After breaking up with me, Will wanted to stay friends. I wanted to stay in touch with him only to make sure he paid his half of the cell phone bill until the contract expired.
He called at least every week. I rarely answered when he called, but waited a good seven, eight hours. Will was working on his thesis, and would by then have spent fifteen hours in a windowless room with a half-dozen other aspiring geologists. He would be tired and demoralized.
Perfect.
I would call back when I was feeling particularly cavalier and frivolous—although usually the thought of Will sweating away over seismological whatsits of the Chesapeake Bay for hours was enough to put me in that mood.
During one conversation, I announced why I was sorry he’d broken up with me.
“Oh, why’s that?”
“Because I don’t have someone to talk to every night, to repeat the clever things I’ve said during the day.”
Even over the phone, I could hear him deflate ever so slightly. Apparently I called too early.
When I started dating Mike, little recap was needed at the end of the day, because we would have been in near constant contact throughout the day. He liked to call while driving, while working on jobs that did not require his full concentration. Mike liked letting me know I was in his thoughts, and maybe make sure that he was in mine.
If I didn’t like him, his behavior might have been creepy.
We had enough of a script that he could supply my response while sending me his: “Texting while driving! Toll road! Toll road! 100 mph! All for me me me! Eyes on the road? No!”
Throughout the natural breaks of the day, we would talk, just to say hi. We might talk about lunch, whether he was close enough to meet me, or better yet, meet at home for lunch.
And at the end of the day, we still had things to tell each other.
I read a piece a while ago by a married couple, Hanna Rosin and David Plotz, in which they conducted an experiment where they stayed within ten feet of each other for an entire day. This span included the many awkward moments during which Plotz had to skulk outside the women’s restroom while she, at many, many months pregnant, ducked inside every hour or so.
Rosin noted how that evening, they had little to say.
“Many a married couple runs through the what-did-you-do-today ritual at the end of the day. This is the marriage's last vestiges of the awkward first date. It often includes elements of theater, drama, self-consciousness, self-pity, and bragging. . .Today, we got to skip this strained ritual.”
I have always liked this ritual—and not just for the opportunity to showcase my wit to a captive audience. This is one of rituals of daily living that cannot be skipped between couples. You talk to your spouse. The exchange of stories, however trivial, reinforces what is between the two.
Because, as Herbert Stein wrote of couples, “they can talk to each other in ways that they cannot talk to anyone else. He can tell her of something good he has done, or something good that has happened to him, without fearing that she will think he is bragging. He can tell her of something bad that has happened without fearing that she will think he is complaining. He can tell her of the most trivial thing without fearing that she will think he is bothering her. . . The primary purpose of this conversation is not to convey any specific information. Its primary purpose is to say, ‘I am here and I know that you are here.’”
I do not relate my problems that they might be solved this moment, but because those are the stones what weigh on my mind right now. My sister’s hours at work are getting cut. I got jerked around by a client. The car needs new tires. And if something good has happened, I want to share it with him, that we might bask together in some tiny joy. I have new photos of my niece. I talked a bill down a hundred dollars. A friend from long ago and far away called.
Knowing about these is part of my presence. This is why I am happy, this is why I worry. Much as we know each other, my mental presence—and his—are not intuitive. Even if there isn’t a damned thing I can do to fix it, I want to know what. And if it’s good, I want to share it.
The ability to tell stories, the need to tell stories is part of how we make love. They do not have to be exciting stories. They do not have to be interesting. Usually they are neither. But they are pieces of the life that we are building together, and I want to know.


Salon.com
Comments
Deborah, me too. It made me do passive aggressive things like run up the bill when it was his month to pay.
blue, Mike and I were so different that we always, always perceived things differently, so comparing notes was always interesting. That is really exciting what your husband and you have. I know plenty of couples who absolutely adore each but would happily have separate condos (well, at least the women feel that way).
cartouche, thank you. Oh Lord--just saw a typo and I need to fix it NOW.
Lovely reflection on healthy relationships.
I think that I have been independent and lived alone for so long that I am simply not used to being in close proximity with other people. I am more used to it now, but I still couldn't imagine working with someone all day and then going home with them all night. That would be too much togetherness for me. I need more mystery than that in my relationships.
I like reading about you and Mike.
verbal, thank you.
emma, it does not surprise me that you need space, but physically and psychically. I felt that way about everyone I ever met, except for with my husband. Initially, I was surprised at his constant need for contact—from the time we met, we didn’t go more than a day without talking, and that was on his initiative. And phone calls do reflect some of the limitations—it’s so much easier to talk about nothing simply to assert one’s presence, when two people are in the same house. None of this is terribly coherent, I’m afraid.
Sandra, that’s a lovely image. Even falling asleep was a different experience: we used to talk about getting a king-sized mattress—no, a California king! when we had a larger bedroom, but concluded it wouldn’t make the slightest difference because he would still chase me across the bed throughout the night and crowd me against the edge to which I’d have retreated.
Julie, it sounds like one of things that it makes you smile even when saying how annoying it is.
bbd, thank you so much.
OE, that is hard. That is so hard. And I’m guessing in your part of the world that’s more than a three-hour drive.
Lea, yes, I do bear witness, but because of how much joy there was, even in the ordinary.
I wish you well as you move forward.
My husband makes me nuts if he's home too much during the day while I'm trying to work, but I treasure the re-connection with him at the end of the day. I appreciate that I can tell him things that anyone else would consider odd or silly. If he thinks I'm odd or silly, he never tells me. Of course, he probably knows that calling me odd or silly would mean he'd never get laid again.
Lisa, that's really such a magical connection. Miss Manners wrote that you should only share your dreams with the person who's there to hear about them when you wake up. And yes, I understand the get the hell out of my hair frustration too--when I had deadlines I wanted to put Mike in a hotel far, far away.
I don't think John Prine had just himself in mind when he wrote this lyric in Angel from Montgomery:
I’m the kinda person goes to work in the mornin'
Comes home in the evenin' with nothin' to say
I wish you'd write more, like every day. You have a lot to say, and you always leave me with a fresh insight.
And I know what you mean, and what your lyricist meant, but when you're the person that man's coming home to, it feels like being shut out.
Michael, even better than the first Transformers? Who knew such possibility existed? Thank you, I wish I had the time (and the patronage) to write more. (Note to Santa: I would like a patron this year. Yes, I know I asked for one every year since 2003, but it would be nice if you got on it.)
My husband and I "touch base" frequently during the day. We've always done this---even when we were both working and traveling a lot.
Whenever possible, we have dinner together (almost every night, since these days I no longer work and he travels less as well) and we can spend one or two hours talking at that time as well. Our short conversations during the day allows for a shorthand approach to the dinner time subjects.
I loved this: "I do not relate my problems that they might be solved this moment..." If I have one complaint---it is that the hub too often feels the need to "solve" that which I simply want to dissect.
Paul calls me all day. Sometimes it's so silly that both of us are asking "And why did you call?" But, if he didn't, I would be freaked out thinking something bad happened to him.
m. a.h., one of the things that I took for granted, and that Mike had never really witnessed, was the sit-down dinner. You sit and talk and eat and turn off the damned television.
Julie, I rather took for granted that if I didn't hear from him on a regular basis it was because he was dead in a gutter somewhere. (Although it might have been annoying when he did it during "business-related" Rangers' games and I was stuck indoors.) But geez, I can't imagine letting Paul run around out of sight without the cell phone.
Ash, it's the great thing about unlimited minutes.
Karin, aw, thank you. And I do like stories.
Frank calls during the day, which used to bother me until I realized how unsettling it was on the rare days he didn't. 27 + years and we still have things to say. Your last paragraph is pure truth.
I'll remember these things. You must have been an excellent wife to an excellent husband, Mrs. Michaels.
The most valuable piece of communication from my husband in the early years of our marriage was his mid-argument retort, 'I'm not telepathic, you know.' I didn't, then, but I do now and our relationship is better for it. Excellent post!
Psychomama, funny how it works like that.
wakingupslowly, thank you.
:) so much of relationships is just being there. This whole post was wonderful.