A small article appearing in today's papers restores in me a small modicum of hope for the future of humanity. From today's news wires:
A Russian court ruled against Josef Stalin's grandson Tuesday in a libel suit over a newspaper article that said the Soviet dictator sent thousands of people to their deaths.
Apparently, Yevgeny Dzhugashvili, Stalin's grandson, took umbrage at a newspaper article which matter-of-factly portrayed the genocidal dicator as a genocidal dictator. Dzhugashvili sued the newspaper, seeking a ruling that would have denied history's judgement on the man generally considered responsible for the deaths of millions in the Gulag, and for the famine that resulted when he destroyed the agricultural foundation of his country.
OK, you may be thinking this is no big deal, and I really wouldn't blame you if you did. What does a silly court case in Moscow have to do with the price of milk in Milwaukee? Everyone knows Stalin was a monster, right? Surely he is writhing in Hell's most notorious quarters, right next to Hitler, and down the hall from Pol Pot, Ghengiz Kahn, and the full host of history's psychopaths.
Unfortunately, however, we live in a short-sighted, hyper-partisan world. After all, no sooner had the grass grown green over the mounds of Dachau's dead, than there arose from the shadows formerly respectable men who claimed the Holocaust was all a lie. Incredibly, seemingly intelligent people believe that evil nonsense. It isn't just a delusional demi-dictator in Teheran who makes those claims. If you don't believe me, just do a Google search on "holocaust denial".
There are less extreme examples, too. Everyday, millions of Americans are told the greatest president of the last century was none other than Ronald Reagan, the man who oversaw huge increases in the national debt, who sent hundreds of Marines to their deaths in a Lebanese civil war, who sent money to Iran's mullahs and sent arms to their enemies in Baghdad. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
Even now, the revisionists are working on their script to recast the administration of Bush II as one of great success, even as the economy struggles to overcome the disaster he helped create, even as a gaping hole still exists where once proudly stood two gigantic monuments to America's economic might, brought down while the Commander-in-Chief played cowboy on his faux ranch and read about a pet goat to kindergartners.
Reagan's face may yet replace Roosevelt's on the dime, and Bush may belatedly be hailed as a hero, but at least I can take comfort in knowing that historical revisionism has limits. Josef Stalin is still a genocidal autocrat. Or, as the Russian courts confirmed, "a bloodthirsty cannibal."


Salon.com
Comments
This IS important.
No self-promotion intended here, but if you haven't already, check out my recent post, "The Bogus Myth of Ronald Reagan."
R
Great post as always.
Although with Reagan and Bush, maybe it's more like the Big Lie theory -- a falsehood so huge people believe it because they think no one would "have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
It's possible I'm over-reacting. Well done on this, anyway. Stalin was a monster.
Rated
John, I remember that post. That is the kind of thing we need to read often to drown out the noise machine on the Right that wants to turn myth into de facto reality.
Skeptic, I wouldn't put it past him, although I suspect that word was used symbolically. It's nice to see you back at OS this past week or so!
Boanerges1, repeat the Big Lie often enough and it becomes part of accepted reality. That's what I'm afraid of.
I have had a problem for years with people decrying the horrors of the Nazi holocaust without even tipping their hat in the direction of the Georgian Butcher, Josef Stalin. Just because the enemy of our enemy was our World War II friend does not excuse the savage genocide the Soviets wreaked on Jews, Slavs, Poles, and the intelligentsia in their own country.
Well said.
Thomas Jefferson: Just a moment, Mr. Thomson. I do not consent. The king is a tyrant whether we say so or not. We might as well say so.
Charles Thomson: But I already scratched it out.
Thomas Jefferson: Then scratch it back in!
John Hancock: Put it back, Mr. Thomson. The King will remain a tyrant.
-----
2 days after 220 Marines died in Lebanon, Reagan gave the order to invade Grenada. What a wonderful guy.
Great little story as always.
Rated
Dolores, me too.
Stacey, I think Moynihan would have had a real problem with "truthiness"!
berrycomposer, I wonder if Yevgeny really believes Grandpa was a nice guy?
Carolinablue, yeah, Stalin is always "the other one" that is mentioned second. But he's probably responsible for even more murders.
Stim, I did not remember Grenada came so soon after. I remember when the news reported that US warships were encircling that island, and I laughingly thought, "Ha, what are we gonna do, invade? Yeah, right." But we did. Oh, and that's a great anecdote about the Declaration.
Blue, thanks, glad you stopped by. Hope the flu bug has left your house!
Robert, the famines caused by Stalin's collectivization of agriculture were truly disastrous. Although the exact number of victims cannot be known, it certainly approaches 8 figures. Combine famine and the Gulag, the total number for the USSR while Stalin was alive is truly unfathomable.
Was Regan's presidency a success? History is so hard to parse, especially this close to events. I think he was a failure, but one can make a credible argument that he was a flexible politician who took necessary steps to reform a moribund economy and reinvigorate the spirit of a nation that had become mired in self-doubt. His supports frequently ignore it, but Regan raised taxes as well as cutting them. He talked tough ("We begin bombing in five minutes"), but when reform got under way in the USSR, he changed to a much more conciliatory tone ("Trust but verify").
Was Star Wars a massive waste of money? Hard to tell at this point. It has been undeniably expensive, but would we have the reasonably effective short-range anti-missile defensive we have now without it? If Iran, North Korea or some other entity launches a long-range nuclear weapon at the US in the future and a Star Wars defense system stops it, Regan will be hailed as prescient.
It's hard to imagine history ever looking kindly on W, but we're still very, very close to his presidency. Having an opinion about its merits—one way or the other—is far from claiming that Pol Pot never had anybody killed.