Mortimer Hayden Smyth

The Center For American Free Thought

Mortimer Hayden Smyth

Mortimer Hayden Smyth
Bio
Founder/Editor, Ka-Ching! Magazine; The Center For American Free Thought: Senior Policy Analyst, Director of Deviant Homosexual Studies; Interests and Hobbies: Morality, Investment, Missile Defense

Mortimer Hayden Smyth's Links

The Center For American Free Thought
Editor’s Pick
JULY 20, 2009 10:05PM

Health Care? HELL, NO!!

Rate: 24 Flag

UPDATE:  My "inbox" is suddenly flooded with outraged Jack-in-the-Box patrons taking issue with my "elitist" metaphor in the above video commentary.  If I caused any offense, I offer my utmost apologies, and would like to encourage all interested parties to join the "Jack In The Box Mini Chicken Dance Group."  It's not often that I admit that I am wrong.  In fact, I'm not admitting that-- I think my metaphor is apt.  But if my portrayal of this fine establishment struck a raw nerve with some, I will go so far as to say that my remarks were "regrettable."


MHS on Twitter
"Empathy-free and Proud Of It!"
 
My twitter account is NOT fake.  It's real. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I thought it was the responsibility of every good conservative to have as many children and grandchildren as possible, just look at Sarah Palin. Why she didn't even wait until the wedding vows to start and neither did Bristol. You have better get busy.
I almost fell out of my chair watching this.

(As an Oklahoman, however, I didn't like your negative portrayal of Jack-in-the-Box).
Can't argue with that logic. You have definitely made your point. I'm sending this to my dad and he will think you are a genius. Loved the end about the pursuit of happiness. I continue to pursue.
you know, mortimer hayden smith, the one question I've always had for you is why do you write your blogs on this commie-pinko opensalon forum? couldn't you get a job at that conservative blogspot that featured the hateful comments about Malia Obama? Just sayin'....
Dolores:
Some people thrive in the thick of battle, while others prefer life on the home front. It would certainly be splendid to join, say, the cast of Fox & Friends, a forum I think I'd be well-suited for (they offer perhaps the finest news analysis I've seen on television in recent years.) But for now, I think it's more important for me to be exposing these ideas to the unconverted. Rather than preaching to the choir, I feel like I am preaching to the Godless, Socialist Omni-sexual homeless people attempting to buy drugs in the alley behind the building where choir practice is held.

If I can convince just one misguided liberal that Quality Health Care is a reward for those who have acquired massive wealth by leading Lives Of Excellence, then I've done my job here.
A Swiftian masterpiece, rich in restaurant detail. Forty-five million thumbs up!
Pursuit of happiness IS healthcare and is in the constitution. We need more men with your genius for detail. You are a great American. You're right -this healthcare reform nonsense is a slap at our most productive citizens- What good is healthcare if everyone can get it? Mortimer-Run for something.
Great stuff! Rated.
Omg: this...this almost made sense to me. It was circular, it was odd, and it was brilliant. I want you on the Supreme Court. I want you on "Fox and Friends." I want you to figure out a way we can return television to its former five star quality (using your Jack-in-the-Box analogy; genius) so that we might banish "American Idol" from the airwaves and bring back "Pushing Daisies." I want so much after listening to your analysis that I'm going to lace up my running shoes and pursue it as it's my Constitutional right to run, run for my life.

Rated.
Curly fries piss me off too. Fries should not curl.
People laugh at Fox and Friends but does anyone remember J. Fred Muggs?
I've learnt something today: there are indeed some Americans who understand sarcasm.

Today is a good day.
Brilliant, though I hope that national health care will provide both an affordable menu and one that offers more choices than Jack-in-the-Box does. You are right, the pursuit is becoming a tough slog for most of us.
I'm not a Jack-in-the-Box patron, I just don't find you informative or amusing.
Sorry--been on the phone all morning bugging my congresspeople about healthcare. I just read and listened again, and obviously my humor and sarcasm reserves are running low. Rock on, you free-thinker!!
You could have my grandchildren, if I had children to have grandchildren that is. Thumbs up (as usual).
I feel there are some businesses that simply shouldn't be profit centers. Without listing each industry individually, as a general rule I find profits derived from the suffering and misery of others to be morally reprehensible, as they will ultimately encourage people t behave in a manner that is contrary to the general well being of the country as a whole. Privatized prisons lobby for more laws to result in more people in prison, which is why the United States has 25% of the World's prison population despite 5% of the World population. Another is healthcare. The whole concept of publicly traded insurance companies providing healthcare is primitive, immoral and asinine. Corporations have a single legal obligation: to maximize shareholder profits. Putting an entity in charge of decisions about your health whose sole purpose is to offer you as little service as possible just strikes me as insane, and I can't understand why anybody with the intellect to form complete sentences can't grasp how inherently counterproductive a system like that is. Privatized industries should be those which can obtain healthy, honest profits in a manner that is not structurally harmful to society. Shoes, for example, shouldn't not be manufactured by government; most goods shouldn't. However, the private sector has proven itself woefully inadequate at providing vital community services, as there is no natural profit center from these businesses and thus profits must therefore be generated by operating in a manner contrary to their ostensible purpose. Check your history, this is why fire departments are no longer private enterprises, as well as police forces. Historically, providing these services as privatized businesses has always resulted in problems. Likewise, vital services such as water utilities are far better served by public sector endeavors. I put healthcare in the vital services category.
Current law does not allow emergency rooms to turn away critical patients who cannot afford to pay and who don't have insurance. As long as that law is on the books, arguing against universal healthcare is simply ridiculous and ignorant. There was a young boy in Detroit a couple of years ago whose mother couldn't afford the 80 dollar dentist fee for his cavity. It abscessed, infected, and ultimately cost the boy his life--but not until he racked up $250,000 in medical expenses related to critical care. I find people who find that system superior to a universal healthcare system hard to take seriously as thinkers, as the argument completely defies all rational thought. Feelers, maybe, who have strong emotions about the idea of socialized medicine but who can't be bothered to take the time to work it out rationally. Not thinkers though. Your diatribe was quite moving and emotional, if devoid of reason.
The notion that a government healthcare system would put "bureaucrats in charge of your health decisions" is often rolled out as a boogeyman, despite the obvious flaw in the thesis: That government bureaucrats would not have financial incentives to deny you any procedure. How a disinterested civil servant who merely needs to check a few criteria off to approve is inferior to the current system--in which insurance companies pay people specifically to deny claims and grant them bonuses for each claim successfully declined, regardless of merit--eludes me.
As for the notion that we can't afford it, the argument is simply ridiculous. The United States has, as mentioned above, 5% of the World's population--yet spends more than the other 95% on war. Any objective reader examining that stat would have to conclude that a claim that we can't afford healthcare for our people because we need to outspend 95% of the world's population on war is frankly, ridiculous, and a badly warped and twisted sense of priority. Given the challenge, you would be very hard pressed to find any arguments from the collective writings of the Founding Fathers that would support that level of military spending during peacetime without badly extracting from the true context of their words.
Look at it this way: You have a neighbor who can't afford health insurance to take care of his family--but he has a bigger arsenal of guns and weapons than the rest of your neighborhood combined. Occasionally, one of his kids gets sick and dies, but he can't support their healthcare because he had to spend the money on guns. You tell me: Smart neighbor, or sick whack job?
Your argument in this video, by the way, is that he's a smart and prudent neighbor looking out for his family's defense. I on the other hand, would label that guy a dangerous kook--particularly of for over a hundred years he couldn't go a single decade without attacking another household in the neighborhood.
The very argument that we can't afford universal healthcare is predicated on the idea that all of our existing government spending is absolutely vital and necessary, by the way--including out-arming the rest of the world. Hey, I appreciate irrational paranoid fantasies that everybody is out to get me as much as the next guy, but if it came to providing for my family's medical needs versus indulging in the paranoid delusions, I'd like to think I'd pick my family.
Maybe you should stick with the choir after all; this "misguided liberal" thinks you're a nut.
Without a public option for health care thousands of Americans will suffer premature death. Therefore, anyone who opposes the public option is in agreement with the Taliban and Alquida with their "Death to America" slogan and ought to be one tried for treason.
May the dust of a thousand camels fly up your nose!
I wonder how people like you ended up in this space time continum as you views would have fit in very nicely back in Nazi Germany. It makes me nauseous to realize that the sacrifices made by the 'greatest generation' made it possible for people like you to besmirch this country.
Well, Mortie, it's a shame that some folks think you're "speaking conservative truth." Funny thing is, I'm only *pretty* sure this is some damn fine sarcasm. On the off chance that I'm right, way to go.
Dear Mortimer,

As a strict constructionist of the Constitution, how do you explain the 3/5 clause and Prohibition? Enquiring minds want to know.

Sincerely yours,
old new lefty
Interesting, if not bizarre takes, here Mort.

Thomas Jefferson was a horny old fart that couldn't keep his fly shut. Screwing his slave had about as much to do with being an anti-slave visionary as the apple pie I had last night making me Marie Callender.

C’mon, really! This crosses the border into pure, irrational absurdity and discredits anything else you have to say.
I continue to be amused at the smattering of outraged comments that each of MHS's posts generate!

One wonders how much more over-the-top a person has to be...
I rest assured that the world will "right" itself when you are on the case.
Mortimer - I'm afraid to say we really need you in this health care debate. I believe an effort akin to that before the '08 elections needs to be mounted. It's already being mounted - by the Right. (choice of "mounted" was unintentional at first, but then I noticed the potential pun and decided to leave it.)
I think we need something like "28 attacks in 28 days" about ObamaCare. (The irony is Fox News is basically already doing it - "Obama will force you to fund abortions"? Taken. "Obama wants to Kill your Gradma"? Taken. So you'll have to think REALLLY hard...)
Can a brother get a little 28A28D about some health care up in this biatch??!?
I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!!
flv to wmv converter
This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing . Hulu Downloader
thanks really thanks. youtube to mp4 converter|