OEsheepdog's Blog

And you thought you were having a bad hair day!

OEsheepdog

OEsheepdog
Location
From the Forest to the Shore, Connecticut, USA
Birthday
March 12
Title
Director of Change
Company
An unnamed non-profit health care provider
Bio
Change is good...that's what I keep telling my colleagues. It's difficult and hard. It's challenging and rewarding. It's fraught with peril. It needs to be done...yesterday!

OEsheepdog's Links

Salon.com
JANUARY 14, 2010 3:20PM

I'm going to take a lot of heat from OSers on this post.

Rate: 53 Flag

I've moved on from the Haiti earthquake. I have to. Yes, it's a tragedy. Yes, innocent victims have died or are dying. I have to look at this situation like a MASH doctor or nurse manages patient Triage.

There are some cases you can't treat, you can't make the effort because there are so many other lives that can be saved. It's part of the exigencies of war.  This sounds heartless and cold; people will resent my comments. I understand that. Please hear me out.

We have a unique medium in the 21st century that's about 70 years old. Television. Television makes the world smaller, and the tragedy of human misery enters our homes every day, often without an invitation.

Here's what Television missed:

President William McKinley assassinated.

The 1906 Earthquake and fire in San Francisco, California. 

The sinking of the Titanic 

World War I

The 1918 flu epidemic

The 1929 Stock Market Crash

The dust bowl.

Kristallnacht.

The great hurricane of 1938

The beginning of World War II

The Blitz on London.

The attack on Pearl Harbor.

The concentration camps of Nazi Germany

The firebombing of Dresden

Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Each of these events is a tragedy in itself.  Without the benefit of Television, they are relegated to the history books or Wikipedia. I don't have a scale to measure human suffering, one human's misery can't be seen as better or worse than another's misery.

Some believe that we only get one appearance on planet Earth. So I have to view this disaster the way a doc or a nurse views Triage in a MASH. I have to move on.

Because I need to focus somewhere I might make a difference. Aren't there Katrina victims that still need a job or a home? Aren't there homeless people in my community? Is there a person who needs medical treatment but doesn't have insurance? Is there a family who needs a job so they can hold on to their home?

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I think the point you're trying to make relates to information overload. Frank Rich had such an excellent post about the topic shortly after 9/11. It's not that people like you don't care - of course they do - but rather that we can only deal with so much. the 24/7 news cylce overloads us with information and with pathos. It's wearying.
Nikki -- You have a unique life experience with respect to 9/11. I value your comment. Thanks.
OEsheepdog, as you say the Haiti disaster is certainly not the only problem or tragedy that faces us. I posted my first piece relating to the earthquake today because it focused on mobilization of resources by a top university to assist Haiti.
No heat from me. Aside from anything else, if you dwell on something over which you had no control, couldn't have prevented and can't do anything constructive about, you'll be suicidal within the week.

You're right to continue helping those you *can* do something for. Haiti has plenty of aid heading their way, and you (or anyone) watching the news and getting distressed isn't going to improve anyone's life.
You won't get any heat from me, as tragic, monumentally, as it is in Haiti. I sent you an OSmail with some further thoughts, but I think it actually does do us some good to reflect on how good we have it compared to the Third World. And yet, when will we recover from Katrina...it hasn't happened yet.

John/designanator has an interesting post, as Harvard has a long history of working in Haiti. So, I understand what you're saying, but I think it helps us to pause and reflect, even if we can't go back in time to an era before TV and the instantaneous. I don't think one can make a ready value judgement on what is better, it's just different. Thanks for your thoughts on this.
My only argument with this, Sheepy is that if in fact we were witnessing any of the atrocities that you listed that were never televised, wouldn't you feel outrage or compassion about some of those more than others? I think the deeper (and possibly more relevant) question here is why does a poor country deserve less consideration than a group of people who are being persecuted and imprisoned (and starved and gassed) for their religion or because a terrorist flew a plane into a building on their soil? If Katrina had struck New York, would the response have been different....?
Not looking to argue, just considering.
Any of these disasters (man made or natural) happen to all of humanity. It just seems a little callous to think that some of the human population is less worthy of compassion than others.
I was just wondering myself how many other needs suffer when we redirect our resources to disasters like Haiti. I'd like to believe that we increase our giving in such times but I don't know.

"one human's misery can't be seen as better or worse than another's misery." I guess you haven't listened to Limbaugh or Robertson lately.
I think I understand you on this. I've had to turn off any coverage because I began to feel a bit ghoulish seeing so much terrible misery when all I could do was donate. My heart goes out to the people in Haiti but I can't stand to keep thinking about the horrors they are enduring. Great post.
This will sound terrible too, but all the money and baby formula in the world won't fix Haiti, earthquake or not. It is a country that has no resources, no industry, little to no educational system, and little arable land. Fly over Hispaniola some time and you will be able to tell which side is Haiti, it's the side without trees. They have been chopped down for firewood, resulting in all the topsoil washing away. It has been an island remarkable only for it's abject poverty and suffering, and a succession of dictatorships that robbed the country of what little money they had.

Say whatever you like about colonialism but visit the BVIs or the French islands of the Caribbean. Sure there is poverty, but nothing like Haiti.

The first time I visited Haiti I was about 8 years old. Naked children swarmed us in the streets, begging for anything we might have to give them. I can still recall the stink of raw sewage in the streets. That was sad and horrifying to see, child or no, but the stuff of nightmares was the huge, uniformed policeman who suddenly appeared with a giant bullwhip. He whipped those children, children the same age as I, and sent them screaming and crying away from us.

Over the years thousands of Haitians have died trying to escape their miserable lot in life. Many drowned or were devoured by sharks. Some who made it to the Bahamas were able to work illegally there but if caught they were instantly deported, no matter how long they had been in the country.

Unlike the Cubans if a Haitian makes it to US soil they will still be deported if they are caught. No one wants the Haitians.

I hope that there is a silver lining to this tragic disaster, but for the life of me I can't imagine what that could be.
I feel compassion and sorry for the people of Haiti...and lots of it.

And you are spot on!

No contradiction there that I can see.

As for heat...you want heat...step just a little further into the kitchen!
John -- I went to your post and rated it as it provides some historical context. Haiti is a troubled country, from the Chevaliers, Aristide, etc. And what news of the any victims in the Dominican Republic? The DR and Haiti share the same island.

HF -- TV is glass that overmagnifies, over emphasizes.

Barry -- I appreciate this comment and the PM. We get caught up in the moment and the magnification of the event. I can only spend so much focused on one thing when I know there are others in need.

Patricia -- I grieve for the senseless and preventable loss of death. Who can imagine a country without building codes? But then you look at the history of this country, this former colony, and the abuses of the people by its so called leaders. The level of misery in that country is astounding. Not too long ago our some of our own country's leaders said we shouldn't be involved in Haiti's affairs.

I can't spend all my time seeing these images and reading about this tragedy. I have to move on.
No heat here, but I guess I disagree that concern about what's happening in Haiti takes away concern from issues closer to home. The two are not mutually exclusive.
I remember seeing the news reels at the theater, and as a child I saw films that showed nuclear detonations while talking about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I saw films of stacked dead bodies from the holocaust and it had every bit as much impact on me as if I was watching it live on television. In fact, I saw film of much of what happened in the early twentieth century. It helped shape me into a person who questions, who cares and who contributes.

As for Haiti, I am certain that we can't save everyone or make it right for anyone, but we can do plenty to relieve the suffering. If we don't, how is that different than failing to call the fire department when a neighbor's house is on fire. How is it different than offering that neighbor blankets or a place to stay the night in the guest room?

The fact that we are not done righting the wrongs of the past few years is no reason to fail to demonstrate compassion in the face of a real tragedy in the present, and perhaps to remember that we are not done yet here, and that maybe, this event is a reminder to stay engaged. I think this is what you meant to say.
No heat, just sadness. It's being estimated that 50,00 people may have died. Some may still be alive. At least wait until the living are dead for forgetting something that just recently happened, not fifty years ago!
Cap'n -- I see this being redirected. As for Limbaugh and Robertson, they are dead to me.

Dear Reader -- This tragedy is the sum total of years of neglect.

Ablonde -- Well said and thanks.

Frank -- About the heat: "my bad." ;)

Jeanette -- I'd like to see real data to support your hyposthesis, because, I think this is an either or response.
Yep, TV missed all those events. Imagine though, that if TV had been around then, what kind of minutae and other drivel would one have had to sift through to glean the truly important stories of the day. Like today, and as you so very eloquently stated, we have to move on to the next earth shattering moment which will come all too soon and which we will have to sift through in order to identify.
I am sick over the earthquake in Haiti and I grieve for this country.
But I am not going to allow myself to watch hours and hours of news coverage. I know it does me no good and won't help them. I am going to donate what I can to the relief efforts and encourage others to do the same. Then I have to keep moving forward.
I agree with Nikki's perspective OES. I think I suffer from info overload at times. I reached my peak several weeks ago with health care debate and politics. I had to put blinders on for a little while. Then, while TRYING to avoid it, yesterday while eating lunch I hear Limbaugh and Robertson's comments. A talk show host and a "minister" (of what?) speak with venomous vitriol about millions of affected lives and I just wanted to crawl up into a big ball or punch someone REALLY hard. I chose selection C. I finished my lunch, trying to ignore it and push it all away. It is your prerogative to feel as you do and I don't blame you. We can walk out our doors at any time and with a mile of all of us, there is someone in desperate need.
the problem with this being on TV, on every channel, on every website, every 3rd blog post, in the 2-dozen e-mails I've just deleted, is that nothing else is occupying that space.

not health care, where some of our current rights are still salvageable, not equal marriage rights, not murderers who may get a "god told me to" walk, not gutting the EPA to give more privileges to oil and coal companies... ad infinitum.

I donated money for relief in Haiti. I then donated money to Croakley in Mass.
and isn't Paris hilton dissing LiLo? or whatevs...I mean, isn't that what's really important?

If they had any real integrity, they'd cancel the bread & circuses of the Olympics & spend the savings on Haiti...
I agree with you about the overload. This world is a bag of dicks. But I had a professor who used to say, "rather than think either/or about this, consider both/and." All of those things that you mentioned were tragic. This life is absurdity with the size, and scope of tragedy. But what makes it all worthwhile is reason. Reason says, yeah its a bag of dicks. Both/and. McKinley's assassination and everything since not diminish the need and the responsibility of the sane and the reasonable. Both/and.

Also, the tragedy in Haiti did not begin a few days ago with a massive earthquake. It began when imperial powers brought slaves from Africa there to torment for profit on plantations.
I am sick to death of the coverage, the feeding frenzy of the news organizations, and the arrogance of their view that they are performing a public service by beating us to death with yet another tragedy.

What strikes me wrong about this is that charity should begin at home and, until there are no Americans suffering as they are suffering now, I cannot stomach watching the orgy of self-flagellation over this latest calamity.

I'm tired of people writing about how embarrassed they are about their self-absorption in the face of this tragedy when, in fact, self-absorption is precisely what people need to get through times like these, in Haiti and here at home.

Unfortunately....I don't always practice as I preach. I still feel like I should be flying to Haiti to do something with my own hands, but I know better. I would just get in the way.
I think volunteering is the only way out of the morass...it helps us internally and help the world get better...xox
When I was a kid I used to think I was lucky, because my African American my family roots reach into the West Indies, rather than the American South. Then I got a little older and reconsidered the homily, ‘out of the frying pan, into the fire’. In short, my ancestors were not transported from Africa to be dumped into the pot, but were dumped into the fire – the West Indies, where the average life span of a newly imported slave was around 2 years. Two years! The freakn’ difficult life of cane picking slaves in the West Indies with its disease, heat and horror, killed off slaves quicker than the American South.
So, for me, when I viewed photos of the horrors of Haiti this morning, I couldn’t stop weeping and I got on line and had to donate and then get on Facebook & ask my family/friends to donate too.

I totally understand your sensory overload with this last-straw-of-a-disaster in Haiti. I envy you the ability to triage it out of your head. Even though I’ve never been to the West Indies, my roots are down there and I have to feel the pain and help all I can. I know we all respond to those world’s disasters that hit us where we live. My heart lives in the West Indies. It’s OK that your’s doesn’t. Peace puppy.
GK Brady has pretty well summed up my views on this recent disaster.
It is important to keep life in perspective, and not allow media sensationalism blur our vision. Thank you for your timely post.
~R
I take your point, but even if there had been TV, I doubt Auschwitz would have been a breaking story. The Nazis wouldn't have let them in.
R
No argument here - you do what you can do.
I can appreciate where you are coming from. As Americans we usually give the most and the soonest. So I agree with the premise to do something for those suffering and then, back to our daily challenges here at home. rated.
To everyone -- thanks for your thoughtful responses to this post. To put my money where my mouth is I made some cash donations to people in need on and beneath the streets of Manhattan on the commute home. I also made an equal donation on line to Haitian relief efforts before I left the office. It is difficult to post responses to comments on my PDA while being bounced around on the train. I'll be back later and respond to individual comments this evening.
You are being honest and that is commendable. But I see the world globally, and I consider this as bad as if it were in my state. The world is interconnected today and disaster will affect not only these poor souls, but us as well, longer term, breeding unrest and terrorism. This is a chance to improve peoples' lives; I know many Haitians here in Miami are hoping for longer term change.
And I'd rather get this overload than most of the crap that is irrelevant to anything.

And if we had seen videos of the holocaust maybe we would have prevented it.
Your right and the media will wrench every little dribble imagined or unimagined till the next disaster strikes. It has happened so let it be and let the functions set in motion for such an disaster do their jobs. Donate your time and money to the Red Cross or Salvation Army if you feel you should. They actually help everyone who asks. Thank You OEsheepdog no need to apologize we have an overload of problems right here. older/exasperated
Well this was a "different" post and comments too. I engaged this at some emotional level as I literally read every comment. I have an unsettled feeling at the moment.

Here's what I think it is related to. All the events you listed were tragedies and rough times. The situation in Haiti is enormously tragic. We find them troubling. They are all facets of life, as life is difficult. These are human beings born into chaos - they didn't choose it. That doesn't make their suffering any less real than the Katrina victims, or the homeless guys in my hometown. They each have a story and each is suffering. My heart and hand goes out to all - no comparisons about who deserves what, when or where. It's just life on life's terms. It's always been that way as far as I know.

When I get overload from the media, I change channels, turn it off, do something else. The media is a problem at times, but they are not the problem here. They are just showing us the hell side of life, and we don't like it.

And I can text my $10.00 to Haiti and it may not seem like much - but who knows, it might help one child make it just long enough to help change that godforsaken island wasteland. Maybe not. I'm choosing to watch, figure out how I might help, and keep on helping people here too. Besides, it keeps me from focusing too much on myself - and that's always a good strategy. Sorry for being so long winded.
I rated your post earlier but I am commenting now - just think of all the money the media and advertisers are making on the reporting and if that money went to help Haiti... the media is overkill on everything real and imagined...
It is a sad distraction in a series of distractions that all rallying around. This one is sadder than most but another thing will come up and grab the attention. Meanwhile, millions still go to prisons on drug charges; our military kills thousands; the Rapture crowd swells their breast and says: "See, I told you, God is a vengeful God and real everyday problems that imprison and kill many more in a year than this earthquake did all at once will be ignored. It is all part of being hypnotized by television. If it isn't outrage over Lieberman or Simple Sarah headlines or healthcare that doesn't even kick in until 2014 or Tiger Woods or Fear Factor. You name it. Now, it is Haiti's turn on the cable news and internet merry-go-round, a country that we have never been concerned about at all that is a neighbor. They have had some of the highest poverty rates in all the world for most of my life and we have always shrugged before. Katrina victims are still trying to get their lives together. But the glitter is off that story. It will be Haiti for a couple of weeks and it will be a combination horrific sad tale of death and "feel good" moments of gallant deeds. A year for now nobody will even be talking about it and those poor souls will continue to live in conditions that would and should sicken us.
OSers are refreshingly understanding on this point, as the lack of heat in the comments attests. I think the whole information overload concept is too unexplored in the context of things like this.

Good on you for writing about it.
No heat from me. Perhaps everyone has to deal with it in their own way. And if we stopped worrying about the RIGHT way and instead opted for the TRUTHFUL way---as you did---perhaps we'd all be a bit better off. My way was to tell a story about one person. Because, to continue what Nikki said---it's informational overload and it's emotional overload.

And besides----this post prompted Bill Beck to write "this world is a bag of dicks" which might be my new favorite phrase.
Maybe, if after the clean up has begun, these poor people who have been stripped of everything they had, no matter how seemingly inconsequential,then maybe the reparations will somehow improve the quality of their lives. Maybe their living quarters will be better, maybe the reparations will provide able bodied Haitians with work, I dunno, I'd like to believe these people will find something positive in their lives, after having survived so much tragedy. If we choose to look away now, will we remember to look back later?
Interesting post, Sheepie, thank you.
Rated
I agree with you. I remember when things like this happened when I was a teen, we would talk about it at school then move on. Now there is such information overload that it just becomes impossible to keep up that intensity for several days.
If limited resources are the problem, then, totally, one should invest in resources closer to home. That's my feeling. Start with the person on the corner whose family needs a good meal. If resources are more, then, you can invest more to help, in many places.

But there is no limit, in my heart, for pity and compassion and the desire to help or to find ways to help any human being wherever that person may live in the whole world, neither down the street or far away. The Revolution may be, indeed, televised, but I still want to help. I respect your thoughts, of course.
I dig the way you speak your mind. I also admire your thinking pattern. Good luck ;)
I can hear the news my husband is watching in the other room.
700 children dead after their school collapses? Now I am a part of what I've tried not to hear. I'm going in the living room to join the survivors in their grief.
Everybody can't worry about everything all the time. Even the President. Even your mother. We all cherry pick the events and stories to engage in, either physically or emotionally or mentally. Human nature dictates that we pay attention first to what's urgent in our own lives. I'm glad, though, that we are not all on the same page with each event; it's better that our collective attention is dispersed so as to cover all the tragedies. If that made any sense whatsoever.
Scribblenerd -- good advice.

Roger -- Two very good points about truthfulness and about Nikki and Bill. They are both good people.

junk1 -- We shouldn't forget, yet we can't let this dominate our lives.

FF -- How hard it must be for little kids who just see all this coverage.

Odette -- Again I guess I didn't make myself clear earlier. By all means provide support. Allow the work to be done, but not focus 24/7 on it.

Amanda -- Thanks for stopping by. I wish I could offer more help for your son other than my suggestion the other day. He's in my thoughts.

Joan H - I respect what you have to do.
A bunch of my earlier comments didn't posted. I will re write them and post again later.
So good to hear you mention giving some bucks to the people in the streets in the City.

I always do.

Unfortunately, I also hear stories about people making a living out of it...but...

...I have a hard time passing a panhandler up.
When I was in SAC in the Air Force, we did scenarios about nuclear war. One of the topics was triage: render the most aid to the ones that need it least. They even advocated active euthanasia. But this would be the case in all out nuke-fest where supplies would be limited. The theory was why help someone is going to die for nuclear burns in a few hours.

I see your. However, the situation in Haiti is not that extreme so we should be concerened. Besides they are our neighbors. I already gave at work and at my daughters school to help the Haitians.

R
200K people die every year on this planet, but due to our psychology we seem to CARE more about some of them than others. In stark, statistical terms, those who die in events like this or 9/11 are just blips against the backdrop of human existence. But the fact that they all died at once, unexpectedly seems to count for something.

Are the Haiti earthquake survivors somehow MORE deserving of our attention than the 1 billion people elsewhere who are in fairly immediate danger of starvation?

I agree with previous comments on compassion overload. I KNOW that every day there is tons of suffering in the world. Sometime, years ago I seem to have reached a point of mental exhaustion where I find it hard to think globally - it's just too overwhelming and I don't seem to be able to "process" it.

Before TV we were oblivious to much of the suffering in the world, but now we are fed a steady diet of tragedy by the media because it drives ratings.

Not sure what the answer is, but I think my own awareness of the massive amounts of suffering in the world has greatly changed the lens through which I view life - causing me to see it more from a detached perspective and try to see it in the context of a larger "plan" or process that is unfolding over a vast period of time.
I don't have objections to your manner of coping. I don't watch TV or read newspapers at all, and always limit my exposure to visual expressions of disaster or tragedy, as I have no need for these images. I listen to the news on public radio, but won't listen to repetition of the same stories. This is self-protection. I was in NYC on 9/11/01, walked from midtown to St Vincent Hospital where (as a nurse) I spent the day hoping to be of some service to victims--but I have never seen the oft-touted images of the the towers falling. I believe that we each cope as best we can. I am one who is not able to "get on with it" however. Even limiting my exposure intentionally, I am beset with overwhelming feelings and concerns. Nature is indifferent and humans are cruel, and these pervasive feelings drive me nuts much of the time. When I heard about the earthquake, I sent a donation right away, that's all I can do, I understand. I will continue to think about it though and more significantly, it enters my unconsciousness and mingles with everything else that is stewing there. Like you, I simply have no choice about my particular coping style.
I guess the best we can do right now is send money if we can, volunteer if we can, and, as you said...do what we can near home, if we can't do more there.
Well ... I probably could and do. But I'm a professional worrier. I'm good at it.

I didn't mean to insult you in any way. It's just, I guess you're right. I don't really understand the post then. I thought not worrying 24/7 went without saying, I suppose. I didn't mean to make you angry.
When tragedy strikes and I feel powerless, I can't watch the news. Not because I don't care but because when I care so much I need to feel like I can make a difference. So I go out and do something meaningful that is within my power, a drop in the bucket but it's what I can do.
This makes me not want to be around White people right now.

Why does this come up when a Black people are suffering?

See ya in a couple of days.
Some people and countries get far more than their share of misery for reasons that I certainly can't comprehend. But it is the nature of man that we keep going. We're hard wired for survival.
What has happened in Haiti is tragic. This country will respond as it should, but I agree 24/7 coverage will not make one bit of difference. As an individual I can give to relief organizations which will do more for the people of Hatti than watching it on the news.
I can appreciate your perspective here.
To be bleakly blunt, it's often easier to get an emotional rush from vicariously experiencing Haiti's disaster than to go out and work to make a difference to people closer to home in need. But not everyone here is just watching. My son is only one example, and he got an okay to organize giving for Haiti among his colleagues for a matching grant program. Such efforts go unreported in the news, but they're better than wallowing or moving on without action. As for me, I can't watch most of the news from Haiti ; all I can do is donate and like you move on.

The question of whether people at a distance from a disaster get more emotional and empathetic than people did before TV and the Internet - good topic for a grad student in poli sci?
Yes, I feel overwhelmed by information overload and compassion fatigue. My solution is to say a prayer and give some money (just a little, since I don't have much, but everyone's little bit helps). If there's an opportunity to give hands-on help, I do so. After Katrina, I volunteered at a refugee center in New York City (for Katrina victims who had chosen to come here when they fled) helping people get clothes, food and shelter, as well as just being there to listen and care about their experience.
I can't give hands-on help to the people in Haiti but I'm participating in a fund-raising event this Saturday and will give some money of my own.
I am in a better position to help Americans in need because they're closer. Is that "triage?" Perhaps. I do what I can and don't beat myself up about what I can't.
I don not disagree fundamentally with anything I read here or the comments above...but I like the comment Jeanette Demain made. The suffering in Haiti and all the other suffering we are a community of earth are not mutually exclusive.
As individuals, we may have to pick and choose.
As a people, we must try to do as much we can everywhere we can.
Nothing is more important than helping others, here at home or across the seas. Nothing en-nobles humanity more.
rated
I like Nikki's point. I think the media these days basically guarantees that people will feel as you do by indulging in info overload, and using a disaster like this to drive ratings. (As soon as I see that Anderson Cooper has put on his disaster t-shirt, I know I'm in trouble as a viewer.) I find it cynical and repulsive. yes, it's a huge story - cover it. But don't exploit it, limit your coverage, and focus more on how people can help.

Sometimes I long for the days of my childhood when news only appeared for 30 min once a day on TV or in the newspaper. The wall to wall coverage of disasters and other events by the likes of CNN et al makes me nuts. No, I don't have to watch it - I actually don't. I've watched short bursts of the Haiti coverage, just to keep abreast of what's happening and otherwise relied on less exploitative and more condensed coverage in paper and online newspapers.
I see your point. What really upsets me is the media taking advantage of tragedy.
You make an excellent point. I feel that way too.