myles spicer

myles spicer
Location
minnetonka, Minnesota, US
Birthday
January 23
Title
na
Company
na
Bio
Retired owner of ad agencies in the Twin cities and San Diego -- 45 years. Graduate U of Minn; Veteran, officer USAF discharged as Capt. Published author. Unrepentant liberal

MY RECENT POSTS

Myles spicer's Links

Salon.com
APRIL 16, 2012 11:37AM

The most unpopular commentary you will likely ever read

Rate: 8 Flag
 

Let’s cut right to the chase: we are now at a point in our history where it is desirable – indeed, essential – to raise taxes.  This suggestion is so antithetical to everything we hear and read (especially during election campaign), that I am positive it will be greeted with disdain, disgust, and some anger. Why not…we ALL hate taxes (as do I), but there is a powerful case to be made for enhanced taxation as we enter a more turbulent financial era.

 

Let’s start with two contentious issues. The first, that Americans are heavily and onerously taxed. The second that it is careless and wasteful spending that has created a fiscal “crisis”.

 

The fact is Americans are not “overly” taxed, at least compared to international standards and the taxes of other developed industrialized nations – most of who have vibrant economies despite their higher tax rates. According to the Organisation of Cooperation and Economic Development (OECD), among developed nations, the United States is ranked 17th in taxes paid as a percent of GDP. Taxes in the U.S. are about 27 percent of GDP, but only about half that number (14.9 percent) are Federal taxes. During the Reagan administration, the Federal take was 18.5 percent. Federal taxes are not increasing despite misinformation to the contrary.

 

The claim that our corporate taxes are stifling and excessive again is not borne out by the facts. While it is true our rates are high, the actual corporate taxes collected as a percent of GDP, are the lowest of all OECD nations. The very bottom!

 

Conservatives like to point the finger at “wasteful” spending as the cause of our serious debt and deficits. Of course “waste” is intolerable and inexcusable. But, a more likely cause is the incredible cost of two ongoing wars this past decade – without a single added tax to pay for them. This is the first time in our history we went to war without some mechanism to cover the cost.  The Washington Post did an analysis claiming the wars (with all collateral costs) ended up putting us $3 Trillion (with a “T”) in added debt. Included in that figure were not only the direct costs, but interest on the added debt, veteran’s benefits, and rising oil prices.

 

But the strongest argument to raise taxes is not to pay for wars past, or to justify by our having among the most moderate taxation in the world, but mostly because we are a great nation in serious decline. And to rectify that decline it will take money – taxes -- pure and simple. Starting with our aged and crumbling infrastructure, our roads, bridges, dams, water systems, and other public facilities are in significant disrepair.  The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates we are at least $2 Trillion behind in upgrading our nation’s infrastructure. It is analogous to owning a fine beautiful home and allowing it to fall into decline and disrepair. Frankly, it is a disgrace, and there is only one solution – revenue (taxes) to reverse the trend. And the sooner we do it, the less costly it will be.

 

There are many other areas, where America’s decline is evident. Education, where college costs (especially at our public universities and community colleges are suffering from lack of funding); health care, where some sort of public/private plan is under attack; and rising poverty rates with safety nets are being eliminated due to lack of revenue. None of these are befitting a great nation, and none will bring us back to the shining land of opportunity for which we were always acclaimed.

 

Republicans assiduously avoid discussing the revenue side of budgeting, preferring instead to focus on the spending issues (especially domestic programs). However, one who has taken a bold and enlightened view is New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has actually suggested that we allow all the Bush tax cuts to expire in order to get our fiscal house in order. He further notes, that by doing this, Obama will have more leverage in negotiating meaningful cuts in spending, and bring a better dialog to budget talks, which have had a bad history of being polarized.

 

The bottom line is this. Taxes are a “dirty word” in today’s political milieu – and they shouldn’t be. They need an adult conversation. Too much of the talk is based on misinformation and partisanship. One suggested reason conservatives do not like to talk about revenue, is that they have a visceral dislike for anything “government”, and by starving it, they are essentially creating a self fulfilling action on its demise. Moreover, there is no empirical evidence that we are “overtaxed” in relation to other developed nations. In fact, we are not. And lack of revenue is a component in our falling behind in a number of significant ways that are not becoming to a nation of our stature.

 

In the end, as it regards taxes, they are the dues we must pay if we want to live in a progressive, advanced, safe, clean, healthy, and robust country. The way America should be!

Author tags:

taxes, economy

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I applaud your willingness to say unpopular things, as you have previously done regarding health care. Speaking just for myself, I find your argument inspiring, not offensive. But then I'm not a tax whiner.
strongly agree- so much talk of patriotism strangely tied to hatred of the government. infrastructure, retooling to compete, support for those unfortunate all need to be addressed and maybe we all need to pay more now- not that we give up the right to complain about it
Incredibly well put argument. The bottom line has always been--even espoused by a person thought to be a bastion of conservatism, Ronald Reagan--that in order to solve the economic and federal budget issues that we have will require both tighter spending and increased revenue.
This has long been a tenet of business--that you always have to look at both the income and expense side of the ledger in order to succeed.
You saw the worst in your years in San Diego and you see a far different (and arguably more responsible) picture in Minnesota. There's a different mindset, isn't there?
Great essay.

Not unpopular with me at all.
Just sounds like common sense to me.
Well said and supported.
The automatic cuts in the Pentagon will force the issue, which involves all sorts of things, deductions, domestic discretionary and non-discretionary, i.e. entitlements, and some alteration of rates that generates more revenue, which though per deductions being altered under some views has a second order effect on economic efficiency over time that means that rates don't have to go up as much as some would argue using a purely static approach, but up somewhat, yes.
"One suggested reason conservatives do not like to talk about revenue, is that they have a visceral dislike for anything “government”, and by starving it"
I know many in the upper brackets who themselves think the current tax structure is unfair. Moderate Republicans agree. There is no reason to be defensive.

The current disparity in income and taxation in this country is the greatest threat to prosperity, civil order, and the future of democracy. The "myth" of America is likely to outlast the reality, and the current ideological polarity shows the control that is still in the hands with the few who can buy it.

The problem ain't the conservatives and ignorant fools who don't know any better, (nothing can be done about them) the problem is with liberals who don't vote for the candidates MOST LIKELY to support their interests.

They are the ones to address between now and the election Myles. If they sit it out again like they did in Bush's second term, history will repeat itself.
Ben Sen makes a very good point. Your argument is valid, but I agree that the only way to actually do anything about this is if for the independents, moderates and liberals (including progressives) to push for these changes and to support democratic candidates, as they are the ones that actually believe government is not a for profit business, and should be run for the general welfare.
r./