionally Biblically illiterate, which to my mind means that they don't take it seriously enough. The other side of that coin is that they take what their pastors say very seriously, including the ridiculous interpretations of too many right wing church leaders, and end up with a distorted message that they then try to force down other people's throats. There is nothing quite so dangerous as a misinformed true believer.

Hi, Mike, just stick with the program as you have been and the Ten Commandments will begin to make even more sense. This essay that gives an overview of them is the hardest and explains the confusion in the most detail of all the essays. It is pretty much easy sledding from here. I promise!

I agree that if we all followed the Commandments relating to how we are to interact with others we would be a whole lot better off. I know many nonreligious people who act much better towards others than many Christians I know. That we are flawed, religious and otherwise, is for me a given. But that we can work hard to overcome those flaws and to do it with some success is for me also a given. It is possible to be a better person today than we were yesterday. But it takes diligence and hard work.

I am not an expert on Judaism and do not want to claim to be. Perhaps some of our Jewish reader friends can answer your questions about Judaism much better than I can. Christians do believe that we much accept Christ as Lord and Savior, and Jews do have to follow the Torah if they are practicing Jews. There are Jews who are born into Jewish families but who do not practice the faith, just as there are people who are born into Christian homes but do not practice the faith. And you can convert to Judaism through study followed by a commitment to practice that faith. So being Jewish is more than just being "born a Jew." You can convert to Judaism regardless of your race. Judaism is really not a "race" at all. It is a religion. There are white, black, brown and yellow Jews, just as there are all of those races that have Christians in them. Most people who have considered Jews as a "race" have done that as a convenient way to distinguish a group to hate, eg: Hitler and the Holocaust. And today it is easy to label a group as a reason to discriminate against them or to irrationally hate them. You hear things like "the Jews control television and the banks" as a way to stereotype them in a negative light. I just don't buy into any of that garbage. And I know you don't either. I hope this primitive understanding of mine helps you a bit.

.
Millie, thanks so much for coming by and commenting. You are right. Christians are ALL called to be holy, to be set apart for God's work and to live according to the teachings of Christ. That is sometimes called "the priesthood of all believers" in Protestant circles. When I use the term "religious" I mean all people of faith, not just the formally ordained. I think you sum up the obligations of the faithful very well. How we witness is often argued among Christians. But however we do it, boldly or timidly, it starts first by witnessing to our faith by how we live our lives. If we claim that we have faith we must "walk the walk not just talk the talk." Thank you for your kind words about my efforts here.

Roger, good to have you come by and share your thoughts. You are never late to these posts and I appreciate it whenever you stop by, even if it is after Mike! I am sure God has a sense of humor when watching us try to muddle through our lives. Kind of like the joy we took watching our children grow up. We laughed at some of their antics, but did so with love in our hearts. I am a bit disturbed at the trend in modern Protestant preaching in particular to cherry pick the texts and to avoid some of the more difficult parts to keep the congregations always happy and hardly ever challenge them to understand the Old Testament or even some of the so-called "Hard Sayings of Jesus." There is a danger there of presenting a religion that will not stand up through the hard times of our lives. Feel good religion is fine when everything is going good. But the question is how would that religion play out in the ghettos of our cities or in the pain that falls in everybody's life? And I do agree that just getting to the Word is a whole lot harder than many people think. In general I am suspicious of anyone who says that Christianity, or any faith for that matter, is "easy." Whoever told us that was lying.

The Decalogue is instruction and far more than rules, as you say. It is, indeed, a gift from God that is designed to instruct us on how to live the good life under Yahweh. If we could be better students and rebel less against that instruction this world would be a far better place than it is now. However, we always must understand the Ten Commandments in the light of the world in which we live, and not confuse how people living over 2500 years ago chose to interpret it with how it is interpreted today. I will be hitting on that point in my next essay.

Thanks much to you all.

Monte
We have no concrete phenomenological
"image", or feeling ,
of God's damn presence...

or..it comes and goes...

in the old days, where the heck did they
"feel" or "sense" God to be?
Do we post-moderns need to agree on a physical
place to locate him? Abstractions and words,
and laws, just don't do it...for me...
Hi, Jim. Assuming you are serious I do not think orthodox religion, either Judaism or Christianity, for example, will be much help to you in discerning a PHYSICAL place to locate God.

There is no accepted hermeneutic in which God is seen that way. Rather the metaphors for God most used refer to God as "spirit," and as "love." The ancient Israelites believed that God's presence was with them in the escape from Egypt, in a pillar of fire and in a cloud; on the mountain at Sinai, in the Tabernacle and later in the Temple. But to see the "face" of God was forbidden and it was assumed that if you did you would die. So they did try to physically locate God much more than we do today.

Christians often say that God is "in heaven" but where that is is anyone's guess, and Christians say that God is omnipresent in the form of the Holy Spirit and, as Jesus said, "I will be with you always, even unto the end of the age."

I think that if we try to box God in, or pin down God to fit our stereotypes of God, to fit our needs, then at the most we get a skewed construct of God. That is why Christians place such great stress on the Son, ("If you have seen the Son you have seen the father.") If, as we Christians believe, Jesus was God incarnate then we have a glimpse of what God is like.

Christian faith says that should be enough to know about the magnificent "Other" who is God. The Risen Christ told Thomas, "You believe because you have seen me; blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe." That, dear friend, is faith. Faith is shrouded in mystery, as is God. Mystery is not well tolerated in the modern, or as you call it, post modern world.

Blessings,

Monte
There's a favorite Van Morrison song of mine: "Let Go into the Mystery"...

"there is no other place to be..."

i can accept that, almost: a felt-sense of a big wide open infine universe tinged, impinged
with a mysterious "something"...

I guess I feel it in my head mostly, and sometimes in my heart.

(Yes, I was serious..!)

blessings back at you
"Most people who have considered Jews as a "race" have done that as a convenient way to distinguish a group to hate,"

Now that makes a lot more sense to me. I didn't think there was anything scientific to a "Jewish race" and it seems that when I have heard the term it may have always had something to do with the holocaust. Thanks for clearing that up. I expected that one could study and join the faith like so many other religions, but that race thing has puzzled me for years. Why I never looked for an answer is also a puzzle.
I would never have thought there was debate about where the 10 commandments begin. Thanks for addressing all the context and comparison; much appreciated.
Hi, Cocoa, glad to see you are sticking with this series and getting new information out of it. I hope as we look at the individual commandments that will also give you some new things to think about.

Monte
You are so passionately detailed about what you write..... it shines through. I often come upon your posts in a quiet moment and read sometimes again and again and even though I am not of your faith I delight with you in your's. As I read through some comments I realize the support your words give to so many and I think ... you are doing much good. Keep it up!
Thank you for your kind comments, Traveller. I much appreciate them.

That we of many faiths - or no faith at all - can get to know our respective faiths better is something that I think this world sorely needs. I try to express what I understand of my own faith and its origins in a way that people can come to their own conclusions about that faith. Whatever others decide about the validity of my or any faith is their decision. But I do believe that kind of a decision needs to be based on a real understanding of a faith and not on some preconceived idea of the faith that is based on bits and pieces, fragments, of what the faith itself teaches.

Blessings and Peace,

Monte
Monte,

I kind of hate to start with some correcting, but the Jewish prayer known as the Shema begins as follows:

Shema Yisrael Adonai eloheinu Adonai ehad

The translation of the Hebrew :

שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל יְהוָה אֱלֹהֵינוּ יְהוָה אֶחָד

Is literally :

Hear, O Israel: the Lord is our God, the Lord is One

The next part goes like this:

בָּרוּךְ שֵׁם כְּבוֹד מַלְכוּתוֹ לְעוֹלָם וָעֶד.
Barukh sheim k'vod malkhuto l'olam va'ed.
Blessed be the Name of His glorious kingdom for ever and ever.

V'ahav'ta eit Adonai Elohekha b'khol l'vav'kha uv'khol naf'sh'kha uv'khol m'odekha.
And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.

V'hayu had'varim ha'eileh asher anokhi m'tzav'kha hayom al l'vavekha.
And these words that I command you today shall be in your heart.

V'shinan'tam l'vanekha v'dibar'ta bam
And you shall teach them diligently to your children, and you shall speak of them

b'shiv't'kha b'veitekha uv'lekh't'kha vaderekh uv'shakh'b'kha uv'kumekha
when you sit at home, and when you walk along the way, and when you lie down and when you rise up.

Uk'shar'tam l'ot al yadekha v'hayu l'totafot bein einekha.
And you shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be for frontlets between your eyes.

Ukh'tav'tam al m'zuzot beitekha uvish'arekha.
And you shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.

There is more, but I don’t want to make a whole post in your comments. Anyone interested in the prayer (with the Hebrew text and translation, which I cannot reproduce here as they are embedded images and not text) can find it here:

http://www.jewfaq.org/prayer/shema.htm

Regarding the constant deconstruction of the ten commandments: I always found it amusing, as well, considering that Talmud scholars have always maintained that G-d gave Moses a total of six hundred and thirteen commandments for the people of Israel. Which, I think, goes to show how much consideration G-d gave to insuring our understanding of His instruction to us.

Rather they see the Torah, what Christians too often call narrowly as "Law," as teaching or instruction regarding how to live a redeemed life day to day under the guidance of the LORD.

Spot on. Well said. The Torah is our guide to life.

It is always interesting for me to see non-Jews try to understand Jewish tradition and Jewish law. You're doing a fine job, my friend (and I never doubted for a moment that you would).

Rated.
Hi, Bill. Never apologize for your additional information, whether as added insight or a "correction." I knew I only cited a part of the Shema and it is good to have the entire prayer outlined here including the link to a more detailed explication of the prayer. Many thanks.

Monte