Story, Place, & Kairos

Reflections from Raymond Vince

Raymond Vince

Raymond Vince
Location
Tampa, Florida, USA
Birthday
October 02
Company
Independent Scholar
Bio
Professionally, I have been a teacher of American Literature, War Studies, Theology, & Writing, but I am also a guitarist, husband, father, & friend. Since 1991, I have lived with my family in Tampa, FL, but I grew up in Cheltenham, London, & Bristol. I have a PhD in English & American Literature, plus three graduate degrees in Theology, Literature, and Logic & Scientific Method. I have published on Fitzgerald & Einstein, William Morris, Norman Mailer, Hemingway, J.R.R. Tolkien, & John le Carre. My faith is important to me, but so is a love of Science. I see the world as beautiful, complex, and full of ambiguity. I love the power of Story & Film, the spirit of Place, and the grace to be found in moments of Kairos.

MY RECENT POSTS

FEBRUARY 12, 2012 10:42PM

Darwin Surviving @ 203

Rate: 0 Flag

Charles Darwin 

On February 12, 1809, he was born.  Who, you say?  Charles Darwin (1809-1882), the great English naturalist, he of the famous Voyage of the Beagle 1831-1836, and his On the Origin of Species (1859). So, you ask, how is dear old Darwin at 203 - or, more accurately, how is his crucial discovery and formulation of the Theory of Evolution? 

Quite well, thank you.  That is true, despite the rather futile sniping from the Far Right of the GOP and US Protestant Fundamentalists. Futile, because in the rest of the World, in half of the United States, and throughout the Sciences, the greatness of Darwin's creative vision of Life is recognized.

I have just discovered (through Twitter) an excellent article on Darwin & Evolution from three years ago.  Written by film critic Roger Ebert, it was posted in his Journal on the Chicago Sun-Times, on 11 Feb 2009 on Darwin's bicenntenial. It is still well worth reading, so I have reposted it here:

Darwin survives as the fittest

A little background to this article may be helpful. Two months earlier, Ebert had published a post (3 Dec 2008), praising Darwin's Theory but castigating Ben Stein's doumentary Expelled and the theory known as Intelligent Design.  Ebert's 2008 post brought a tremendous response.  This is what he wrote in Feb 2009, "That entry has so far drawn some 280,000 visits and inspired nearly 1,300 comments comprising some 145,000 words, every one of which I have read. The thread is still active and growing every day." 

He goes on to write this:

  • "Why do I have a horse in this race? I'm not a scientist. No, but I am an intelligent, curious person who years ago became fascinated by the Theory of Evolution because of its magnificence, its beauty, and its self-evident truth. To study it is to see pieces falling into place. It appears to describe a process that takes place throughout the universe, in the struggles of molecules and the collisions of galaxies"

There is so much written for and against Evolution, a theory that many misunderstand, many ignore, but which is at the heart of the Sciences. Along with later discoveries such as Genetics and DNA, Darwin's Theory has become the great unifying theory of the Life Sciences. In similar fashion, Einstein's Special Theory (1905) and General Theory of Relativity (1915) now dominate our understanding of Physics.  
 
Why do some people of faith in the USA - nearly all literalists and fundamentalists in their belief - have a problem with Darwin?  And why don't they have a problem with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Entropy, Relativity Theory, Quantum Mechanics, all equally revolutionary?  I firmly believe that the Darwin "thing" is not a problem in Science at all: it is a feature of a particular religious movement in the USA, and a fatally flawed system of biblical interpretation.
 
It is a plain observable fact that people of Faith elsewhere in the world almost never have a problem with Darwin or Evolution.  It is also true that, in the fight against cancer, in the war against the coming Plague, in the quest for new sources of energy, in the development of better food production for a starving world, nobody trusts the "research" of so-called Creation Science or Intelligent Design. Real Science does things that matter: it changes the Universe.
 
Yet, insofar as it adversely impacts science & education in the USA, and our national competiveness in a World economy, this Darwin "thing" remains a major problem in the USA.  It keeps too many Americans locked in a little box, blind to the wonders of this vast, creative Universe. As J. B. Philips, the Bible translator, said decades ago, "Your God is too small."
 
So, on this February 12, 2012, in D-Year 203, let us celebrate Charles Darwin's great achievement in the Life Sciences. Let us encourage our children into the wonders of the Life Sciences.  And, please let us try and re-enter the 21st Century!

Author tags:

roger ebert, evolution, darwin

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Great informative article, once again. So many pearls here but one question for me recasts this so-called argument into higher, more salty waters indeed:

"Why do some people of faith in the USA - nearly all literalists and fundamentalists in their belief - have a problem with Darwin? And why don't they have a problem with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, etc..." . Indeed.

The box these "New Victorians" (sorry, can't find link) would have us live in certainly speaks to J.B Philips' statement that "Your God is too small." That about says it all for me.

Your satisfying article sort of hits all the "well, duh" moments. Oh, and thanks for the Ebert link. Terrific stuff.
Thanks, Meg, for your affirmation and support. Writing is often a lonely enterprise, and so I appreciate your good words. I'm writing like a demon, hoping at least some of it is worth reading. And I;m enjoying the process!