When Christopher Columbus sailed out of the harbor of Sanlucar, Spain, to make his way to “The Indies” of Asia, he did not immediately sail into the unknown. Like many explorers of the 15th century, his first destination was the Canary Islands, off the west coast of Africa. Columbus landed in the Canaries in August, 1492, and stayed there for close to a month while repairs were made to the Pinta’s troublesome rudder, and the Nina was outfitted with new square rigging. While docked in the Canaries, the crew took on additional food and supplies to last for a voyage of a few weeks, until they reached Asia.
On September 6, 1492, the Nina, Pinta, and Santa Maria left the harbor of Gomera in the Canary Islands, and on this date 517 years ago the three small caravels began sailing into the unknown.
The maps that Columbus had at his disposal were generally in agreement that Asia was a relatively easy distance to sail from the Canaries. In fact, many islanders there, as well as in Madeira and the Azores, claimed to have seen low lying land far off to the west. All of the descriptions of this land were remarkably similar, lending credibility to the supposed sightings.
Between the erroneous early Renaissance maps and the sightings of phantom land, Columbus believed the Atlantic Ocean was only half as wide, or less, than what it actually is. We now know that the land the islanders claimed to have seen was actually a mirage, brought on by specific atmospheric conditions that occasionally occur in the mid-latitudes of the Atlantic. These mirages are sometimes seen even today.
One cannot help but wonder what must have gone through Columbus’s mind as it became apparent that his conception of the world was significantly flawed. Just three days after leaving the Canaries, he began misleading his crew on the distance they had traveled. He began keeping two logs, one private log for his eyes only, and another which he shared with the crew. The false log underestimated the distance traveled by about 15%. Had he shared the actual distance with the crew, he understandably feared there would be a mutiny. After all, no one had ever sailed so far from land before, and fear of the unknown could drive men to take desperate measures against their Admiral.
The mutiny never materialized. Land was finally spotted in the wee hours of the morning on October 12, three or four weeks later than Columbus expected. As he sailed along the northern coast of Cuba, Columbus was certain he was looking at Japan. He held on to the belief that he had discovered a western route to Asia until the day he died, even after nearly every other explorer was convinced he had actually discovered a Mundo Novo, or New World.
Although Columbus demonstrated that the Atlantic Ocean was more than twice as wide as had previously been thought, the actual circumference of the globe continued to be grossly underestimated. By the time of Columbus’s death in 1506, virtually everyone agreed that what was discovered in 1492 was something other than Asia. However, everyone who considered such matters believed Asia was still nearby, maybe 500 or 1000 miles past the west coast of America. That misconception would persist for another 30 years after Columbus’s discovery.
In fact, exactly 30 years after Columbus set out from the Canary Islands, another great voyage of discovery came to an end. On September 6, 1522, the lone remaining ship that had been under the command of Ferdinand Magellan arrived at the same Spanish port from which Columbus had left, Sanlucar. On board were 18 starving men, their bodies ravaged by scurvy and malnutrition, their clothes hanging from their skeletal bodies in rags. These emaciated men were the first to circumnavigate the globe. The world, they discovered to their great detriment, was more than twice as large as they had thought, and four or five times larger than what Columbus had imagined.
On this date in 1492, a few brave men set out on a voyage that would begin to redefine how we perceive our world. On this date 30 years later, that redefinition was largely completed.



Salon.com
Comments
Another excellent foray into the pages of our much neglected history! Enthusiastically rated...
Rob, it kind of makes us seem pretty pedestrian, doesn't it?
Ordinary ham-and-eggers, as my high school French teacher used to say. (Actually, he'd challenge us to be more than that. Oh, well.)
Steve, what route did Magellan's remaining crew take back to Spain? Why didn't they stop at a European possession off of Africa to resupply?
When they left the Cape, they stayed well away from the African Coast. That was considered Portuguese territory by reason of the Papal Line of Demarcation that split newly discovered lands between Spain and Portugal. What's more, from the moment Magellan began his voyage, he was being pursued to one degree or another by Portugal. Magellan was himself Portuguese, and had tried, unsuccessfully, to get the Portuguese king to sponsor him on a voyage of discovery. When that sponsorship never happened, Magellan went to Spain and got the Spanish king's support. From that moment, Magellan was considered a traitor to Portugal, and he and his crew were marked for arrest and possible execution. In addition, the whole purpose of Magellan's voyage was to give Spain a legitimate claim to the East Indies by reaching them from the Spanish side of the Line of Demarcation. From Portugal's viewpoint, Magellan's voyage was an act of war. Thus, Magellan's crew could not stop at any Portuguese outpost in Africa. It would have meant certain arrest, or worse!
zuma, thank you!
Gordon, these men had one foot in the Medieval world, and one foot in the Renaissance. I personally think they had noble goals that were a product of their milieu, but unfortunately they too often used Medieval methods to make their goals reality. That does not make what they accomplished, however, any less amazing. They were indeed incredibly brave and tough men.
Ric, well put!
As always, this was interesting. It’s interesting how often people set about proving one thing and end up proving something totally different. It’s also interesting how stubborn people can be at times, as evidenced by a number of events during those earlier time periods. Of course, we see much evidence of such stubbornness running rampant within our own society these days, too.
RATED
Rick, I just find that era amazing, and no matter what you think of the individuals who engaged in those discoveries, their accomplishments, whether intended or not, changed the world.
Stacey & rwnj, & Lea, thanks, I'm glad you stopped by!
Nice post. :-)
Kaysong, that's a good question. I don't think there has ever been a time that saw so much change in the way people look at the world as what happened in the 50 years before and after the year 1500. The first half of the 20th century comes close, and that period saw the greatest changes ever, I think, in the way people actually live, but not in how they perceive themselves and the world in which they live. Great food for thought!
I meant to come back and say no, there's another book 1491 that talks about how much more complex and sophisticated "new world" culture was prior to columbus, and that many of our theories about how old civilization was in the americas is built around our own creation myth (that the "old world" must come from the fertile crescent because of adam and eve) whereas the fossil record contains more ambiguities...
it's a wildly controversial book in exploring anthropological theories, but I recommend it and wonder what you would think (there's a huge discussion about it waged on amazon's pages...)
or here's a summing up from wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/index.html?curid=3239326