POSTCARDS FROM ECOTOPIA

the view from my window

old new lefty

old new lefty
Location
alienation, discontent
Birthday
September 16
Title
CEO
Company
Making trouble whenever possible
Bio
virgin novelist, middle school teacher for the morally handicapped, government bureaucrat, most famous unknown photographer in LA, PhD dropout, coat hanger sorter, presidential campaign worker, sewer worker, and retired guy -- but not in that order.

Old new lefty's Links

MY LINKS
JANUARY 13, 2012 12:04AM

IRAN: Unintended Consequences

Rate: 12 Flag

When the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1905 ( so misappropriately named the Iran Threat Reduction Resolution), the clock started ticking on another war in the Middle East.  What the neocons and AIPAC succeeded in doing was to hurt Iran where it hurt the most.  Not only did the House resolution order the Obama administration to impose a worldwide embargo on Iranian financial transactions, but it ordered the US to seek a worldwide embargo on Iranian oil.

This is the major reason why Iran has been appearing to act so irrationally lately. The recent military exercises in the Straits of Hormuz have created the dry tinder that increases the chance of a major conflagration if one military accident occurs between Iran and the US Navy.  And the careful structuring of media 'events' in the mainstream media have been warming the American public up for another Middle Eastern war-- with a good possibility that this could occur shortly before the presidential election.

And yet in the last few days, there have been a series of significant (though very low key) events that offer the promise of a major game change.  Pay very little attention to the Navy's rescues of Iranian fishermen from the hands of Somali pirates. No, the first thing that happened of major import was the January 11th assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist by two motorcyclists attaching a magnetic bomb to the scientist's car. 

These kinds of actions are ultimately traceable to Israeli intelligence.  But the really astounding thing was that one day later, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton categorically denied that the US had anything to do with the incident.  Whenever this has happened before, the US has been as silent as a tomb. And political analysts have chalked up the US denial not only as a reassurance to the Iranians, but as a subtle rebuke to Israel.

One day after that, Speaker of the Iranian Parliament Ali Larijani publicly agreed to re-establishing talks with the US, EU, and others about its nuclear program.    No petty functionary, Larijani is Ayatollah Khamenei's closest ally and a rival to President Ahmadinejad. There may very well be a serious behind the scenes shift inside the US government to engage Iran in prolonged, no-holds-barred, freeranging talks.

Perhaps this is due to the fact that both sides know that H.R. 1905 is exactly equivalent to FDR's embargo of steel exports to Japan in 1941.  While it was not a declaration of war, the embargo(s) set up everything needed on both sides to make war inevitable.  And so, for the first time since President Obama has taken office, he may very well be in the process of living up to one of his campaign promises and do what it takes to get serious in developing American-Iranian relations, rather than posturing and bullying.

The turd in the swimming pool is, of course, Israel.  The Netanyahu government has made nothing but bellicose sounds about attacking Iran, most recently stating that there is now only a nine month window before Iran's nuclear programs will be beyond influence. Israel still appears intent on taking out at least some Iranian nuclear installations, come hell or high water.

 With GOP candidates outdoing themselves as to who's most warmongering as far as the Iranians go, there's justified paranoia aplenty for an October Surprise that would spike oil prices to $200 a barrel just before November.  After all, this is an old trick of Republicans.  Go back to William Casey's secret visit to Paris in 1980 to meet with representatives of the Iranian government while Jimmy Carter was fighting for re-election.

The only thing is -- Secretary of State Clinton is strongly hinting that American-Israeli relations could be severely jeapordized if Israel were to pre-emptively attack Iran this year. If Israel attacks Iran this year, the Obama administration appears to be very willing to go on a full offensive, saying  in no uncertain terms whose knife is cutting the juglar vein of the world economy.

Verry interesting.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Interesting, is putting it far too mildly. God knows how close brinksmanship came to blowing the whole world up in '63.

As for Iran, what we read in the papers (for those who still read papers) and what we see on TV is for public consumption -- just as what Ahmadinejad says on TV is for public consumption in Iran and elsewhere. If nothing else, the Wikileaks documents make it plain that what's said for public consumption is fluff and nonsense. Warships playing chicken in and around the Straits of Hormuz is not, and there's always the chance of an accident, deliberate or otherwise.

This hick from the sticks can only guess, but then my guess about Iraq was a helluva lot better than Dick Cheney's or Don Rumsfeld's. My guess? This pissing contest is exactly that. We can't possibly afford another war, and Iran is getting its way in the Mideast without having to fire a shot, so why would it risk a war?

My advice? Believe half of what you see, and some or none of what your hear. But if you're an Iranian nuclear physicist, stay well clear of motorcycles.
I hope your right that the US is trying to stay out of a war with Iran. I'm not so confident.

If some country put massive sanctions on the US and then assassinated a high level nuke scientist, you can bet that is all it would take to launch a full scale offensive. I give credit to Iran for having so much restraint.
Penata also said today, while we categorically did not do it, we have an idea who did. Now, I wonder who he was talking about? Israel seems to have this idea, as does Americas, that we can kill with impunity. I guess, in a way, we can, but it will come back to bite us all in the ass. Ask the Romans. Hell, ask England!
Your article is interesting. Thank you a lot for it.

I don't know what is going to happen because of tryings of putting the worldwide embargo on Iranian oil. I think that Iran will not suffer much because of that. China will maybe buy even more oil from Iran, India might do the same?

If Iran would in exchange close all the oil from the Gulf... I think that it would hurt Europeans hardest... Maybe this whole thing is to get EU on the line concerning Iran?

I think that Obama's administration is trying to prevent another war to start just now in the Middle East, because America isn't ready for it (and also Russians and Chinese are against the war).

I agree with you with that 'American-Israeli relations could be severely jeapordized if Israel were to pre-emptively attack Iran this year.'

There seems to be even more about American-Israeli relations. Americans are trying to put the blame on Israel even about the assassination of an Iranian nuclear scientist.

Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the White House’s National Security Council, said in reaction to the attack: “The United States had absolutely nothing to do with this."

I think that Obama's strategy is mainly to act for the regime change in Iran. If common citizen's life will get more uncomfortable in Iran, they will put the blame on their own leaders, it means Ahmadinejad. The embargo might be somewhat effective for achieving this result.

The game with warships is getting more and more dangerous. I think that hey should be called home.

I've written something about these issue on my blog, too.
That one particular assassination may not have been US inspired but what about the other nuclear scientists and others that have been murdered in Iran recently?

Israel is, with good reason, 100% confident that no matter what they do, they will not lose the backing of the US. Israel is the ONLY reliable friend the US has in that whole area.... and they know it.

War with Iran may depend more on how Obamas sees his chances of re-election coming along. If they look poor, it's likely he will hit Iran or rather, set Israel to do it then back Israel. Americans are reluctant to toss out a sitting president in the middle of a war during a mid-term election.
.
This truly is interesting, and I wish I could be so confident. But didn't Robert Burns have something to say about "the best-laid plans of mice and men"? Today we call it the law of unexpected consequences, which gets magnified when you have an American political class that anticipates no consequences of its own (except for a fat pension and a lucrative job as a public speaker or lobbyist). Just one misstep in this risky pas-à-trois could set off a major regional war. Let's hope the Iranians, who would be the ones getting the bombs on their heads, are more responsible than our own crop of leaders. (r)
An attack on yet another Middle Eastern Muslim country would be a disaster, politically as well as economically and militarily; the U.S.'s last remaining shreds of credibility would be gone, and we'd become--understandably--the target of universal attacks both rhetorical and physical. But maybe that's the whole idea-- the government could then justify all the absurd "security" measures the last eacde has given us, and move even beyond the heinous NDAA to a complete surveillance-and-prison state.
An attack on yet another Middle Eastern Muslim country would be a disaster, politically as well as economically and militarily; the U.S.'s last remaining shreds of credibility would be gone, and we'd become--understandably--the target of universal attacks both rhetorical and physical. But maybe that's the whole idea-- the government could then justify all the absurd "security" measures the last decade has given us, and move even beyond the heinous NDAA to a complete surveillance-and-prison state.
Thought-provoking post and comment thread.
Thanks for your thoughts on this subject. I guess time will tell.
Very thoughtful and thought-provoking post. Thank you!
Interesting that ships passing through the straits of Hormuz actually pass through Iranian territory before entering international waters. Sure hope the US is working out another alternative or we will all be paying $10-15 a gallon for gas.
-- The turd in the swimming pool is, of course, Israel.

Such a lovable anti-Semite :)

It's long been time enough to cut ties to those antediluvian breeders.
Anti-Semitic, I'm not. But I freely admit that I have a horrible view of Israel. It's my belief that once upon a time, Israel actually represented the best values of civilization. But thanks to ultra-orthodox fundamentalism and militarism and oppression of the Palestinian people, it has devolved significantly. When I submitted an overview of world polices to a relative in the Army, I said that it was not possible for me to take a purely objective view of Israel because of its recent history.

Some good friends on OS have reminded me that factions of the PLO and others are no choir boys, and perhaps I should pay more attention to their outrages than the outrages committed by the Israeli government. And I try to do that as much as I possibly can.

The thing that still sticks in my throat is the differential in power relations between the Israelis and the Palestinians. While maybe not the analogy of the power difference between a man in a car and some dogs, the power differential still remains. And to me, the fact remains that Israel has sullied the principles that it was founded on.

Just as I hold America to a higher standard of behavior than any other country (and I'm continually disappointed there), I hold Israel to a higher standard as well. Some day it would be nice if Israel returned to those founding principles, but I'm not holding my breath.