Procopius

Procopius
Location
Rockford, Illinois, USA
Birthday
February 05
Bio
I'm a regular middle aged guy, living in a regular middle class neighborhood, in a regular middle-sized community in the middle of America. I am an expatriate Texan transplanted to the Midwest, and wondering how I got here, and where I'm headed.

MY RECENT POSTS

Procopius's Links

Salon.com
DECEMBER 2, 2009 3:42PM

A True Little War Story

Rate: 11 Flag

With President Obama's decision to escalate the war in Afghanistan, I thought it a good idea to look at another war that took place a long time ago.  Perhaps there are lessons to be learned.

One summer day 995 years ago, the Byzantine forces of Emperor Basil II surrounded and destroyed the Bulgarian army of King Samuel.  The battle took place in a mountainous Macedonian valley near the Struma River.  A Hunnic people from the Central Asian steppes, the Bulgars began settling in the Balkan Peninsula nearly 400 years earlier.  By the end of the first millennium they were challenging the old Byzantine Empire’s hegemony in the Balkans.

 

I have no idea if our modern lives would be any different today if the outcome of the battle had been different.  One could make a persuasive argument that medieval history would have developed much differently than it did with a Byzantine defeat.  Had the Bulgarians won, for instance, the Crusades might never have happened, since there might not have been a Byzantine emperor to request Western aid to fight the Seljuk Turks 85 years later.  Without the impetus of the Crusades, the Renaissance might have developed much differently than it did, or perhaps not at all, as Western Europe might have remained isolated much longer from the far more advanced empires and caliphates of the Near East.  But really, who knows?

Here’s what we do know.  During the battle, King Samuel remained in his castle a hundred miles away.  Facing total annihilation, Samuel’s army, numbering somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000 men, laid down their arms and surrendered to the mercy of Emperor Basil.  But Basil was not a merciful man.  The entire Bulgarian army was blinded by their Byzantine captors.  One man out of every one-hundred prisoners was left with a single eye to lead the pathetic remnant back to their king.  When Samuel saw the defeated, blind army, he was overcome with grief and collapsed.  Two days later he was dead.  Thus was the fate of an upstart nation that would dare to challenge the East Roman Empire!

What does this have to do with our world today?  What lesson could this obscure battle have for 21st century America?   Only this: War begets atrocity.  Not just some obscure war vaguely recalled from the mists of medieval history.  Every war does.  When we debate whether or not America should continue fighting in Afghanistan, remember that fact.  War begets atrocity.  When we hear American politicians and commentators casually toss numbers like 30,000 or 50,000 additional troops, remember that fact.  War begets atrocity.  It always has, and it always will. 

“War is hell,” said General Sherman.  And it still is.

Author tags:

war, history

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I will go one step further and say, from experience, there is no such thing as a just war or a clean war. War, by its very defination, is the effort of one side to kill the other...what other outcome could there be?
I do think that the Crusades would have still taken place though. There was riches and land to be had in the Middle East and the Church wanted both. They would have come up with one excuse or another to go to holy war.
This sad story recalls the old saying "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."

There's another old saying that no battle plan ever survives the first contact with the enemy. I thought Obama might have heard about that one, but I guess I was wrong. He really claims to believe that his "surge" can be completed within 18 months, after which the insurgency will dry up and Afghanistan will become a stable democracy that will look out for our interests. I just hope the Taliban receive the memo in time.

Rated.
yes, bringing democracy on the point of a sword or from the nozzle of a flame-thrower has never worked well. the only information transmitted across a battlefront is rage and resolve for revenge.

my policy is, ask what is the motivation. the point of this war may simply be that you can not leave afghanistan and remain president, since the other party would seize on any terror attack with a "see what happens when you are weak!"

america is reaping what it's history has sown, bitter fruit indeed. too bad the rest of the world must suffer with them!
Fascinating and instructive bit of history, Pro.

I just re-read Dispatches, Michael Herr's incredible book on Vietnam. (Knowing you, I'm sure you've read it too.) So much of what he wrote about his year covering that war resonates today. It worries me.
Or, as General Robert E. Lee famously said while surveying the devastation of the Battle of Fredericksburg, "It is well that war is so terrible -- lest we should grow too fond of it."

The U.S. will not be able to achieve its nebulous objectives in Afghanistan through Mr. Obama's application of blunt force. When the only tool in the box is a hammer, all your problems begin to resemble nails.

One million dollars per soldier per year in Afghanistan-- sheer insanity, unjustifiable and unsustainable.

-R-
Well said Steve. It's simply true and nothing in history disproves you. (I say that because if it did---you'd know about it.)
Torman, I believe there is such a thing as a "just" war, if you consider it just to defend yourself, or to respond to an attack, or even a preponderance of evidence that you are about to be attacked. However, I'm not sure Afghanistan qualifies, and even if it did 8 years ago, I don't think it does any more.

Alan, we'll see how long the new battle plan lasts.

Al, your point is frighteningly plausible.

Boanerges, thanks. And I'm afraid I have not read that, other than a few snippets. Shame on me.

Carolina, I couldn't say it any better than you.

Roger, that's a shame, isn't it?
I have nothing to add but felt compelled to comment.

I agree with you all. War is hell.
Too many in Washington did not and do not comprehend war. They have no idea.
Kudos for using an obscure battle to make a significant point. Different actors, same script.
Kaysong, that's all you need to know.

Zuma, Washington is the roost of too many chickenhawks.

Stim, you'd think that script is ripe for some changes by now, wouldn't you?
There are no good wars or "just" wars but some wars are necessary. I don't believe Iraq or Afghanistan qualify. The Taliban are impossible to approve of but they were welcomed in Houston, Texas in 1996, I believe, maybe 1997. You can find the report of their visit in the Houston Chronicle archives. Taliban officials were there at the invitation of UNOCAL, trying to work out a deal for a petrol pipeline across Afghanistan to a huge refinery Enron was building in Pakistan. They were taken to NASA and given the royal treatment. The problem was that there was no recognized government in Afghanistan to make the deal legal. Republicans pushed Clinton to recognize them as the official government of Afghanistan. Kissinger was Taliban's lobbyist. Because they tried to stop poppy growing most US aid to Afghanistan went to the Taliban. A Taliban official warned the US of an impending terrorist attack before 9/11. The CIA said that Taliban made at least 20 attempts to place Osama bin-Laden in US hands but in a way that did not violate Sharia law. I believe Taliban would have agreed to let Special Forces attempt to capture or kill Osama and other al-Qaida.

Three Bush envoys met with Taliban in the summer of 2001 to work out an agreement for the oil pipeline but were unsuccessful. According to a media report the envoys warned that without an agreement, the US would begin bombing in October, 2001. The Republican co-chair of the 9/11 commission spoke here and I was able to ask whether the three had been interviewed by the commission. He replied that there were a lot of conspiracy theories. Actually, the three were interviewed and said they did warn Taliban to act right or they would be attacked but didn't mention the pipeline. Bush's war wasn't on al-Qaida, it was on Taiban.