[Part- 3 of a 3- Part series; click here to read Part-1; click here to read Part-2]
Though Webster’s does define “history” as a chronological record of a series of significant events… often including an
explanation of their causes, it cites this as a secondary meaning. The popular desk reference’s preferred definition of “history” is tale, story.
The idea of history as a catalogue of sequential events that operates within the strictures of cause-and-effect is convenient, but facile. Events occur within layered matrices of temporal, logistical and cultural context. Events are perceived through an array of senses that form different constellations in different individuals, are easily colored, easily fooled and conditioned by the unpredictable interaction of genetics and experience. The sensory perception of events is interpreted by analytical faculties inevitably compromised by emotional factors and predisposed to patterns of reasoning largely determined by the influences of early childhood; language, education, family dynamics and values, religious upbringing, peer relationships and community interface. To top it off, recorded chronicles of events – even those that aspire to the highest standards of objectivity – are subject to both immediate and retroactive editing, manipulation and outright censorship by socio-political bodies and aesthetic and ethical authorities.
When an historical sequence of events is especially suspect (due to poor documentation, an evident bias on the part of the historian, overtly doctored data or a prevalence of unsupportable facts), the dubious tale is often labeled a “myth.” Though this term may be somewhat applicable in its sense of an unfounded or false notion; a person or thing having only an imaginary or unverified existence; fictitious – again, these are secondary or even tertiary meanings. A "myth" proper is defined as a usually traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon. Myths express profound cultural truths, not precise historical data. A people’s mythology is not their history; historical fabrications and errata are not the stuff of myth.
“Legend” is also entangled in semantic confusion. Commonly misused as a synonym for “myth,” the word is actually closer in meaning to “history.” Webster’s number-1 choice for the entry is a story coming down from the past; esp. : one popularly regarded as historical although not verifiable.
Myths occur in a time before memory. Histories are judged on the accuracy of their timelines and authenticity of their sources. Legends are history born of memory – tales anchored in real events, real people and real time that nevertheless float carelessly adrift of exact dates and precise details. A legend is the annually-toasted miracle
goal that won the school the state championship back in 1935 (or was it 1936?). It’s the adventures of Robin Hood or Wong Fei-Hung. It’s the spine-tingler Uncle Nathan swears is true because he heard it from Great-Grandma's own lips – how her hair turned white at 17, when she saw her father’s ghost in the attic window. Whether a pivotal moment etched into communal consciousness, biographical anecdotes embellished by countless repetition or a cherished bit of family lore, at the heart of every legend is a seed of truth that has grown in the telling.
Yang Lu-Chan taught his two sons – and only his sons -- the true art of Tai Chi Ch’uan. The younger son, Yang Chien-Hou, was possessed of a gentle nature and kind to his students, and so was the more popular teacher. His elder brother, Yang Pan-Hou, was stern and fierce, and his teaching methods were cruel… but his kung fu was better.
When compelled to royal service by Imperial command, Yang Pan-Hou obeyed the Emperor’s will -- but his obedience was only a sembla
nce of submission. By day and in public, he taught the Emperor’s soldiers and palace nobility “Tai Chi Ch’uan for Manchurians” – a modified version of the Yang Family martial art. By night and in secret, in a secluded garden behind high walls and locked doors, he practiced true Tai Chi Ch’uan with select members of his own clan.
Passing by the Royal Stables one day, Master Yang was alarmed to discover a young stable-boy practicing the secret form he had taken such pains to hide from prying eyes. When confronted, the boy – Wang Jiao-Yu – confessed he had been spying on the clandestine nightly sessions. On learning that Wang was not Manchu (the non-native ruling class) but Han (native Chinese) and that he originally hailed from Yang’s home prefecture of Guang Ping, the Master asked the stable-boy if he truly wished to study Yang Family kung fu. Wang immediately dropped to his knees and demonstrated his earnest desire by bowing before Yang 100 times, each time striking his forehead on the hard stone paving.
When he finally rose, Yang advised the boy that if he sincerely wished to learn the authentic art of Tai Chi Ch’uan, he must first learn to bend over and touch his chin to his toe. He gave Wang 100 days in which to attain the skill. Wang achieved the difficult stretch before the time limit had elapsed, and so became one of Yang Pan-Hou’s three disciples.
![rei1[1]](/files/rei1%5B1%5D1272413644.jpg)
Another element of the story some deem questionable is the “secret form.” Myriad traditions boast a secret form or two, but in the open-instruction atmosphere of 21st century martial arts, these claims are frequently dismissed as colorful invention designed to boost class enrollment. Such skepticism is understandable, but in this case, ill-founded. When the more flimsy details of the Guang Ping legend are discarded and the tale stripped down to its bare historical bones, the existence of not one, but several secret Yang Style forms seems almost certain.
The Emperor did, indeed, summon one or more Yang Family masters to the Forbidden City. The master(s) so summoned d
id, in fact, teach at least some resident military personnel and palace nobility an intentionally-altered style of Tai Chi Ch’uan. Factoring in the diversity of interpretation (though disciples took pride in maintaining their masters' forms exactly as transmitted, strict standardization of martial arts systems did not occur until the mid-20th century, when mandated by the Cultural Revolution), there is every reason to assume five closely-related, but distinct Yang forms were in circulation during the second half of the 19th century: Yang Lu-Chan’s system he passed on to his sons; his sons’ individual versions of their father’s form; the form the Yang masters taught their kin and Han-born students; the highly-modified form they taught the Imperial Guard and Emperor’s relations.
Under the sepia light of retrospect, out-moded customs look ridiculous, old-fashioned ideas appear irrational, and the perils confronting legendary heroes hardly seem credible. As a story of events long past, the secret-garden episode offers a happy-ending guarantee. In the moment, defying the Emperor by teaching his soldiers and relatives a modified version of Tai Chi Ch’uan was a traitorous act that, if discovered, would not only cost the duplicitous master his head, but bring retribution on his entire clan, wiping it from the face of the earth. The creation of Beijing Style not only drove the true teachings underground, it meant that the greatest Tai Chi Ch'uan masters of the day could no longer teach or perform their art publicly without revealing that the form they had taught their Imperial students was not the genuine article.
Knowing the dire consequences that would ensue, should word of their nightly activities reach the ears of the Emperor, the dangerous game of sneaking into a midnight garden in the heart of Manchu territory surely took its toll on Yang Family morale. Given that not all Yang progeny would have been viable candidates to receive the true teachings (due to a lack of potential or discretion, unsuitable disposition, or gender (as girls married into other clans, they were considered untrustworthy repositories for family secrets)), the unexpected appearance of an exceptionally sincere and talented hometown boy may well have been viewed as fortuitous. Nor is it beyond imagining that Yang Lu-Chan saw something of himself in the young stable-boy and, recalling his own history, approved his son’s decision to accept Wang Jiao-Yu as an “inner-door” disciple and heir to the true mysteries of Tai Chi Ch’uan.
In an escapade worthy of Hong Kong cinema, the tale picks up again as a sheriff and his nine deputies chase a notorious thief and certified kung fu genius – Robber Li aka Chi-Li – into a dead-end alley. Though the solid-stone Lu-Tsu temple blocking the far end of the alley would stop any other thief in his tracks, the sherrif knew there was little chance it would daunt Robber Li.
Robber Li had powerful kung fu. He could fly over twenty-foot canals and leap from the cobbled streets to the tiled rooftops laden with loot to make his get-away. Never had anyone been able to catch him. But when the sheriff and his men barreled down the alley after the elusive thief, they found him prostrate on the ground, knocked out cold. Mystified, they looked to see who had done this wonderful deed. The alley boasted only one other occupant, a wizened old tea seller, sitting on the ancient steps of the temple.
Naturally, the sheriff questioned him, but the old man denied any knowledge of what had happened to Robber Li. Nevertheless and despite his protestations, the night’s events soon set tongues in town wagging about the aged tea seller and his remarkable kung fu skills. Every day, throngs of people gathered at Lu-Tsu temple to ogle the old man; the curious, hoping to see the master in action, and the eager, begging him for instruction. Insisting he was no more than he appeared to be – an old man selling tea to support himself – he refused all suppliants.
As the weeks went by, the curious lost interest, the eager lost patience and the crowds dispersed… except for one particularly persistent fellow, who took to sleeping during the day so he could spy on the tea seller at night. After many fruitless watches, his patience was rewarded. One morning, in the gray hour before the dawn, he succeeded in catching the old man at practice. Though the tea seller’s movements were gentle as clouds drifting across the sky, the power projecting from him made trees bend and their leaves rustle as if buffeted by a mighty wind.
By mid-day, the whole town was buzzing with the news: the old tea seller had indeed defeated Robber Li with his astonishing kung fu. The crowds returned in full force. No longer able to deny it, the old master acknowledged that he was Wang Jiao-Yu, Yang Pan-Hou’s erstwhile disciple, and eventually accepted four disciples of his own.
A nefarious bandit with super-human strength and agility, a kung fu master disguised by age and poverty, magical powers unveil
ed (yet again) by a young insomniac with a predilection for spying… It’s too fantastic for history, too contemporary for myth, too archetypal for legend – surely this is the stuff of fairy tale!
At first glance, this Robber Li business does seem to be a narrative of adventures with fantasy elements and supernatural characters – a fairy story, by definition. Suspending disbelief long enough to consult Webster’s, however, reveals that fairy stories/folktales are characteristically anonymous, timeless and placeless – un-authored tales that happened long ago and far away. Those who tell the tale of ‘Robber Li and the Tea Seller’ are eager to cite its source; they either heard it from Kuo Lien-Ying, one of Wang Jiao-Yu’s four disciples, or from Master Kuo’s students. Nor do the Robber-Li events happen once upon a time in the fairyland of Xuanpu. The tale is set on a legendary time-scale (about 50 years after Yang Pan-Hou and Wang Jiao-Yu parted ways) and at a site anyone can visit (Lu-Tsu temple in the Ho Ping-Men sector of Beijing).
Moreover, though the story lacks the check-able source required of an historical tale (the police blotter confirming the existence of Robber Li and the circumstances of his arrest, for example), its direct, traceable line of oral transmission eliminates it from fairy-story contention. If a tale begins with a time-marker (“When my mother was a little girl…”), or points an ephemeral finger over a nearby hill, (“There was an old man had a farm in western Telemark…”) or ends with a six-degrees-of-separation connection to the characters, (“I heard this tale from old Seamus, whose grand-dad it was saw the seal-woman on Falcarragh strand…”) – if it evokes a sense of memory and suggests an immediate connection between the storyteller and the people in the story – it is the stuff of legend.
As legends age, their dates blur, their place-names fade from the maps and the implied personal link to the story is lost. Old legends teeter on the brink, awaiting redemption or refutation. The former puts them in the history books; the latter relegates them to fairy tale anthologies.
Robin Hood epitomizes this legendary limbo. With a good 900 years separating the storytellers who were chronologically and geographically close to the events from, say, Ridley Scott and his 2010 cinematic take on the tale, Robin Hood would have de-volved to a fairy tale character long ago, had scholars not established that he was an historical personage. Likewise, he would long ago have secured a place in the academic texts had those scholars been able to definitively establish his identity. His reality does not redeem him from the realm of folklore; the fanciful nature of his adventures does not refute his historical existence. Robin Hood remains quintessentially legend: a story coming down from the past… popularly regarded as historical although not verifiable.
Kuo Lien-Ying was a renowned fighter with superb kung f
u. His opponent was a spry 112 year-old, a remarkably preserved old man, but surely not the martial equal of 30-something year-old Kuo. Yet it was the venerable master of Lu-Tsu temple won the match, and won it soundly. Amazed at the ease with which he had been defeated, Kuo humbly bowed to the victor and begged the old man to accept him as a student. The old man declined. Kuo bowed again, but instead of departing, sat down on the temple’s ancient steps and waited out the day, hoping Master Wang Jiao-Yu would change his mind.
The next day, Kuo returned to the temple with the same request. Again he was denied. Again he retired to the temple steps, and again Wang Jiao-Yu ignored him. The next day was the same, and the next and the next. For six long months, Kuo went every day to the temple to beg Master Wang to teach him Tai Chi Ch’uan. Every day Wang refused to do so, and Kuo would retire to the temple steps to keep his quiet vigil.
At the end of the six months, Kuo’s demonstration of patience and perseverance finally gained the master’s attention. Convinced of Kuo’s sincerity, devotion and respect, Wang issued him the “chin-to-toe” challenge. Kuo attained the difficult skill well within the 100-day time limit. After passing the master’s other tests of skill and character, Kuo Lien-Ying became one of Wang Jiao-Yu’s four disciples.
When their revered teacher died at age 121, those four students alone in the world knew the original Yang Family martial art that had earned Yang Lu-Chan the epithet "The Unsurpassed" and won his son Yang Pan-Hou such renown in the days before the Emperor demanded his service. The venerable Wang always called this art “Guang Ping Yang Tai Chi Ch’uan” to honor its original masters – all men of Guang Ping – and to distinguish it from "Beijing Style Tai Chi Ch'uan," the bastardized form Yang Pan-Hou had taught the Manchurian troops and nobility.
Yang Pan-Hou kept Guang Ping Yang Tai Chi Ch’uan hidden from the Emperor. Wang Jiao-Yu secretly preserved the form through the fall of Ch’ing dynasty and the rise of the Chinese National government. Wang's four students discreetly maintained the Guang Ping Yang legacy until Mao Tse-Tung went to war against China’s traditional arts and enacted policies eliminating most kung fu schools, forms and styles and standardizing the rest.
Two of Wang Jiao-Yu’s disciples – Masters Kuo Lien-Ying and Wang Zhi-Qian – fled to Taiwan where they opened schools and taught the art as it been taught to them. Master Wang’s other two disciples did not escape China, and on the mainland, Guang Ping Yang Tai Chi Ch’uan did not survive.

Except for the numbers, which are naturally suspect, this part of the legend is far less magical than the Robber Li section and far easier to authenticate. Granted, Master Wang may have been as young as 94 years of age when he accepted Kuo Lien-Ying as a student. He may not have lived 121 years, but “only” to 112. Perhaps Kuo only waited outside the temple for three months, practicing chin-to-toe all the while, but as the six-month figure was the one Kuo himself quoted when telling the tale, it would be presumptuous to second-guess him.
The masters' respective number of disciples should not be doubted. That Yang Pan-Hou had only three disciples and Wang Jiao-Yu only four partly was due to the rampant secrecy that so permeated the time and the culture. Individual character may have had an influence, as well. Yang Pan-Hou’s reputedly harsher teaching methods may well have deterred potential students from seeking him out as a teacher.
It is also entirely possible that the true teachings are so philosophically complex and physically demanding, the art itself limits the size of the “inner door” disciple population.
The modern health-and-exercise versions of Tai Chi are appropriate for all ages and fitness levels, but to excel at the true spiritual-martial art of Tai Chi Ch'uan requires exceptional physical fitness, intense mental focus, a shining spirit and a practical, working knowledge of Qi. Masters who teach advanced practices, it has been suggested, do not care to waste time with pupils who simply cannot "get" it, and accept only those with sufficient skills to absorb the teachings.
![chintotoe[1]](/files/chintotoe%5B1%5D1272416347.jpg)
Were this a genuine legend, of course, it would contain an "in the ballpark" time marker, a reference to a nearby and recognizable locale, and a personal connection, linking the storyteller to the story. Far be it for the tale of Guang Ping Yang to disappoint.
In 1965, Kuo Lien-Ying emigrated from Taiwan to San Francisco and began teaching martial arts in Chinatown’s Portsmouth Square. That’s where I met him, in 1972. That’s where I learned Guang Ping Yang Tai Chi Ch’uan. And that’s where I heard this story.
![100_0920[1]](/files/100_0920%5B1%5D1272414361.jpg)


Salon.com
Comments
You realize, of course, that anyone who reads this piece is going to attempt to touch their chin to their toe...
Suzie, thanks so much sticking with me through part-3 :) How I got started with tai chi ch'uan? Like so many important things in my life -- my marriage, my years as a sign-language interpreter, my current employment as a college instructor -- it started in the theatre. Up for another story?
When other little girls were playing with Barbies, I was playing at being an action hero. It never entered my consciousness that there was such a thing as classes where I could fight for real, though. I took dance and rode horses.
As a dramatic arts undergrad at Cal Berkeley, I took more dance, but also upped the ante on my fantasy-fight life with courses in archery, fencing and stage combat . Then I got cast in a show where my character died in a choreographed kung fu battle... and that was it. I wanted MORE.
My roommate Pat -- an older, wiser, wilder chemistry grad student -- was always expanding my horizons in unexpected ways. I'd come home for a night of study, f'rinstance, and suddenly find myself at a hockey game. Casually mentioning how much I loved my kung fu fight in the play, Pat said she'd heard about this amazing guy in the city who taught kung fu in Portsmouth Square. She suggested I check it out.
Today, under similar circumstances, I might stop and think, "The city? I live in the East Bay! There must be someone who teaches martial arts closer to home!" That day, I thought, "Wow, cool," hopped a bus to San Francisco, and checked it out.
The rest of the saga is in this post: http://open.salon.com/blog/risa_aratyr/2009/02/27/stand_like_a_mountain
Guess it goes to show that life is either entirely random, or not at all. ;)
My first thought when I read this a month ago was the difference between cultures that seek to impress their traditions on others versus those who seek to keep traditions cloaked and secure from others. Re-reading the article I see that this impulse to keep a tradition secure also flies in the face of our modern definition of "history." One thing that jumps up from this tale is the that the characters of Yang Pan Hou, the Emporer, the Robber Li, Wang Jiao Yu, of Chairman Mao,Kuo Lien-Ying and Risa the swashbuckling girl from the East Bay stand up both as historical figures reflecting an implied historically chronology, but also powerful symbols both positive and negative that reflect upon each other. Though they are implied to be real people existing in real time they shine and smolder like the images on tarot cards, or the stations of the cross.
Webster's likes to keep all the knowledge categorized and spaced appropriately; one must navigate from history to myth and back if one seeks to compare them and there is no encouragement to reconcile them. Wisdom is narrowly defined and only dolled out briefly near the very end.
In this tale we are invited to breathe in myth and express history, or perhaps the other way around if one will. Either path will be of little avail til we can touch our chins to our toes which we might consider impossible until reflect on the photo you have included of your sensei.
Thank you so much.
Actually, chin to toe was no big deal. Seems to me that most of his students achieved chin to toe in about 1 and 1/2 to 3 years.
To speak of cultivating martial ability in Tai Chi is difficult since IMHO, it entirely unintuitive. Take the constructs of zhan nian (adhere/stick). This is understood to be the basis of the jings (skills). The best description I've come across is that it is a matter of resting-in and supporting through rolling, pivoting, transferring and exchanging at the points of contact (Sam Masich's teaching). I began a description of the process on my blog (http://decodingtaichi.blogspot.com/). Basic skills come from utilization of the hip track, the use of the waist which is differentiating the hips from the ribs and peng.
Good article on the legends of Tai Chi. But I believe the martial aspects are not so much lost as the lack of teachers' who know and their ability to impart the kinesthetic basis for the skill. Above all, in Tai Chi, you should be comfortable.
I love your evocation of Kuo Sifu’s playfulness, his cyclical morning/afternoon/nighttime personalities, his disconcerting stare, the monkey-style he taught only to Robert “Spirit Boxer” Bergman… (Robert has a great pic on his website of the two of you sparring :)) Oh, and that “done-for” heart-tap! Kuo was so utterly able to conceal his energetic activity and intentions, even though he warned you it was coming, that killer strike still managed to take you completely by surprise.
I absolutely agree that his skill was a matter of changing being and accessing states that are not available to most of us. Then again, I tend to think those states were available to him at least partly because of his exceptional technique. Seems to me that extensive training in external physical arts – sport, dance, shaolin, whatever – provides a kinetic education in Qi basics (center of gravity, energy modalities (peng, ji, liu, an), alignment, etc.). that act as a springboard for gifted and serious students, enabling them to reach Kuo-type internal art states of being.
In a way, this is connected to your insight about the cultivation of martial ability being unintuitive. Breaking down energetic constructs into bio-mechanical processes that can be practiced and perfected – yes, that’s it, exactly! But when a skill is so fully attained it becomes 2nd nature, doesn’t using it in sparring become an essentially intuitive act?
This is worth a way more involved discussion (which I’d love to have with you) – but before I go, I gotta say -- chin-to-toe no big deal? For the rest of you, maybe. As a little kid, when I bent over, my hands hung barely below my knees. Gaining and maintaining hamstring and Achilles flexibility has been a lifelong challenge. I arrived at Kuo’s studio relatively stretched-out from dancing, and even so, my first reaction to being told to put my chin to my toe was, “That’s impossible – can’t be done!” Thirty-plus years later, it’s impossible again. These days I’m aiming to get my forehead to my toe. Your photo is my inspiration. :)