Open Levinson

Paul Levinson's Open Salon Blog

Paul Levinson

Paul Levinson
Location
New York City, New York, USA
Birthday
March 25
Title
Professor
Company
Fordham University
Bio
Paul Levinson's The Silk Code won the 2000 Locus Award for Best First Novel. He has since published Borrowed Tides (2001), The Consciousness Plague (2002), The Pixel Eye (2003), and The Plot To Save Socrates (2006). His science fiction and mystery short stories have been nominated for Nebula, Hugo, Edgar, and Sturgeon Awards. His eight nonfiction books, including The Soft Edge (1997), Digital McLuhan (1999), Realspace (2003), and Cellphone (2004), have been the subject of major articles in the New York Times, Wired, the Christian Science Monitor, and have been translated into ten languages. New New Media, exploring how Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and blogging have changed our lives, was published in September 2009. Paul Levinson appears on "The O'Reilly Factor" (Fox News), "The CBS Evening News," the “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” (PBS), “Nightline” (ABC), and numerous national and international TV and radio programs. He reviews the best of television in his InfiniteRegress.tv blog. Paul Levinson is Professor of Communication & Media Studies at Fordham University in New York City

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
APRIL 20, 2009 10:40PM

One Great, Spinning Season of 24

Rate: 3 Flag

Well, once again, my intrepid powers of analysis and prediction have apparently been proven ... wrong.

Last week, I said I couldn't believe that Tony was bad. Truthfully, I still can't believe it this week, but in the Season 7 Hour 19 I just saw, Tony sure looks that way. Jack thinks so, too.

Jack's still veering between functioning and collapsing, and he collapses before he's able to further question or shoot Tony, and Kim's on the way to the airport to fly back home. I predict she'll change her mind (hey, I have to be right about this easy one), though I still like my idea that Jack developed an immunity to the pathogen if/when he was exposed to it in Sangala.

Larry seems definitely dead. Hodges should be - he took the heart attack pill - but he seems to be hanging on. Is that because he had the heart attack in the car rather than in his jail cell? But if so, the knock-out redhead with the blond wig - who gave Hodges the pill - didn't seem too upset that Hodges was being taken out of the cell.

We see her next week - in Tony's arms - which further seems to be telling us that Tony is bad. But I still have my problems with that. One problem - as Dawn commented on my Infinite Regress blog about Hour 18 last week - is how the bad Tony was able to fool Buchanan and Chloe? Jack's reasoning may also have been a little off when he confronted Tony tonight - after all, he's in the throes of the germ.  And why did Tony help bring down the Dumbaku attack, the Juma assault on the White House, and the Hodges attack as well?  All in the service of some even worse bad guy or force?  I suppose so, but doesn't quite add up.

But Tony's doing evil after evil. He killed Larry (assuming Larry really is dead). He could have easily killed Renee when he lured her and the FBI team into the building wired to explode.

If I had to bet, I still think Tony will turn out good. But the odds look long against me....

And that's why I'm really enjoying this great season! And, yeah, it was good to hear that Kim's little daughter is named Teri.

 



See also: Hours 1 and 2 ... Hours 3 and 4 ... Hour 5 ... Hour 6 ... Hour 7 ... Hour 8 ... Hour 9 ... Hour 10 ... Hours 11-12 ... Hour 13 ... Hour 14 ... Hour 15 ... Hour 16 ... Hour 17 ... Hour 18

 


5-min podcast review of 24.7.19

 

 

Author tags:

24, television

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Exactly how does this merit an EP? It's not even a good review in that you can't read it without already knowing all about what he's talking about and please, where's the analysis?

Further, given the horrors of the real torture memos, someone's postings that promote a show that promotes torture in prime time seems a bit ugly to me.

There have been several different superlative postings in the past week and today on torture on OS, including breaking stories, but only one of them has made the cover.
Dennis, you haven't been watching...I think these posts are for those of us who are fans of the show. You could never catch anyone up on what's happening if you aren't watching.
Also....They have had a whole scenario about not allowing torture...everyone is so worried about being PC. I have been listening to the exchange about torture and when questioned most people feel it would be okay if it really saves the U.S. from another terrorist attack.

No one wants to sanction it and that is a natural thing, I think. At one time all of what was going on was kept hush hush. My father worked in the Air force doing top secret stuff and he took it to his grave. What has happened to us? No one cares enough to keep a friggin secret anymore.

As for the show, I am disappointed that Tony appears to be bad...but he appeared to be bad before...maybe he is being a double double spy. We know Jack won't die, as for the rest it's a mystery and I love it. Yeah I'm jealous that you get editors pick all the time...I think my last post "The Black Bra Club" should have made it. But C'est la Vie!
Sage:

You write: "They have had a whole scenario about not allowing torture...everyone is so worried about being PC. I have been listening to the exchange about torture and when questioned most people feel it would be okay if it really saves the U.S. from another terrorist attack."

That idea that they're saving the US from another terrorist attack is precisely the trope that is being employed by the real torturers and their leaders. The fact that people support this idea is exactly the problem. Torturers can always claim that the barbarities that they are perpetrating are for the greater good. That's one of the reasons why torture is illegal under any and all circumstances under int'l and national law (until the Bush regime and now, under Obama who is allowing torture to continue at Gitmo and Bagram and isn't going to prosecute the ones with blood on their hands.)
Dennis - I'm as upset about the torture memos as the next person who has a sense of ethics. I really hope these soulless criminals get prosecuted, and if the White House protects them they are wrong to do so.

But after watching the downward spiral of the last several seasons of 24, this season is actually good and offers a reasonable debate about the ethics of torture. This show to me is entertainment, pure and simple. Those who watch this show for guidance on real-life are idiots. Let the adults who understand the difference between reality and fiction have their fun.
Tony went from bad to EVIL!!!!
Tony, though pursuing his own agenda and pursued by his own demons, is after the larger wheel in which Hodges says he is only a small cog. Apparently, Tony is willing to do or sacrifice anything to accomplish that. Everything he did to check Hodges' scheme served to make him a hero to that larger wheel, and in particular to Ms. Assassin. As much as I like the idea that Jack has developed an immunity to the pathogen, we can expect Kim and her cells to come to the rescue either before or after she gets on the 6:10 flight back to CA. That Hodges survives his red-pill heart attack keeps an engaging villain in the mix. And yes, Larry is definitely dead.
Seth: I'm going to leave it this most likely, but regarding it being just entertainment:

This is from http://66.90.101.164/articles/ps/torture_24_show_torture_on_tv.htm:

The show's connection to the Bush White House and the conservative establishment became explicit last June, when Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff appeared alongside the show's producers and three cast members at an event sponsored by the Heritage Foundation to discuss "The public image of US terrorism policy." The discussion was moderated by Rush Limbaugh. The C-SPAN store sells a DVD of the event--price reduced from $60 to $29.95. Sunday night's two-hour premiere again argued not just that torture is necessary but that it works -- and it's also really exciting to watch. The show as usual made the "ticking time bomb" case for torture: we need to torture a suspect, or else thousands, or millions, will die in the next hour.

It's the same case made by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, who proposed that judges ought to issue torture warrants in the "rare 'ticking bomb' case," and by University of Chicago law professor and federal judge Richard Posner, who has written, "If torture is the only means of obtaining the information necessary to prevent the detonation of a nuclear bomb in Times Square, torture should be used." He added that "no one who doubts that this is the case should be in a position of responsibility."

Thanks to "24," tens of millions of TV viewers know exactly what Dershowitz and Posner are talking about. As Richard Kim pointed out in The Nation in 2005, those are the cases where "the stakes are dire, the information perfect and the authorities omniscient." Of course that's a fantasy of total knowledge and power, and of course the U.S. has never had a real "ticking time bomb" case -- but Jack Bauer faces one every Sunday night on Fox.
Dennis, it really is just a tv show. A preposterously plotted, unbelievable entertainment vehicle that many of us happen to enjoy a great deal. Mr. Levinson's blog is a brief summary of his opinions and musings about that show. (If you'd like to read a more extensive blog with all the details, there's a pretty good one at the ew.com website.) I watch this action-oriented tv show and read about it for enjoyment, not to be faced political discussions about torture. And if there have been "several different superlative postings in the past week... on torture on OS", that's a good thing. But why must you continue it over on this blog about a tv show? Please lighten up, buddy. I'm skipping over all your posts, sheeesh...

Anyway, I'm really sorry Tony's an evil minion of Will Patton's mysterious bad bossman. It seems like if the ever-dimwitted Kim (yes, I've been this watching since season 1) had bothered to mention to Jack that he has a granddaughter (named Teri!), it might've been the reason-to-live that would change his inexplicable decision to go ahead and die. Hopefully, he'll find out soon.
Dennis wrote: "Thanks to "24," tens of millions of TV viewers know exactly what Dershowitz and Posner are talking about. "

Two problems with your "analysis" Dennis:

1. One, as several people have mentioned in this discussion, 24 is just a television show. You have a simplistic view of the impact of television fiction on real-life politics.

2. You apparently have not been watching the show this season - in which the prime villain is a Blackwater-like organization, the head of which (well played by Jon Voight) talks from a script that could well have been written by Rumsfeld or Cheney.

As to your low opinion of my reviews, I note with pleasure that you continue to read them, and comment upon them.

You might also enjoy my reviews of "In Treatment"...
Whoa baby, I'm hangin' on the for the ride also. One of my friends thinks Tony is in deep, deep, deep cover....I mean how deep does "cover" get? I will be crushed if Tony is evil; he's such a hottie after all. Oh and PLEASE advise....will they really let Jack writhe and die? Although I agree that the daughter will save him in the end.
Too many things don't add up about Tony, you're right. Is the unbeknownst group trying to take over the country? I think Larry is dead...he looked very very dead, but if this was "All My Children" he would be alive in a couple of weeks or next season. I want Renee to end up with Jack...do you? help!
As we all know, there's no knowing who's good or bad, They've taken the, you think (s)he's bad- but good, (and vice versa) to the extreme. Tony's still good as long as the "bad guys" are still out there plotting there evil deeds. Some collateral damage in the name of saving the world...Shame for the families, Oh yea, it's fiction!
Gail - yes, I think Renee and Jack will end up together, in the last scene ... but, then again, I'm a hopeless romantic...
Hey, don't Jack's love interests die? Sorry.
You're right Jackster - you don't want to fall in love with Jack and you never ever want him to tell you, "trust me".

It is only a show and pretty even handed I think. You take what you want from it.

As to Tony, well, he's really running out of chances to show us that he's in that deep deep deep deep deep deep cover Gail mentioned. I don't know that he can flip one more time ... unless Ryan Chappell isn't really dead and he's running a very covert operation with Michelle.

... and where's Chloe? Isn't it about time for her to save Jack with some little known intel?

Thanks for th gathering point Paul.
Jackster: Chloe is a wife and stay at home mom, remember? But you're right it's time for her to don her supercyper cape and rescue Jack. Maybe she's home concocting an anti-viral serum to save our boy! It's a bird, it's a plane, holy crap , it's Chloe!!!!