Open Levinson

Paul Levinson's Open Salon Blog

Paul Levinson

Paul Levinson
Location
New York City, New York, USA
Birthday
March 25
Title
Professor
Company
Fordham University
Bio
Paul Levinson's The Silk Code won the 2000 Locus Award for Best First Novel. He has since published Borrowed Tides (2001), The Consciousness Plague (2002), The Pixel Eye (2003), and The Plot To Save Socrates (2006). His science fiction and mystery short stories have been nominated for Nebula, Hugo, Edgar, and Sturgeon Awards. His eight nonfiction books, including The Soft Edge (1997), Digital McLuhan (1999), Realspace (2003), and Cellphone (2004), have been the subject of major articles in the New York Times, Wired, the Christian Science Monitor, and have been translated into ten languages. New New Media, exploring how Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and blogging have changed our lives, was published in September 2009. Paul Levinson appears on "The O'Reilly Factor" (Fox News), "The CBS Evening News," the “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” (PBS), “Nightline” (ABC), and numerous national and international TV and radio programs. He reviews the best of television in his InfiniteRegress.tv blog. Paul Levinson is Professor of Communication & Media Studies at Fordham University in New York City

MY RECENT POSTS

OCTOBER 4, 2012 12:13PM

On Last Night's Obama Disappoinment

Rate: 2 Flag
It's generally accepted that nonverbal communication - body language, posture, facial expressions - are more important in Presidential debates than spoken words.  That's likely because it's true.  People who saw the JFK / Nixon debates in 1960 on television thought Kennedy won; people who heard the same debates on radio awarded the debates to Nixon.  Nonverbal actions on camera often speak louder than words.   It's been that way ever since, including in last night's debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, except Obama performed poorly in most of the verbal exchanges as well.

About the only negative thing you could say about Mitt Romney's nonverbal performance was that he seemed a little hyper at times.   But he also seemed crisp, clear, energized to be on the stage and in a contest for the Presidency.   In contrast, although Obama had flashes of humor and style - as when he said that he liked the name Obamacare - his demeanor in general was low-energy to the point of looking tired, even listless.  Although he appeared at ease, which would have been good in moderation, the President appeared to be so much at ease last night as to barely be there.

And Romney bested Obama in the verbal as well.  Time after time, Obama let Romney have the last word, and the President was over-solicitous to the moderator, Jim Lehrer.  Romney made sure he made his points in spite of Lehrer's saying the debate needed to move on.  In contrast, Obama just smiled and let it slide.

Obama, in general, failed to challenge Romney on the Republican's outright lies.  For example, when Obama rightly claimed that American businesses go overseas to get tax breaks, and Romney said that wasn't true, Obama just left it at that.   Further, Obama never raised crucial missteps in Romney's campaign and positions - not a word about Romney's disdain for the 47%, nothing about Romney's urging the government to let American car companies go bankrupt, nothing about Republican obstruction on budget actions in Congress.

The one bright spot for Obama was his clear, impassioned defense of the Affordable Health Care Act - Obamacare.  This is one of the top issues for Americans, and in besting Romney on that crucial issue, Obama may have done lasting damage to the Republican.

But, obviously, the President cannot rely on that.  He has shown great resiliency in getting back up and into the fight in the past.   He owes it to the American people and himself to do that now.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I was surprised to hear on the news that Romney "won" the debate. What I saw was a series of pained expressions, supposedly to convey a sense of disdain, an arrogant display of contempt for the rules of the debate, and an unwillingness to actually discuss any of the issues. What I saw in Obama: a man listening, waiting for actual intellectual engagement. That didn't happen, and probably never will. He will continue to make a display of confidence, but its not very convincing. He has an agenda, and he knows he can't really defend it. Hence, that's what we see. The sprayed-on tan.
Obama made several interesting comments: he said, several times, "people like you and I," referring to the fact that they both are in fact quite wealthy. Romney seemed to want to convey the impression that Obama was impossibly small compared to him, the CEO of Bain. This is one reason that Romney needs to be villified for his business activities, in every way possible. That is what people really wanted to hear from Obama, and didn't get. All the same, I think Obama will strengthen his attack on Romney, as the campaign progresses.