I recently attended a dinner party thrown by a friend of mine who fancies herself a gourmet chef. She’d prepared a lavish dinner for six and I was the first one to finish eating because everybody else just couldn’t stop jabbering about how splendid it all was. While my food was experiencing the digestive process, theirs was experiencing the congealing process.

When each dish appeared, our host would explain what it was: “This is a pan fried, minced Sicilian inbred butterfly ravioli, infused with a reduction sauce of strained and pounded Nigerian roast garlic pod, exfoliated in Albanian ginger grass, marinated for three hours in a deluded joie de pomegranate cream sauce, spiced with a soupcon of fennel de mer and served in a tower on a bed of enhanced, devolved, ersatz rice-spinach.”
Whatever.
All I heard through dinner was foodie talk: “My taste buds are absolutely tingling from the sprightly forensic climax of the divine roast garlic pod.” “This exfoliated ginger grass is better than sex.” “The Chardonnay really brings out the full explosive demeanor hidden subtly in the fresh, flagrant enigma of the rice-spinach.”
To me, it resembled Chef Boyardee’s canned ravioli that tasted a little like licorice. Only she’d spent eight hours cooking it and arranging it artistically on the plate. Admittedly, the design created by ravioli plopped out of a can isn’t all that esthetic, but it all ends up in the toilet anyway so who cares?
It's just as annoying at gourmet restaurants. You order salmon and you get a piece of something pinkish the size of your big toe, usually served on “a bed” of something. Why does food now have to be served on a bed? Is it sleepy from soaking in a marinade? And there’s always a sprig of something on top. I usually toss that aside immediately.

At the really expensive restaurants, you’re given palate cleansers. Who needs it? My tastes buds, primitive as they may be, can tell the difference between meat loaf and ice cream.
Speaking of ice cream, when did sherbet become sorbet?
A foodie acquaintance of mine recently tried to convince me that truly great chefs are on the same level as truly great artists. In other words, according to her, a really terrific crème brulee is on the same level as Moby Dick and The Moonlight Sonata. Really? Really?

In my youth, when you went to a restaurant, you got a nice big plate of food and it didn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out how to arrange it on the plate. The steak was between the fries and the cole slaw. There were no specials, the waiters weren't snooty and the menus were written by someone whose primary language was not Frenchified gibberish.

What is this absurd obsession with food? Is everybody a food snob now? Here we are, sitting in restaurants, oohing and ahhing about reductions and infusions of towers of food which cost enough to supply club sandwiches to the entire population of Sierra Leone for a year.
Back to my friend’s dinner party: After one petite bite, one of the guests said to our host, “Suzette, this is simply to die for!”
I looked up from my plate. “Oh really, Gwendolyn?” I asked. “If this dish were in the middle of a burning house, are you saying you would risk your life, run into the flames and save it from becoming toast?”

I was ignored for the rest of the evening while everybody else chattered about the grub, which was fine because I was the only one who finished the sorbet before it had turned into soup.
Photos courtesy of: about-culinary-colleges.com, wegmans.com, ehow.com, centralthoughts.net, salmonrecipes.net, popsugar.com, istockphoto.com


Salon.com
Comments
Over ice? The stuff is to die for.
rated with hgs
That is the best argument I've ever seen concerning "foo-foo foodies".
Serve me this stuff while I'm sitting on the toilet and let's save a little bit of time--although it would be hard to balance a plate and paperback all at the same time.
Besides, I've found that "true" foodies don't invite "cheap bastids" to dinner.
♥
Could I interest you in a rack of barbqued ribs, bake beans, and potato salad? That is my idea of fine dining.
I count adjectives on menus and try to choose the item with the least. IMHO, the only relevant adjective is "good".
The Tower of food in the middle of the plate drives me nuts.
just sayin'
almost removing rating for no mention of cookies.
blech.
Torman, that's just what we're having for dinner tonight, and I can't wait. -R-
Your review of her dinner party should determine whether she's a friend or not.
Thank God that, as I age, there is an increasingly inverse relationship between my ability to pay for a drizzled entree and the ability of my taste buds to distinguish between menu saucery (pun intended!) and ranch dressing.
My French and California Cuisine days have long since passed.
Rated for this being to die for.
Funny, as always, and rated, of course.
I've also enjoyed nearly every fine dining experiences at five star restaurants and my only complaints were the prices.
Ever notice the ingredients in these culinary creations are also used in health and beauty aids?
Pardon me while I go chow down on a pulled pork po-boy smothered in hickory-smoke flavored bbq sauce, some slaw, and a pitcher of sweet tea. ;)
While what you describe does sound a little snobbish and there are incredibly snobbish people and places out there, I do not think that all of them do it just out of desire to be snobbish. Good food and new recipes amuse them and a good recipe can indeed be art. Even if not quite on par with Sistine Chapel and Moby Dick. It can be art because some people express themselves through what they can do with food and mostly these people do it for others to share and appreciate. It may sound ridiculous to you, but many hobbies are ridiculous to people who do not share them. If I were you, I would thank the hostess, but perhaps find a polite excuse to decline the next time. Gourmet food is just not your thing.
I used to work for a an online cookware company in the height of this foodies craze but our customers were 80% normal folks who just wanted good products. As a customer service person I got talk to really great folks around the country and share their cooking experiences.
Most people are so over this bullshit. I do not need for food to be an adventure; if a cook/chef can educate me to technique that helps my cooking, or share really good tasting ingredients that are accessible -- great, but just to prove you are out on the edge?? What crap!!!
Thanks.
There was a scandal last week or two locally about a restaurant that outed the main local food critic and refused to serve her. The owner/chef thought they were so cool/so smart to do this, but I went to their site to check out the menu and the ingrdients were so off the map and so unintriguing I decided I'd never go there, and their actions were really stupid re: the food critic. Who the hell cares??
Whether it is food, wine, literature, music or anything else, aren't those people already pompous before they get involved with good and basic things, then suck the joy out of our lives?
This is an official gushy comment!
You response was perfect - shut up an eat the damn stuff. No one who spends hours on a dinner is more complimented than when you manage to squeeze out, through a mouth full of food, a hearty "goo'g!!, goo'gmph!!", while trying not to spray the other diners with the food in your mouth. All the knowledgeable maunderings in the world don't say "great dinner" as clearly as an empty plate. If you feel a need to be "delicate", cover your mouth when you burp. ;-)
.
This is going to get offal.
I hate when lunch makes me hungry!
I love interesting ingredients, but please don't try to make me feel stupid when I'm simply trying to purchase a sandwich!
As soon as he gets that behind him he'll return.
Gastronomically, I believe you're correct but I'll need to chew on it a bit as would any good ruminant.
Let's hope it's just a temporary expulsion.
Have you noticed "seared" meat? Formerly knows as raw meat. I don't like raw duck no matter how artistically arranged on the plate.
I'm TheBadScot and Caitlin Kelly approved this message.
One does not have to understand something to make fun of it (not that there's much to understand about piling stuff on a plate and calling it fine food.) For example, I don't understand Black Holes (which is actually the name of a dish at Valentino's), but I would certainly not be diminished by poking fun at them.
But, I'm sure I'd be pissed off if someone kept blabbering away while I was trying to eat.
Rated!
Actually, one does have to understand. Understanding is the key to humor. That was Swift's genius, and Twain's, Borat's, Mencken's. In this case, the humor is at the expense of others, a cheap result of not understanding, and therefore, not funny. It could have been, had you understood the butt of your joke, but you do not. Funny words, but in the end, a misfire.
Pomposity and ass-kissery can happen at dinner parties and has been a ripe subject for satire ever since the time of Mr. Blumenthal's favorite author, Jane Austen.
First off, I have no idea if the people at the dinner really liked the food or if they were just trying to sound chic. Nowadays, it's considered pedestrian not to like fine food. For all they knew, the main course could have been infused meerkat. And who was going to tell the hostess they hated it? (And yes, of course I said thank you.)
Second, I doubt if Twain knew what it was really like to be in King Arthur's Court or if Swift knew what it was like to be tied up by really small people. And as far as I know, Borat never lived in Eastern Europe.
Third, I've been to lots of gourmet restaurants with my foodie friends and I can't tell you how many times I've ordered something that was fancified by the chef to such an extent that it tasted like sixteen different flavors, except for the one it was supposed to taste like. And then the bill -- $40 for an entree.
Fourth, why is it that, everytime wine experts participate in blindfolded taste tests, the six dollar bottle of wine wins?
I feel a new college credit coming on: The Sociology of Food Presentation. Oh wait, there's probably one already.
My loved one took me to the "finest" restaurant in the area for my birthday. While it was nice when we got the bill I suddenly developed indigestion. We could've bought three weeks worth of groceries.
John, Sounds like you've got a good appetite though. Do eat the garnish though, they're $5 each!
@Ryan: I do have a hobby -- writing for OS.
I eat anything...as long as I don't have to cook it. My stove-top is a cat bed and the oven is for storing dog food. I like fancy stuff when it comes my way - a change from frozen entrees.
enjoyed this very much.
And thanks very much for calling out "to die for". That cliché should practice what it preaches.
Have you ever tried to read Moby Dick?
Have you ever tried to read Moby Dick?
Next we need a parody of Iron Chef. I can't even, um, stomach it anymore. One time they unveiled the secret ingredient and it was whole pigs. So the chefs just started picking up these dead animal carcasses and hauling them to their work stations. Ugh. Doesn't make me want to eat.
Still torn on the artist thing, as I think that great chefs have their special place in the "art" community. I'm just not a fan, but I do appreciate the fact that some of them are great and other people do flock to them. As a writer, I'm much more inclined to agree with you, but I think that's just ego speaking more than rationality. While I tend to agree with you, I think we both might actually be wrong on this one.
I like fancy food, so I'm not totally there with you - though I can't stand small portions. That pisses me off. I'm hungry and a teeny piece of artwork is NOT going to cut it.
R
I know of two brothers, one colorblind and the other with normal perception. One was in awe over the rainbow they saw after a storm. The other saw nothing particular to admire. You sound pretty superior and self-satisfied in your analysis, but consider: maybe your mouth is colorblind. Whether or not you agree, consider the possibility that others DO find pleasure where you do not and have perceptual abilities you do not.
You and your friends are not on the same wavelength. Just because you can't enjoy it, don't feel obligated to spoil it for others. No matter how presumptuous you thought the food, your hostess took a lot of time and care to produce food she hoped you would enjoy. It sounds like you acted the ass. Who's bad is that?
Yawn...
This line, btw, is truly to die for: Why does food now have to be served on a bed? Is it sleepy from soaking in a marinade?
Granted, my partner and I like cooking. When I make desserts, I make them from scratch, but the only thing I look forward to is seeing the empty plates at the end of the meal. No meandering, self-congratulatory explanation of the preparation is ever involved. It's not necessary.
In any case, a great meal usually leads to sparse dinner conversation anyway, since everyone is busy eating.
We are not chefs, just simple cooks like our mothers and fathers, who only asked us to be thankful for the food we received.