From far yon country blows.
What are those blue remembered hills,
What spires, what farms are those?
That is the land of lost content,
I see it shining plain,
The happy highways where I went
And cannot come again.
A. E. Houseman
This is the second in a series of blog entries about a trip to Cambodia I took in the spring of 1993. The first post included a brief historical outline of Cambodia during the traumatic period from about 1969 through the peace accords of 1991. You can read that here. In addition to historical information, that post featured everyday street scenes from the capital, Phnom Penh.
My trip to Cambodia occurred just two years after most fighting had come to an end in the country’s long war between Maoist Khmer Rouge guerillas, royalists, nationalists, and the Vietnamese supported government. Only after the 1991 peace accords went into effect did the country truly open up to the outside world. By 1993, a very shaky peace existed in most (but not all) of the country, but its recent history was sadly noticeable wherever one went.
A generation of genocide and warfare leaves scars that cannot be portrayed adequately by photographs. Pictures can't show how young the Cambodian population was in 1993. It was striking how few people, especially men, there were in their 40's and 50's and 60's. Another alarming reality was the large number of beggars, often missing one or more extremities, the lasting result of war and torture, and of the scourge of landmines. Finally, pictures cannot show psychological scars. One can't help but wonder how great a toll has been inflicted on the Cambodian nation by suicide and depression. Like a missing leg or blinded eye, those are consequences that last long after the guns have fallen silent.
My pictures, therefore, show only a small part of Cambodia's recent war-torn history.
***********************************************
In the distance is the old bridge crossing the Tonle Sap, a tributary of the Mekong River. The bridge was destroyed in 1973, during fighting between the government of Lon Nol and the Khmer Rouge guerillas. The bridge was one of two major approaches to Phnom Penh from the east. There is some dispute as to who was responsible for the bridge'e destruction. Some say the Khmer Rouge blew it up. Others say the government destroyed it to prevent the Khmer Rouge from being able to enter the city in 1973. Of course, two years later they entered the city almost unhindered. The bridge was repaired several years after my visit.
The peace agreement of 1991 called for the Red Cross to provide humanitarian assistance to the war torn country. I have always held that organization in high esteem. After my trip to Cambodia, my admiration grew even more.
This was a common sight throughout Phnom Penh: White vehicles sporting a large, black "UN". The United Nations maintained a very visible presence in the capital during the early 1990's. Its task was to keep the various factions from reverting to the civil war that had raged since 1979, following the collapse of the Khmer Rouge.
About 40 km outside of Phnom Penh is the old Khmer capital of Oudong. In 1993 it was in an obvious state of neglect and damage from the war. Guidebooks published in the early 1990's warned tourists to Oudong not to venture off the trails due to the likely presence of landmines, buried there since the 1970's.
This is the remains of what was once the largest temple in Oudong. It used to house a huge statue of the Buddha, its head as tall as a grown man. The temple was damaged badly by American bombs in the early 1970's. After the Khmer Rouge took over, the damaged temple was blown to bits as part of the regime's attempt to wipe out all traces of Cambodia's religious traditions. Although much of Oudong has been restored, this temple remains in ruins.
Whether in Phnom Penh, or in the countryside, one did not have to go far to see a ruined temple, mosque, or church, sheathed in scaffolding as workers attempted to restore the damage inflicted on houses of worship by the Khmer Rouge so many years before.
What were once stately colonial mansions along Phnom Penh's major boulevards were only empty shells in 1993, plundered and decaying, their formerly manicured lawns a wild, unkempt tangle of tropical foliage. Many of these old buildings have been torn down to make room for upscale hotels and guesthouses during the past several years.
Among the saddest remnants of the war that I saw were the posters scattered throughout Phnom Penh, put up by the Red Cross to advise residents how to track down family members missing following nearly 20 years of brutal repression and civil war. By 1993, most of these posters were tattered and faded. Did they achieve their purpose? One wonders how many were reunited with long lost loved ones. and how many learned a sadly tragic truth of a missing loved one's fate.
Next: Driving Into the Countryside


Salon.com
Comments
Rated.
John, it is a shame, indeed, and I also thought of the similarities with the Buddha's in Afghanistan. I'm also amazed at how utterly dehumanized many revolutionary societies are, even when they supposedly seek to improve the lot of the people. Taliban and Khmer Rouge bore similarities in that regard. Ideology can be blinding.
The country has come a long way. Thanks for sharing Steve.
Peace,
G
(rated)
Sandra, yes they are...Thanks for commenting.
And two years ago, construction was huge. The country was thriving.
Maybe you're correct, too, that Buddhism enabled the people of Cambodia to overcome the desire for vengeance.
Nicely done. The ghosts that populate my mind when I’m in a historic building or setting are called forth by your photos and your brief descriptions of the past. Your essay evokes for me a flow of different emotions; sadness, anger, confusion, and hope are among them.
The sadness, anger, and confusion come from thinking about the suffering these people have endured, and from considering the motivation behind the cause of that suffering. It all seems so preposterous, so pointless.
The hope springs from the idea that human beings may yet, someday, actually truly learn from our greatest historical blunders.
RATED
Your anger is well placed, too. What, exactly, was achieved by the tonnage dropped by American B-52's? What tragic absurdity it was. The same for the evils perpetrated by Pol Pot and his followers.
You ask, “Why do some societies rise above the tragedy and hatred of the past, and others do not? Cambodia seems, so far at least, to be among the former.”
That’s an interesting question. I might begin such a discussion with a question of my own: Which countries would you enlist as examples of those who did not “rise above the tragedy and hatred of the past”? The Mid-East comes to mind as possibly offering some examples.
Perhaps with such a comparison, we could consider specific differences in a particular situation and then perhaps generalize some theories from there to cover a broader assembly. What would you say?
War breaks up families and kills them. Forty years after WWII
Maybe Cambodia is different because there is no ethnic aspect. It was largely Khmers vs. Khmers. Lea suggests it has to do with their Buddhist traditions. I do think the ethnic issue is big, though. If our own Civil War had pitted peoples with different language or skin color against one another, maybe we would still be fighting that one today. I really don't know.
The ethnic aspect; that makes sense to me.
I think we can see evidence to support that thesis even in our Civil War. While it was not one ethnic group against another, there was the racial issue of keeping blacks in slavery. And that aspect led to divisions that have endured for over 150 years here in America.
Another aspect that probably is a factor in other conflicts in which the hatred is long-lived is religion.