Richard Rider

Richard Rider
Location
San Diego, California, USA
Birthday
August 24
Title
Chairman
Company
San Diego Tax Fighters
Bio
Biography of Richard Rider (Updated July, 2011) San Diego, CA 92131 E-mail: RRider@san.rr.com * AGE: 66 * EDUCATION: B.A. Economics, University of North Carolina, 1968 * MILITARY SERVICE: Commander, Supply Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve, retired after 26 years (four years active, the rest in the reserve). ** OCCUPATION: Retired stockbroker and financial planner. Lifetime member of the International Association of Financial Planners. Former business owner. * AFFILIATION: • Chairman, San Diego Tax Fighters • National Taxpayers Union • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association • San Diego County Taxpayers Association * POLITICAL ACTIVITIES: • Successfully sued the county of San Diego (Rider vs. County of San Diego) to force a rollback of an illegal 1/2-cent jails sales tax, a precedent that saved California taxpayers over fourteen billion dollars, including $3.5 billion for San Diego taxpayers. • Actively supported a variety of tax-cutting ballot initiatives including Proposition 13. Has written ballot arguments against numerous county and state tax increase initiatives. • County co-chair of both California term limit initiatives (Prop 140 and Prop 164). • Libertarian Party candidate for governor in 1994. • Candidate for the 3rd District County Supervisor in 1992 (third place among six candidates with about 20% of the vote). • 1993 – appointed to (and then elected chair of) the San Diego County Social Services Advisory Board. • 1996 – appointed as a Commissioner on the California Constitution Revision Commission by state Assembly Speaker Kurt Pringle. • Has been involved in legal actions against City of San Diego to force a public vote on issuing bonds for Qualcomm stadium expansion, convention center, baseball ballpark and other projects. • 2005 – Unsuccessful candidate for Mayor of San Diego, though his reform ideas have since taken hold. • 2007 – Columnist for NORTH COUNTY TIMES and SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT • 2009 - The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association's "California Tax Fighter of the Year" * FAMILY: Married. Wife, Diane, is a retired public high school teacher. Two sons, ages 32 and 27.

JANUARY 18, 2012 7:55PM

Labor unions do vast majority of "IE" spending in CA

Rate: 0 Flag

 

The Left loves to lament the evil-corporations spending money on political matters -- supporting presumably conservative political candidates and causes.   The presumption is that the "working class" party is buried by the profligate political contributions of the unfettered Fat Cats using "Independent Expenditure" (IE) campaign committees. But there are two important aspects they fail to mention:

1.  Corporations give to whoever is in power, attempting to buy access and influence.  Depending on the jurisdiction, corporations often give as much or more to Democrats as Republicans.  In the aggregate, ideology takes a back seat in such distributions.

2.  The biggest "corporate" givers donate almost exclusively to Democrats and their causes.  And these "businesses" are indeed not corporations at all -- they are labor unions.

What I particularly relish is that frequently this spending information is available on liberal research sites tailored to lambast corporate influence on politics.  But being honest in their data, the true owners and operators of politicians becomes readily apparent with just a little digging -- in this case, on the www.followthemoney.org website.  

Here's a chart of the "Independent Expenditures" in California during the 2010 election year (I can't get the chart to print in this blog format):

http://www.followthemoney.org/database/StateGlance/state_ie_spenders.phtml?y=2010&s=CA

There were 111 Independent Spenders, totaling almost $39 million. Consider the bigger spenders of these groups -- the ones that spent over $50,000.

There were 28 such entities, broken down as follows:  

·       SIXTEEN of the 28 IE groups were totally funded by labor unions directly. 

·       Four more were Democrat leaning (including the Democrat Party, which gets big funding from labor).  

·       Two were GOP -- including the Republican Party.  

·       Five were GOP leaning.  

·       One was an unknown. 

Just counting these 16 top labor groups, labor spent $21,360,000 of the $39,000,000 spent by all 112 groups (most of the $50,000 and under groups were also labor groups, and are not counted in this figure).

The California Democratic Party spent $8,215,000, the Republican Party $3,335,000. 

But let's narrow it down further.  Consider just the top 10 IE groups:

Seven of the top ten are labor unions, spending an incredible total of $20,598,000.

Aside from the two parties, only one GOP IE is in the top ten -- and it spent only $1,600,000. 

There is far more IE money spent in CA on local campaigns and propositions -- these amounts apparently cover only state matters.  

Clearly the labor unions rule the roost in California campaign spending -- THEY should get the majority of the credit for our state’s fiscal meltdown.  That's why "paycheck protection" -- the ending of mandatory collection of union dues by governments for political purposes -- is so desperately needed in California.

 

Author tags:

california, taxes, regulation

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Comments are now closed.

Richard Rider's Favorites

  1. No relations made yet.