I will be the first to admit, The Pink Ribbon campaign has never been my cause du jour. I have always found it silly to focus on breast cancer as the worthy cause, when breast cancer is not just one disease. The causes of breast cancer are widely known or suspected, and they range from genetic to environmental to just bad luck. Why focus on one body part, when all cancer needs to be addressed?
The Walks for the Cure, now a registered Trademark to the Susan G Komen foundation, were supposed to raise awareness of breast cancer and women's health- as well as money. Finally, a huge corporate cause that everyone can feel good about. Breasts make women beautiful (because we spend a gazillion dollars a year on lingerie and breast augmentation or lifts) and they feed babies. They nurture the young and the old alike. Who doesn't enjoy looking at a soft pair of boobs? Without breasts, what woman could feel whole, what man could really love his wife, what child could feel nurtured?
The foundation played on the feelings- and also helped empower a lot of women to take back their definition of femininity by surviving the disease. More deals and sponsorships were made, and the Think Pink crap started showing up everywhere. Ironically, hormone laden cow dairy and plastic cups (from, let's say, yogurt with a pink cap on it) do make breast disease and hormone related cancers worse. Plastics from cheaply produced goods in our oceans and landfills and air do increase exposure to environmental toxins and xeno estrogens that increase all cancer risk, and especially hormone sensitive cancers. Still, people raised money, and they walked for a good cause.
The good cause is supposed to be saving women's lives. This means education and screening, and that means access to people who can educate you and screen you. Komen partnered up with Planned Parenthood- one of the largest primary care providers in the country for urban and rural women with no access to other health care- whether or not they are insured. And Komen has now bowed to the non-scientific and completely political forces that allow them to amass loads of money and put it into whatever research suits their own agenda. With that, they have decided to no longer fund the services at Planned Parenthood for breast cancer screening.
Why is this so important?
Breast cancer occurs in 1 in 8 women, well below the number of women who will get and die from heart disease (1 in 3). Most women will survive breast cancer- some types are not as malignant as others. Eventually, most women who live long enough will develop some type of breast neoplasm (cancer)- just as most men will develop some type of prostate neoplasm.
This is important because breast cancer is still a reproductive health issue for women. Not having breasts does not mean you can't get pregnant, but having early breast cancer may signal a much higher risk for ovarian, uterine and endometrial cancers. The estrogens that your ovaries are pumping out, and that you are drinking in the plastic water bottles and eating with your farm fed animals and farm raised salmon, all add up in the body and need to get eliminated properly. If you are a heavy bleeder or developing fibroids, you cannot do this well. The same estrogens that go to the uterus go to the breast and the brain. Difficulty eliminating this toxic build up sends toxic estrogen to the brain, the breasts, the lungs, the colon, the uterus.
What's critical here is that for poor women, all risk factors for breast cancer, uterine cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, increase with their environment: cheap and shitty packaged fast foods, junky meat that is loaded with all sorts of growth hormones, garbage processed dairy products that similarly contain hormones, plastic containers everywhere, and increased risk of obesity. Cigarette smoke and cleaning fumes and dirty air from incinerators and cars all increase these cancers. Obesity makes your estrogen more toxic, and the fatter you are, the higher your risk for all these diseases, plus heart disease and diabetes! These are known things, not speculated. Poor women suffer disproportionately for lack of choice of where to live, and how to have a clean, safe environment, and health food.
When you treat poor people as women who can't make good choices for themselves, look at the resources and options before them. How would a young woman seeking pelvic health care (cervical cancer screening, infectious disease screening, pregnancy prevention or control) not need to know that her breasts are part of her health- not just an appendage for the purpose of the sexual behavior that brought her there? Planned Parenthood is about education, choice, prevention. Sometimes the only health care women get is after they have had infections raging for months- or haven't had a period in a really long time. Those extra five minutes of breast cancer screening services they have now cut may be the only five minutes some women will ever hear about the importance of breast health.
Planned Parenthood, now cut off from many federal funds due to the completely religious and unscientific bias of right wing politicians who have no grasp of biochemistry or basic health, relies on donations from major and minor fundraising groups. Recently, Planned Parenthood of New England partnered with The Hicks Foundation to provide services for the annual Cervical Cancer Screening Day in Vermont, Jan 28. They had the most successful campaign to date, and they provided screening services for those women for breast and heart health as well. For some, it was a lifesaving day.
I have never donated money to the Komen Foundation, and I did think before I pink'd- realizing that all those dollars were not serving the purposes they intended. Do we need a pink Sponge Bob Square Pants doll? Do I care if a football player is wearing a giant pink ribbon? or do I care that actual women get breast care?
Of course, I work in primary care, and often with a lot of uninsured women who have not gotten their annual pap and not gotten their annual mammogram in a long time, not knowing why they needed to or how it would make a difference. The difference of a couple years of skipped screenings could be life and death .
The key to prevention is education and screening, which is part of the cure. Shame on the Susan G Komen Foundation for taking that last bit of health security away from the women who have relied on it for their lives.


Salon.com
Comments
rated with love
Sometimes I feel maybe if we had got Hilary in women's health and rights would not be going down the drain.
PP uses a lot of non profit cold calling centers to raise funds. this is one not to hang the phone up on.
HUGGGGGGGGGGG
Just a thought.
Mike Pence, a leader in the defund PP crusade, is now running for Governor of Indiana. Indiana being what it is, I fear he will be elected because he is a Republican. My only hope is that Rupert Boneham or John Gregg can pull something out of the hat.
A quick internet search found that they are spending about 20% of their money on research. It also found that it spends millions of donor dollars filing lawsuits against anyone who would dare use the term "for the cure" regardless of what they are trying to cure.Their tax form shows that the top person is a $500k employee with a lot over $200k.
While I didn't know some of the things here I have long avoided anything that was attached to their foundation. It seemed like they wanted all the donation money regardless of who else was out there looking for the cure.
Ritat- I think many of us has had to rely on them now and again, especially younger women who don't get healthcare through their work or family. I have to let women know they can get cheap PAPs and screenings through Planned Parenthood, many don't realize it is a health service provider.
Firechick- right on! I think mostly people will be horrified to realize that SGK foundation spends more money on keeping itself in business than it does "fighting" cancer.
Mary- I have long been horrified from what I realize is there reality and hypocrisy. Maybe it's easier to find a cure for evangelicals?
It's too bad someone with some clout doesn't make a ribbon for Planned Parenthood and get the word out about all they do and what a precarious place they're in. Great post, O.
Lezlie
Con- pretty despicable, no? I heard that they sue anyone for the proprietary right to say "Walk for cure" of anything. Wonder how the Diabetes people who have been doing this for a while feel about that. Perhaps their lawyer worked for the woman who wanted to TM her husband's "Let's Roll" before the United plane went down in PA.
Wren- this is past sexualization. It involves character assassination of a long running non profit that has more to do for world health and women's empowerment than almost any single organization out there, and implies a moral "rightness" for those who don't choose choice. Only evangelicals deserve a cure?
Sheila and Catnlion- right on target! they are squeezing lots of fundraising dollars out of the hands of sick and angry people and putting it in their own pockets. One of those salaries could cover a year's worth of screening for a large number of women.
I'm more proud than ever to donate to Planned Parenthood, to have a support sticker on my car, and to have a family member who works in a PP clinic.
thanks for a great article.
r./
Great post. I've always felt ickie about Think Pink. In fact I got an EP last October on that very subject.
http://open.salon.com/blog/toritto/2011/10/04/reflections_on_think_pink
Nice work. Really. / r
Rated...
Rated
You've touched on a subject that is the nasty skeletons and the under-belly of charitable organizations come falling out of the closet all the time. If a politician spent $2 million in legal fees to copyright their own name and used tax dollars to do it, the media would scream bloody murder. But the SGK Foundation did just that, sued over the use of their name, and used donations to pay for their legal battles.
We have gause, like a bee-keeper, vision where "charities" are concerned. The good ones are run by human beings, the bad ones are run by corporations.
And they fight each other and attempt to discredit each other in a most "unChristian" like fashion, for the majority of the folks strike me as rather WASPISH.
You bring to this discussion a pretty unique professional perspective. Yes; shame on SGK.
(I'll be interested in your take on how I have approached this topic this morning.)
r.
Do you ever get anything right?
Thank you for this, Oryoki.
♥
Ditto catnlion's comment.
Over at Breast Cancer Action dot org, there is a petition letter to SGK's CEO Nancy Brinker and President Liz Thompson regarding the Planned Parenthood debacle.. Anyone can sign. I urge you to.
While there, you might want to read up about SGK. It's an excellent source of information. Perhaps their lowest of low pinkwashing was the introduction last October of Susan B. Komen perfume called "Promise Me", chock full of toxic carcinogens. I'm one breast cancer survivor who would be thrilled to see this ugly foundation disappear.
▄▀▄▀▄
▀▄─▄▀
──▀ ♡❀Լ♡Ɣخ❀Լ♡Ɣخ❀Լ♡Ɣخ❀
I foresee a world where corporations try co-opt many if not all of the current civil, economic, social and environmental rights movements and then they water them down and neutralize them such that, in time, they are non-controversial, hollow, syphilitic shells of their former glory.
I was never sold on the whole Pink campaign, because I've long believed that research and support should be for ALL types of cancer. I have several friends who are breast cancer survivors. I also have several friends and family members who have been affected by other types of cancer. Some survived. Some did not. Even before this, I donated to American Cancer Society because their work has made a difference to people I know who suffered from different types of cancer, including breast cancer.
I used PP for healthcare when I was in college and for a while after. They've helped friends of mine. Their services should continue to be available to anyone who needs them. I'm glad to hear that plenty of people are donating. Bloomberg's matching donation is a great boost for the cause.
I've been aware of Komen's numbers for a long time -- a lot of what they do is brand awareness (which helps women HOW?) and quite a small percentage goes directly to research or toward treatment. I hope a lot of people are getting an education about their organization and, really, how little they help. Everyone who wants to donate to a charity needs to research that organization: charitynavigator.org and givewell.org
Credit Lawsuit
And that sure seems strange to me.
My hip bone is connected to my fibula,
and my skull bone noggin needs bourbon.
tease . . .
`
after my orthopedic visit
(VAMC) I'll but 'Fat Tire'
brew . . . and wear one
pretty colored turban
I barter at a 7-11 store
after I borrow change
from the 'Take/Give\
penny cup. Gad\Grief\
Ay,
Good Grief. No bourbon\
Barter with surgeon beer/
Make beer or honeymoon\
Wine\
burps/
behave
We do
`
a blocked writer
terrified of a editor
misunderstanding