Open Levinson

Paul Levinson's Open Salon Blog

Paul Levinson

Paul Levinson
Location
New York City, New York, USA
Birthday
March 25
Title
Professor
Company
Fordham University
Bio
Paul Levinson's The Silk Code won the 2000 Locus Award for Best First Novel. He has since published Borrowed Tides (2001), The Consciousness Plague (2002), The Pixel Eye (2003), and The Plot To Save Socrates (2006). His science fiction and mystery short stories have been nominated for Nebula, Hugo, Edgar, and Sturgeon Awards. His eight nonfiction books, including The Soft Edge (1997), Digital McLuhan (1999), Realspace (2003), and Cellphone (2004), have been the subject of major articles in the New York Times, Wired, the Christian Science Monitor, and have been translated into ten languages. New New Media, exploring how Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and blogging have changed our lives, was published in September 2009. Paul Levinson appears on "The O'Reilly Factor" (Fox News), "The CBS Evening News," the “NewsHour with Jim Lehrer” (PBS), “Nightline” (ABC), and numerous national and international TV and radio programs. He reviews the best of television in his InfiniteRegress.tv blog. Paul Levinson is Professor of Communication & Media Studies at Fordham University in New York City

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 5, 2012 8:36PM

Obama vs. Romney: Social vs. Mass Media

Rate: 1 Flag

As the dust begins to settle on what just about everyone agrees was a weak performance by Barack Obama in his debate with Mitt Romney on Tuesday night, it's interesting to think about what the most damaging moments have been to both candidates in the campaign so far, and through which media they occurred.

Obama's worst moment, clearly, was his lackluster performance in the debate.  Nonverbally, he looked tired and uninterested.  Verbally, he failed to engage Romney for most of the debate.  In this traditional mass media event on television - seen by 60 million people - Obama was clearly at a loss.

Romney's worst moment, clearly, was the grainy video recording of his 47% remark that was put up on YouTube and further disseminated on cable and network television.   Unlike the debate, the recording and initial postings of this video were not seen by millions of people.  Like all social media - or, what I call "new new media" - the impact of this viral video grew exponentially over a period of time.

The 47% remark cost Romney in the polls.  It's too soon to know what Obama's poor debate will cost him in the polls.  But it's unlikely that a debate seen by 60 million will not have some negative impact.

So we're left, at this point, with a contest not only between Obama and Romney, but between social and mass media.  Social media have thus far helped Obama and hurt Romney.  Mass media, at least insofar as Tuesday's debate and its single broadcast to millions of people, have had the reverse result.

It has been tempting to count the role of mass media out, or at least demote its importance, in our age of social media such as YouTube and Twitter.   But as Isaac Asimov explored dramatically in his Foundation trilogy decades ago, a declining empire (read: mass media of today) can still exert powerful influence in a new age (read: social media).

Media and communications are, of course, by no means the only factors that determine an election.  Further, Obama may well do much better in the next debate.  But  if the current split continues - Romney hurt by social media, Obama by mass media - the election would well be decided by which media have the most power in our world today.

See also On Last Night's Obama Disappointment and Romney's 47% Remark and the Power of New New Media



Author tags:

asimov, romney, obama

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Paul, I was very interested in your analysis and was reminded how the debates are definitely in the realm of mass media which has been around so much longer than social media. I would love to know if more liberal tweeters were tweeting than conservative ones at the time of the debate. Live blogging and tweeting certainly brought the debate right into the center of social media both during and after the event with so many putting in their 2 cents about how each candidate was performing, etc.