OEsheepdog's Blog

And you thought you were having a bad hair day!

OEsheepdog

OEsheepdog
Location
From the Forest to the Shore, Connecticut, USA
Birthday
March 12
Title
Director of Change
Company
An unnamed non-profit health care provider
Bio
Change is good...that's what I keep telling my colleagues. It's difficult and hard. It's challenging and rewarding. It's fraught with peril. It needs to be done...yesterday!

OEsheepdog's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 6, 2010 8:19AM

Chris Dodd retiring as Connecticut's senior US Senator

Rate: 20 Flag

The New York Times reports that Christopher Dodd, senior U.S. Senator from Connecticut will likely not seek re-election and will retire after serving five terms.

As a new resident of Connecticut, I find this very good news. Dodd who allegedly got a sweetheart mortgage deal from the subprime lender Countrywide Financial, was on the outs with locals and was a long shot to be re-elected.

He likely would have faced Linda McMahon, of the World Wrestling Federation McMahons in the general election. She is a political novice, but has name recognition through her family connections.

Dodd's decision not to run opens the door for Richard Blumenthal, the highly regarded state attorney general. Dodd's move, may ultimately keep the seat in Democratic hands. Dodd was the son of Thomas Dodd, former Connecticut senator who was censured by the U.S. Senate on ethics and corruption charges.

Dodd is one of those late 20th century politicians who rode to office on the name recognition of his relatives, like Olympia Snowe, Andrew Cuomo, Jesse Jackson, Jr., George H.W. Bush,  George W. Bush, Ted and Robert Kennedy, Lincoln Chaffee, and scores of others. When former Senator Jonn Tower was nominated to be George H.W. Bush's Secretary of Defense, Dodd voted to confirm Tower and was the only democrat to do so, probably because Tower has not voted for Senator Thomas Dodd's (Chris Dodd's father) censure in 1968.

North Dakota's Byron Dorgan has also announced he won't seek re-election in North Dakota. That seat will likely switch out of Democrats hands to Republicans.

With the two incumbents retiring, two questions remain:

Will they shed the shackles of the special interests in their remaining months in office?

Or will they spend their remaining time looking for lucrative opportunities to enrich themselves after they leave office?

What do you think?

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Cynic that I am when it comes to career politicians, they will be looking for lucrative opportunities to enrich themselves...
Leonde -- There's a fine line between being cynical and being a realist. You're a realist.
I'm with Leonde on that, Andy.

But I do not have quite as negative opinion on Dodd as you...and I hope he fools us cynics.
Frank -- I remember watching Dodd explain his vote for Tower when he was a first termer, so my opinon was only validated by his mortgage deal with Countrywide.

As the one Senator who can't stand another Senator says, "I hold him "in minimum high regard."
Yippee! and who cares there will be another slimeball somewhere to fill his shit covered shoes. Man I'm cynical this morning.Politicians are like roaches, you can never get rid of them. My apologies to roaches who are inherently smarter. the other o/e
as a ct resident myself I'm glad. dodd's extracurricular mortgage activities were a disappointment to say the least. as you probably know there are "dump dodd" signs all over the place.

I'm glad there's a positive, well known and respected democrat to run in his place. my husband and I like blumenthal a lot.

it's bad enough we have leiberman. to have the wwf representing our state in addition to whining joe would be more than any sane person could take.
Yes, Lieberman. The narcisssitic, preening peacock who finds new ways to shame CT all the time. Dodd's career in the Senate is a checkered one to be sure, but it's about time CT got a break. We here in NY understand -- we once had Senator Pothole, Al D'Amato. Blumenthal has a chance to make a difference. Let's hope so.
o/e -- I'm trying to think positive thoughts. I always thought politics was a hobby for ecocentric rich people and lawyers who had no outlet for their miserable frustrated existance.

vfcm -- Lieberman is a whole 'nother post. I look forward to voting in that election, too.

Pandora -- Joe is a disgrace all right. Attorneys general usually make good candidates.
OEsheepdog, given all the negatives concerning that mortgage you have to wonder why he ever signed up for it. Beyond that it's clear that other missteps were taken by him over the years which is also unfortunate for his "legacy." He could have ended his Senate career with many thinking very highly of him instead of what we see today regarding a political career that was checkered.
I think that politics happens to be the biggest spectator sport in the country and that this year looks to be a doozy...
John -- You are not born arrogant; it is a learned behavior. Son of a censured U.S. senator, let's just say the values learned at home were not from a role model or propriety. There's a lot of entitlement in politics (regardless of party affilitation). He might have just felt entitled.

Geoff -- It wouldn't surprise me if Massachusetts elects its first Republican Senator since Ed Brooke. A doozy is right. People are mad as hell and they're fed up.

Will -- How many boards of directors of financial institutions will chris be elected too next year? Cashing out is probably correct. You should visit his web site and just see how difficult it is to get access for the average citizen.
OE: Oddly enough, I have listened to Martha Coakley on talk radio and actually respect her. She did seek in the primary to move left on some social issues which might have worked well in the primary, but may bite her a bit. She's formidable. Patrick should be running scared in the governor's race, for sure, though.
Geoff -- Does respecting her mean voting for her? Rhetorical question. There's been so much corruption by Democrats in the state legislature for so long...let me just say it woun't be a cake walk and as you said in your blog (please visit Gwool's blog) unless she self immolates, she'll probably win.
Based on his history, he'll rake it in. He took plenty from the financial institutions he regulated, including Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac.
Ann -- I guess that seems to be the consenus today.

Con -- I know that you give back to the community through the work you do in Roxbury and Dorchester. Chris plan on giving back to his community by paying off his allegedly sweetheart mortgage early.
Good time for him to depart. Dems could use fresh blood.
Dodd's decision is not a surprise. Ever since his questionable practices with a mortgage lender and his "cottage" in Ireland, Ct. democrats have become dissatisfied with the man.
Chuck -- Hubris always trumps intellect.
Oh gosh. If only they could make it a two-fer. Take Droopy Dog with him, too.
Isn't there a public-minded Kennedy in CT who could run? Do you know anything about McMahon's politics? What about the guy that beat Lieberman in the primary and then was beaten in the general?

I know, too many questions.

I just want CHANGE, damnit.

And whatever deal Dodd made with the Devil, well, it's going to come due sooner or later.
I have a friend who lives in Connecticut and was thinking of calling him up today and asking whether he, with Joe Lieberman---who will be the senior senator when Dodd leaves---or me---with Roland Burris---had it worse? But then I realized he'd win. . .

As to shedding shackles (excellent alliteration btw) Hah!
Lorraine -- I think Ned Lamont is running for Governor. Blumenthal is very popular here.

I sometimes wish I could pass a law stating you can't hold office if you attended Harvard or Yale.
Roger -- Roland Burris's monument is bigger than Joe's. Have you ever seen the pictures of it? And monument is not being used as an euphemism, here.
Very interesting, Sheepdog. Gwool's post on the subject is also interesting. I like your optimism.
I choose Door #2.

Thanks for the insider's view.
Most people don't realize this, but the real boondoggle that senior politicians look forward to upon retirement isn't their generous government pensions....it's the paid seats they're given on corporate boards of directors. A seat on a major corporation's board can be worth $100,000 a year or more (and you thought they were doing it as a civic responsibility!) The corporate dragoons invented those lollipops to keep their minions in line right down to the wire, the last vote on the last day of their last terms. And, as far as I know, there's no restrictions on former office holders taking these positions, as there are for lower ranked government employees.

Leonde Delmare (great name! May I borrow it sometime for a character?) hinted at this; I just wanted to make it explicit.
Bonnie Russell -- I never said he received a sweetheart deal from Mozilo, I said allegedly (i.e., assert without or before proof). I feel people perceive he received a sweetheart deal; their perception is their reality. Which is why his polls are so low, and why he is retiring. Your point about Mozilo acting unilaterally is well taken.

I agree it's early to call the election in ND, but it's how I feel right now.
One hugely corrupt politican retiring? It must mean he's stolen enough of the American pie that now he can go richly into that good night. Bye Dodd, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
Deb -- Please don't sugarcoat it, tell me how you really feel.
Fortunately there's no chance of a "Connecticut for Chris Dodd" party.
I like using it as a euphemism better! But you're right, if that's the ah. . .measuring stick. . .then Roland the Brainless wins.