Paul Nevins

Paul Nevins
Location
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Birthday
October 29
Bio
Paul Nevins is the author of "The Politics of Selfishness: How John Locke’s Legacy Is Paralyzing America "(Greenwood /Praeger/ABC-CLIO). The central thesis of this important and unconventional work is that the United States has begun to experience a number of profound, interrelated problems that are caused, both directly and indirectly, by the country's dogmatic and often unconscious adherence, collectively as a political culture and individually as Americans, to the political philosophy of John Locke. That ideology, which is the bedrock upon which the American liberal democracy has been founded, asserts that human beings are by nature solitary, aggrandizing individuals. Hence, preoccupation with the self in all of its manifestations and attributes - as opposed to the whole, the public interest - has become the primary focus by which political, economic and societal decisions are made. Consequently, the preferred form of social and political relationships with others, including the state as the organized expression of political society, is solely contractual and is designed primarily to protect private property in all of its forms. "The Politics of Selfishness" provides compelling historic and contemporary evidence that U.S. institutions, at all levels, are failing because of the country's uncritical embrace of the anti-social individualism which is John Locke’s legacy. Paul Nevins has been a trial attorney in private practice since 1982. He concentrates in public and private sector employment law and litigation, related civil rights and constitutional law claims, and contract claims. Prior to becoming a lawyer, Paul Nevins taught in the Boston Public Schools. While teaching, Mr. Nevins served as a member of the Executive Board of the Boston Teachers Union, Local 66, AFT/AFL-CIO. Paul Nevins served as a conscript in the United States Army from 1968 to 1970. In 1969, he was a founder and the first chairman of GIs for Peace at Fort Bliss, Texas.This was the first organization of active duty soldiers who publicly opposed the Vietnam War. Mr. Nevins received an A.B. Degree from Suffolk University, a Master of Arts Degree from New York University, and a Juris Doctor Degree from Suffolk University Law School. He lives and works in Boston.

MY RECENT POSTS

Paul Nevins's Links

My Links
SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 9:56AM

Me Or We?

Rate: 1 Flag

                                  cross-posted@politicsofselfishness.com 

     Many Americans who describe themselves as conservatives are firmly persuaded, as articles of faith, that government is a danger to their personal liberty, that government should control its spending and its budget as families do,  and that regulation of private enterprise is harmful per se. The "small government" proponents, albeit perhaps unintentionally, illustrate a basic philosophic controversy that dates back to the time of the ancients - the conflict between the universal and the particular .Which is more real?

427px-FDAHoxsey


        The "small-government" advocates fail to understand that their notion of the role of government is quintessentially liberal - not conservative. Their politics owes its inspiration to the ideas of John Locke. As such, their prescriptions are based upon philosophic nominalism: they can see the particular, the tree, but not the universal, the forest, the idea of a tree; the little picture, but not the big picture. The little picture, when applied to politics, asserts that 305 million solitary selves, each pursuing their own self-interests, based upon profit-motive and the accumulation of material goods, will somehow benefit everyone.
 
          If that proposition were true, the American economy today would be booming. Instead, the empirical evidence - in contrast to the theological beliefs of its proponents  - shows that solitary  selves, particularly in the world of private enterprise, seek to maximize their profits and minimize their costs of production to the detriment of the public good and , in the long run, to the detriment of private enterprise itself.  As more and more Americans descend into poverty, as  the middle class is hollowed-out, and increasing  numbers of jobs are out-sourced to the third-world, the United States more and more begins to resemble a third -world country.   
 
          Evidence that the private sector and entrepreneurs will, if left to their own devices, create prosperity is belied by an opinion piece in yesterday's New York Times ("Yes, We Need Jobs. But What Kind?") In that article, MIT economist Paul Osterman observes that "Last year, one in five American adults worked in jobs that paid poverty-level wages." He further reported on a job study that he conducted in the Rio Grande Valley in Texas, which Governor Perry has touted as one of his great success stories. Osterman observes that, "the median wage for adults in the valley between 2005 and 2008 was a stunningly low $8.14 an hour (in 2008 dollars). One in for earned less that $6.19 an hour."

          By contrast, the big picture people intuitively understand that society is something more than the aggregation of selfish selves, and that the public interest in a democracy - essential public needs - can only be met through the agent chosen by the people in elections- the government. By contrast, no one elects a corporation or private enterprise to do anything; nor would either ever do anything that could not return a profit.

         What do the railroads, the highways, the land grant colleges, the GI Bill, community colleges, public education, airports, FEMA, the Veterans' Administration, polio vaccine, initial AIDs research, the Food and Drug Administration, Medicare and Social Security all have in common? They were all created by the government, not the private sector.

         The railroads are a perfect illustration.  The Westward movement in the United States was subsidized and supported by the federal government. All of the railroad rights-of-way were ceded to private railroad corporations by the U.S. government; the land belonged to the public, the taxpayers. Initially, the symbiotic relationship between passengers and freight service worked well. Over generations, however, the greedy children of the railroad magnates and the shareholders decided that passenger service was too much of a burden and opted, from the 1950s onward, to reduce passenger service as a priority. This effort was aided and abetted by banks and real estate developers who saw a benefit from suburban sprawl, but it has greatly harmed our environment and to our ability to recognize our essential inter-connectedness as citizens in a democracy. 

         Our increasing inability to recognize our essential inter-connectedness as citizens, and to act in accordance with that recognition, has exacerbated the latent anti-social individualism that threatens to unravel our society. If this trend is not reversed , our children and grandchildren, given their meager prospects in life, will rue our collective myopia  and selfishness.  

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
And what is most ironic is that the advocates of private enterprise where there is not only competition for minimum production costs but a very hard drive to drop the cost of labor and thus deprive their markets of the purchasing power to gain them profits.
The continuing advocacy of supply-side, Randian, Libertarian politics and economics -- despite an acid test over the last three decades that has shown such ideas to be utterly without merit and that have left this country -- and many of its citizens -- virtually bankrupt, can only be explained as the actions of greedy children, who give no thought for what will happen when -- and if -- they grow up.