Open Levinson

Paul Levinson's Open Salon Blog

Paul Levinson

Paul Levinson
Location
New York City, New York, USA
Birthday
March 25
Title
Professor
Company
Fordham University
Bio
Paul Levinson's The Silk Code won the 2000 Locus Award for Best First Novel. He has since published Borrowed Tides (2001), The Consciousness Plague (2002), The Pixel Eye (2003), and The Plot To Save Socrates (2006). His science fiction and mystery short stories have been nominated for Nebula, Hugo, Edgar, and Sturgeon Awards. His eight nonfiction books, including The Soft Edge (1997), Digital McLuhan (1999), Realspace (2003), and Cellphone (2004), have been the subject of major articles in the New York Times, Wired, the Christian Science Monitor, and have been translated into ten languages. New New Media, exploring how Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and blogging have changed our lives, was published in September 2009. Paul Levinson appears on "The O'Reilly Factor" (Fox News), "The CBS Evening News," the “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” (PBS), “Nightline” (ABC), and numerous national and international TV and radio programs. He reviews the best of television in his InfiniteRegress.tv blog. Paul Levinson is Professor of Communication & Media Studies at Fordham University in New York City

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
APRIL 13, 2009 10:53PM

Astonishing Surprise in 24

Rate: 3 Flag

24 waited for tonight's Hour 18 to reveal the most astonishing surprise of the Season (7) ....

So astonishing, in fact, that I don't know if I believe it. But I'm not sure...

First, Hodges and his plan to launch missiles with bio weapons against American cities seems foiled. Tony blew up the Starkwood facility.

Jack's getting sicker. Kim comes to see him - and I thought that was a powerful scene. Say what you will about Kim Bauer and her role in the previous seasons of 24 - and I've said that I've been no great fan of that - but her relationship to her father is one of the bedrocks of the story of 24, and Kim and Jack played it just right tonight.

But that's not the astonishing surprise.

If you haven't seen this episode, don't read any further.

If you have - can it be that Tony is bad?

He apparently kills Larry Moss, who was trying to stop a bad guy with a canister of the weaponized prion.

Since I can't believe that Tony is bad, after all of this, I see only two possibilities:

1. Larry is not really dead. Tony just pretended to suffocate Larry - the way Jack did Renee, earlier this year. He needed to do that to get in the bad guy's good graces, so Tony could find any other bio-weapons. (The bad guy already knew Tony from his earlier work.)

2. Tony really did kill Larry, for the reason indicated above.

But I have to admit I'm not too sure about any of this. I would certainly prefer #1 rather than #2, but #2 is certainly better than #3 - Tony really is bad. Hodges did tell the President that she had no idea what greater evil she and the country would be facing ... Can Tony be a part of it?

Nah, I don't believe it...

But I can't to see in the weeks ahead.





See also: Hours 1 and 2 ... Hours 3 and 4 ... Hour 5 ... Hour 6 ... Hour 7 ... Hour 8 ... Hour 9 ... Hour 10 ... Hours 11-12 ... Hour 13 ... Hour 14 ... Hour 15 ... Hour 16 ... Hour 17

Author tags:

television, 24

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I completely forgot (had some grieving to do), but I hope to catch up next week, unless there's a repeat on Fox scheduled for another time this week. Yes, I did read on. I couldn't help myself. Nevertheless, I still have hope for Tony.
I'm betting that Tony isn't really a bad guy
I don't think killing Larry Moss makes him a bad guy.
Lairderg - You can watch the full episode on Fox.com. It is the only reason I go to Fox.com.
Unless Tony knows that Larry has been a bad guy all along.

For whatever reason. TBD.
Tony is one seriously bad dude. I think he really killed Larry Moss--it didn't seem at all like the fake out they pulled with Renee. Significant other and I were trying to figure out how Tony can actually be one of the evil ones and still blow up the bio weapons and missiles, but the simplest explanation is that he only needs a small amount of the bio-weapon to accomplish whatever he is up to (or please whoever he is working for).

I'm sorry to say I got a little tired of Jack playing the martyr with his daughter. "No, no, I'd rather just die than cause you physical discomfort so you can donate stem cells." It was annoyingly "Big He Man." I think Keifer is developing an unfortunate tendency to chew up the scenery, a la William Shatner. It is a risk inherent in keeping that role going for so long, but it would be nice to see him give the character a little more emotional range about now. (He has more than enough emotion.)
The thing is when Tony killed (or "killed") Larry, the look on his face was akin to the look Bruce Lee delivered when he had to kill Bolo in Enter the Dragon -- the "it pains me to do this, but I must" look, which tells me he has an ulterior motive for doing it besides just being an evil mercenary badass.

Looking forward to the next one...
I'm afraid that Tony is a bad guy, at least if the coming attractions snippets are not misleading. In them, you see Tony intentionally wounding himself to establish his credibility as a victim of the Starkwood bad guys. Furthermore, Larry Moss is carted off under a sheet, which means he's not faking it. Whether there is a triple twist that will restore Tony's role as a penitent sinner who only wants to do good, I don't know. But clearly he has no allegience to Starkwood or Hodges, and seems to be freelancing to accomplish something that I can't fathom. Perhaps he wants to even scores for past wrongs, perhaps he wants to use the threat of releasing the pathogen to extort something from either bad guys or from his perceived enemies, which we might consider good guys.
PS I've been wondering why Kim made so quick an exit after Jack told her he wanted off the series. My best guess is that she needs to get back to her pet mountain lion before it tears apart her room at the Mayflower.
I was BLOWN AWAY by last night's episode (pardon the pun). I just finished saying to my wife that I am so glad that they brought Tony back because he was always a favorite character of mine. However, I did NOT see it coming. Although if you backtrack from that point it DOES make sense. The OTHER bad guy left just before Tony showed up, Tony has a tendency to slip thru the cracks without being detected, etc. My only question though is this: If Tony IS bad them does that mean that Bill and Chloe were as well or was Tony playing them all to get his ultimate revenge on the Government? I STILL think this is one of the best shows on TV if not THE best.
1.Larry is not really dead.

Sorry, but Larry is very dead. Unlike Renee, Larry was late to the CTU class and didn't have enough sense to play like he was, actually, dead.

But you can take solace from the fact that Tony hasn't gone "bad" but is in fact playing the ball, or the bio-weapon in this case, in an attempt to continue ferreting out the nefarious Starkwood co-conspirators.

24 is unpredictable, but not that unpredictable!

(of course I reserve the right to eat crow at a later date)
What about that henchman of Hodges? The one who "misled" Jack and Tony as to the location of the weapons? Something is up with that dude, I think. Maybe a closet good guy after all, and somehow connected with Tony?
Interestingly, I knew early on in the episode that Tony was going to do something unexpected. What gave it away was the fact Larry took away his handcuffs and let him go along the ride to capture the rogue Starkwood operative. Also, the fact that we saw this person leave to do another round of "checking the perimeter", the look the other bad guy gave this dude before he left to do his round (talk to Tony?), but not seeing him until the last 10 minutes in this episode. Although I am enjoying this season less, I am still curious enough to see how it ends. Some of my thoughts about this season can be found here:

http://open.salon.com/blog/kanuk/2009/03/31/jack_bauer_continues_to_save_the_day_one_day_at_a_time
Tony, I think, is very, very bad. Two things stick in my mind as arguments against him being good. First, when Starkwood first caught him, Hodges and Seaton run that game and even fool their own henchman... they let Tony go, in effect. When they first caught him, instead of just shooting him on sight they go through this whole act with Hodges insisting they don't kill him while Seaton comes up with his "plan."
Second, Hodges hinted that there was something far worse and bigger than the President even knew coming soon... that made me think about Tony and the rogue Starkwood guy and the revelation that they were working together... if this was a full-out Starkwood operation, the other henchmen wouldn't have let Tony blow up the bombs. This other leg of the conspiracy must go deeper and higher.
No one knows that Tony has (apparently) gone bad yet, which means having his hands on one bioweapon can be awfully dangerous.