Open Levinson

Paul Levinson's Open Salon Blog

Paul Levinson

Paul Levinson
Location
New York City, New York, USA
Birthday
March 25
Title
Professor
Company
Fordham University
Bio
Paul Levinson's The Silk Code won the 2000 Locus Award for Best First Novel. He has since published Borrowed Tides (2001), The Consciousness Plague (2002), The Pixel Eye (2003), and The Plot To Save Socrates (2006). His science fiction and mystery short stories have been nominated for Nebula, Hugo, Edgar, and Sturgeon Awards. His eight nonfiction books, including The Soft Edge (1997), Digital McLuhan (1999), Realspace (2003), and Cellphone (2004), have been the subject of major articles in the New York Times, Wired, the Christian Science Monitor, and have been translated into ten languages. New New Media, exploring how Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and blogging have changed our lives, was published in September 2009. Paul Levinson appears on "The O'Reilly Factor" (Fox News), "The CBS Evening News," the “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” (PBS), “Nightline” (ABC), and numerous national and international TV and radio programs. He reviews the best of television in his InfiniteRegress.tv blog. Paul Levinson is Professor of Communication & Media Studies at Fordham University in New York City

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 29, 2009 4:17PM

Chris Matthews Should Have Thrown Dick Armey off the Show

Rate: 15 Flag

Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey's sexist attack on Salon editor Joan Walsh on MSNBC's Hardball last night - telling her, in response to her apt critique of Republican intransigence in responding to the economic crisis, that "I'm so damn glad you can never be my wife because I surely wouldn't have to listen to that prattle from you" - has been well lambasted all over the Web, along with plaudits for New York Times reporter Bob Herbert, who, appearing on the next Hardball segment, said Armey owed Walsh and Hardball viewers an apology (see video clips below).

One aspect of this Republican outburst which has not received enough attention, however, is Hardball host Chris Matthews' mild response. He did say that what Joan Walsh said was "not prattle," and, in the segment after Bob Herbert's, that Armey "went way overboard going after Joan" - but where was the outrage, the shouting down of jackasses by Chris Matthews, that has become one of the admirable hallmarks of his show?

Why didn't Matthews interrupt Armey, talk over him, and throw him off the show?

Perhaps he's a bit tone deaf to sexism, or maybe is so used to such trash-talk from some Republicans that he doesn't find it so outrageous. It is true, at least in my experience, that when you make a logical point that makes some Republicans uncomfortable, they respond with a personal attack. I noticed this the very first time I was on O'Reilly's Factor, and he started riffing on his amazement that someone with my views could be a professor at Fordham University (I was actually happy to hear this, because it gave the school good publicity).

But ubiquity of bad behavior is no reason to continue accept it. Matthews should have shown Armey to the door last night. I hope he makes up for not doing that by denouncing Armey in much stronger terms, tonight.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Hear, Hear! Here's hoping he (and the rest of the media) grow a little more backbone standing up to attitudes like these...
That's censorship. Granted, he made a ridiculous comment, but so does Keith Olberman on a regular basis. Should he be thrown off the air for saying wildy exagerated things about Bush at times, or kept on because you like what he says?

TV news and political talk is boring. I worry a lot more about balance in the news than invective.
The soft underbelly of "Hardball" is that it is driven by ratings and not principle. Making the response to Armey an aside offered up later is CYA at its worst. Matthews knows better and I believe his private heart is in the right place but there are times when your outrage must be immediate or it lacks credibility. I too will be watching tonight.
This is why I don't watch Hardball--no real discourse, just rants. I did watch the video and thought Armey was really out of touch. This is why Obama won. Armey does not have a clue. Rated.
People who can't debate ideas attack the person espousing them. Classic symptom of a stunted mind. I don't believe he should have been thrown off the show. Matthews let him hang himself but good.
Personally, I like rants. If I ran CNN, I would want a show hosted by Micheal Moore and Ann Coulter. It would be amusing. They bring on guests, have wildy different outlooks, but it would be funny and entertaining.

The news we see is sterile, arrogant and phony.
With a name like Armey, nobody expected him to retreat. I wonder what his wife had to say when he got home? I hope she punishes him but good. Joan remained a lady and Chris dropped the (hard)ball by not calling "Dick" out on his behavior. The outrage just makes Joan look better and better.
I think we should all write to hardball@msnbc.com and suggest he publicly apologize. Otherwise, I promise, I am not turning my TV to MSNBC until time for Keith Olbermann.
Good for you, and good for the rest of the web to denounce this Republican prattle.
I must be letting my standards for sexism slip, as I thought that Chris Matthews (CM) did give some lip service to defending Joan last night. In the past, I have been of the first to openly criticize Matthews, as I did early on in my blogging here at OS. I have boycotted Hardball in spite of my respect for Joan, because I believe CM to have been one of the worst offenders of overt sexism while Hillary Clinton was campaigning for President.

Last night, it appeared that CM recognized Armey's insultingly childish behavior, but I have seen Matthews behave in a similar manner himself in the past. For example, I will NEVER forget his comments about Hillary Clinton with regard to her ability to serve as VP when he said, "But can she obey?". Obey / prattle => sexist. UGH!

I like your line that suggests CM is "a bit tone deaf to sexism"? Yes, yes he is -- that is it in a nutshell.;)
"Granted, he made a ridiculous comment, but so does Keith Olberman[sic] on a regular basis. Should he be thrown off the air for saying wildy[sic] exagerated[sic] things about Bush at times..."

Lighten up. Many of us use "exaggeration" as a comedic device. Only a moron would take every syllable Olbermann utters at face value. (See there? I just did it.)
Most people, when they are unhappy with a political statement start to get personal, because as Schumpeter said in Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, the political always calls on the sub-rational.
Actually, by my research, it brings out the inner reptile for very good reasons, which you can see in the response of the Left to Amey's statement about Ms. Walsh, "throw him off the show." Really? Is that a fully rational non-personal response to what was basically Dick Armey saying what the majority of males actually think, which is that they cannot take a woman's opposed political views except in small doses.
Now, does that make him a sexist? I guess, but then I am, after having been a stay at home Dad for six years, an unrepentant Masculinst, see Mansfield for details,because I have concluded that feminism in the end is a myth, and a dangerous one at that, which goes against the natural order generated by evolution as to sex roles.
As to the response to the economic "crisis" it is not in itself a crime to point out that in fact the problems in housing that have obliterated the banking sector were in fact the consequence of monetary policy and teh activities of Fannie and Freddie, which means the government started this in the first place, which would suggest caution in blindly assuming governmental action in response will be efficacious.
Although I don't really like Limbaugh that much. I miss Buckley.
I said the same thing, almost verbatim after I saw it Paul. I think Chris was speechless for the first time in his laugh and Armey owes Joan a public apology. Never gonna happen.

(RATED)
Don Rich wrote: ""throw him off the show." Really? Is that a fully rational non-personal response to what was basically Dick Armey saying what the majority of males actually think..."

Well, I should at least get some credit for refraining from saying "Matthews should have shown the Dick to the door," don't ya think?

More seriously - what on Earth gives you the idea that a majority of males agree with Armey? What males have you been researching?
Don't hold your breath.
What a male chauvinistic pig. This man shows his true colors. We, as a society, will not progress as long people feel free to say such horrendous things to women and, in fact, to one another. Chris really made a mistake in not calling him out, on the spot, for such a statement. And his wife, if he has one, should start proceedings to divorce him right away. Our old pastor used to say this about his congregation, in private, "There's nothing wrong with this congregation that a few funerals wouldnt cure." You take it from there. LOL