The idea of a "War on Christmas" is a bit more ludicrous than the idea of a monolithic and Liberal (Mainstream) Media, but both ideas sprout from the spoiled-rottenness of people who nowadays pass for conservatives generally and Christian conservatives more specifically.
When the source for such comments isn't cynical lying by pundits, that source is an honest but parochial perception that everyone important in one's life is or ought to be a Christian, living a life normal by the norms of traditionalist American society.
In such Ozzie-and-Harriet perceptions, it is simply natural and literally unremarkable that everybody celebrates Christmas and that the pushing of religious-conservative views is nonpolitical.
For example, pronatalism: encouraging marriage and reproduction. How do fairy tales and romantic comedies end? "They married and lived happily ever after."
Most Americans find it natural that we celebrate Mothers' Day and Fathers' Day but take no time out to acknowledge those Americans who aid the environment by not reproducing; most of us find it unremarkable that Americans get tax deduction not just for the first and second child but for unlimited numbers of offspring dependents.
Most people don't notice just how much of the newspaper is advertising, or how much TV nowadays is commercials. Well, each ad and commercial has as a subtext, "Buying is good"; "The Market is good"; "Capitalism is good" — and that is a political message you may agree with, but it is political.
Few Americans find it odd that newspapers have a section titled "Business" but none titled "Labor" — or that few recent TV shows celebrate defense attorneys like Perry Mason or straight-arrow, by-the-book cops like Joe Friday. On much TV and in most of crime-story movies, the heroes are cops and prosecutors; Christians who praise Jesus and the US Constitution, will often cheer on images of sworn police officers solving social problems with violence, usually including figurative violence to the Bill of Rights.
More so for war movies and video games: "Blessed are the peace-makers"; they and the meek will called "the children of God" and inherit of the Earth — but neither the meek nor the assertively peaceful get much screen-time, and that is fine with most Americans. Few professing Christians get even a twinge of cognitive dissonance when they hold in contempt some alien-symp Sci-Fi scientist trying to study and negotiate with the Thing or other such alien invaders, and youngsters in the audience learn to cheer on the slaughter of the ETs.
If "All we are saying, / Is give peace a chance" is Leftist doctrine, then much of the product of "the liberal media" is solidly on the Right.
But — there is an important "but" here: But serious Christians and other religious people do have valid complaints about various media, media of a wide variety and over a long time.
To immodestly quote me in a journal article entitled "Le Guin and God" starting with an obvious point about Star Trek:
We don't see bathrooms on the starship Enterprise—or even on the industrial, funky Nostromo in Alien—and the Enterprise's chapel gets used only for the occasional nondenominational wedding and perhaps a funeral. If we do see washrooms, there is a good chance we are in a satire; and outside of the TV or radio religious-broadcasting ghetto, prayer is as invisible as urination..
In most of what Americans read and hear and watch in the various arts and media, people don't piss, and people don't pray. What we usually see are human beings as social animals and only social animals, not animal animals and not spiritual beings.
And that is just wrong. Of the seven billion or so people on Earth, some five billion subscribe (more or less, at least nominally) to one of the world's major religions. With only trivial exceptions, "Everyone poops" and pisses; and most people — at least occasionally — pray.
With honorable exceptions like The Simpsons and a theologically serious atheist like Ursula K. Le Guin, you don't encounter such standard human behavior on most TV or radio, or in books, movies, video games, plays, or whatever.
Either you're in the religious ghetto where all the talk is of God and such — or spiritual matters are ignored.
So enough already with "The War on Christmas" and similar horse puckey! The legitimate complaint is that matters important to most of the world's people are too often shut off from view as rigidly as excretion.
There's no need to stress biological functions or hit audiences over the head with religion. But humans are definitely biological and — in some sense— spiritual beings, and those facts should be recognized and not, dishonestly, denied.


Salon.com
Comments
the web changed that, but didn't change the quality of the people who used it. it's still information*, needing evaluation for quality and motivation, as with any interaction with those tricky homo saps.
i'm not sure how long the web is going to last, it's a running sore on the face of the elite of every nation, but while it lasts there is a chance at getting a reasonably accurate second-hand picture of reality.
we don't talk about 'poo' for a number of reasons: everybody does it, in general it's not interesting, and most cultures load it with aversion labels to promote hygiene. americans are more 'averted' than many, but it's not significant, is my guess.
'spirituality,' now, that's a bomb in america. the difference between the practice of 'christian' culture and its nominal precepts is so large that only serious believers dare go there. everyone else walks around it fearing the violent reaction that exposing hypocrisy generates.
you wanna be careful about that...
"'spirituality,' now, that's a bomb in america. the difference between the practice of 'christian' culture and its nominal precepts is so large that only serious believers dare go there. everyone else walks around it fearing the violent reaction that exposing hypocrisy generates.
"you wanna be careful about that...
Erlich switches hats and goes into film-biz mode and responds, "OK." It is indeed the case that one of the reasons so few religious issues are gotten into — hell, GENTLEMAN'S AGREEMENT is a movie about antiSemitism with nothing about Jewish religion! — is that it's safer to just leave out religion.
Also, I appreciate the point about bathrooms on the Enterprise. The only place I've seen bathrooms — and even people using the bathroom — is RoboCop, which turns out to be satire, anyway.
We're starting to see a fair number of toilets in the media, including in the award-winning film MOST HIGH, which has a notable john scene, featuring its junkie hero in communion with a cockroach (a film now available from NetFlix) — but which is just more evidence that there's a lot of satire nowadays.
On Hanukkah — it's a very minor holiday compared with Passover, and even Purim, and Sukkot! (It's not Biblical: the Books of the Maccabees are part of the Jewish Apocrypha, not Bible.) My family celebrated Hanukkah when I was a kid in Chicago, but not much. But, then, my parents weren't particularly religious.
I'm not sure how much to blame Christians for holiday inflation with Hanukkah.
* The rabbis "religio-fied" it, but Hanukkah is basically a nationalist holiday, celebrating a brief period when the Jews had managed to throw out a set of occupying imperialists. (Not that Judea was worth having; it was just on the way to important places and needed to be held to protect one's flanks in Egypt or Syria.) So it was a handy little holiday to make much of if arguing that Jews should wrest a state from an empire, say the Ottoman or the British.
Hanukkah is ambiguous, though. For one thing, throwing out Hellenistic imperialists can be seen as the victory of parochial religious fanatics against modernizing forces trying to pull some stubborn barbarians into the civilized world. (The French and the British weren't the first with the "Civilizing Mission" fetish.) For another thing, one of the great victories of the Macabbean revolt was an alliance with THE up-and-coming new kids on the block: the Romans. And we all know how generous the Romans were with their allies (who happened to be on the way to places worth conquering, or whose lands were needed to protect a flank). If readers other than Mark don't know, they should see MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN.
* A midwinter holiday with a central motif of increasing light — an additional candle for each day — may be suspected of having some relationship with solstice and Saturnalia. Given the history of Christmas, it seems likely that Hanukkah was an attempt by the monotheists to get in on holiday celebrations people were going to get into anyway.
Thanks for the comment, Mark!
Rich