Ben Barber's idea (it's too much to call it a proposal) is the best idea ever...and that's why it will never be implemented.
Mine isn't the kind of job where I can listen intently to a radio show, but I find Marketplace from American Public Media to be one show I try to catch on my local NPR News station.
Monday, commentator Benjamin Barber put forward the idea that instead of injecting cash into the banking system and hoping they lend it out, the Treasury and the Fed ought to distribute expiring vouchers for businesses and individuals who remain shut out from access to necessary credit.
Only when a bank closes a loan and disburses the funds would the "injection" be made. It would be a boost for transparency and public trust, too, in that the banks could not "spend" the money on bonuses or to shore up nonperforming assets. It would all be new loans that, presumably, would drive growth and employment in business and liquidity and growth in home sales.
Here's a text link to his commentary.
Listen to the story here.
To foster comment and feedback in the community, I'm posting Barber's transcript here.
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has offered a second phase bank bailout plan that is mostly carrots and no sticks.
Trouble is without sticks, the banks are likely to figure out how to hang on to the big bucks the way they did the first time around last fall. So here's another proposal that no free market zealot can object to: vouchers.
That's right, let's submit the banks to the privatizing discipline of vouchers to which schools have been made to submit. Give the banks the big bucks, but make it so they have no choice but to, well, pass the buck -- the bucks -- on to you and me. Sort of like food stamps, you gotta spend them on food.
It won't be the dreaded feds but the banks that will negotiate and administer the loans. But they will have to work with federal vouchers that can be redeemed only when they are credited to a client who has obtained a home mortgage or car loan or business credit.
Sorry, Mr. Bank CEO, but the vouchers can't be used to pay salaries or bonuses, and are not redeemable for merger and acquisition deals. And if we put a shelf limit of say three to six months on them, these vouchers can't be held in a safe as insurance against future debts and losses when those packages of bad debt are finally opened and evaluated. The banks will have a simple choice: use 'em or lose 'em!
So there it is: The banks get the vouchers, but we the people get the cash. Cause the cash is available only when a loan is approved and the banks pass on the dough to those real folks who, as credit recipients, can get the real economy moving again.
And hey, with vouchers, the government can truly pass the buck without worrying that the buck will stop with the banks. And Tim Geitner can relax because nobody will be able to call him a bank nationalizer or accuse Larry Summers of socialist leanings.
credit American Public Media


Salon.com
Comments
There's an outrageous story about a Chicago bank who received bailout money and they just spent a fortune on parties and a golf tournament. Excuse the source, but it's here:
http://www.tmz.com/2009/02/24/northern-trust-bank-bailout/
Great post, Randy!
My spelling/proofreading/grammar geek leaks out. You know what I mean, don't you, Julie?
If anyone knew how annoyed I get when I see misspellings, they'd forgive me for those few times I speak out. Maybe I should start a spelling blog!
This weekend's local paper quoted a man as saying "my soul interest is in Downtown New Albany." I'm pretty sure that one falls on the young reporter, but you never know.
Did I ever tell you that I can't spel for crap?
monte
My bride grew tired of me yelling at the TV.