Today, we talked about tape in class. We use tape (yes, the sticky kind) quite a bit. We have notebooks that we write in and add information by taping it in. If the tape is left on the desks, it is soon gone. Ten year olds find quite a bit of things to do with tape. Most frequently, it becomes a goatee of sorts, or tapes fingertips together. For this reason, the tape stays off the desks. Even then, it still gets used for all sorts of non-academic pursuits (can you say tape goatee?) and this class in particular has used quite a bit of tape. This is a problem.
10 rolls of tape cost $20 to order with our preferred customer account at the supply store. I showed my class the 10 rolls of tape I received today and explained to them how this will impact them. My classroom has a $100 supplies budget for the school year. Not just for tape, but for all the supplies we will need. This is for pencils, whiteboard pens, notebook paper, graph paper, construction paper, glue sticks, crayons, markers, the journals we use, anything else that the classroom might need. All consumable and non-consumable supplies come out of this $100 budget.
If I am buying tape in November, my $100 is not going to last very long. My students wanted to know why our budget was such a small amount. I tried to explain that the tax payers decided they didn't want to pay any more to schools, but I am not sure they understand. Quite frankly, in the land of ballot initiatives and minimal funding requirements, I am not sure I understand any more.
This evening, as I was leaving, I had a chat with my principal. We did not talk about tape, but we did talk about Program Improvement Status. Apparently, my school is on the verge of being in the dreaded PI status. Our API is not below 800, but our test scores did not show adequate growth in two of our subgroups (Hispanics and economically disadvantaged). The pressure is on. We are having a school wide meeting tomorrow about how we need to reevaluate our whole school and ensure that all students are making adequate progress. If we do not show growth in these areas, we will go into PI status, as the standards are going up.
It is a good thing I have still have $80 in my supplies budget.

Salon.com
Comments
I don't think people like perdidochas have much understanding that simply "requiring" the purchases means that parents can afford these things. It's like "laws" and "directives" in general...you have to fund it to make it work!
What do you do if 20 kids bring the stuff and 10 can't afford it? Do you then require the kids that have parents with money to provide for those who don't?
I don't even count how much I spend on student supplies any more, or how many times I have slipped a kid bus fare or lunch money. I have kids that are living in homeless shelters and foster care group homes...many are working themselves. What must we do?
I feel your pain...I live it with you daily!
And by the way, my own kids LOVE tape--there's just something about it.
For a variety of reasons--transient families, transient teachers, parents with little time for volunteer activities, lack of outreach-- PTAs are rare at schools in the city's poorer neighborhoods.
But here's some hope: For the first time in the 12 years my wife has been in the OUSD, she and a group of parents have managed to get a PTA up and running. They're in their second year and raising money with regular school events. The funds involved are a relative pittance--this is a school where 100 percent of the students qualify for free and reduced-price lunches, so the families are not throwing money around. But you've got to start somewhere. And the larger is benefit, my wife says, is that the fund-raising has given parents a feeling that they can influence the quality of the school experience.
In the early 1990s, I taught in a rough school. I'm thinking our free lunch percentage was over 60%, with another 10-15% reduced lunch. I once told another teacher (who had taught their for ages) that I didn't want to require a science fair, basically since the kids were too poor to get supplies for it. She jumped on me, saying I was being racist, and that if it was important enough, they'd get the money. After that point, I realized she was right. I was just being condescending. IMHO, you are doing the same.