Procopius

Procopius
Location
Rockford, Illinois, USA
Birthday
February 05
Bio
I'm a regular middle aged guy, living in a regular middle class neighborhood, in a regular middle-sized community in the middle of America. I am an expatriate Texan transplanted to the Midwest, and wondering how I got here, and where I'm headed.

Procopius's Links

Salon.com
OCTOBER 14, 2009 11:33AM

It's True: Stalin Really Did Commit Genocide!

Rate: 15 Flag

A small article appearing in today's papers restores in me a small modicum of hope for the future of humanity.  From today's news wires:

A Russian court ruled against Josef Stalin's grandson Tuesday in a libel suit over a newspaper article that said the Soviet dictator sent thousands of people to their deaths.

Apparently, Yevgeny Dzhugashvili, Stalin's grandson, took umbrage at a newspaper article which matter-of-factly portrayed the genocidal dicator as a genocidal dictator.  Dzhugashvili sued the newspaper, seeking a ruling that would have denied history's judgement on the man generally considered responsible for the deaths of millions in the Gulag, and for the famine that resulted when he destroyed the agricultural foundation of his country.

OK, you may be thinking this is no big deal, and I really wouldn't blame you if you did.  What does a silly court case in Moscow have to do with the price of milk in Milwaukee?  Everyone knows Stalin was a monster, right?  Surely he is writhing in Hell's most notorious quarters, right next to Hitler, and down the hall from Pol Pot, Ghengiz Kahn, and the full host of history's psychopaths.

Unfortunately, however, we live in a short-sighted, hyper-partisan world.   After all, no sooner had the grass grown green over the mounds of Dachau's dead,  than there arose from the shadows formerly respectable men who claimed the Holocaust was all a lie.  Incredibly, seemingly intelligent people believe that evil nonsense.  It isn't just a delusional demi-dictator in Teheran who makes those claims.  If you don't believe me, just do a Google search on "holocaust denial".

There are less extreme examples, too.  Everyday, millions of Americans are told the greatest president of the last century was none other than Ronald Reagan, the man who oversaw huge increases in the national debt, who sent hundreds of Marines to their deaths in a Lebanese civil war, who sent money to Iran's mullahs and sent arms to their enemies in Baghdad.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Even now, the revisionists are working on their script to recast the administration of Bush II as one of great success, even as the economy struggles to overcome the disaster he helped create, even as a gaping hole still exists where once proudly stood two gigantic monuments to America's economic might, brought down while the Commander-in-Chief played cowboy on his faux ranch and read about a pet goat to kindergartners.

Reagan's face may yet replace Roosevelt's on the dime, and Bush may belatedly be hailed as a hero,  but at least I can take comfort in knowing that historical revisionism has limits.  Josef Stalin is still a genocidal autocrat.  Or, as the Russian courts confirmed, "a bloodthirsty cannibal."

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Bravo Procopius! A seamless, well needed reminder that the majority of what we call "history" really isn't history at all. The result being that the crap takes up the air space and attention that should be given real history.

This IS important.
Yes, the Bush/Reagan business makes me nuts. Reagan's head on a coin? Maybe the wooden nickel.
No self-promotion intended here, but if you haven't already, check out my recent post, "The Bogus Myth of Ronald Reagan."

R
This is an instance of what we call a "buried lead." As you said, we all know that Stalin was a mass murderer. But this is the first I've learned that he was a "cannibal." Even my high school history teacher, who spent half the time in world history class describing the evils of communism (and the other half the evils of homosexuality) didn't tell us that Stalin was a cannibal.

Great post as always.
Yeah, well they tried to rehab Nixon's image too, and that didn't work so good.

Although with Reagan and Bush, maybe it's more like the Big Lie theory -- a falsehood so huge people believe it because they think no one would "have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".

It's possible I'm over-reacting. Well done on this, anyway. Stalin was a monster.

Rated
CG, A history professor once defined history as the "reconstruction of the human past based on sources". The last part of that definition may be the most important. Those who try to call propaganda history nearly always forget to base their arguments on legitimate sources.

John, I remember that post. That is the kind of thing we need to read often to drown out the noise machine on the Right that wants to turn myth into de facto reality.

Skeptic, I wouldn't put it past him, although I suspect that word was used symbolically. It's nice to see you back at OS this past week or so!

Boanerges1, repeat the Big Lie often enough and it becomes part of accepted reality. That's what I'm afraid of.
Thanks for pointing this out to us, Pro. It is a good piece of news when the truth gains support.
those that write history have so much power....
and I hope reagan's face never replaces roosevelt's on the dime....
Daniel Patrick Moynihan is frequently quoted as having said "you are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts." Never more so true than when applied to propaganda machinery. Way to go Russian court system! And kudos Procopius.
Thank you! A truly important reminder---sometimes, after all, some people remember the truth and report it. (Even when the grand-children get piss-ey)
Spasiba, spasiba, a thousand times spasiba for this entry.

I have had a problem for years with people decrying the horrors of the Nazi holocaust without even tipping their hat in the direction of the Georgian Butcher, Josef Stalin. Just because the enemy of our enemy was our World War II friend does not excuse the savage genocide the Soviets wreaked on Jews, Slavs, Poles, and the intelligentsia in their own country.

Well said.
Oddly this reminds me of a scene from the musical "1776" (I played Caesar Rodney -- poorly -- in our high school production). During the delegates' debate on the language of the Declaration, John Dickinson doesn't approve of the description of George III and wants "tyrant" removed from the Declaration. The subsequent dialog:

Thomas Jefferson: Just a moment, Mr. Thomson. I do not consent. The king is a tyrant whether we say so or not. We might as well say so.
Charles Thomson: But I already scratched it out.
Thomas Jefferson: Then scratch it back in!
John Hancock: Put it back, Mr. Thomson. The King will remain a tyrant.

-----
2 days after 220 Marines died in Lebanon, Reagan gave the order to invade Grenada. What a wonderful guy.
Oh I see the relevance. Can you imagine someone saying such a thing back in the 80's? They would sort of disappear, and I know you know what I mean.

Great little story as always.
Rated
Pilgrim, didn't a wise man once say that the truth shall set us free?

Dolores, me too.

Stacey, I think Moynihan would have had a real problem with "truthiness"!

berrycomposer, I wonder if Yevgeny really believes Grandpa was a nice guy?

Carolinablue, yeah, Stalin is always "the other one" that is mentioned second. But he's probably responsible for even more murders.

Stim, I did not remember Grenada came so soon after. I remember when the news reported that US warships were encircling that island, and I laughingly thought, "Ha, what are we gonna do, invade? Yeah, right." But we did. Oh, and that's a great anecdote about the Declaration.

Blue, thanks, glad you stopped by. Hope the flu bug has left your house!
Yes you are right to commend and emphasize this condemnation of the crimes of Stalin. rated!
I remember hearing about the lawsuit a few weeks ago and I'm glad to read here they made the right decision. It sounds like the Russian legal system has more guts than ours.
According to some historians Stalin caused the death of 14 million Ukranians. Last year while I was in Russia and Ukraine, and the media were debating the Armenian genocide, a Russian history professor assured me that the count was "only" 10 million Ukranians. In the "Great Leap Forward," Mao is credited with killing 30 million Chinese. Most people are aware of only the Jewish holocaust and for that we owe a debt of gratitude to Jewish writers and artists who will not let us forget. If you ever question the importance of your story just remember the Jewish holocaust. If you don't tell it, no one will know or will forget. The Armenian holocaust was forgotten, most never heard of the Ukranian holocaust, and there are so many Chinese who misses 30 million?
Nothnagels, thanks! Glad you stopped by.

Robert, the famines caused by Stalin's collectivization of agriculture were truly disastrous. Although the exact number of victims cannot be known, it certainly approaches 8 figures. Combine famine and the Gulag, the total number for the USSR while Stalin was alive is truly unfathomable.
Interesting post, Steve. I think you take your analogy too far, however, when you go from denial of factual events to subjective appraisal. "Great" doesn't innately mean anything without defining terms. Regan was inarguably a great public speaker, with a capacity to engage and invigorate the American populace unmatched in my lifetime until Obama—and possibly not even by Obama.

Was Regan's presidency a success? History is so hard to parse, especially this close to events. I think he was a failure, but one can make a credible argument that he was a flexible politician who took necessary steps to reform a moribund economy and reinvigorate the spirit of a nation that had become mired in self-doubt. His supports frequently ignore it, but Regan raised taxes as well as cutting them. He talked tough ("We begin bombing in five minutes"), but when reform got under way in the USSR, he changed to a much more conciliatory tone ("Trust but verify").

Was Star Wars a massive waste of money? Hard to tell at this point. It has been undeniably expensive, but would we have the reasonably effective short-range anti-missile defensive we have now without it? If Iran, North Korea or some other entity launches a long-range nuclear weapon at the US in the future and a Star Wars defense system stops it, Regan will be hailed as prescient.

It's hard to imagine history ever looking kindly on W, but we're still very, very close to his presidency. Having an opinion about its merits—one way or the other—is far from claiming that Pol Pot never had anybody killed.