Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 23, 2011 2:47PM

OCCUPY OTTAWA - gone, gone, gone.

Rate: 13 Flag

 

After being warned that the camp would be cleared, a number of protestors left.  The remaining hard-core people barricaded themselves at the fountain. 

barricade

On Monday the police came in and posted eviction notices everywhere and taped notices to the tents. 

5745574 

At two in the morning today the police moved in.  100 police for the two dozen remaining protestors.

No pepper spray or anything.  Nine of the protestors who didn't leave on their own were arrested and then released, and given tickets for trespassing. 

A big encampment in Toronto was also cleared out yesterday.  Most Canadian Occupy camps are now gone.  An exception is Windsor, where the mayor says he doesn't want to "stir the pot".

Montreal remains, but the English-language paper, the Gazette, says they're on "borrowed time".  (Or maybe burrowed time, considering the snowfall last night...)

occupy mtl 

Ottawa Occupy people are planning protests.  They thought they could hang in there, and even participate in the Winterlude activities scheduled in the park for early in the new year.  Personally, I'm think it's just as well - winter camping, brrr.   They maybe should do what I've read that the Detroit Occupiers are doing - find some free/cheap office and living space.  Of course, there are lots of  empty buildings in Detroit and not so many here...

I guess, at least up here, it's time for the Occupiers to move on to the next stage, whatever that might be.

The Canadian magazine, Adbusters, which was the original inspiration for the Occupy movement, is promoting the idea of Occupy Christmas, with the idea that people should refrain from holiday shopping.  I think that may be futile - those who have money will shop and those who don't won't be shopping anyway.  (I've been doing Occupy Xmas for years).

Anyway, Occupy Ottawa is gone gone gone.  Here's what the park looks like now:

aftermath

Well, actually that's what it looked like first thing this morning.  It has been re-opened now for its normal use - which is mainly, especially at this season, a walkway between bus-stops.

 Meanwhile, some Ontario lawyers are filing a complaint with the U.N. (lotsa luck).

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
The photo of the barricades at the fountain looked all too familiar to me with the pallats signs and tents, made me sad. Thanks for posting this.
I'm just glad I didn't have to report anything along the lines of your posts from Oakland!
Yeah, the Windsor situation is somewhat unique. But then, the city has a mayor who doesn't have his head up his ass. The PD is also on its best behaviour after a couple of damning incidents involving assaults (unrelated to the Occupy protests) that were caught by surveillance cameras.
This made me sad and discouraged, but then I read this sentence: "I guess, at least up here, it's time for the Occupiers to move on to the next stage, whatever that might be." Thank you for that viewpoint.

And for your excellent "Occupy" coverage.
:(

I've been thinking for a while now that, with winter and other developments, OWS is going to go dormant for a bit. Not dormant exactly (hopefully), but perhaps shifting to something more doable and productive than defending little plots of ground like the Japanese did on Iwo Jima. Whatever happens from this point forward, the Occupiers have done far more than most of us ever do; they got off their asses, took to the street, and got people talking about some critically important issues. In this era of a terminally apathetic and deluded electorate, that's very good work indeed.
How come in Canada they manage to do things in a civilized fashion, even sodomizing the public, but that’s right in order to become a Mountie one must have an IQ above the temperature that water freezes at.
Jack - we have our share of police problems. Some disturbed Polish guy, who knew no English, and was distressed at landing at the Vancouver airport and not knowing where to go, what to do (his mother was meeting him, but was delayed) was tasered a few dozen times and subsequently croaked. Defense by the police was he was about to attack them with a stapler, if I remember rightly. Also we had someone dubbed Sgt. Pepper some time prior to the recent events in California. Also we have had at least three cases of many many women disappearing, with the police doing very little...the women, after all, were mostly prostitutes and Native. One perp, the pig-farmer, was finally caught, tho it should have happened years earlier. The Highway of Tears in B.C. and the disappearing prostitutes of Edmonton are still unsolved...

I wish I could say we do better........but we're only 'better' because smaller-scale...

Nana - they even got Palin stealing their lines! And many commentators have said they've got the public political talking points shifted from deficit to inequality. I hope that winter and eviction (and efforts at co-opting) won't mean an end to this movement...

Alysa - I'm depressed too. Wish I'd managed to get there one more time. But I read a good phrase somewhere, about the fetishization of the literal occupying...tho on the other hand there was an interesting community happening there... I hope that a new stage is coming out of the chrysalis...

Boanerges - ah. But also the civic authorities there may have the same idea I had - that the best way to get rid of the occupiers would be to ignore them. Esp. here. Wanna camp all winter? Knock yourself out.
Myriad ~ it is sad to see the ending of the Occupy sites in Canada that you have been highlighting. Fortunately, so many creative and resourceful people are involved in the movement and there will be lots of ways to keep this going. When I consider what happened in NYC it makes me glad that I was able to document the park in its heyday with all of the great things that were going on when it was a full encampment site running 24/7 including people sleeping overnight under the tarps. That's a special period of history that we have lived through and will remember always!
Designanator - it has certainly been an exciting couple of months, restoring some hope that people could influence the society they live in. And, right, it involved creative people - the whole physically occupying thing was great - who can think of some other, as they say in Quebec, manifestations.
Protesting to the rich, that you're hungry, has no effect.

Protesting to the wealthy, that you're poor, means nothing to them.

Protesting to the government, that they aren't doing their job, means they'll vote themselves a pay raise and increase your taxes.

Protesting about the environment means nothing if you ride home in a motor vehicle and turn on the lights, heat, hot & cold water, phone, etc.

Protesting, everything, as in "Occupy", without having viable solutions to those problems to put on the table, means you're just whining.

Protesting, as in "Occupy", without clear cut, common, definable goals, is just plain ridiculous.

Yes. We CERTAINLY DO very much need to protest all of the above - and more - but unless we lodge that protest with the right ends in sight, and offer the MEANS of achieving those ends, we are, as Shakespeare said, "Full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!"

Come back in the spring. Come back with goals and the means/methods to achieve them. Come back with a plan; then you'll have something to say that others will hear and heed.

Until then all you do is, ".....strut and fret (your) hour upon the stage" as though you'd "done something" of worth and value.

.
Sky, I think people (*the people*) are going to have to abandon the system that has abandoned them and set up a society of their own. The Occupiers had something of that going on, living as a community. I think it's time for another back-to-the-land movement. People are going to have to do for themselves instead of working for money to pay people for stuff.

I just posted on Dawn Bell a bit about what I have in mind, based on how a lot of people out my way get along on very little income - they heat by firewood they cut themselves, grow a lot of their own food, live in old cheap houses (mine cost $17,000), work for each other, and get a lot of their clothing, furniture, household goods, building materials etc. from the the 're-use centre' at the country dump. Looking to TPTB to respond to our needs, as you say, ain't gonna work - if we're not useful to them any more, they'll ignore us. So let's us ignore THEM.
Or, as fark.com so eloquently described the situation:

"Occupy Ottawa demonstration broken up by Canadian police in unspeakable orgy of violence: Eight people received tickets, one was helped to hospital and three others had their feelings temporarily hurt"
Myriad,
I so love the "Back To The Land" concept - in theory. But I'm such an ancient ol' fart that I have lived the way you are talking about in my youth. If you do indeed do this, it will definitely be without me. I'll wish you good fortune, but I've been there, done that, and hated it.

Imagine the pollution if our present-day population all burned wood for cooking and heating!! Imagine also how quickly most of the wooded areas near to our highly populated areas would be de-nuded of burnable trees!

The vast majority of our population is urban. They have absolutely no knowledge of, or interest in, living in that "rural" manner. Trying to turn back the clock to an earlier, simpler day is not my idea of a viable solution. To my thinking, we need a social/economic/political system that meets our needs in 2011 and onward. One we design for that purpose and initiate on our own. A REAL "of the people, by the people, for the people" system - NOT the mockery of that fine principle we have now.

But if you wish to try it, why fill yer boots!

.
Yeah, the wood-burning is only for rural types. Cities...infrastructure investment first, in geo-thermal and solar. (And, of course, I don't do a lot of the work I'm recommending any more - but there's lotsa people who can and do...) Thing is, I think we have to work up some new approaches rather than the old ones (old ones including hippy back to the land, I spose).

Anyway, necessity/mother and all that: things will evolve, people will adapt.
Boanerges = that Fark bit was cute. And reminds me, I heard on the car radio, and tried to make a mental note, of the costs to police for the entire Occupy Ottawa - I think it was ... oh hell, it's on the internet, everything's on the internet - $24,000, of which $16,000 was for the fairly large number of personnel who cleared out the protestors. Covered by budget for demonstrations. Pretty puny compared to the $900,000 (!) costs for a Tamil demonstration a few years back...
Do you think they will reconvene in the spring?
Another really informative post, Myriad. ~r
Thanks for sharing this. People everywhere who see this first hand are the eyes and ears of those of us stuck in the middle of no where. It is good to see things first hand.
Kind of like their saying, "You have the right to protest for a little while then we can ignore you and tell you to go home without addressing any issues."

We're supposed to consider this a democracy?
Well the kind of changes the progressives want will only happen here in Canada, in Ottawa, if the NDP win the general election in 4 years. Between now and then the Conservative Harper government, for which I voted, will continue with its agenda. And let's not forget that the overwhelming majority of work age people here are EMPLOYED. What's this nonsense about starting alternative communities. Who do you think is in all those buildings in the city throughout the day, all the stores, who's creating traffic jams on the highways around here? Sure, there is a poverty problem but the government has a solution for that...it is highly possible, from what I have heard from party workers, that the Conservatives will introduce a Guaranteed Annual Income plan for the country. You know why? It is a way to rationalize the overly bureaucratized social welfare system that presently wastes resources by employing redundant personnel, in the thousands, in delivering welfare that is mandated by the Charter Rights provisions for a healthy life, so welfare can't be legislated away. But delivery of the service can be made much more efficient. Everybody in the nation will be put into an automated system that will deposit cheques in bank accounts for all those who fall below a certain minimum annual income. And the system can be paid for by the savings accruing from terminating tens of thousands of redundant government workers, at all levels, throughout the country. This is the computerized future. And the fiscal health of this encompassing plan will be guaranteed by accelerated tar sands development, in Alberta, which is crucial for generating the revenue much of the economy and public budget relies on. No one is going back to the land.
JP - Canada is better off than the U.S. re proportion of poor people. I was watching 60 Min last night about the incredible number of families living in cars. It seems to me there are sufficient quantities of unemployed people in the U.S. for them to start looking at some alternative way of getting along.

Seriously? The Conservative govt considering GAI? I think you're right that it would be more efficient and I think it would be a Good Thing. I'm not in favor of the tar sands supporting it...
Yep, a GAI is definitely on the horizon...it makes sense policy-wise, as an efficiency multiplier, but secondly, even more importantly, the Conservatives are thinking politically...what better way to boost their chances for re-election against the NDP than by stealing their premier issue and making them eat dirt as the Conservatives brag that THEY are bringing this in, starting about 3 years from now, just in time for the next election. It will make all the government job cuts now, when the pain is being imposed for the next couple of years, all seem worthwile to get the pay-off, the goodie, for the whole society later. Pretty smart, huh? Between now and then there are the higher priority items to do of course...one of which is withdrawing from the Kyoto protocol to clear the way for tar sands expansion. I know tar sands development is opposed by many, but also supported by many others, and there's no other way in today's world to generate the money needed for all the programs. It will be done...it's the grand plan, it makes sense politically, and it will win the government re-election in 2015 barring any catastrophes...wink
Libs & Cons regularly steal from the NDP. It's a strength Canada has that two-party U.S. lacks.