This blog was born when my recent life-decision to up the ante on my kung fu collided with my inability to resist a blank page. Yes, fair cop. I’m a writer – but that doesn’t mean I’m a blogger. Though my preferred mode of expression is through my fingers and onto a virtual sheet of paper, the only work I’m really interested in offering to the public are my fantasy novels, my journalism and my cause-inspired, scathingly articulate angry letters. At its inception, I didn’t intend Stringing Pearls as a podium to broadcast my reflections on Qi, but as a private journal and personal record of my evolving practice.
My error was in thinking OS was like other blog sites. I’d assumed that if I didn’t spam my friends and tell them I was posting, no one would ever know. In my curmudgeonly, solitary writer mind-set, I’d pre-determined that my random, rambling efforts to wrap words around the physical-spiritual aspects of my kung fu process must be an intimate exercise. I didn’t hope and never imagined my dinky poem and memoir-esque prose would have any resonance in the OS blogosphere. I expected to be talking to myself. Happily disappointed in my expectations, I find myself in company, community and conversation with artists whose passions are cousin to my own.
So. When a light of this community – a published author in the field and certified Tai Chi Ch’uan instructor – expresses uncertainty about joining the conversation, wonders if she can or should write about her sense of chi, and cites as the source of her hesitation a reluctance to influence the way others experience it... I give her caveats due consideration.
My thoughts on the matter are these.
Suppose we weren’t talking about the art of Qi. Suppose we were talking about another art, any art, say… the art of writing.
My, my… that got your attention. There’s nothing a writer enjoys more than talking about his/her writing process – except, of course, writing. But consider. When you discuss your process with a non-writer, how quickly does s/he become bored? How much of what you say does s/he really get? How one-sided is the conversation, and how long does it last?
Right. Now consider again. When you’re hanging with another writer, do you ever discuss anything but the creative process? Does the conversation ever lag or sag; does the subject ever grow stale? Or do you talk till all hours, does the pleasure last for days, and do you return to your work inspired?
Damn straight. And the beauty of it is, whether our sense of the writing experience is remarkably similar or radically different, we’ll have the same scintillating discourse, either way. Writing is writing. There’s no right way to do it, no wrong approach. Our conversation doesn’t hinge on the particulars; they’re just grist for the compare-contrast mill. We’re not talking specifics, we’re talking process – with someone who speaks our language.
Ok, but suppose I’m a tyro, never in print, and you’re a best-selling author. Doesn’t that change the tenor of our conversation? If you speak uncensored and tell me all, won’t the weight and scope of your professional experience overwhelm my nascent creative efforts and mold my aspirations?
No chance. If I set out on the Writer’s Road and promptly bump into a veteran traveller, I count myself lucky and thank the gods. What a blessing, what a gift! You know the lie of the land, you speak the lingo, you’ve been around. How much I’ll learn from your traveller’s tales!
But not if you hold out on me. Not if you seal your lips and cover your trail for fear I’ll try to follow your path instead of blazing my own. And what if I do? How far do you think I’ll get before I figure out that I made a mistake, before I learn for myself that we all have to find our own way in life? No need to guard your tongue or school your speech. Whether you speak true or false, whether your intentions are sterling or you mean me harm, your experiences can only inform my process. You’re the lesson; my Art is my teacher. So, go ahead. Give me your biased opinion. Tell me all successful writers get their best work done between dawn and noon, and it's a safe bet, I’ll give it a try. But if my muse is mute when the daystar shines and I hear her singing at midnight, I’ll soon be sleeping in again, your sage advice scorned and forgotten.
I’m not claiming knowledge isn’t powerful or that power isn’t dangerous. Ask a master African drummer how he feels about enthusiastic amateurs retreating to the woods for a weekend of pounding out their feelings on cowhide congas. He’ll tell you he fears for their safety. Drumming is potent magic and serious medicine. The physical act, sensory experience and complex rhythms have profound effects on our neurology, chemistry and biological systems; it’s not a practice to be taken lightly. Knowing this and respecting the energetic power of his art, does a Baba dole out his lessons in measured increments to protect his students? Not a bit of it. Traditionally, an aspiring drummer’s lessons begin when he joins the circle and starts beating on an available instrument. From his very first day, the novice is exposed to it all.
It’s the same in my martial arts tradition. Everyone attends morning practice together, from teachers to first-time students. We may not all be doing the same practices, mind. Shirmu could be leading a Shaolin sword set, others playing Tai Chi Ch’uan. The first-timers will be learning the warm-ups – surrounded by forms and energies far beyond their abilities and comprehension. Like the percussive arts, the martial arts are dangerous, but if we are to believe our Babas and Sifus, the greater peril lies not in giving beginners too much instruction, but in denying them access to the source of learning and/or letting them go it alone. After all, if we’re truly not ready to learn a lesson, someone could place it in our hands, and we’d let it slip right through our fingers.
Yes, there are certain very powerful practices that if performed without proper awareness and mastery of the energetics involved can do more harm than good. I’m not advocating sharing secrets. I’m not advocating sharing at all, really. I’m an intensely private person myself; perhaps you've noticed this blog’s lack of photo or bio. If you’re opting out of the conversation because you’d like to keep your personal experiences personal, I understand completely and support you entirely. What I’m on about, what I’m railing against, is reticence rooted in fear.
I think I get it, though. Fear of doing others ill by speaking out of turn, or giving too much away, or laying our trips on them stems from a sane and healthy fear of grandiosity. Who am I to tell somebody else how it feels, how it looks, how it works, what it means? What gives me the right to foist my reality on others? Are my senses so keen, my thoughts so insightful, are the events of my life so exceptionally cool I’m entitled to ask you to paint your world in colors of my choosing, or follow my line of thinking, or pattern your practice after mine?
But these questions have no meaning. We’re already teachers. All of us, always. We’re living lessons, whether we will it or no. Everything we are, everything we’ve done has the power to instruct, inform and illuminate someone else’s process, just as the patterns of a lover’s or stranger’s life have the power to illuminate our own. So. Is it kindness to hoard our experiences? Or is it cruelty to deny others the opportunity to learn from them? Is it humility that restrains us and altruism that impels us to refrain from discussing our subjective connection to our art? Or is it arrogance to assume our words have the power to taint or define someone else’s process?
This blog was conceived as a private notebook, but I’ve no qualms about it going public. Writing down my adventures with Qi is exactly like writing down my dreams. Language is mighty, I’m the first to attest, but it can’t describe the indescribable. No matter how eloquently I express the essence of my dream experience, how brilliantly I illustrate it, how shrewdly I plumb the depths of its meaning – no matter how compelling a tale I tell or how compelling you find it, when you sleep, your dreams will be unequivocally your own, and my words powerless to affect them.


Salon.com
Comments
I do believe this is aimed at me. I understand what you are saying completely, but let me explain my earlier comment on your post.
I was not reluctant to talk about tai chi or all the wonderful gifts it brings, but I was reluctant to talk about my personal chi and how it feels. Although it is such personal experience for me, I haven't quite figured out a way to put it into words...yet. I am a certified teacher, but I don't currently offer classes. That is a personal decision that is affected by my life situation right now.
I've seen too many students who get caught up in chasing their chi. Is it here yet? Is my chi moving? When will I know? How does it feel? And as more than one master has pointed out, the more you chase it, the more elusive it is. I've also seen too many students who become needlessly frustrated because they are expecting something and can't seem to find it.
Some students walk into class with their chi already accessible, and others practise for years and years and never quite get it moving.
My chi is loud and boisterous. It rolls and rumbles and fills the room like the sound of a washing machine on the agitate cycle. I've had new students line up while I'm doing toi yus (sp?) waiting to put their hand on my tantian to feel the chi. I am one of the lucky ones who can actually show rather than try to explain something so complicated.
For those with no tai chi experience, the whole thing is completely lost on them.
I've been blessed with an amazing teacher, who has trained directly with some of the top masters. I've been with her for 16 years, and I also study meditation with her. It was with her as the "expert" that I wrote the book on yoga.
I will likely find a way to discuss this, but I will do it on my own schedule and when I feel it is right for me. The last year has kept me from regular practise. My sword mocks me from the trunk of my car every day. But while I may be temporarily away from tai chi, I still attend to my meditation practise.
I understand what you are saying, and I appreciate the sentiment behind your words.
Namaste
JK - I'm so glad you read and responded. Yes, as I said in the body of the piece, it was inspired by a comment you left last time. But your comment was just a welcome catalyst that brought a bunch of ideas and feelings into focus for me. Neither the "taint or define" sentence nor any other was directly aimed at you. My real targets were various and very specific musicians, folkdancers, martial artists, masters, writers and theatre professionals I've known; people who deliberately withheld information, instruction or their assistance -- for the very best of reasons, none of which ever made any sense to me. Re-reading "Public Record," I realize that after alluding to your comment, I should clarified for myself and made it clear to others that I was simply picking it up and running with your comments, racing off in my own direction and for my own purposes. In fact, "the matter" I was considering was more autobiographical than I managed to convey.
Your posts and comments radiate generosity and wisdom; thanks for shining the light of patience and understanding on my over-hasty and unintentionally presumptuous post -- and for the many insights, stories & descriptions you kindly shared here and now! Oh, how I'd love to feel that rumbling chi inside you!
Side note -- for the couple years leading up to last June, my work schedule was so oppressive, most days my practice was limited to a little intentional smiling and breathing on my long commutes. It was lousy, and yes, I was miserably out of shape when I finally had time to devote to kung fu again -- but it also convinced me that just "touching base" with the tan tien daily, just visiting our practice with our intention is a powerful practice that keeps us connected and in the flow.
I know nothing of the arts that you are invested in but have great admiration for the meditative disciplines, whether associated with the martial arts or with a monastery of believers of whatever sort, or with an individual meditating on the psalms, or other spiritual text.
One thing you write that strikes a chord deeply in me is that we are all teachers whether we know it or not. I have always felt that it is better to know it. We may do less damage that way.
As a theologian, former pastor, and holder of several advanced degrees, including a ThD, I have often been asked, usually by self righteous holders of similar paper, why I spend so much time writing for lay members of the church and, as the years go by, less and less time writing for the academic theological community. The answer to me has always seemed obvious.
Theology exists to serve the Church, never the other way around. And the church is not the clergy or the schools or the hierarchy of leadership. The church has been and always will be the people who come together to worship. Always.
And so now, at 70 years of age, I have come to OS in part, but only in part because I have many other interests, to share some of the theology that I have studied and pondered and prayed about with the members here who wish to better understand their faith. And I invite those of faith who are not Christians to join us in our learning, if for no other reason than to show that all Christianity is not right wing dogmatism.
I take great pains to insure that lay people can understand what I write in plain everyday English. I share this not in the hope that they will follow my path or that they will assume that they can learn to believe in Christ. I tell them that I can teach the head, but I cannot teach the heart. Each heart must find its own center, must decide the path it will walk and the faith it feels.
A very wise saint, Anselm, long ago said that Christianity was faith seeking understanding. Once one has faith then they can understand. So I try to offer understanding about Christianity and faith as others, myself included, have understood it. But I never expect anyone to find it the way I have found it.
Faith cannot be taught. It must be felt and then lived. Kierkegaard called it a "leap of faith." That is very much akin to the Ah Ha! moment, the epiphany, of which JK speaks. Perhaps, although I may be way off base here, somewhat akin to when you call students to " Wake the Qi."
Thanks for a thoughtful and clear presentation of the teaching experience. I find much in common with your views as I have experienced them in my own life.
Blessings,
Monte
Your words on faith, leaps of faith and self-awareness led me to a personal mini-epiphany: accepting our teacher-hood, bringing the teacher-aspect of our being into the forefront out of consciousness is true leap of faith.
And a mystery, as well... because our students are really our teachers, aren't they? Seems to me, if I really want to learn something, inevitably I have to take on the challenge of trying to teach it to someone else. Whenever I step up to the "teacher" plate, it's with tremendous excitement, eagerness and gratitude for what I'm about to learn.
I so admire the way you express your ideas and feelings in clear, forthright, accessible language, both in your comments and your posts. By offering your perspectives and experiences with an open heart and without defining the goal or purpose of the lesson, you invite us to learn with open hearts. Big thanks to JK for pointing you in my direction, so I could find you, in turn. :)