Procopius

Procopius
Location
Rockford, Illinois, USA
Birthday
February 05
Bio
I'm a regular middle aged guy, living in a regular middle class neighborhood, in a regular middle-sized community in the middle of America. I am an expatriate Texan transplanted to the Midwest, and wondering how I got here, and where I'm headed.

MY RECENT POSTS

Procopius's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
APRIL 1, 2011 10:19AM

The Chicago Mini-Tribune

Rate: 9 Flag

I’m really glad I don’t work for a newspaper.  I would hate to work in a profession that just barely limps along while the front office takes desperate measures to keep the enterprise afloat against seemingly insurmountable economic trends.  In the past two years we’ve seen an obvious downgrading of paper stock quality.  We’ve seen a steady regression away from in-depth reporting on major national and international stories toward more local tabloid content.  Sure, the paper looks flashier, with large color photos splattered across many of its pages.  But with those large photos comes noticeably less written content.  It’s a tough thing to see a great old institution like the Chicago Tribune slide into mediocrity.

Now the Trib has taken the next step in its sad descent.  Reading the movie reviews this morning at the breakfast table, I noticed something was different.  Then it hit me:  the paper was too skinny.  Well, maybe it’s just the “Movies” section, I thought.  I picked up Section 1 to see if it was skinny as well.  It was.

The Chicago Tribune has just whacked off an inch of its width from each page, two inches when the paper is opened.   This means each page contains about 8% less content than it did a week ago.  Here is a photo of today’s mini-Trib:

 

Trib front page

 

Notice the paper isn’t even as wide as the 12 inch tiles on my kitchen floor.  However, they still have room for a large color photograph.  The photo accompanies an April Fools Day story about a non-existent baseball player.  The picture itself takes up about 25% of the available space on the front page.  Mind you, this is a story about someone who doesn’t actually exist.  It is a story about a fake news story.  The only real news on the front page of today’s Tribune deals with decidedly local stories about area schools. 

These are important stories, no doubt, but let’s consider what is not on the front page.  There is nothing about our nation’s military involvement in Libya.  You have to turn to page 13 for that.  There’s nothing about the budget crisis in Washington and the looming government shutdown.  That story is on page 14.  The nuclear disaster threatening Japan?  Page 16.

As if the content issues were not enough, the paper’s actual production seems to be more and more prone to quality control problems.  Assuming I am even interested in the silly April Fools Day story on page one, I would have to turn to page 12 to finish reading it.  Here is what page 12 looks like:

 

 

Trib page 12

 

Good grief. 

Last year I wrote a blog post in which I announced my divorce from the Chicago Tribune.  I had been a long time subscriber, but with the obvious decline in quality I could not justify continuing my daily subscription.  I cancelled all but the Sunday delivery.  A month or two later, the circulation department called me and offered four day delivery for basically the same price as what I was paying for Sunday only.  It was a good offer, so I accepted it.  Now, however, I’m simply waiting for my entire subscription to expire, including Sunday.  I’ll pay 75 cents for a single day’s paper to be downloaded on my Nook whenever I have the inclination.  I’ll help the Trib contain costs by eliminating entirely home delivery.  I don’t need a mini-Tribune.

 

Author tags:

chicago tribune, newspaper

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Sadly, this is not an April Fools Day story.
Interesting. My morning Trib matched the size of last Friday's edition (the only advantage of stockpiling papers for future recycling). The Trib has been in steady decline for awhile and the pace of decline accelerated when Sam Zell bought the Tribune Co. and wrecked its finances. I don't know why I keep my subscription. Habit, I guess.
Stim, I'm curious -- is your paper 11 inches wide (22 if opened), or 12 inches? Mine is just 11, and that's noticeably smaller than it used to be.
I have loved newspapers all my life. I don't even bother with them anymore. 75% of what news there is looks to be the same thing I read on the internet yesterday. When flash outweighs substance then there is no surprise that papers are dying. The people who want news papers aren't there to see a poorly reproduced screen capture from a website. They want news.
A sad sign of the times. I recently stopped my kindle subscription of the New York Times, not for lack of quality, but because it's just too damned expensive. I've never thought of ordering a la carte. I will look into it.
11 inches. I'll admit that "measure my newspaper" was not on the agenda today.
I wonder if the fall would have been this hard, this fast if Sam Zell hadn't come in to basically burn it down?

And you are right. It's gone. Nothing left.
The Star Telegram in Forth Worth has not only shrunk in size ("for greater readability!") but also throws out an entire section on Monday and Tuesday, making it not much more than a supplement.

Funny thing is I remember reading that as a stand alone enterprise it makes money but the parent corporation was so leveraged they have to sacrifice the ST.
bobbot, news is expensive, so instead we get color photos. Yippee!

bluestocking, I'm also amazed at how expensive the electronic version of the paper is. I thought it was just Nook that was overcharging, but I guess Kindle does, too.

Stim, just to make sure I wasn't crazy, I checked my Rockford Register Star, and it's still the same size it's always been, the standard (at least what used to be standard) 12 inches. For now. Honestly, the Rockford paper is now just as good as the Chicago Tribune.

Travelight, there is no doubt in my mind that Zell hastened the decline.

Ghost, sorry to hear the Star-Telegram has also succumbed. That's the paper I grew up with, and I know some of its staffers.
The Trib has gotten pathetic enough that I'm on the verge of dropping our subscription. Years ago, I got the local paper in the town where I was living (in another state), and we referred to it as "the daily disappointment." In that pre-internet era, getting some news in print was better than nothing at all. The Trib was actually a good paper back then. Unfortunately, it has joined the many formerly fine papers that have become "the daily disappointment."
bikepsycho, I think you would agree with me when I say that the Trib is barely recognizable when compared to what it was just a few short years ago. I wonder if that is true for all big city papers.
This is the total content of most of the news coverage of many stories:

Indian Subcontinent Disappears


0000000000000000
lefty, at least they'll have a nice color photo of it!
the guardian and independent put all the useful news on the web for free. aljazeera has boots on the ground in the middle east. elpais, lemonde, are also good.

the chicago trib was never in that league, so let go and shake off the parochial blinders of american 'journalism.'
OMg this sounds just so horrible. I hate seeing this happen and I share your grief as well. What to do where to go ? Us photographers are now the last of a visual community where even our work is taken for granted. I guess one is better off working for the internet seeing how it is consuming our old lifestyle and everything else along with it. I think the computer is also an addictive medium that makes the brain pleased to working with it as well. The end result is everything we knew or grew up with as far as style knowledge and manners has been rewritten and looks to furthered along by the youth of today and their wishes.
Al, I actually believe the Trib was once a very good paper. I don't know much about the foreign language press, other than the fact I used to be fluent in German and read Die Zeit (a weekly) and the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, which at least 30 years ago was very good. I don't speak that language well enough any more to have an opinion.

algis, you bring up a good point, that perhaps the content is there, somewhere, but you have to go to a different medium to find it.
Steve, it's really sad to see what has happened to the Chicago Tribune. At its current size its page size is not much larger than the free "Pennysaver" that is mailed every week around here!
I think the reason why most papers are in such decline is people are tired of them spouting their liberal crap all the time. Once they get a dose of real news reporting they see what a hack job the papers have done for so long. The only thing they are good for is lining your pet cages. I guess crap attracts crap.
rushdman, interesting take. Have you ever seen who the Chicago Tribune endorses for political office? Obama, the native son, was the first Democratic endorsement for president in the paper's history. Probably 75% of lower office endorsements go to Republicans. The liberal crap you speak of included cheerleading for the Iraq war. It included a relentless attack on the last democratic governor and endorsement of the Republican trying to replace him. It included an endorsement for the Republican running to replace Obama in the Senate.

The liberal crap on today's front page deals with problems of red tape in Illinois's Democratic Attorney General's office that are hampering freedom of information requests, and the progress of conjoined twins on their first birthday. Turning to the editorial pages, the liberal crap includes the Trib's own Steve Chapman questioning the rationale behind the Libya raids, Clarence Page opining about the different way we respond to dictators in the Arab world vs. sub-Saharan Africa, and a guest columnist writing about the fact that the media has failed to report that banks have paid back the TARP money they received two years ago.

One could argue, I suppose, that these stories and editorials are crap, but are they really LIBERAL crap?

In fact, I would challenge you to go to chicagotribune.com and find a single article that carries a liberal bias. If you find a liberal editorial, I'll bet there is at least one other on the right that is a counterbalance to it. Feel free to comment here on what you find, or send me a personal e-mail if you prefer.
sells clothing,footwear,handbags,Sunglasses

Our products sell well in Europe and North America.
Feel of a newspaper while sitting on toilet is irreplaceable. Actually, Sun-Times fold is more toilet-friendly.
I'm sure the paper that serves one of the biggest liberal disasters in America is conservative. The disaster I am talking about is Illinois. The state that is so far in debt they will probably have to file bankruptcy. The state that I drive trough, pay them $10 in tolls along with the millions of other cars each day and they are still broke. I love going by the construction sites and I see one guy working and 15 others on break. Come to think of it, pretty much every liberal stronghold is in a financial death match. The libs did great for my home state of Michigan. No jobs, High Taxes, Big Government Programs, a virtual Liberal Utopia. I think I read more people left that state last year than came there. For a lib, all papers are neutral. I guess thats why the New York Times decided to not run Gov. Walkers op-ed. One of the biggest story's in history and they decide to not run the gov. op-ed. No liberal bias there. 80% of Reporters vote Dem. The rest work for Fox. Come on. It is a racket that is falling apart as people get better news elsewhere. Bye Bye Papers.
I think you would agree with me when I say that the Trib is barely recognizable when compared to what it was just a few short years ago.

I definitely would. I'm amazed at how far it's fallen in a relatively short time.

I wonder if that is true for all big city papers.

Many U.S. papers seem to have met a similar fate. Oddly enough, the Chicago Sun-Times, which I've long considered a distant second to the Trib in writing and editing, has improved noticeably in the last couple of years. I certainly wouldn't consider it a first rate paper, but I think they've actually passed the Trib by. They often scoop the Trib on breaking new as well. I wouldn't have predicted these changes 10 years ago.

I haven't seen the print editions in a while, but I still read the San Francisco Chronicle and Boston Globe online. Their web sites are stronger than the Trib's.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer fell to bankruptcy a while back and went to a web-only format. While they're still going, they seem to be dying a slow death.

The New York Times is still first rate. The Concord Monitor, an old familiar from my New Hampshire days, is solid and respectable in the realm of smaller local papers.

I suspect that a lot of papers may adopt a model similar to the New York Times is starting, where they offer online readers access to a limited number of articles unless they are online or print subscribers. I'll be curious to see how that trend plays out over the next several years.