Let's begin at the beginning of the Lost Season 5 finale ... Two men are talking on the shore of our island - Jacob and a man played by Titus Welliver. The man says he wants to kill Jacob, and says he'll one day find a "loophole" to allow him to do this ... This happened a long time ago...
Back in our time - that is, the past few decades - Jacob visits most of our original, now still surviving, Flight 815 passengers. Some, like Saywer and Kate, are visited when they are children. Others, like Jack and Locke, when they at low or desperate points in their adult lives. Jacob visits Sayid, distracts him, so he can't stop Nadia from being hit and killed by a car. Hurley's visit is the most recent - its purpose to convince Hurley to get back the island.
Tonight's episode, then, among the many intriguing, fabulous things it is, is the story of Jacob. It provides at least part of an answer to something I've been saying since the beginning of the second season - that the key to understanding Lost resides, somehow, in the inexplicable coincidences in the flashbacks, in people who presumably first met on Flight 815, or on the island, crossing paths in the past - such as Desmond and Jack running into each other on the steps of the stadium, Kate's mother serving Sawyer in a diner, etc. We didn't see Jacob in those intersections tonight, but we saw him in enough places and times to make it plausible that he could have manipulated those coincidences to happen, too...
But Jacob's story is also as short as it is long. And it ends with one of the best surprises in the series: Locke did not come back to life when Flight 316 crashed on the island this season. No, not at all. The Locke who has been walking around on the island is the man who was talking to Jacob on the shore all those centuries or whenever ago. He has somehow taken Locke's form - and inexplicably has at least some of Locke's memories - and in that form goads Ben into killing Jacob. That, apparently was the loophole - the man could not kill Jacob himself, but he could drive someone else to do that...
Which may explain a lot of things. Let's say no ever came back to life on the island? Coming back to life certainly seems like news to Richard - his people can cure the critically wounded, not the dead. That's why young Ben but not Faraday was saved. Did this shape-shifter look like Christian, to manipulate Jack; look like Alex to manipulate Ben; and who knows who else?
Dead is dead, that seems clear now. And it brings us to the other great part of tonight's story.
Jack brings the core of the hydrogen bomb to the Swan site. There are some wonderful scenes with Jack and Sawyer - who, as he's been throughout much of this season, is a more admirable character than Jack. The plan is that the bomb will wipe out the island, 815 won't crash, and nothing we've been seeing for the past five seasons will happen. Sayid is badly wounded, so this might be good for him (though Richard could well cure him) ... but for everyone else?
As I wrote last week, and in previous weeks, the plan can't succeed. Faraday was right when he said the past can't be changed (and he was too torn by grief to be thinking clearly when he said it might be changed, after all). Miles seems to best get this now - he says maybe the bomb going off will cause the "incident" to happen - will cause the reality we have seen to occur.
Jack drops the bomb into the shaft, as the digging already going on unleashes a magnetic force that starts pulling the equipment apart. Phil from Dharma gets killed - good riddance (but good acting by Patrick Fischler). Juliet gets pulled into the shaft. She's hanging on. Sawyer and Kate try to save her (great line from Sawyer - "where you going, Blondie?") But the force is too strong. Juliet leaves go because doesn't want to pull Sawyer in and she falls down the shaft.
But she's not killed. And at the bottom of shaft, she finds the core of the h-bomb, still intact. She pounds on it. And - it goes off.
Have the past five years been destroyed? Will they never happen?
Of course not. Of course they will. I'm sure Miles was right. And we'll see how this all plays out - with the new "Locke" next year... The fact is that we can't be sure what the blast will do, other than that it won't change the past and wipe out five years. Conceivably, it could throw our people from 1977 back into the present ... it could even, perhaps, save Juliet in this way.
Minor quibbles ... I found Jacob coming in and out so fast a little unsatisfying, and we could have used a little more precedent in the story for the shape shifting. But, all in all, a splendid resolution to this season and a powerful set-up for the next, and final, season.
And, oh yeah, Rose and Bernard! Someone asked me, in a comment somewhere about one of my Lost reviews this season, if I thought we'd ever see those two again. I said I was sure they'd turn up in the final episode of the season, as they usually do. And, sure, enough, they did (taking care of Vincent!) - both looking better and happier than ever!
More Lost - see : The Richard-Locke Compass Time Travel Loop ...
and Lost Returns in 5 Dimensions and 5.3: The Loops, The Bomb ... 5.4: A Saving Skip Back in Time ... 5.5 Two Time Loops and Mind Benders ... 5.6 A Lot of Questions ... 5.7 Bentham and Ben ... 5.8 True Love Ways ... 5.9 Two Times and a Baby ... 5.10 The Impossible Cannot Happen ... 5.11 Clockwork Perfect Time Travel ... 5.12: Ben v. Charles, and Locke' Slave ... 5.13: Lost Meets Star Wars and the Sixth Sense ... The Problem with Baby Aaron and the Return of the Oceanic Six ... 5.14: Eloise, Daniel, and Obsession Trumping Paradox ... 5.15: Moral Compasses in Motion
10-min podcast review of Lost Season 5 Finale!


Salon.com
Comments
Kate/Jack/Sawyer, etc were in a much more compelling story. The emotional interactions between them were completely in fitting with the characters and wrenching decisions were made (and then unmade--ahem, I'm lookin' at you, Juliet). There was also great suspense and an excellent cliffhanger.
I'm still unclear as to why you think Sawyer "is a more admirable character than Jack." Sawyer wants something; Jack wants something. They are both trying to act in their own self-interest--Jack, however, is hoping to save everyone who was on the plane. Sawyer doesn't care about those people. Who is more admirable?
As for "something I've been saying since the beginning of the second season - that the key to understanding Lost resides, somehow, in the inexplicable coincidences in the flashbacks"--umm, yes. I don't think it took a rocket scientist to figure this out long ago. From the beginning it seemed obvious that these weren't mere coincidence and were vital to understanding the story. Why tell us you've been saying it since season 2, as if it's something to brag on?
Overall, a disappointing episode. Last week's was far superior. I was on the edge of my seat last week. This week, not so much.
It looks like "the wager" being played out between Jacob and his counter-part (call him Esau) is not over yet, even though Jacob is dead. This is apparently why Jacob needed everyone to come back to the island, and why Locke persuaded them: they perhaps knew what Esau was up to. Jacob's faith in Jack, Kate, etc. (i.e. humanity) will be justified over Esau's cynicism, b/c they succeeded in detonating the bomb.
They have to escape "the cycle" of history repeating itself, otherwise Esau's view wins out, and that's no way to end a show. Thus, I take issue with the "the past can't be changed " viewpoint. That's no fun at all. Esau said "It always ends the same," but Jacob countered "It only ends once, everything else is just progress," meaning, essentially, if at first you don't succeed try try again.
Quick question for those paying close attention, what was the answer to the question "What lies in the shadow of the idol?" I didn't catch it. Something about the paths of the dead or the gateway to the world of the dead or something like that.
I liked the interview with the creators prior to the show, promising next year will bring resolutions to all. They can't just leave it hanging. Great finale.
[Ilana asks Richard "What lies in the shadow of the statue?", and Richard replies in Latin, "He who will protect/save us all."]
1. guitar case represents Charlie in some way (getting his soul back to the island?) Is Charlie coming back? Apparently, Claire is expected back next season
2. There was no bomb blast, but another time jump?
3. Locke is not Man in Black reincarnated/shapeshifted. He seemed surprised about Ben seeing his dead daughter and he seemed genuinely confused about the statue where Jacob lived... "That's a nice foot, Richard. But what does it have to do with Jacob?"
4. there is some biblical good/evil battle or game going on between Jacob and the Man in Black/Esau... everyone else are just pawns defending their own end zones...
5. the plane crash was not the beginning of this adventure, no matter how many time jumps we've had... they were selected for some reason.
6. no one can really think Jacob, whatever/whoever he really is, could actually be killed by a little man like Ben, who is now more pawn than puppetmaster?
7. whatever happened to Jeremy Benton?
AND FINALLY....
8. Regardless of bomb/no bomb... maybe they're thrust not back n time to just before the plane takes off from Sydney, but further back to witness and participate in the original battle of good and evil...... In other words (two words, actually) PARADISE LOST!
RT
www.privacy-resources.us.tc
I was very annoyed by opening, which implied that it was sometime in the distant past, yet the actors in the scene look like contemporary American urbanites, with a fresh $200 haircut and trim... geeze!
In any case, thanks Paul, for recapping this finale because for the first time ever watching this show, i was lost.
Thanks for the great work on these posts, and also "Fringe". I have the finale for Fringe tivo'ed and might just watch it now, since it's my day off. Then I can read your take on it.
In contrast to other posters, I thought that the appearance of Jacob was well-timed and somehow a seamless part of the narrative considering how big a leap it was.
Loved seeing Rose and Bernard, living a happy retirement on their little corner of the island. Can't imagine that they would be erradicated if the island does explode.
So many things to come to grips with after all the appearances of Jacob in and out of many lives. He's creepy and though killed by doppleganger Locke, must have known that could or would happen.
Always more to the story. Do not want this show to end next year.
What a deep hole that will leave. Jonesin' already! Really enjoy your recaps, Paul and will miss those too.
When you say that the past can't be changed you are speaking, I think, in more 'spiritual' sense, right? Like, you don't think people can change things that are destiny but you aren't suggesting that they don't go back and step on sticks that weren't broken before they went back...or that they aren't shifting air molecules?
Anyway, Love This Show. And i thought last nights episode was only ok. I loved watching it but was dissapointed in the way decisions were being made. I mean, "I saw you look at her".....ug...
And, for me, something was lost in Jack letting his motivation be reduced to merely his love for Kate. I actually was enjoying watching him with the sense of a new kind of world-view being born. In fact, I was so put off by that whole section of the episode that i'm sticking to the version of those characters that isn't so flat.
I think, eventually, the view that nothing changes the past will be proven wrong. More than anything it has to do with whether you like the notion that new streams are created or if you are inclined to think that only one stream exists.
Hey, Paul, have you seen PRIMER yet??? And if so, what did you think??
Here's my guess: Blast sets off the time warp; they end up back in 2007, Juliet is alive. Flaw with that theory is that Richard said he saw them die. So, may Juliet hit the bomb a lot later than we assumed, giving time for them to "die" in front of Richard, or else he just assumed that from the explosion...
And even if that theory turns out to be bunk, what do you think of this one: Jacob's brother (or whatever) is the smoke monster is the security for the island - the one who wants to keep technology and people off the island, keep it pure. Jacob is okay with Technology and people and the war that brings coming to the Island (heck, he brought the Blackrock over to start it all). So, I bet that in the end we will be rooting against Jacob, for the Island to go pure... Am I reading way too much in?
Read my essay, and then tell me what you think I wrote that was "obvious" back then - and I'll reply with why I think it was worth bragging "on" :)
It's one logical way of resolving the so-called "grandparent" paradox - if I travel back in time, and accidentally killed one of my grandparents before they procreated, how was I born, and, therefore, how could I have ever traveled back to the past?
A universe in which the past cannot be changed prevents this paradox, by making sure I don't kill my grandparents if I travel to the past.
A universe which allows the past to be changed can deal with the grandparent paradox by creating alternate universes ... far more complicated :)
Click on my Richard-Locke Compass link above - you'll find links there to other posts I have about time travel and its delights.
I'm certainly more impressed by the changable past...For some reason I'm turned off by the idea that the "universe" would have have a sense of what is ok to change and what is not ok to change. It gets too gooey for me to think that there is some set of "human destiny" critera that the universe uses to decide which changes are ok and which are not...
but maybe that's just me...
plus, i like the idea that if I go back and kill my grandfather I'm eliminating the possibility of a me that hasn't been born "yet" as opposed to the me that originally was...and I do understand why both views of TIME are not compatable...can't wait to see howthe show moves with this!!