It is an anniversary that passes almost unnoticed every year. Given the tumultuous years that preceded it, I suppose that is understandable. Still, I think it is an anniversary worth remembering. On March 29, 1973, the last American combat troops left Vietnam. After more than 58,000 Americans paid the ultimate sacrifice, our military involvement in Southeast Asia was at an end.
For such a remarkable fact as that, the headlines that day were amazingly muted. The biggest story on the front page of the New York Times that Friday dealt not with the end of a war that had gone on for more than a decade, but with the Nixon Administration's imposition of controls on the price of meat.

Like most Americans, I rarely think about this anniversary. The only reason I remember it this year is because my Vietnam veteran brother pointed it out on his Facebook page. March 29 bears little similarity to the main end-of-war anniversaries of the 20th century. Most people remember the almost poetic moment that World War I came to an end, when the armistice was signed on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month. After four horrific years, the guns finally fell silent along the trenches of the Western Front. The day would be forever memorialized first as Armistice Day, then later as Veterans Day.
Surprisingly, few Americans today remember when World War II ended. That war ended on August 14, 1945, when Japan announced its surrender to American forces. Instead of remembering August 14, however, we are more likely to remember that other anniversary from that month, August 6, when the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Americans were of course jubilant when World War II ended, but as time passed that jubilation was replaced by trepidation as the potential horrors of this new nuclear age became apparent.
As for Vietnam, I suspect one reason we don't remember the day our troops left that country is because the end of that war was not what Americans had grown accustommed to. Indeed, to say that the war "ended" on March 29, 1973 is to engage in historical gaming. The war continued another two years, culminating in the fall of Saigon in the spring of 1975, and the ascendance of the murderous Khmer Rouge in Cambodia at roughly the same time. The Vietnam War did not end so much as it simply faded away, at least as far as America's involvement in it is concerned.
Some Americans remember this anniversary, though. I am certain the individuals pictured here remember it well.

I was a 15 year old high school freshman on March 29, 1973. I was young, but I remember watching joyful reunions on TV like the one pictured above. I remember thinking that the Vietnam War had been a reality during my entire conscious life. I remember thinking how strange it was going to be now that the war was over and it would no longer dominate the nightly news. I remember thinking how glad I was that I would not have to worry about serving in Vietnam like my older brother did after he drew the number "26" in the 1970 draft lottery.
Whether we remember it or not, March 29 is an important anniversary. To those who came home on this date 37 years ago, I rejoice that your names are not included among the 58,000 on Maya Lin's black wall.



Salon.com
Comments
Life went on....life goes on. Maybe it is enough to say: "Yes. I remember that day."
Well written, my friend and highly Rated.
Do you think that the muted reporting about the end of our presence in Vietnam was due to people not wanting to deal with the information? It's a bit hard to recreate all the elements of political context, but it might be a combination to the nation being stunned by the Watergate revelations, and that many were perhaps in denial that the war in Vietnam, at such cost of blood and treasure, was not worth fighting, was not worth getting involved in...there is that aphorism about history, doom and repetition after all. Though it's easy to connect some dots...many architects of war in that era resurfaced to lead us into our present quagmires.
I've got a few newspapers from April, 1945 and VE Day, etc. Since it will be 65 years next month that seems like an appropriate time to do a post on that part of WWII.
Torman, I can relate very easily to your sentiments -- something I have heard many times from those just a little older than me.
Barry, you raise some fascinating questions. The muted response to the end of Vietnam may have an almost mirror image to our reaction these days to Iraq. These unpopular misadventures don't elicit much recognition as they fade away. Your recollection about Watergate is also interesting, and it would soon replace Vietnam in the headlines. This was about 4 months before the House Committee hearings (chaired by Sam Ervin) would uncover the full extend of Nixon's corruption. In March, 1973, a lot of people still believed Nixon was more the victim than the perpetrator.
I too had forgotten the date, and thank you for reminding me -- all of us -- what it meant. Some of the names on The Wall came from north of the 49th....
And Torman? I wish you had written a longer reply.
Lea, these wars we find ourselves in just seem to go on and on until they fade away, with so many lives needlessly lost.
Boanerges, it is easy for those of us in the USA to forget that many different nationalities fought in Vietnam. It was a tragedy affecting far too many.
sheepdog, that might have been the last year for the lottery, although I cannot remember for certain.
Monsieur, me too, and she was only 21 years old when she won the competition for the Vietnam War Memorial. I remember how some were at the time angry about both her design and the fact that she was of Asian descent. I think most would agree now that her creation is of amazing taste and reverence, and it is a highlight of any visit to D.C.
Is it possible that it could happen again--for the same misplaced reasons? I think so. Even if the reasons for Afganhistan are clear, Iraq is still a war that was launched for even less noble causes: personal vendetta on the part of the ruling class and pure capitalist greed.
In the last 40ty years its been proven this is a coutry where fear mongering pays off despite the educational level and despite the growth of a small conscious minority--but that too is a legacy of Viet Nam.
Ben Sen, I fear we have learned very little since 1973. Fear mongering works.
Gordon, indeed.
It is a powerful advancement that we now honor our veterans, and are outraged that we have lost less than 5,000. They are painful losses, nonetheless.
But our reaction speaks volumes of change since Vietnam, when soldiers were still cannon fodder.
Looking forward to a new day to celebrate: the day our last Iraq, then Afghanistan vets come home.
It seems you and I are the same age. I remember how that war haunted us. I think it was really the first war that simply had no real purpose to it. And that seems to be the case with the current or most recent wars. Many people, even today, don’t seem to realize how long that struggle went on and how early our involvement began – 1950 as advisors to the French and South Vietnamese forces.
The French had an interest in trying to maintain their hold on that region, but when they recognized it would not be feasible, they pulled out; but not the good ol’ war mongering U.S. of A. No, sir, we were going to kill off as many of our young as necessary to be able to say, “We won another one.” I have no idea what it was we would win, exactly. Do you?
You’re right, of course, about how “the end” wasn’t really the end and so it just did not have the impact of the other conflicts you mention. But just as the end of the Vietnam involvement sort of just faded away rather than ending, that was reciprocal to the beginning of our involvement; we started out superficially involved and just sort of gradually sunk deeper and deeper into it.
That war was an embarrassment, and that is also a factor in why its end is not remembered or celebrated, I think. It serves as a perfect instruction in what damage occurs when fear and ignorance are allowed to direct national policy.
Great post, great point about the anniversary, and thank you for calling it to our attention. I think it has special significance considering the state of the world at this time.
RATED.
jimmymac, how would you like to be the loved one of the last person to die for a mistake? Or among the last 20,000. That's the tragedy.
Pilgrim, thank you for stopping by.
Rick, I'm sure we're in agreement that the most frustrating thing about our current affairs is that we seem not to learn our lessons. And like you point out, far too many allow themselves to be swayed by fear and ignorance. I'd also add a naive trust in authority. You'd think that, more than anything, would have been a lesson learned.