Off the Main Trail

Finding a Progressive Path in Kentucky

Ric Caric

Ric Caric
Location
College Town, U. S.
Birthday
May 14
Company
Regional University
Bio
I'm married with two daughters and have been teaching at a state university in a red state for 21 years. My blogging covers a lot of issues but I'm a progressive kind of guy who tends to focus on political process, conservatism, and religiosity. Living in the Bible Belt gives me a little different though not necessarily more friendly perspective on conservatism. I also get in the occasional sports post.

Ric Caric's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
APRIL 30, 2009 12:12PM

Escape from Michele Bachmann: The New Republican Group

Rate: 6 Flag

It sounds like the Republicans are starting to try to pull themselves off the bottom.

Generally, people in government call for a commission when things go really bad and they don't know what to do about it. One way to tell that things are going horribly for the Republicans is that they're launching a "commission-like" entity entitled the National Council for a New America as an effort to re-brand the Republican Party.

Here's the official gobbledygook that Eric Cantor's office supplied to the Washington Post.

"The NCNA [National Council for a New America] will bring together citizens from across the country to begin a dialogue with the American people through a series of forums, town halls, and an online effort that will engage people in a discussion to meet our common challenges and build a stronger country through common-sense ideas," the letter says. "The NCNA will be a dynamic, forward-looking organization that will amplify the common-sense and wisdom of our fellow citizens through a grassroots dialogue with Republican leaders."

The letter says the group is not "a Republican-only forum." But GOP sources said House Minority Whip Eric Cantor played a top role in creating it. The group seems aimed at offering a conservative alternative at time when Democrats are lambasting the Republicans as the "Party of No" that simply attacks President Obama without offering policy ideas of its own. Its leadership does not include any Democrats.

"We do this not just to offer an alternative point of view or to bedisagreeable," the group's letter says. "Instead, we want to ask the American people what their hopes and dreams are. Since January, the President and the Democratic Majority in Congress have - rightfully so - put forward their plan for the future, now we must listen, learn and lead through an honest, open conversation with the American people that will result in building policy proposals that will yield the best results for our nation's long-term success."

Let me translate this into better political English. Republican political heavyweights have lost control over the Republican Party apparatus, the Republican Party brand, and the Republican Party message. Instead of Republican political, lobbying, and think tank elites disseminating a relatively unified Republican message, the heavyweights see a motley collection of has-beens, right-wing media types, political relatives, and lightweights out there killing the Republican Party with random chatter. Right now, the three most talked about Republicans are Michael Steele, Michele Bachmann, and Glenn Beck and that's just killing the Republican Party.

What the National Council for a New America (NCNA) represents is an attempt by the political leadership to re-assert control over the Republican message. The NCNA is going to send out big names like John McCain, Mitt Romney, Bobby Jindal, and Eric Cantor to talk about Republican views on energy, health care, and foreign policy in a way that seems less self-indulgent and stupid than Michele Bachmann. In this way, the leadership hopes to cut through all the "conservatives in crisis" chatter and re-establish themselves as the primary spokespeople for the Republican Party. The leadership also hopes to showcase potential Republican presidential candidates like Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney, and Bobby Jindal as well as "elder statesmen" like John McCain. If the Republicans hope to have a credible presidential campaign in 2012, they know they will have to start undoing the damage of the last nine years now.

Don't be surprised if Michael Steele isn't locked in a hotel room somewhere for the first NCNA event next Saturday in Virginia.

What are the chances of the NCNA initiative working? Like most commissions, the odds are something close to zero that they'll any impact. In the case of the Republican Party, the inmates really have seized the asylum and I seriously doubt that party elites are in position to regain control. Far from being a sign of rebirth, the NCNA looks more like evidence of how badly the Republicans are sinking.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
it's just hard to imagine that mccain (who recently lost), bobby jindal (who was pretty much humiliated in his big public moment), and the brother of the guy that 70% of americans hate are going to bring any "new energy" to the GOP...
Most of their official gook is malformed peanut butter, but these lines stood out for me:

"We do this not just to offer an alternative point of view or to be disagreeable," the group's letter says. "Instead, we want to ask the American people what their hopes and dreams are.

The American people have been telling their hopes and dreams to both parties for way too long. At least it seems the Democrats are listening with half an ear. The Republicans put in their earplugs a long time ago. Until our hopes and dreams match up with THEIR hopes and dreams, they couldn't care less.
Was it Medusa whose blood spawned snakes when her head was cut off and the blood spurted onto the ground?

I keep thinking something like that is going to happen with the Republicans; something even fouler will grow where the party's blood falls.

I'm a little bit scared. It can ALWAYS get worse.

Good post, though. Rated.
Nice analysis, Ric.
Would that there were some more "heavyweights" out there to counter the insanity. Mitt Romney? A Bush? Yikes. Too bad WF Buckley is dead. And I'm sure Geo. Will isn't going to go anywhere near a grass root.

I do detect a great deal of desperation in their use of multi-level marketing buzzwords like "dynamic" and "forward looking". Now all they need to offer up is an opportunity to make $5000 a week working from home.
Newsmax is already doing things like that. Ann Coulter's also giving stock tips.
There are three things about this I see as a disaster in the making.

1) Any group that calls itself "...for America" or "...of America" are usually hard core groups with a hidden agenda.

2) The "new face" of the Republican party is the same old face that lost the 08 election.

and

3) Announcing right off the bat, "Republicans only" will turn off Independents and Democrats not to mention the swing Libertarian vote the Republican party needs to win over.
I would add that I don't think they're going to cut through the considerable clutter on the right.
"less self-indulgent and stupid than Michele Bachmann"

That sounds like an achieveable goal. ;-)

But seriously we need two major parties. We need healthy disagreement and a variety of leadership and ideas. Too bad the Republicans aren't offering any.
Seems to me that the atmosphere is ripe for a third party to form and really get some traction. But it wont come from an effort that is "for Republicans Only" which is not unlike the sign on the lunch counter that says "Whites Only."
Someone else here said we need a healthy 2 party system and I agree. Both parties are disfunctional right now, but the Republicans have painted themselves into a corner and will only get out at the cost of repudiating much of what they have stood for. Lets face it, as long as their main bagman is Grover Norquist, their big thinker is Newt Gingrich and their main pitchman is Rush Limbaugh they are only going to be able to sling mud and tell lies. They cannot change unless and until they break up that unholy triumverate.
I'm all for a two-party system as well and have posted about the likelihood of a moderate party forming and getting traction. Today might turn out to be the day that pressure started to build for a moderate party. Larry Sabato--political scientist to the stars--made some trenchant comments about the Republican Party's lack of viability as a national party. That might start things moving toward the formation of a replacement for the Republicans.
Here's a couple of the url's for my posting about the possibility of another party:

http://open.salon.com/blog/riccaric/2009/04/19/meghan_mccain_moves_toward_a_new_party

http://open.salon.com/blog/riccaric/2009/04/12/the_future_of_the_republicans_as_a_third_party
As the American People, I'm always delighted to enter into a dialogue about my hope and my dream.

"We do this not just to offer an alternative point of view or to be disagreeable," the group's letter says. "Instead, we want to ask the American people what their hopes and dreams are.


Reminds me of Freud; "What do women want?" Because you know-- the answers we've already been given aren't the answers we want.
I find myself wondering how effective any group led by Eric Can'tor can possibly be in re-branding the GOP. This is the same Eric Can'tor who, as minority whip, has been highly instrumental in every non-initiative, late-night punch line inducing move the GOP has made since January. As far as I can tell, this is just another way to make sure his name gets mentioned on FOX, and to keep Americans aware of his "leadership". Can you say "Can'tor 2012"