OEsheepdog's Blog

And you thought you were having a bad hair day!

OEsheepdog

OEsheepdog
Location
From the Forest to the Shore, Connecticut, USA
Birthday
March 12
Title
Director of Change
Company
An unnamed non-profit health care provider
Bio
Change is good...that's what I keep telling my colleagues. It's difficult and hard. It's challenging and rewarding. It's fraught with peril. It needs to be done...yesterday!

MY RECENT POSTS

OEsheepdog's Links

Salon.com
NOVEMBER 19, 2010 12:19PM

A few words in defense of the TSA

Rate: 19 Flag

I worked in industrial security for almost 7 years. The bulk of that time was spent at a Nuclear Power Plant that was being built. I understand why security is needed and the effort that it requires.

I can understand the frustration many have with the new "body scan" devices installed at our busier airports. Perhaps it seems as if we are using nuclear weapons to kill mosquitioes and perhaps there is a bit of truth to that notion.

We live in a society in which a segment of the population is paranoid. Paranoid about immigrants, African American presidents, Muslims, intellectuals, Democrats and yes, even terrorists.

Many people will not know nor remember the first time our nation's airports had to deal with airport security. Political leftists used to hijack planes to Cuba in the 1960s and 70s. Many of you under the age of 40 have no recollection of the inconvenience of having a Florida bound plane diverted to Havana. Johnny Carson and Dick Cavett would make jokes about it on their late night TV shows.

Then came the flight of PanAm 103 and the disaster over Lockerbie, Scotland. All on the plane were killed, the airline went out of business, and the signs atop 200 Park Avenue in New York City, were changed from PanAm to MetLife.

While the TSA is being lambasted for theie latest and greatest attempt to check for hidden explosives, we kvetch about our dignity, our personal space, and civil liberties. Probably with good reason.

I would think working for the TSA is one of the most thankless jobs in the United States. These underpaid overworked harassed individuals are just doing their jobs. They don't make policy, they just carry it out.

If you are angry with the process, you should reach out to the politicians and government officials who drive this policy at the airports. Of course, we could do nothing about airport security. Then at the next tragedy we could get irate about our leaders' negligence.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
There are two sides to every story, as they say. Good of you to play devil's advocate.
A breath of fresh air - thank you.
You are so right! It's a real case of damned if you do...damned if you don't and sex on the brains.
Your last point is the key. No one wants to be the person who is perceived to have weakened our "security" in case something blows up.
Yup.. they are just doing their jobs..:(
Rated with hugs
These underpaid overworked harassed individuals are just doing their jobs. They don't make policy, they just carry it out.

The same things were said about the guards at Auschwitz... I'm still not buying it.
Roger that from a former rent a cop.
If these actions actually increased safety and security, it would be more acceptable. Most of these measures are far too expensive and inconvienient for the small measure of additional planning a smart and determined terrorist will need to use to get through them. The quality of security varies widely from airport to airport. Have security measures actually identified travellers with evil intent trying to smuggle a means for violence through security? Maybe we don't hear about them.
Some folks are really touchy, aren't they? For their sake I hope we get fast rail fast.
Ron Moore, a former TSA manager, posted on this, and I HIGHLY recommend people read it:

Who is Behind the Patdown Controversy
.
I would rather live with a few minutes of inconvience than die on a plane being slammed into a building any day of the week.
Oh I should point out that on numerous times I've had my bags searched and went through a sniffer machine without complaining once.
did you day taser? Oh, TSA, whew!
Well said O/E, while I do agree with some of the complaints, they will complain even more if they lived through a hijacking. The next time they crash a jet into a building or blow up the plane they will be yelling how could this have happened again. I fly frequently year round and have made the adjustment for delays, I travel light and and know what you can have and can't. Be well my friend......o/e R******
I remember the Cuban hijackings...while flying from NJ to Georgia for my cousin's wedding, my older sister told me point blank if we were hijacked on the way, she would pass me off as a hostage. She really hated flying...

I agree, being a TSA agent would not be pleasant, but it would sure be nice if they weren't nasty to the people who don't treat them badly...
I don't object to the delays... I object to what would be classed as "sexual assault" in any OTHER environment being perfectly 'ok' if one happens to work for TSA.

I'll be blunt... a man removing my breasts from my bra without my DIRECT consent is guilty of sexual assault... Equally a man putting his hands INSIDE my clothing without my consent is GUILTY of sexual assault. I have had BOTH happen at Metro airport in Detroit ... in the last 6 months.

I have also had, also at Metro, a *male* TSA employee want to STRIP SEARCH my SEVEN year old daughter because she "didn't respond" when he asked her a question with his back to her.... she's DEAF...

IF we are going to continue to exempt TSA employees from the LAW... we are ASKING for trouble... and when is it "enough"? It wasn't "enough" the first time it happened... it wasn't "enough" the last time it happened (likely a few minutes ago)... will it be "enough" when it is YOUR wife or YOUR daughter who is sexually assaulted by someone who is above the law?
I worked in the airline industry and traveled at least twice a month. Back then, it was obnoxious Koreans and horny mens, neither of whom had a clue about appropriate conduct.

I know that those TSA employees are doing what their job calls for, but there is going to be improper conduct, especially when they think that they can get away with it.

Sad, but people not doing their jobs back in 2001 was indicative that someone is inclined to not be doing their job now, even in this atmosphere of egregious excess and fear.
good post, sheepie. it's just not that big a deal to go through security, i don't think. well, except in san diego (where the nitpickiest tsa guys work, i swear) where they keep trying to throw away my shampoo for not being in its original container which, btw, would be .5 ounces over the limit. me and a supervisor work it out every time. better than planes falling out of the sky, right? right.
we all need to grow up, and in a hurry
If these actions actually increased safety and security, it would be more acceptable. Most of these measures are far too expensive and inconvienient for the small measure of additional planning a smart and determined terrorist will need to use to get through them.

I agree.
I agree with your point that the TSA agents are just following orders and are not to blame. It's the orders that are to blame, ridiculously intrusive. To repeat the comment I made on Cartouche's blog: I rarely agree with George Will, but his latest essay dubbed what goes on at airports now "Security Theater," doing everything to annoy the innocent and virtually nothing to deter the guilty.
There was a big article in our newspaper about the "pat-downs" and how one woman was forced to remove her prosthetic breast during one such search. There is a delicate balance to be found; but it is similar to when the lines at airports were all two hours long in the wake of 9/11 - I remarked then that if you had told people on Sept. 10, 2001 that they would have to wait in line for two hours at airport security, there would have been a revolt. But at the end of September, in light of what happened, it was acceptable. Perhaps too many people have forgotten.