Open Levinson

Paul Levinson's Open Salon Blog

Paul Levinson

Paul Levinson
Location
New York City, New York, USA
Birthday
March 25
Title
Professor
Company
Fordham University
Bio
Paul Levinson's The Silk Code won the 2000 Locus Award for Best First Novel. He has since published Borrowed Tides (2001), The Consciousness Plague (2002), The Pixel Eye (2003), and The Plot To Save Socrates (2006). His science fiction and mystery short stories have been nominated for Nebula, Hugo, Edgar, and Sturgeon Awards. His eight nonfiction books, including The Soft Edge (1997), Digital McLuhan (1999), Realspace (2003), and Cellphone (2004), have been the subject of major articles in the New York Times, Wired, the Christian Science Monitor, and have been translated into ten languages. New New Media, exploring how Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and blogging have changed our lives, was published in September 2009. Paul Levinson appears on "The O'Reilly Factor" (Fox News), "The CBS Evening News," the “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” (PBS), “Nightline” (ABC), and numerous national and international TV and radio programs. He reviews the best of television in his InfiniteRegress.tv blog. Paul Levinson is Professor of Communication & Media Studies at Fordham University in New York City

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
MAY 14, 2009 12:58AM

Lost Season 5 Finale: Jacob and Locke

Rate: 12 Flag

Let's begin at the beginning of the Lost Season 5 finale ... Two men are talking on the shore of our island - Jacob and a man played by Titus Welliver. The man says he wants to kill Jacob, and says he'll one day find a "loophole" to allow him to do this ... This happened a long time ago...

Back in our time - that is, the past few decades - Jacob visits most of our original, now still surviving, Flight 815 passengers. Some, like Saywer and Kate, are visited when they are children. Others, like Jack and Locke, when they at low or desperate points in their adult lives. Jacob visits Sayid, distracts him, so he can't stop Nadia from being hit and killed by a car. Hurley's visit is the most recent - its purpose to convince Hurley to get back the island.

Tonight's episode, then, among the many intriguing, fabulous things it is, is the story of Jacob. It provides at least part of an answer to something I've been saying since the beginning of the second season - that the key to understanding Lost resides, somehow, in the inexplicable coincidences in the flashbacks, in people who presumably first met on Flight 815, or on the island, crossing paths in the past - such as Desmond and Jack running into each other on the steps of the stadium, Kate's mother serving Sawyer in a diner, etc. We didn't see Jacob in those intersections tonight, but we saw him in enough places and times to make it plausible that he could have manipulated those coincidences to happen, too...

But Jacob's story is also as short as it is long. And it ends with one of the best surprises in the series: Locke did not come back to life when Flight 316 crashed on the island this season. No, not at all. The Locke who has been walking around on the island is the man who was talking to Jacob on the shore all those centuries or whenever ago. He has somehow taken Locke's form - and inexplicably has at least some of Locke's memories - and in that form goads Ben into killing Jacob. That, apparently was the loophole - the man could not kill Jacob himself, but he could drive someone else to do that...

Which may explain a lot of things. Let's say no ever came back to life on the island? Coming back to life certainly seems like news to Richard - his people can cure the critically wounded, not the dead. That's why young Ben but not Faraday was saved. Did this shape-shifter look like Christian, to manipulate Jack; look like Alex to manipulate Ben; and who knows who else?

Dead is dead, that seems clear now. And it brings us to the other great part of tonight's story.

Jack brings the core of the hydrogen bomb to the Swan site. There are some wonderful scenes with Jack and Sawyer - who, as he's been throughout much of this season, is a more admirable character than Jack. The plan is that the bomb will wipe out the island, 815 won't crash, and nothing we've been seeing for the past five seasons will happen. Sayid is badly wounded, so this might be good for him (though Richard could well cure him) ... but for everyone else?

As I wrote last week, and in previous weeks, the plan can't succeed. Faraday was right when he said the past can't be changed (and he was too torn by grief to be thinking clearly when he said it might be changed, after all). Miles seems to best get this now - he says maybe the bomb going off will cause the "incident" to happen - will cause the reality we have seen to occur.

Jack drops the bomb into the shaft, as the digging already going on unleashes a magnetic force that starts pulling the equipment apart. Phil from Dharma gets killed - good riddance (but good acting by Patrick Fischler). Juliet gets pulled into the shaft. She's hanging on. Sawyer and Kate try to save her (great line from Sawyer - "where you going, Blondie?") But the force is too strong. Juliet leaves go because doesn't want to pull Sawyer in and she falls down the shaft.

But she's not killed. And at the bottom of shaft, she finds the core of the h-bomb, still intact. She pounds on it. And - it goes off.

Have the past five years been destroyed? Will they never happen?

Of course not. Of course they will. I'm sure Miles was right. And we'll see how this all plays out - with the new "Locke" next year... The fact is that we can't be sure what the blast will do, other than that it won't change the past and wipe out five years. Conceivably, it could throw our people from 1977 back into the present ... it could even, perhaps, save Juliet in this way.

Minor quibbles ... I found Jacob coming in and out so fast a little unsatisfying, and we could have used a little more precedent in the story for the shape shifting. But, all in all, a splendid resolution to this season and a powerful set-up for the next, and final, season.

And, oh yeah, Rose and Bernard! Someone asked me, in a comment somewhere about one of my Lost reviews this season, if I thought we'd ever see those two again. I said I was sure they'd turn up in the final episode of the season, as they usually do. And, sure, enough, they did (taking care of Vincent!) - both looking better and happier than ever!

More Lost - see : The Richard-Locke Compass Time Travel Loop ...

and Lost Returns in 5 Dimensions and 5.3: The Loops, The Bomb ... 5.4: A Saving Skip Back in Time ... 5.5 Two Time Loops and Mind Benders ... 5.6 A Lot of Questions ... 5.7 Bentham and Ben ... 5.8 True Love Ways ... 5.9 Two Times and a Baby ... 5.10 The Impossible Cannot Happen ... 5.11 Clockwork Perfect Time Travel ... 5.12: Ben v. Charles, and Locke' Slave ... 5.13: Lost Meets Star Wars and the Sixth Sense ... The Problem with Baby Aaron and the Return of the Oceanic Six ... 5.14: Eloise, Daniel, and Obsession Trumping Paradox ... 5.15: Moral Compasses in Motion


10-min podcast review of Lost Season 5 Finale!

Author tags:

television, lost

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Thanks, Paul! If it wasn't for you I'd have no idea how this season ends, till I have time to watch the tape, who knows when! I was busy on antoher OS task while Lost was on. The ultimate sacrifice!
The actual person of Jacob appears way too late in the season/series for this episode to really work. I was highly disappointed with the Jacob/Locke/whoever thing because there had been absolutely no set up. I was glad Ben killed him, because, well, Jacob just seemed like a dick. And I didn't really give a rat's ass about him, whereas I kind of like Ben. I have no idea what's up with Locke, but his story is starting to wander and lose interest.

Kate/Jack/Sawyer, etc were in a much more compelling story. The emotional interactions between them were completely in fitting with the characters and wrenching decisions were made (and then unmade--ahem, I'm lookin' at you, Juliet). There was also great suspense and an excellent cliffhanger.

I'm still unclear as to why you think Sawyer "is a more admirable character than Jack." Sawyer wants something; Jack wants something. They are both trying to act in their own self-interest--Jack, however, is hoping to save everyone who was on the plane. Sawyer doesn't care about those people. Who is more admirable?

As for "something I've been saying since the beginning of the second season - that the key to understanding Lost resides, somehow, in the inexplicable coincidences in the flashbacks"--umm, yes. I don't think it took a rocket scientist to figure this out long ago. From the beginning it seemed obvious that these weren't mere coincidence and were vital to understanding the story. Why tell us you've been saying it since season 2, as if it's something to brag on?

Overall, a disappointing episode. Last week's was far superior. I was on the edge of my seat last week. This week, not so much.
I found it eerie that Jacob's dying words were "They're coming!" He seemed scared and, considering his role is the most God-like of all the characters, if HE'S scared, then everyone else better look out. Who's coming?!

It looks like "the wager" being played out between Jacob and his counter-part (call him Esau) is not over yet, even though Jacob is dead. This is apparently why Jacob needed everyone to come back to the island, and why Locke persuaded them: they perhaps knew what Esau was up to. Jacob's faith in Jack, Kate, etc. (i.e. humanity) will be justified over Esau's cynicism, b/c they succeeded in detonating the bomb.

They have to escape "the cycle" of history repeating itself, otherwise Esau's view wins out, and that's no way to end a show. Thus, I take issue with the "the past can't be changed " viewpoint. That's no fun at all. Esau said "It always ends the same," but Jacob countered "It only ends once, everything else is just progress," meaning, essentially, if at first you don't succeed try try again.
Thank goodness for your post. I rushed home to watch (why I watch is something else altogether!) I figured out Locke wasn't Locke but didn't know who he was. I still don't quite know why he wants to kill Jacob. For that matter, I can't figure out who Jacob is or was or what his agenda was or what the agenda is for this "shape-shifter" - and by the way, has he assumed any other identities we should know about? I feel certain our survivors will all be tossed into 2008 or whenever the present is supposed to be, including Bernard and Rose. But if dead is dead, I don't suppose we'll see the return of Charlie or Claire or any of those others. Then again, who knows what lurks in the mind of J. J. Abrams and company?
AHA, I was right, sort of. I somehow knew that it wasn't really Locke but a spirit of the island. As for Jacob not showing up until the very end, he had been trapped in the cabin by the circle of ash and if we remember it was Locke who scooped up a handful and set him free. And when he said "They're coming" I am pretty sure he was talking about the survivors 1977 and when Julia hit the bomb she caused the same type of explosion that propelled Desmond into a massive time skip winding up with him running neked through the jungle. And Jacob pretty much knew Ben would stab him but is he really dead?

Quick question for those paying close attention, what was the answer to the question "What lies in the shadow of the idol?" I didn't catch it. Something about the paths of the dead or the gateway to the world of the dead or something like that.
Paul I wasn't too sure about The Sopranos going dark ending, but otherwise found it to be a great ending. Of course, if an H bomb goes off in your face, I guess a camera would go black. Once again though, I thought as with The Sopranos, OH NO the cable went out...
I liked the interview with the creators prior to the show, promising next year will bring resolutions to all. They can't just leave it hanging. Great finale.
From Lostpedia
[Ilana asks Richard "What lies in the shadow of the statue?", and Richard replies in Latin, "He who will protect/save us all."]
Was the cabin Rose and Bernard were living in Jacobs cabin?
just some food for thought, in no particular order:
1. guitar case represents Charlie in some way (getting his soul back to the island?) Is Charlie coming back? Apparently, Claire is expected back next season
2. There was no bomb blast, but another time jump?
3. Locke is not Man in Black reincarnated/shapeshifted. He seemed surprised about Ben seeing his dead daughter and he seemed genuinely confused about the statue where Jacob lived... "That's a nice foot, Richard. But what does it have to do with Jacob?"
4. there is some biblical good/evil battle or game going on between Jacob and the Man in Black/Esau... everyone else are just pawns defending their own end zones...
5. the plane crash was not the beginning of this adventure, no matter how many time jumps we've had... they were selected for some reason.
6. no one can really think Jacob, whatever/whoever he really is, could actually be killed by a little man like Ben, who is now more pawn than puppetmaster?
7. whatever happened to Jeremy Benton?
AND FINALLY....
8. Regardless of bomb/no bomb... maybe they're thrust not back n time to just before the plane takes off from Sydney, but further back to witness and participate in the original battle of good and evil...... In other words (two words, actually) PARADISE LOST!
I liked this ep, overall, pretty much for the reasons Paul discusses. However, something isn't sitting well with me, and it's the Locke's-n0t-really-Locke thing. Pulling this stunt with a major character feels like a big cheat, independent of our examination of eps since his "resurrection" regarding the consistency of either scenario (it is/isn't really him.) It's a cheat because it introduces a deep inconsistency in the character and messes with our underlying sense of who the character is. (Contrast Ben's mercurial nature, which is well-established for him -- we know he's like this, like him or not.)
No doubt about it, its going to be very interesting indeed!

RT
www.privacy-resources.us.tc
I'm a dedicated fan of LOST, but tonight's episode was two long hours with very little payback given in return. Even the ending is uncertain. Did the bomb go off? Or was it a time warp?

I was very annoyed by opening, which implied that it was sometime in the distant past, yet the actors in the scene look like contemporary American urbanites, with a fresh $200 haircut and trim... geeze!

In any case, thanks Paul, for recapping this finale because for the first time ever watching this show, i was lost.
I started composing a series of LOST haiku in honor of your excellent weekly anlyses - but it was late last night, so I'll post them sometime today and PM you.
Thanks for the great work on these posts, and also "Fringe". I have the finale for Fringe tivo'ed and might just watch it now, since it's my day off. Then I can read your take on it.
Thanks for the great recap. One theme which struck me last night was the overwhelming emphasis on married couples: Jin and Sun, Sawyer's parents, Juliet's parents, Sayid and Nadia, Rose and Bernard. It seems to be setting up a new theme (or, perhaps a variation on "Live together, die alone"), a striking contrast to the old fixation on father issues and mother issues. As Bernard said: "...so we die. The important thing is that we're together."

In contrast to other posters, I thought that the appearance of Jacob was well-timed and somehow a seamless part of the narrative considering how big a leap it was.
I just now watched the last 2 hour finale, playing a little hookie today. Good Lord, it was gripping, tense, tears streamed down my face and had me in suspended animation to the last second.

Loved seeing Rose and Bernard, living a happy retirement on their little corner of the island. Can't imagine that they would be erradicated if the island does explode.

So many things to come to grips with after all the appearances of Jacob in and out of many lives. He's creepy and though killed by doppleganger Locke, must have known that could or would happen.

Always more to the story. Do not want this show to end next year.
What a deep hole that will leave. Jonesin' already! Really enjoy your recaps, Paul and will miss those too.
Correction! I meant to say that Ben killed Jacob with the assistance and prodding of the faux Locke!
paul, do you have a link that explains what you mean when you say that they can not change the past? I have no clue what you mean. There was clearly a lock who did not get helped in the woods in one stream of time until Locke (knowing what what was about to happen) came back and set up the help.

When you say that the past can't be changed you are speaking, I think, in more 'spiritual' sense, right? Like, you don't think people can change things that are destiny but you aren't suggesting that they don't go back and step on sticks that weren't broken before they went back...or that they aren't shifting air molecules?

Anyway, Love This Show. And i thought last nights episode was only ok. I loved watching it but was dissapointed in the way decisions were being made. I mean, "I saw you look at her".....ug...

And, for me, something was lost in Jack letting his motivation be reduced to merely his love for Kate. I actually was enjoying watching him with the sense of a new kind of world-view being born. In fact, I was so put off by that whole section of the episode that i'm sticking to the version of those characters that isn't so flat.

I think, eventually, the view that nothing changes the past will be proven wrong. More than anything it has to do with whether you like the notion that new streams are created or if you are inclined to think that only one stream exists.

Hey, Paul, have you seen PRIMER yet??? And if so, what did you think??
One thing no-one seems to be mentioning anywhere is that at the very end, after the fade to white, we had a shot of someon'es eye opening. I think it was Juliets, but that's probably just my heart talking.

Here's my guess: Blast sets off the time warp; they end up back in 2007, Juliet is alive. Flaw with that theory is that Richard said he saw them die. So, may Juliet hit the bomb a lot later than we assumed, giving time for them to "die" in front of Richard, or else he just assumed that from the explosion...

And even if that theory turns out to be bunk, what do you think of this one: Jacob's brother (or whatever) is the smoke monster is the security for the island - the one who wants to keep technology and people off the island, keep it pure. Jacob is okay with Technology and people and the war that brings coming to the Island (heck, he brought the Blackrock over to start it all). So, I bet that in the end we will be rooting against Jacob, for the Island to go pure... Am I reading way too much in?
Chris K wrote: "From the beginning it seemed obvious that these weren't mere coincidence and were vital to understanding the story. Why tell us you've been saying it since season 2, as if it's something to brag on?"

Read my essay, and then tell me what you think I wrote that was "obvious" back then - and I'll reply with why I think it was worth bragging "on" :)
Carol wrote: "paul, do you have a link that explains what you mean when you say that they can not change the past? I have no clue what you mean."

It's one logical way of resolving the so-called "grandparent" paradox - if I travel back in time, and accidentally killed one of my grandparents before they procreated, how was I born, and, therefore, how could I have ever traveled back to the past?

A universe in which the past cannot be changed prevents this paradox, by making sure I don't kill my grandparents if I travel to the past.

A universe which allows the past to be changed can deal with the grandparent paradox by creating alternate universes ... far more complicated :)

Click on my Richard-Locke Compass link above - you'll find links there to other posts I have about time travel and its delights.
Thanks, aim - looking forward to the haiku.
thanks much, Paul...

I'm certainly more impressed by the changable past...For some reason I'm turned off by the idea that the "universe" would have have a sense of what is ok to change and what is not ok to change. It gets too gooey for me to think that there is some set of "human destiny" critera that the universe uses to decide which changes are ok and which are not...

but maybe that's just me...

plus, i like the idea that if I go back and kill my grandfather I'm eliminating the possibility of a me that hasn't been born "yet" as opposed to the me that originally was...and I do understand why both views of TIME are not compatable...can't wait to see howthe show moves with this!!