Must Be Thursday

Pick a subject, and I'll probably cover it on Thursdays

Robyn Martins

Robyn Martins
Birthday
June 21
Bio
I am a freelance writer embedded in Small Town, Ohio. Each post here also appears in the Thursday editions of the Times-Reporter, local paper for Small Town. For two years, they appeared on Mondays, but with the editorial change, I have renamed my blog and shifted publishing days.

MY RECENT POSTS

Robyn Martins's Links

New list
No links in this category.
Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 7, 2011 8:00AM

Marie Curie—Obstacles No Excuse for Failure

Rate: 2 Flag

 

Marie Curie

 

 

Ever hear of Dan Shechtman? Me either. Last month, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for discovering quasicrystals. Does the name Melvin Calvin ring a bell? He was awarded the prize 50 years ago for carbon dioxide research.

 

Well, how about Marie Curie who earned the same prize 100 years ago today for her discovery of and ground-breaking work with radium? Now, there is a name we recognize. Hers is a household name still because she pursued her goals and cleared her hurdles in such a way that her example remains relevant so many years later.

 

Curie was the first European woman to earn a doctorate in science, the first female professor at the University of Paris, the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and the first person to earn prizes in two disciplines. She founded institutes in Paris and in Warsaw, was instrumental in treating wounded soldiers in WWI and set the groundwork for cancer treatment.

 

She has been celebrated with everything from the French Legion of Honor to commemorative statues and postage stamps. In fact, all of France declared this year to be the Year of Marie Curie.

 

She is an icon because or her work as a chemist, but I find her ability to confront obstacles head on as inspiring as her achievements. Curie was born with two strikes against her—she was a woman in an era when women were suppressed and a Pole at a time when Russia controlled Poland with a heavy hand. Despite what appeared a bleak future, though, she was fiercely determined to get an education even when one was officially forbidden.

 

In the late 1800s, women were not admitted to most European universities, and the Russians censored what education was available to native Poles. So, young people like Curie banded together in what they called the Floating University. They held clandestine classes at night and on Sundays, meeting in private homes and changing locations to avoid being found out. With the help of renowned lecturers, they studied the humanities, sciences and mathematics; and they performed covert lab research and pitched in to develop a secret library.

 

Nearly 5,000 young women, along with disenfranchised men, attended this underground university, and it became a source of national pride. “Truly the means of action were poor and the results obtained could not be considerable;” Curie wrote, “Yet I still believe that the ideas which inspired us then are the only way to real social progress.”

 

It wasn’t until Curie moved to Paris that she was permitted an accredited education and could do lab research openly, but she held onto her fond memories of the Floating University. The secret school was a collaborative effort filled with sympathetic and enthusiastic companions “who united in a common desire to study, and whose activities were at the same time social and patriotic.” The setting allowed her to developed an intense work ethic and mighty resolve.

 

Believe it or not, we live in fortunate times. We aren’t forced to create secret societies to achieve our goals, and we need not fear government retribution for attempting to learn beyond our “station.” Our schools are now open to everyone, so that our daughters can learn along with our sons, and we are free to pursue our goals with near-limitless possibilities.

 

Curie’s story makes me wonder, though, how we would fare if we were to suddenly lose our freedoms and find ourselves tested by severe adversity, if we were forced to hide underground for something as basic to us as education for women. Would we sit down with arms folded, or would we stand up with shoulders back and hands ready for work in order to make our own opportunities?

 

Most of us won’t become household names, and we won’t be remembered a century from now, but that isn’t the point. Marie Curie proved that when aiming for the most esteemed pursuits, obstacles are no excuse for failure. “Life is not easy for any of us. But what of that?” she said. “We must have perseverance and above all confidence in ourselves. We must believe that we are gifted for something and that thing must be attained.” That thing must be attained even if our achievements are lost to history.

 

Photo: Marie Sklodowska (Curie) at 16

Author tags:

marie curie

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Great historical post, and very timely. Not a lot of female Nobel Prize winners, that is for sure. You did neglect to mention that she died at an early age of what we now know as radiation poisoning from her experiments.

And while I wish your statement that there are no more "underground" universities was correct it is not. Women are not allowed to be educated in many parts of the Islamic world, where boys are sent. Or education is available to both sexes, but parents can only afford to send one, the boy/s in the family.

We're closer to world-wide literacy, but we are not there yet.
Thank you for this. Excellent essay! The sad fact is that there are only two women among the Nobel physics laureates. The second recipient was Maria Goeppert-Mayer.
Kate, when writing my column, I considered including the current underground schools around the world, but I considered my audience—middle America where the corn is high—and decided to use "we" in a more limited scope. There was so much I could have said about this remarkable woman—I skipped her death AND her birthday.

Suresh, true. But interestingly, Curie's daughter, Irène Joliot-Curie, won the Prize for chemistry.