As one of good my friends says repeatedly, and this is one of the reasons I keep him as a good friend, “we in the neat community don’t appreciate the term neat freak because we find it offensive.” Both my friend and I love being part of this community. So, as a person who prefers to have a little order in my life, you can imagine my glee when I received a link to this Slate article in my inbox yesterday: Messy house, messy mind.
Warning: For those of you who hate reading recent studies that make grand sweeping conclusions that might implicate your fine self and cause you to argue with their dubious results, the rest of this post might irritate you. You might even want to stop reading now. I personally find those kinds of articles great food for thought, and don’t have a problem trying things on for size and then taking them off and letting them land on the floor.

When I first saw this article about the connection between reading and an orderly home, I pictured myself printing it out and posting it on my refrigerator for all—that includes husband, mother in law, and all those on the neat-challenged spectrum who enter my house—to read. Though the content was slightly inconclusive, the headline was a delicious finger pointer that a clean person like me couldn’t resist. Sort of an “I told you so!,” but expertly written by someone else so that I didn’t have to look like a bully with a neat agenda.
The article, at least I thought this as I started to read it, vaguely covers one of the subjects you will hear my husband and raising our voices over the most: keeping things neat and orderly in our house. Before I risk coming off as one of those anal types, I should say that I just need a little neat and clean in my life—ok, a lot—for my mental health. As I am fond of saying, I have a lot of internal chaos, and so I require a fair amount of external order to combat it. And, to make matters more complicated, I married, just as my own mother did, someone who is on the very high end of that spectrum I mentioned. In other words, he is not so interested in being part of the neat community. In fact, not at all.
It’s true that you might also be able to add this Slate article to that collection of wacky fear-inducing parenting articles I tend to be forever on the receiving list of (got it from another mom in my white, well-educated, progressive preschool sphere). But, of course, I had to read it. I had to find out there is, it appears, a connection between good reading skills and an orderly home, that is between high-reading moms and their orderly or not so orderly homes. I needed more people on my side.
According to this writer’s research, her’s is an article about the book Order in the House! Associations among Household Chaos, the Home Literacy Environment, Maternal Reading Ability, and Children’s Early Reading (so yes, I am two times removed here) by several writers from Columbia’s Teachers College, there is a new set of research about how we as parents set the tone for our kids functionality in the world (before you say duh, see the rest of the article). It’s not about how much we read to them, it’s how much we have our shite together. More to feel guilty about, indeed. Unless you are one of those perfect parents, which you might be.
Here’s the quick academic view of the book’s findings:
Results suggest that the degree of household order is significantly and positively associated with expressive vocabulary, reading tests, and phonological awareness skills of children whose mothers are above-average readers. By contrast, the number of books a child owns or brings home and how often a child amuses herself alone with books are significantly associated with the expressive vocabulary, reading tests, and phonological awareness skills of children whose mothers are average-ability readers. These results suggest the potential for new approaches to encouraging literacy development in the home beyond those that depend solely on parental literacy.
What does this mean? According to my findings, this means, and it took me a while to get this from the article (written about the book), that how much order there is in the house of the above-average readers, determines how well that child might read. The funny thing is, as much as I wanted this to be an incentive, you know, "we have to keep the house clean because it means our child will read better," it’s not really.
What’s being said is that the more there is an orderly routine in the house, consistent rules, bedtimes, boundaries, etc., the better the children of those households fare, that is in the area of literacy. This is interesting, at least in part to me, because for awhile now I’ve had that other idea in my head. The idea that all I had to do was surround my child with books and they would love reading. I think I got it from Malcolm Gladwell or possibly even from another one of those renegade writers who like to prove that everything you think is right is actually wrong.
Here’s my favorite part about why orderliness is good for reading. It has to do with something called “executive functioning,” something that I, with or without my neatness, could probably stand to have a little more of.
“Household order taps a more fundamental characteristic of parents or households, such as maternal industriousness, planning ability, or conscientiousness, that gives rise to both orderliness and better reading skills in children. This is the idea of executive functioning, which captures planning and problem-solving abilities."
So what it boils down to is, if you want to encourage sharper minds, you have to value order and routine in the house. Not so bad, right? I can still use this against my husband when he leaves all the cooking utensils lying uncleaned around the kitchen, right? Or when he throwns his clothes into a mysterious pile on the floor—are they clean, are they dirty, are they meant to go to the Salvation Army?
Chances are since her parents are both avid readers and writers, I don’t have to worry about my daughter being a good reader. And, realistically, I don’t. She already has more books than we can shelve. In fact, when I draw a mental picture of her room, I realize that a lot of her books, overflow fromthe shleves, are in tall piles on the floor. That might not be so good, according to this research. Unless the piles are neat, I suppose.
But, I do love it when there is scientific evidence to support something that I complain about daily. So, I’m still going to go ahead and post on the article on my refrigerator. You never know, someone might read it. And I could come home to a cleaner house one day.
Though, I doubt it.
One final note: Last night, as I, for the first time ever in her four years of life, let my daughter fall asleep next to me watching American Idol, way after her usual bedtime, because I was tired from long trip and wanting just to sit in front of the TV and watch people sing and be judged, I started to feel a little trickle of guilt knowing that we were creating inconsistency for the sole sake of mom’s exhaustion, but I stopped myself. Perhaps those 15 minutes of American Idol ruined her, but we hadn’t been in the house for days, and it was so clean and neat and, well, my parents let me stay up past my bedtime watching TV once in awhile and I turned out OK. Sort of.


Salon.com
Comments
"I personally ... don’t have a problem trying things on for size and then taking them off and letting them land on the floor."
But if I read you correctly, you WOULD have a problem letting them STAY on the floor for days while everyone walked around them and stepped over them....!?
Here's what he says:
NOT TRUE! And he and I are laughing very hard.
Not buying it.
But he's in K and reading on a 3-4th grade level. His brain is wired to recognize words. I don't think being neater would improve, nor do I think being messier would hurt. (It'd hurt his own future housekeeping skills, of course!)
And yet, as a mom, when I first saw that headline a few weeks ago, my stomach dropped as I was clicking on it, even knowing it didn't fit us. Now, other children who aren't hard-wired for words, who are likely to be average readers or below? Sure, maybe that would help some of the connections. Not sure.
You've got me thinking about something one of my friends said recently about "kids like us who got through socially awkward years by always having a book on hand to hide in". Sometimes, I think, a book is a little world of order and consistancy in whose leaves we can shelter for a while.
I love this idea as a compliment. Orderly outside world can foster reading too. Wow. Thanks!
As someone who was raised in emotional chaos but a clean home where nothing was wasted or taken for granted, living with him is a daily exercise in biting my tongue and stifling screams. I keep the dining room table set all the time so that he can't pile stuff on it, and I've tried to relegate his office to one room where the door closes. I don't even want to think about what it looks like in there. I just know that some of it bleeds into every corner of the house. But since it's his house too, I have to accept it as best I can. I do reserve the right to throw anything out that's been sitting in a place it doesn't belong for more than a year!
I'm with Stellaa, as always...tired of these trend stories that build on parental anxiety and the flip side, parental belief in control. I ran a reasonably clean (but not always neat) house, was high on routine because I need it myself, and I don't take credit for anything I did to make my daughter a successful person except for loving her constantly, laughing a lot, and talking to her as often as she'd stand it.
That said, I'm going to get off OS and say goodnight to her via Google Chat now!
I always see that side of it since I grew up with such poverty around me. I do see their point, however. I don't think it is cause to worry that if you are messy sometimes or let down your hair, so to speak, that it will in any way damage your kid.
On the other hand, my MIL kept an immaculate home, yelled at kids for reading and not getting outside, and forbade reading at the dinner table--things my mom and myself did not do which produced great readers.
Cleanliness does not equate with good parenting. Period.
That the orderly household is associated with better reading skills only if the mother is an above-average reader says to me that mothers who clean their houses are also more likely to spend time teaching their children to read.
All that being said, it certainly makes sense that an orderly home allows more room in the mind for things like encouraging creative play or reading or time together with kids. If someone is distracted by the mess or the guilty desire to clean the mess, it seems like that would take away from being able to enjoy the guilty pleasures of reading, whether you are the kid or the parent. Or is it the other way around that makes sense? That a neat freak doesn't have time for his/her kids and also doesn't encourage any creative (read: messy) play? (Yes, I'm riding the roller coaster today)
My home, while not horribly messy or dirty, is probably not on the side of the continuum called neat and clean, and I just graduated a National Merit Scholar whose two brothers routinely score in the 99th percentile of every single IOWA/COGAT test they've ever taken.
As you say, food for thought, and ammunition for a preferred lifestyle if it fits! Thanks for sharing.
That's why I found it kind of frustrating.
Given that the sample contained children nested within families, we employed a multilevel modeling approach via the PROC MIXED procedure in Statistical Analysis System, which adjusts the standard errors to account for the nonindependence of observations. Both measures of chaos, all characteristics of the HLE, maternal reading ability, and maternal education were standardized, as were the three early reading skills. Thus, the regression coefficients for any given reading skill should be interpreted as the average change in standard deviations for that skill associated with an increase of one standard deviation in the variable of interest.
Table 4 shows that the degree of household order was significantly and consistently related to all three early reading skills (b = .20)...
Just FYI. As others have suggested, it's good to keep in mind the difference between causation and correlation. A related point that I'll make is that this was not a manipulation experiment, which means that deciding to maintain a more orderly household than one has done in the past may have no effect at all (even leaving aside the strength of the statistical association) on a child's early reading skills.
I need to be careful I don't come off differently than I intend to. I worked for Tulsa Public Schools, a severely poverty stricken district, and the prevailing theory was: "poor people are messy and don't care about literacy therefore it is their fault therefore we have a hard time teaching them." I hate that perspective... so I guess I saw the article through those eyes. Each region has their own perspective and we tend to skew the conversation that way.
I think this is a most interesting topic. Thanks for bringing it into our area! I noticed several readers mention we are too busy reading to clean... us too!!!! Plus most of my family.
As a grandmother, I am disturbed by all of these studies that bedevil young mothers about their progeny. Children develop all too often despite their environments. Geniuses have been raised in deplorable, filthy conditions whereas well-ordered and spotless homes have turned out average individuals who go about their lives.
I can't help but think that far too many middle class white, brown abd balck young mothers spend too much time reading articles on the Internet and/or books and not enough time developing patience to allow their children to freely explore the world around them. An widely circulated Internet ditty recently spoke about why grandparents are great: "they never tell me to hurry up" or "they a;ways make time for me, no matter what. What I have to say to them is always important." And therein lies the key out of the mouths of babes.
My brothers and I grew up reading to the point that one time the three of us were sitting around in one brother's frat house reading and a frat brother proclaimed his annoyance with all of us for doing that. Did I mention that our house was a disaster and that our schedule was only so-so? My two kids followed the same path and their mother was not at all consistent either in housekeeping or daily schedule.
The common factor that I have found in kids who do more reading than others is the lack of TV time. We grew up without one. My kids were not allowed to watch except when I wasn't home.
0.20 is not a particularly strong correlation. A correlation like that is barely high enough to be of use in genetic selection.
The book Freakanomics (I think) also mentions the correlation between the number of books a parent owns and the reading competency of the child. It's not so much about anything inherently educational about owning books--there is none, but the organization, philosophies, structure, and habits of a family that does so has a high statistical probability of engaging in multiple behaviors that help a child to become successful.
And I'd add, don't sweat the 15 minutes. The best part of order is letting the chaos in from time to time and feeling like your getting away with something special.